ATT_9_PAST_PERFORMANCE_QUESTIONNAIRE.pdf

PDF 494 KB Posted

Attached to
Remote Visual Assessment (RVA) Contractor Logistics Support (CLS) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA8204-14-R-7014
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Lifecycle Management Center Hill Air Force Base

About this file

Draft Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Remote Visual Assessment (RVA) Contractor Logistics Support (CLS), newest first.
File Type Posted
ppi_tool.accdb —
FA820414R7014_ATT_12_MONTANA_WAGE_DETERMINATION.pdf PDF
FA820414R7014_ATT_8_EZ_SOURCE_PPI_INSTRUCTIONS_TO_OFFERORS.docx DOCX document
FA820414R7014_ATT_10_SUBCONTRACTOR_PPI_DISCLOSURE_CONSENT_FORM.doc DOC document
FA820414R7014_ATT_1_RVA_CLS_Section_L.pdf PDF
FA820414R7014_ATT_9_PAST_PERFORMANCE_QUESTIONNAIRE.doc DOC document
FA820414R7014_ATT_15_WYOMING_WAGE_DETERMINATION.pdf PDF
FA820414R7014_ATT_2_RVA_CLS_Section_M.pdf PDF
FA820414R7014_ATT_14_UTAH_WAGE_DETERMINATION.pdf PDF
FA820414R7014_ATT_13_NORTH_DAKOTA_WAGE_DETERMINATION.pdf PDF
FA820414R7014_ATT_4_RVA_CDRL_PACKAGE_PRINT.pdf PDF
FA820414R7014_ATT_6_FIXED_PRICE_LABOR_RATE_MATRIX.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
FA820414R7014_ATT_3_RVA_CLS_PWS.pdf PDF
FA820414R7014_ATT_11_PREAWARD_SURVEY_OF_PROSPECTIVE_CONTRACTOR_ACCOUNTING_SYSTEM_CHECKLIST.doc DOC document
FA820414R7014_ATT_5_TEP_CLIN_PRICING_MATRIX.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
FA820414R7014.RTF RTF text file
FA820414R7014_ATT_7_SAMPLE_QUESTIONNAIRE_COVER_LETTER.doc DOC document
ATT_11_PREAWARD_SURVEY_OF_PROSPECTIVE_CONTRACTOR_ACCOUNTING_SYSTEM_CHECKLIST.pdf PDF
ATT_10_SUBCONTRACTOR_PPI_DISCLOSURE_CONSENT_FORM.pdf PDF
ATT_1_RVA_CLS_Section_L.pdf PDF
ATT_5_TEP_CLIN_PRICING_MATRIX.pdf PDF
FA820414R7014.pdf PDF
ATT_2_RVA_CLS_Section_M.pdf PDF
ATT_6_FIXED_PRICE_LABOR_RATE_MATRIX.pdf PDF
ATT_4_RVA_CDRL_PACKAGE.pdf PDF
ATT_8_EZ_SOURCE_PPI_INSTRUCTIONS_TO_OFFERORS.pdf PDF
ATT_7_SAMPLE_QUESTIONNAIRE_COVER_LETTER.pdf PDF
ATT_3_RVA_CLS_PWS.pdf PDF
Show all 28

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 9

SECTION L : PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Offeror: Complete Section 1, then e-mail questionnaire to the customer points of contact listed on the Past Performance Information Sheet.

Offeror’s Evaluator: Complete Sections 2-5 and e-mail to: Melanie Thomas at melanie.thomas@us.af.mil and Capt M. McAllister Gentry at michael.gentry.4@us.af.mil.

DO NOT PROVIDE A COPY BACK TO THE OFFEROR.

When filled in, this document is source selection sensitive information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor:

B. Cage Code of contractor contract was awarded to:

C. Contract number:

D. Contract type:

E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____

F. Period of performance:

G. Initial contract cost:

H. Current/final contract cost:

I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs: (enter below)

J. Description of service provided (enter below):

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

C. Geographic description of services under this contract (enter below)

Local_____ Nationwide_____ Worldwide_____ Other Command(s) _____

DRAFT

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Evaluator's name:

B. Evaluator's title:

C. Evaluator's phone/fax number:

D. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract:

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

1. Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL

B BLUE/EXCEPTIONAL - The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit.

The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

P PURPLE/VERY GOOD- The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government’s benefit.

The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

G GREEN/SATISFACTORY – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or was satisfactory.

Y YELLOW/MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

R RED/UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score

Technical Performance (General) B P G Y R N

T1. Ability to maintain configuration control and baseline management.

T2. Demonstrated the technical capabilities and expertise required in the contract.

T3. Ability to maintain security systems

T4. Ability to identify and handle Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS) issues.

T5. Overall effectiveness in performing Program Schedule Management.

T6. Overall effectiveness in performing Program Risk Management

T7. Overall effectiveness in performing Earned Value Management

T8. Overall effectiveness in performing Quality Assurance

T9. Overall effectiveness in performing Logistics Planning

Program Management B P G Y R N

P1. Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage, and control the program).

P2. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes).

P3. Ability to understand/comply with customer objectives and

Program Management B P G Y R N technical requirements.

P4. Effectiveness of material management (including Government Furnished Property or Material).

P5. Contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the customer.

P6. Ability to meet contract schedule

Organization, Staff & Subcontractor Management B P G Y R N

O1. Ability to hire a qualified workforce for this effort.

O2. Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort.

O3. Contractor effectiveness in maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/ phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts.

O4. Effective management of its subcontractors/ teaming partners

Cost Performance B P G Y R N

C1 Accuracy in forecasting contract costs

C2 Ability to meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs

C3 Ability to alert Government of unforeseen costs before they occur

2. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated B/E (Blue/Exceptional), Y/M (Yellow/Marginal), or R/U (Red/Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

3. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes___ Default___ Convenience___ Pending Terminations___ No ___

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).

SECTION 5: OVERALL PERFORMANCE SUMMARY

1. Describe the contractor’s greatest strong points in the performance of the contract.

2. Describe the contractor’s greatest shortcomings in the performance of the contract.

3. Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Yes ____ No ____ (If yes, provide details/comments)

Evaluator’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please e-mail this completed questionnaire to: Melanie Thomas at melanie.thomas@us.af.mil and Capt M. McAllister Gentry at michael.gentry.4@us.af.mil.

Questions or Comments can be directed to the above via the email address listed or by phone, Melanie Thomas at (801) 775-4916 or Capt M. McAllister Gentry at (801) 775- 3699.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .