RFI's_1 2 3_FA6675-15-R-0004-signed.pdf

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION / CLARIFICATION FORM

FOR CONTRACTOR USE ONLY

CONTRACT NO: RFI NO: 0001 DATE (YYYYMMDD)

20150722

SUBJECT:

Solicitation FA6675-15-R-0004

DRAWING REFERENCE/ DETAIL:

ATTACHMENT SENT UNDER SEPARATE

COVER(__)

RESPONSE NEEDED BY:

ASAP

REQUEST:

The instructions for proposal preparation do not seem to match. The table following paragraph L-01 on page 43 of 47 provides the following page limits:

Cover Page, 1 page; SF 1442, 1 page; and Price Proposal, 20 pages. The SF 1442 is a 2-page document, so are you asking for only page 2 of the SF 1442? On the same page, the Price Proposal is shown to consist of the SF 1442, the CLIN bid schedule, and the fill-ins for sections C – K. If you only want 1 copy of the Cover Page and the SF 1442 and we have to provide two copies of the Price Proposal, into which copy do we place the Cover Page and SF 1442?

In the same table following paragraph L-01, there is a column heading of “Table of Contents”, followed by Sections I – V. This is the only time the section numbers are referenced. We are confused about how to organize our proposal. It appears that we should have two binders with Price Proposal and Technical Proposal. We understand how to tab out the various pieces of the proposal, but we are not sure how these five Sections are used in that schema.

Finally, in the same table, there is a Section V, Certifications that is 1 page in length. What is this certification? We can find no other requirement for a 1-page certification. The Reps & Certs are much more than one page.

PROPOSED SOLUTION (If applicable:

Recommend the table following paragraph L-01 be changed as follows:

Table of Contents Title Copies Page Limit Binder 1 Price Proposal Two (2) paper; One (1) electronic None Binder 2 Technical Proposal Two (2) paper; One (1) electronic Twenty (20)

Subfactor (a) – Project Management Subfactor (b) – Key Personnel

TO(Contracting Officer): 301 CONF/LGC FROM (Contractor):

Dakota Meyer Enterprises, Inc

DATE (YYYYMMDD)

20150722

TYPE OR PRINT NAME AND TITLE

John P. Feiler, Technical Writer

SIGNATURE:

//SIGNED//

FOR GOVERNMENT USE ONLY

FROM CONTRACTING N/A

TO:(Base Civil Engineering): Charles Tehan (__) Robert Dudley(__)

For Evaluation and Action

DATE (YYYYMMDD) TYPE OR PRINT NAME AND TITLE SIGNATURE:

RFI RESPONSE / CLARIFICATION (refer to page 2)

20150723 Yvette Todtenhoefer, Contracting Officer Yvette Todtenhoefer

RFI RESPONSE / CLARIFICATION:-

Government to complete following sections:

1. The Government will ammend table to section L(pg43) in the solicitation.

This ammendment will be posted on FBO.

2. Certification refers to 1(C)in Section L.

TO:(AF Contracting Office)

DATE (YYYYMMDD)

20150723

TYPE OR PRINT NAME AND TITLE

N/A

SIGNATURE:

N/A

TO:(Contractor)

DATE (YYYYMMDD) TYPE OR PRINT NAME AND TITLE SIGNATURE:

CONTRACTOR REVIEW

After reviewing the Government response, does the contractor anticipate A change order will be required? YES NO There will be an increase in the cost of the project? YES NO

Reviewer:

DATE (YYYYMMDD) TYPE OR PRINT NAME AND TITLE SIGNATURE:

*Contractor- return reviewed form to Contracting Officer. Should the review results in YES for either of the two questions, if any further action is required by the contractor (i.e. submission of change proporsal), they will be notified by the contracting office.

Yvette Todtenhoefer, Contracting Officer20150723 Yvette Todtenhoefer

FOR CONTRACTOR USE ONLY

CONTRACT NO: RFI NO: 0002 DATE (YYYYMMDD)

20150723

SUBJECT:

Solicitation FA6675-15-R-0004

DRAWING REFERENCE/ DETAIL:

ATTACHMENT SENT UNDER SEPARATE

COVER(__)

RESPONSE NEEDED BY:

ASAP

REQUEST:

Referencing solicitation pages 43 and 44 of 47:

1. PART I – PRICE PROPOSAL - Submit original plus two (2) paper copies and one

(1) electronic file (PDF, email). Copies shall be titled: FA6675-15-R-0004 –

COMPANY NAME – “PRICE”

2. PART II – TECHNICAL PROPOSAL - Limited to no more than 20 pages. Submit original plus two (2) paper copies and one (1) electronic file (PDF, email).

We would like to clarify these two requirements. Are we allowed to email a PDF to you to cover the requirement for an electronic file? We believe this is your intent, but just want to verify. We also believe you want the file name of the electronic copy of the Technical Proposal to have the same naming convention as the Price Proposal. Also, file names cannot have quote marks.

PROPOSED SOLUTION (If applicable:

TO(Contracting Officer): 301 CONF/LGC FROM (Contractor):

Dakota Meyer Enterprises, Inc.

DATE (YYYYMMDD)

20150723

TYPE OR PRINT NAME AND TITLE

John P. Feiler, Technical Writer

SIGNATURE:

//SIGNED//

FOR GOVERNMENT USE ONLY

FROM CONTRACTING

TO:(Base Civil Engineering): Charles Tehan (__) Robert Dudley(__)

For Evaluation and Action

DATE (YYYYMMDD) TYPE OR PRINT NAME AND TITLE SIGNATURE:

RFI RESPONSE / CLARIFICATION:-

Government to complete following sections:

1. Yes, email copy is an electronic one.

2. Leave quotes off.

TO:(AF Contracting Office)

DATE (YYYYMMDD) TYPE OR PRINT NAME AND TITLE SIGNATURE:

TO:(Contractor)

DATE (YYYYMMDD) TYPE OR PRINT NAME AND TITLE SIGNATURE:

CONTRACTOR REVIEW

After reviewing the Government response, does the contractor anticipate A change order will be required? YES NO There will be an increase in the cost of the project? YES NO

Reviewer:

DATE (YYYYMMDD) TYPE OR PRINT NAME AND TITLE SIGNATURE:

*Contractor- return reviewed form to Contracting Officer. Should the review results in YES for either of the two questions, if any further action is required by the contractor (i.e. submission of change proporsal), they will be

FOR CONTRACTOR USE ONLY

CONTRACT NO: RFI NO: 0003 DATE (YYYYMMDD)

20150723

SUBJECT:

Solicitation FA6675-15-R-0004

DRAWING REFERENCE/ DETAIL:

ATTACHMENT SENT UNDER SEPARATE

COVER(__)

RESPONSE NEEDED BY:

REQUEST:

Referencing the SF 1442 and FAR 52.228-1 on page 16 of 47.

Both of these references indicate a Bid Bond is required. However, the Section L requirements do not indicate a bid bond is to be submitted.

Also, if a bid bond is required, is an SF 24 acceptable?

PROPOSED SOLUTION (If applicable:

Amend the solicitation at the appropriate location (SF 1442/Section I or Section L) to clarify if or where a Bid Bond is to be submitted.

TO(Contracting Officer): 301 CONF/LGC FROM (Contractor):

Dakota Meyer Enterprises, Inc.

DATE (YYYYMMDD)

20150723

TYPE OR PRINT NAME AND TITLE

John P. Feiler, Technical Writer

SIGNATURE:

//SIGNED//

FOR GOVERNMENT USE ONLY

FROM CONTRACTING

TO:(Base Civil Engineering): Charles Tehan (__) Robert Dudley(__)

For Evaluation and Action

DATE (YYYYMMDD) TYPE OR PRINT NAME AND TITLE SIGNATURE:

Yvette Todtenhoefer, Contracting Officer20150730 Yvette Todtenhoefer

RFI RESPONSE / CLARIFICATION:-

Government to complete following sections:

1. Section L will be amended to clarify where a Bid Bond is to be submitted.

2. SF 24 is acceptable.

TO:(AF Contracting Office)

DATE (YYYYMMDD) TYPE OR PRINT NAME AND TITLE SIGNATURE:

TO:(Contractor)

DATE (YYYYMMDD) TYPE OR PRINT NAME AND TITLE SIGNATURE:

CONTRACTOR REVIEW

After reviewing the Government response, does the contractor anticipate A change order will be required? YES NO There will be an increase in the cost of the project? YES NO

Reviewer:

DATE (YYYYMMDD) TYPE OR PRINT NAME AND TITLE SIGNATURE:

*Contractor- return reviewed form to Contracting Officer. Should the review results in YES for either of the two questions, if any further action is required by the contractor (i.e. submission of change proporsal), they will be

Yvette Todtenhoefer, Contracting Officer20150730 Yvette Todtenhoefer