CARA_question_set_4.docx
DOCX document 18 KB Posted
- Attached to
- A-10 Combined Altitude Radar Altimeter (CARA) Modification Effort Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA8202-15-R-1003
About this file
CARA Question Set 4
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| CARA_section_L.docx | DOCX document | |
| FA820215R1003_______0002.pdf | ||
| CARA_question_set_5.docx | DOCX document | |
| CARA_PWS_July_30.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFP_FA8202-15-R-1003-0001.pdf | ||
| CARA_question_set_3.docx | DOCX document | |
| CARA_question_set_2.docx | DOCX document | |
| CARA_question_set_1.docx | DOCX document | |
| A006_Integrated_Master_Schedule.pdf | ||
| Section_L_Appendix_2_Consent_Letter.pdf | ||
| A007_Time_Compliance_Tech_Order.pdf | ||
| A003_Tech_Order_Updates.pdf | ||
| Section_L_Appendix_3_Client_Authorization_Letter.pdf | ||
| A002_Product_Drawings_and_Associated_Lists.pdf | ||
| A005_Conference_Minutes.pdf | ||
| CARA_PWS.docx | DOCX document | |
| section_L_Appendix_1_past_performance_information.pdf | ||
| A001_Status_Report.pdf | ||
| Section_M.pdf | ||
| A004_Conference_Agenda.pdf | ||
| CARA_GFP.pdf | ||
| Section_L.pdf | ||
| FA820215R1003.pdf | ||
| CARA_PWS_May_15.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 24
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA8202-15-R-1003
CARA Question Set #4 13 July 2015
1. Question: A) A TCTO is normally part of a TO effort such as this and it is discussed (ref. page 4, paragraph 15), and Section 2, Table 1 (ref. page 7, item 12) has checked the requirement for a TCTO; however, it is not listed in the DELIVERY SCHEDULE. CLIN 0002 also calls for a TCTO. B) Is this exclusion of a TCTO by design? C) If not, should an estimated price for a TCTO be included as an option?
Answer: The TCTO is going to be completed organically. This is by design. The price of a TCTO should not be included.
2. Question: The method of change is not clearly defined. Are changes to the TOs to be in the form of TO change pages or Technical Order Page Supplements (TOPS) or will we be authoring directly into the A-10 aircraft manuals?
Answer: The changes will be source data.
3. Question: Although the TMCR mentions a ".Document Type Definition (DTD)structure or XML schema structure located in Section 2 Table 1" (ref. page 1, paragraph 4 of the TMCR), there is no requirement for XML or SGML tagging in the DELIVERY SCHEDULE. A) Is this exclusion of a DTD or SGML requirement by design? B) If there is a requirement for a DTD tagging will the schema be provided?
C) If there is a requirement for a DTD tagging, is there a specific publishing engine (such as DL composer) required and if so what is it? If there is, can a compatible alternative be used?
Answer: A) DTD or SGML are not applicable to source data. B) No DTD tagging schema needs to be provided. C) This is not applicable to source data.
4. Question: Are the soft copies of the original manuals (or editable PDFs) available?
Answer: Yes, PDFs are available.
5. Question: The TMCR normally lists the delivery format requirements and associated codes in the DELIVERY SCHEDULE (ref. page 10 of the TMCR). This TMCR lists the following:
For the two IPRs, Verification and Prepublication reviews:
IPDF/1 - Meaning one IPDF copy of each TO file.
For the Final TO Distribution:
I/C/W-2 - . Meaning two IPDF copies of each TO file.
. Meaning two copies of each Vectorized CGM file.
. Meaning two copies of each TO file generated in Word.
CLIN 0003 lists 3 final copies are to be delivered, the DELIVERY SCHEDULE (ref. page 10 of the TMCR) lists only two, which is correct?
Answer: Two (2) copies is the correct number.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .