Attac_5_Past_Performance_Information_Sheet.docx

Attachment # 5 Past Performance Information Sheet

RFP # FA8202-19-R-1007

Present/Past Performance Information Sheet

TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFEROR / JOINT VENTURE PARTNER

Highlighted areas - Please delete, remove highlighting formatting, and then overwrite with info where applicable. Note: Typical Past Performance Information sheets include: NAME OF CONTRACTING ACTIVITY OR CUSTOMER, CONTRACT TYPE, CONTRACT $ VALUE, BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF EFFORT, PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE. The offeror shall utilize the PPI Tool to provide this information.

Complete a separate FACTS Sheet for each relevant contract. See Section L of this RFP for detailed instructions and limits on number and recency of contracts. Provide frank, concise comments regarding present/past performance on the program identified in B. below.

A. IDENTIFICATION

Name (Company/Division)

B. PROGRAM TITLE and CONTRACT NUMBER Program Title Contact Number

C. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EFFORT

Offerors shall provide detailed information specific to each contract to cover the list below and show the connections in design/complexity/process expected in the effort solicited: Specific examples, detailed data, graphics, drawings, etc. Offerors shall make clear their ownership of the task within the Past Performance Information Sheet, offerors/joint venture members or critical subcontractors may mention efforts by subcontractors as long as it is made clear what the subcontractor accomplished independently, what the contractor accomplished independently, what the contractor and subcontractor accomplished together, and whether the subcontractor will be used in the proposed effort. This is in addition to qualifying critical subcontractors for the current effort (as specified in the updated Section L) being able to provide one past performance information sheet providing past performance data for tasks they will execute under the proposed contract.

1. Offerors are required to explain what aspects of the contracts are deemed relevant to the proposed effort and to what aspects of the proposed effort they relate. This may include a discussion of efforts accomplished by the offeror to resolve problems encountered on prior contracts as well as past efforts to identify and manage program risk. Merely having problems does not automatically equate to a limited or no confidence rating, since the problems encountered may have been on a more complex program, or an offeror may have subsequently demonstrated the ability to overcome the problems encountered. The offeror is required to clearly demonstrate management actions employed in overcoming problems and the effects of those actions in terms of improvements achieved or problems rectified. This may allow the offeror to be considered a higher confidence candidate.

D. DESCRIPTION OF DELIVERY EFFECTIVINESS

1. On-time delivery Answer

2. Technical quality Answer

3. Cost control Answer

E. SMALL BUSINESS

This program was executed as:

X Small Business X Large Business This program was compliant to the following:

X FAR 52.219-9 (Small Business Subcontracting Plan) X FAR 52.219-8 (Utilization of Small Business Concerns) X Neither

If you are a large business compliant to FAR 52.219-9 (Small Business Subcontracting Plan), complete the following table regarding subcontracting goals and status-to-date.

Explain any shortcomings or non-compliance here.

If you are small business, or if you are a large business and FAR 52.219-9 (Small Business Subcontracting Plan) was NOT required by this effort, indicate your compliance with FAR 52.219-8 (Utilization of Small Business Concerns). That is, when subcontracting possibilities existed on this effort, did you award subcontracts to small business concerns, veteran-owned small business concerns, service-disabled veteran-owned small business concerns, HUBZone small business concerns, small disadvantaged business concerns, and women-owned small business concerns to the fullest extent consistent with efficient contract performance? If applicable, complete the following table:

Explain any non-compliance here.

If FAR 52.219-8 or FAR 52.219-9 was NOT included in this effort, whenever subcontracting possibilities existed in the performance of this effort, address whether or not it was your policy to utilize small business concerns, veteran-owned small business concerns, service-disabled veteran-owned small business concerns, HUBZone small business concerns, small disadvantaged business concerns, and women-owned small business concerns to the fullest extent consistent with efficient contract performance. If applicable, complete the following table:

F. PROGRAM UNIQUITY

Use this space to address any aspect about this program considered unique. Describe quality awards or certifications that indicate the offeror possesses a high-quality process for developing and producing the product/service required. Note: In the case of Contractor Performance Assessment Report System (CPARS), if your input has already been provided and the rationale/ circumstances have not changed, DO NOT repeat them here.

G. PROGRAM ISSUES

Summarize contract issues relative to the number and severity of quality deficiencies recorded/contract discrepancy reports issued, cure notices, show cause letters, termination for default or cause, disputes, claims, latent defects; and, corrective actions taken for the contract listed in paragraph B. above. Note: In the case of Contractor Performance Assessment Report System (CPARS), if your input has already been provided and the rationale/ circumstances have not changed, DO NOT repeat them here.

H. UNFAVORABLE PAST RATINGS

Additionally, for those efforts where you are cognizant of unfavorable and/or marginal past performance ratings/reports previously assessed by customers or clients, but feel that significant progress has been made but not yet credited or formally documented, provide the program name, contract number, customer location and a narrative explaining "fixes" made to date, or any other information regarding the unfavorable/marginal assessment. It is not presumed that performance has been perfect. Rather, the proposal should contain evidence of your ability to isolate the root causes of problems and should describe programs or actions taken to resolve those causes. Demonstrated corrective actions (not just planned or promised), and the overall work record will be considered. Problems not addressed, but found by the Government during the evaluation of the information in this volume, will be assumed to still exist. Note: In the case of Contractor Performance Assessment Report System (CPARS), if your input has already been provided and the rationale/ circumstances have not changed, DO NOT repeat them here.

PLEASE NOTE: The Government is not bound by the offeror's opinion of relevancy. The Government will perform an independent assessment of relevancy of the data provided or obtained.