Attch_2_PastPerformanceQuestionnaire.docx

DOCX document 47 KB Posted

Attached to
A-10 PACAF DEPOT MAINTENANCE Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA8202-19-R-1007
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Lifecycle Management Center Hill Air Force Base

About this file

Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to A-10 PACAF DEPOT MAINTENANCE, newest first.
File Type Posted
Attac_5_Past_Performance_Information_Sheet.docx DOCX document
Question_Answer.docx DOCX document
Question_Answer.docx DOCX document
Attch_2_PastPerformanceQuestionnaire.docx DOCX document
Question_Answer.docx DOCX document
CY_PACAF_CLIN_Structure_10_YR_Extended.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Contract_Data_Requirement_List_(CDRL).pdf PDF
FA820219R1007.pdf PDF
Section_L.pdf PDF
Attch_1_Past_Perf_Info_Sheet.docx DOCX document
Attach_4_Client_Authorization.docx DOCX document
Section_M.pdf PDF
Attach_3_SubKtr_and_Joint_Venture_Partner_Consent.docx DOCX document
Performance_Work_Statement_(PWS).pdf PDF
CY_PACAF_CLIN_Structure_10_YR_Extended.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attac_5_Past_Performance_Information_Sheet.docx DOCX document
Delivery_Schedule-Flow_Days.docx DOCX document
Show all 17

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PRESENT/PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

RFP FA8202-19-R-1007

Name:

Company:

Office:

Phone:

Return your completed questionnaire electronically BY COB Friday 8 February 2019 to Jerome.savikis@us.af.mil.

If you have questions regarding this Questionnaire, please contact the Past Performance Team Lead:

Mr. Jerome Savikis Jerome.savikis@us.af.mil 801-777-4153

NOTICE: WHEN COMPLETED, THIS QUESTIONNAIRE WILL BE CONSIDERED SENSITIVE AND SHALL NOT BE RELEASED TO THE OFFEROR.

Instructions to Evaluator: Please assist our source selection team as we evaluate sources for our solicitation. Expand the document as needed to fit answers. Lines are a placeholder (delete as necessary).

PART I. SPECIFIC PROGRAM INFORMATION.

Contractor/Business: CAGE Code:

Program Title and Brief Description: PACAF A-10 Depot Support Contract

Role in the Program/Work Performed As: Prime Subcontractor Vendor/Supplier

Contract Number:

Contract Type(s):

PART II. GENERAL PROGRAM INFORMATION.

Period of Performance:

Number of Years?: Basic: Option:

1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised): Beginning Date through

2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised): Beginning Date through

3. Reason for difference (if applicable)

Contract Dollar Value:

1. Original MAX Contract $ Value (assuming all options are exercised):

2. Current MAX $ Value (assuming all options exercised):

3. Primary Causes of Changes:

NOTE: In Part III, should your response be other than “satisfactory,” please provide supporting documentation in “Additional Remarks” on page 3.

PART III. PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS.

Please check the appropriate rating for each of the following questions (see definitions on page 4):

E = Exceptional VG = Very Good S = Satisfactory M = Marginal US = Unsatisfactory NA = Not Available

E
VG
S
M
US

1. Extent to which Company’s products and/or services met the specification / performance requirements

2. Current Safety Certification, ISO 9001 or equivalent

3. Quality of Completed Maintenance Services

4. Company’s quality control level with local manufacturer of parts and equipment is in support of maintenance requirement.

5. Customer’s Satisfaction with response times and corrective actions for Maintenance Services

6. Adequate Number of Dedicated Resources For Your Program

7. Timely recognition and notification of administrative, engineering, production, problems affecting the program

8. Company performed independently without significant customer direction/oversight

9. Monitoring of Program Schedules and Critical Milestones

10. Company demonstrated positive responsiveness to unscheduled requirements or contract changes

11. Has action been initiated to cancel or terminate the contract for default? If yes, explain.

12. Have there been any disputes/claims relative to the contract? If yes, explain.

13. Describe the contractor’s or company’s strong and/or weak points identified as a result of technical performance and any technical performance risk identified during the life of the contract.

14. If given a choice, would you award to this contractor again? If not, please explain.

15. Do you feel you “got what you paid for?” Please explain.

16. Additional Remarks: In Part III, should your response be other than “satisfactory,” please provide supporting documentation

QUESTIONNAIRE RATING SYSTEM

CONTRACT PERFORMANCE

Rating
Description
Exceptional
During the contract period, contractor performance outstanding, meeting all contract requirements and consistently exceeded many. Very few, if any, minor problems encountered. Contractor took immediate and effective corrective action.
Very Good
During the contract period, contractor performance very good, meeting all contract requirements and consistently exceeded some. Some minor problems encountered. Contractor took timely corrective action.
Satisfactory
During the contract period, contractor performance acceptable, meeting all contract requirements. For any problems encountered, contractor took effective corrective action.
Marginal
During the contract period, contractor performance less than acceptable, not meeting some contract requirements. For problems encountered, corrective action appeared only marginally effective, not effective, or not fully implemented. Government involvement was required.
Unsatisfactory
During the contract period, contractor performance unacceptable, failing to meet most contract requirements. Serious problems encountered. Corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent. Extensive government oversight and involvement was required.

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION

SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 2

File details come from the government source that posted it.