SF30_Amendment_2.pdf

FA4890-16-R-0040

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

1. In the SF1449, Reference Section 6, Subsection 8.4, Section 8, Instructions for Volume 2 - Price Proposal. The last part of the f if th sentence has been removed, (... and should not exceed 3 pages.")

2. Section 2, Continuation of SF 1449, Paragraph 6 is changed from "This contract is expected to be aw arded on or about 1 Dec 2016 to 7

Jul 2017."

3. All other terms and conditions of the subject solicitation remain unchanged.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

S 1 12

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 22-Feb-2017

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X FA4890-16-R-0040

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

25-Jan-2017

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

22-Feb-2017

CODE

ACC AMIC/PKB

BLDG 664 - 129 ANDREWS ST., SUITE 110

LANGLEY AFB VA 23665-2788

FA4890 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been deleted:

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

The following have been modified:

SECTION 2

CONTINUATION OF SF 1449

1. Block 17b -- REMITTANCE ADDRESS

If the remittance address is different from the mailing address, enter the remittance address below. Failure to provide this information may impact payment.

2. ELECTONIC FUNDS TRANSFER (EFT) ADDRESS:

(Information to be completed by the contractor)

Address: ______________________________________

ABA Routing: ______________________________________

Account Number: ______________________________________

3. Block 18b: The contractor shall route invoices electronically through Wide Area Work Flow (WAWF)

(https://wawf.eb.mil/) IAW DFARS 252.232-7003. WAWF submissions shall be in the Combination

Invoice/Receiving Report format. When submitting an invoice for payment under a “Cost Reimbursable

CLIN/SLIN”, please include any required supporting backup data (receipts) as an attachment to the Combination

Invoice/Receiving Report directly in the WAWF system.

4. Blocks 19-24: See Section 3 for Schedule of Supplies and Services

5. Block 25: Accounting and Appropriation Data to be included upon contract award.

6. This contract is expected to be awarded on or about 7 July 2017. The Government intends to award the basic contract period, subject to the availability of funds, in accordance with FAR 52.232-18. Funding for the base period of performance is expected on 1 Feb 2017.

7. Additional Required Information: In addition to the information requested in blocks 12, 17(a-b), 23, 24, and

30(a-c) of the SF 1449, please provide the following:

POINT OF CONTACT: _______________________________________________________________

PHONE: ________________________________

SMALL BUSINESS: ___________ TYPE SB: __________

TIN# ________________________________________

https://wawf.eb.mil/

DUNS# ____________________________________

CAGE CODE: ________________________________

REGISTERED IN SAM as a SMALL BUSINESS UNDER NAICS 611512: YES: _______ NO: ________

8. SAM Representations and Certifications complete and registered as a SB under NAICS 611512 as of the date of this solicitation: YES: _______ NO: ________

Address all questions to both pocs listed below:

Capt Hannah Kosirog, hannah.kosirog.1@us.af.mil (757) 225-2153

Ms. Catherine Artis, catherine.artis@us.af.mil (757) 764-3222

ACC AMIC/PKB

11817 Canon Blvd., Suite 306

Newport News, VA 23606-4516 mailto:hannah.kosirog.1@us.af.mil mailto:catherine.artis@us.af.mil

SECTION 2 CONTINUED – TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION TITLE PAGE

1 Standard Form 1449 1

3 Schedule of Supplies/Services 3

2 Table of Contents 50

4 Contract Clauses 57

4a Addendum to 52.212-4 96

5 List of Attachments 99

6 Instructions To Offerors - Addendum to 52.212-1 100

7 Evaluation Criteria – Factors for Award – 52.212-2 107

SECTION 6

SECTION 6 of the Solicitation - INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

ADDENDUM TO 52.212-1 - INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS – COMMERCIAL ITEMS

(OCT 2015)

52.215-1 Instructions to Offerors—Competitive Acquisition. (Jan 2004) FAR Clause 52.215-1(d) Offer expiration date. Proposals in response to this solicitation will be valid for 180 calendar days.

Notice to Offerors: Funds are not presently available for this effort. No award will be made under this solicitation until funds are available. The Government reserves the right to cancel this solicitation, either before or after the closing date. In the event the Government cancels this solicitation, the Government has no obligation to reimburse an offeror for any costs.

1. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

1.1. To assure timely and equitable evaluation of the proposal, the offeror must follow the instructions contained herein. The proposal must be complete, self-sufficient, and respond directly to the requirements of this solicitation. The response shall consist of two (2) separate volumes; Part I –– Technical, and Part II–

Price Proposal.

1.2. ONLY THE MINIMUM AMOUNT OF INFORMATION REQUIRED TO PROVIDE FOR PROPER

EVALUATION IS REQUESTED. EFFORTS SHOULD BE MADE TO KEEP OFFERS AS CONCISE

AS POSSIBLE WITH THE EMPHASIS BEING ON PROVIDING INFORMATION ESSENTIAL FOR

PROPER EVALUATION. The proposal shall be clear, concise, and include sufficient detail to provide for adequate evaluation and for substantiation of the validity of stated claims. Submitted documents must contain adequate information to enable the evaluation board to fully ascertain offerors capability to perform contract requirements, must meet the requirements of the RFP, and must address the evaluation factors for award.

1.3 All information contained in the proposal that an offeror feels is “Proprietary Information” and therefore not releasable under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), should be labeled “Source Selection

Information—See FAR 2.101 and 3.104.”

1.4. Offerors shall acknowledge awareness of all amendments to the solicitation by signing and dating Page 1 of each Standard Form 30, Amendment of Solicitation/Modification of Contract, and including it in Volume

II, Price, of the proposal.

1.5 The Contracting Officer has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition for this acquisition so offerors are cautioned to submit their best pricing and technical information up-front.

2. FORMAL COMMUNICATIONS

2.1. Any formal communication shall be submitted in writing (via email) to the POCs below. It is the offeror’s responsibility to confirm receipt of all formal communications.

ACC AMIC/PKB

Ms. Catherine Artis and Capt Hannah Kosirog

129 Andrews Ave., Suite 110

Langley AFB, VA 23665-2788

Email: catherine.artis@us.af.mil and hannah.kosirog.1@us.af.mil

Reference: Solicitation FA4890-16-R-0040 mailto:catherine.artis@us.af.mil mailto:hannah.kosirog.1@us.af.mil

3. PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE

3.1. The pre-proposal conference will be held at USAF Weapons School, 4269 Tyndall Ave, Bldg 282, Nellis AFB, NV, 89191-6074 on 1 Feb 2017 at 0900 hours local time. All potential offerors are encouraged to attend. Offerors desiring to attend the conference must pre-register prior to the Pre-Proposal Conference. Offerors that do not pre-register will not have access to the base/facilities. Full details pertaining to the conference can be found in Section 6 of the solicitation under clause AFFARS Clause 5352.215-9001 NOTICE OF PRE-BID/PRE- PROPOSAL

CONFERENCE (MAY 1996). The Government will not be liable for any expense incurred by offerors prior to contract award.

3.2. Registration. The number of attendees shall not exceed 3 per company or 5 per joint venture/partner arrangement. The registration information shall include the company name, individual name(s), phone number and social security number of each attendee for security purposes and access to the base. The Government requests this information under the authority of 10 U.S.C. 8013. Offerors must submit their pre-registration notification by e-mail to Ms. Catherine Artis and Capt Hannah Kosirog.

3.3. Advance Questions. Questions concerning this solicitation should be submitted under separate cover, clearly marked as "Advance Questions" to include solicitation number, name of person submitting the question(s), company name and phone number. Each question should reference the specific section, paragraph and/or attachment number of the solicitation or PWS (as applicable). These questions must be received by ACC AMIC/PKB, prior to the Pre-

Proposal Conference in order for an appropriate response to be given at the conference. Please submit your advance questions and registration information by email to Ms. Catherine Artis and Capt Hannah Kosirog.

3.4. Remarks and Explanations. Remarks and explanations at the conference shall not alter the terms and conditions of the solicitation unless the solicitation is formally amended. Any oral statements by Government representatives shall not be binding upon the Government; the CO will make all necessary changes in writing via an amendment if required. If an offeror discovers discrepancies or omissions in any portion of the solicitation, the matter should be submitted in writing and provided to the CO as soon as the discrepancy is noted or not later than ten (10) days prior to the proposal due date.

4. SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS

4.1. The original proposal and copies as specified in this document shall be sent to the issuing office listed in

Block 9 of Standard Form (SF) 1449; Solicitation, /Contract/Order for Commercial Items; on or before the date and time specified in Block 8 of SF 1449. Please mark all packages as follows:

DO NOT OPEN IN MAIL ROOM

ATTN: Ms. Catherine Artis and Capt Hannah Kosirog

ACC AMIC/PKB

Solicitation No. FA4890-16-R-0040, Volume # and Title

4.2. Offerors are cautioned to strictly comply with all instructions within this solicitation to ensure submission of a complete proposal. Failure to furnish a complete proposal at the time of proposal submission may result in the proposal being considered non-responsive to the Government and eliminated from consideration for award. Late proposals will be processed in accordance with FAR 52.212-1(f) “Late submission, modifications, revisions, and withdrawals of offers.” If the proposal is received late, the Government will retain the unopened proposal.

However, the proposal will not be evaluated or considered for award.

5. PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS

5.1. The following instructions prescribe the format for proposals, and describe the approach to be used for the development and presentation of the proposal data. The proposal shall include all of the information requested in the specific instructions. Failure to include all information requested may adversely affect the evaluation and may result in a determination that the proposal is non-responsive. A proposal that merely reiterates or promises to accomplish the requirements of the PWS will be considered unacceptable. A proposal that is orderly and sufficiently documented will enable the Government to easily understand the proposal and perform a thorough and fair evaluation of it. The Government may incorporate into the contract by reference or full text portions of the successful offeror’s proposal as revised and supplemented through the Final Proposal Revision submitted in response to the solicitation.

5.2. Proposal Volumes. Proposals shall be prepared in two (2) separate and distinct volumes:

Volume I – Technical

Volume II –Price

5.3. Proposal Format. Specific guidance regarding format and content is discussed in the following paragraphs.

The Government will only read/evaluate the maximum number of pages allowed. The proposal content shall be formatted as follows:

a. Text: Single-spaced and printed on single-sided paper - no duplex

b. Font Size: Microsoft Office Word, Times New Roman, 12 font

c. Margins: One Inch (1”) left, right, top and bottom

d. Paper Size: 8½” x 11” with a background color of white or ivory stock only

e. Page Numbering: Sequential (i.e., 1 through 100)

Note: The font size requirement does not apply to charts, (i.e., Workload Manning Charts); however the font size must be reasonable and easily readable. Also, page numbering must be sequential throughout the entire document, and that new chapters/sections do not restart the page numbering.

5.4. Legal Size Paper/Fold-Outs. Any page within the proposal over the standard 8½” x 11” size paper shall be kept to a minimum, and only used where a table or other graph cannot be accommodated by a single 8½” x 11” page. Any text included in the fold-out shall be directly related to the fold-out contents. Fold-outs will be counted as the appropriate number of pages based on the number of folds (i.e., fold-outs with one fold shall count as one page; each additional fold counts as one additional page). All material shall be contained within the page limit identified for each volume.

5.5. Electronic Copies. Electronic copies shall be submitted on CD-ROM, CD-R or DVD using Microsoft Office

97 through Microsoft Office 2013 or Adobe PDF Version 8 or earlier, except for Volume II, Price, Section 3 of the

RFP. Section 3 shall be submitted in Microsoft Excel format only. Offerors may use JPEG for charts or screen shots. Offerors shall name files using standard naming conventions (i.e., filename.doc for MS Word, filename.xls for MS Excel, filename.PDF for Portable Document Format, etc.). Do NOT submit any documents in PDF format that are copied as “images” or Windows Photo Gallery etc. PDF files shall enable textual search and copy functions.

Each volume shall be in a single searchable, editable file and stored in a folder that corresponds to the proposal volume it represents. The files shall be named in an unambiguous manner, using plain language text, which facilitates the evaluator’s ease of accessing the files for evaluation. Offerors shall insert the file name in the header of each document. All disks shall be virus checked prior to submission. Replacement disks will be required to update the final proposal resulting from any discussions should they occur. Electronic copy(s) of all proposal information is required for each volume. Information submitted in the electronic format shall not exceed the page limits stated below for each hard copy volume. If there are variances between the paper copy and the electronic copy, the paper copy will take precedence.

5.6. Copies and Page Limit. Evaluators will only read up to the maximum number of pages specified. All pages provided by the offeror in excess of the stated limitations will be returned to the offeror unread. Copy requirements and page limitations are as follows:

VOL TITLE PAPER

COPIES

CD ROM Page Limit Closing Date

I** TECHNICAL 6 1 100 27 Feb 2017

II PRICE 3 1 None 27 Feb 2017

** Executive Summary shall be included in Volume I – Technical – limit is 2 pages

5.7. One copy of each Volume shall be marked “Original”. Page limitation is subject to exclusions stated in the paragraph titled “Exceptions” below. Further, the Government will not include the following in the page limitation: Cover page(s), title pages or tables of contents, tab/section-divider pages, technical definition page(s), acronym list, cross reference matrix. Note: These pages will be counted if they contain any other information, (i.e., diagrams, extraneous data, etc). Pages marked “This Page Intentionally Left Blank” will also not be counted.

6. EXCEPTIONS

6.1. If the offeror finds it necessary to take exception to any of the requirements specified in this solicitation, clearly indicate such exception(s) in the appropriate volume along with a complete explanation of why the exception was taken and what benefit accrues to the Government. All substantive exceptions to the solicitation requirements and supporting rationale shall be identified as such and consolidated into an overview section of the subject volume. An overview section is only required if the offeror takes exception to any requirement in the solicitation (the overview section will not be included in the proposal page limitation described above). While offerors may propose exceptions to the solicitation requirements, the Government is not obligated to accept or consider such exceptions. Further, exceptions could result in an unacceptable offer. Any change to the requirement as a result of accepting an exception shall be reflected within the resultant contract.

6.2. In the event the offeror takes no exception to the stated requirements, a statement to this effect is required at the front of each subject volume.

6.3. Additional Data

For the purposes of contractor responsibility determination, past performance informationmay be obtained from sources such as the Government’s Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), the Defense Contract

Management Agency, interviews with Program Managers, COs, and Award Fee Determining Officials, and other sources known to the Government. The Government reserves the right to obtain more past performance data from any source that it deems appropriate.

7. INSTRUCTIONS FOR VOLUME I – TECHNICAL

7.1. To facilitate the evaluation, the technical volume should be specific, detailed, and complete to clearly and fully demonstrate that the offeror has a thorough understanding of the requirements for the accomplishment of the effort.

Statements that the offeror understands, can, or will comply with the PWS (including Air Force (AF) publications, technical requirements, etc.); statements paraphrasing the PWS or parts thereof; and phrases such as “standard procedures will be employed” or “well known techniques will be used” etc., will be considered unacceptable.

Offerors should note that data submitted prior to the proposal submission including data submitted for current contracts and other solicitations will not be considered in the Government’s evaluation. Therefore, such data should not be relied upon nor incorporated in the technical proposal by reference. Offerors shall address the requirements noted in this section by imperative verbs regardless of whether such requirements are preceded by “the offeror shall”. The offeror’s proposal shall at a minimum be prepared in a form consistent with the technical criteria set forth in Section 7, Evaluation Criteria, of this solicitation. All information that the offeror deems appropriate to address for this factor and its subfactors must be included in the proposal in an orderly format. The technical volume shall address all the technical subfactors.

http://www.ppirs.gov/

7.2. Technical Contents

A. Table of Contents – A table of contents shall be included in Volume I. Each subfactor/aspect/section shall be clearly marked and tabbed for easy reference. The pages shall be numbered sequentially in a consistent manner as stated under Proposal Preparation Instructions.

B. Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms – Each volume shall contain a glossary of all abbreviations and acronyms used with an explanation for each. Glossaries do not count against the page limitations for their respective volumes.

C. Executive Summary – Included in this volume is the offeror’s Executive Summary (limit is 2 pages).

D. Cross Reference Matrix – Each volume shall be written on a stand-alone basis so that its contents may be evaluated without cross referencing to other volumes of the proposal. Information required for proposal evaluation which is not found in its designated volume will be assumed to have been omitted from the proposal. Cross-referencing within a proposal volume is permitted where its use would conserve space without impairing clarity.

The offeror shall fill out the cross reference matrix indicating the proposal reference information as it relates to the

RFP, PWS, and CLIN references found therein.

E. Technical Section – The purpose of this section is to allow the offeror to set forth in the most comprehensive manner its understanding of the program requirements and to demonstrate its ability to meet the evaluation requirements of Section 7, Evaluation Criteria; Factor 2, Technical. In this section the offeror shall present a clear and concise description of how it plans to meet contract requirements. The offeror shall describe the performance standards that have been established in each area and explain how performance standards will be met or exceeded.

This section shall not contain any pricing data. The technical section shall be completed as follows:

i. Subfactor A: Manning Requirements and Analysis – The offeror shall describe their proposed understanding of the program requirements and demonstrate their ability to meet the evaluation requirement of, Aspect 1) Manning Requirements and Workload Analysis as described in Section

7, Evaluation Factors for Award.

Workload Analysis Charts – Offerors shall provide a workload analysis, based on PWS workload tables, that depicts the proposed labor categories for both full time and any part time positions, to include cross-matrixing of requirements, with full explanation of the offerors methodology for figuring personnel requirements. The analysis must address all direct, indirect and ancillary work hours. The Government also requires a Courseware Development Workload Chart to explain how staffing levels are determined to include estimated development times for each product.

Offerors are encouraged to use the sample charts provided at (Appendix 1) in developing the breakdown to assist the Government in the evaluation process. Staff support positions specified as productive hours in Appendix 1 do not require workload analysis, but these positions must be reflected in the total manning proposed.

ii. Subfactor B: Training Management and Approach – The offeror shall describe their proposed understanding of the program requirements and demonstrate their ability to meet the evaluation requirement of, Aspect 1) Training Management and Approach; Aspect 2) Effective Management of

Personnel Resources, and Aspect 3) USAF Weapons School Academic/Training Database.

iii. Subfactor C: Courseware Development Approach, Instructional Systems Development Management

Plan (ISDMP), – The offeror shall describe proposed understanding of the program requirements and demonstrate their ability to meet the evaluation requirements of, Aspect 1) Courseware Development

Approach and ISD Management Plan.

iv. Subfactor D: All Other Plans and Contractor Furnished Equipment – The offeror shall describe their proposed understanding of the program requirements and demonstrate their ability to meet the evaluation requirements of, Aspect 1) Phase-In/Phase-Out Plan, Aspect 2) Training and Certification

Plan, and Aspect 3) Contractor’s Quality Control Plan as described in Section 7, Evaluation Factors for

Award.

7.3. Failure to include all information requested may adversely affect the evaluation and may result in a determination that the proposal is non-responsive. Award CANNOT be made to a nonresponsive offeror.

8. INSTRUCTIONS FOR VOLUME 2 -- PRICE PROPOSAL

8.1. The offeror shall complete Section 3 of the solicitation (Schedule of Supplies and Services (CLINS)) by inserting the price elements (unit price and extended amount) for all Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract line item numbers (CLINS) for Phase-In, Base Year and all Option Years. For ease of administration, all pricing should be rounded to whole dollar amounts and evenly divisible by 12. Cost Reimbursable Travel and Reproduction CLINS: A

Not to Exceed (NTE) amount has been pre- established for these CLINS. These pre-established amounts are to be included in the offerors proposal. The price proposal shall also contain the following:

8.2. Complete in its entirety the "Offeror" portion of the Standard Form 1449. An official having authority to legally bind the company contractually must sign and date the Standard Form 1449. One copy of the Standard Form

1449 must bear an original signature and if applicable, all amendments. Failure to acknowledge any amendments to the solicitation can result in an offeror being deemed nonresponsive. Award CANNOT be made to a nonresponsive offeror. Note: Be sure to sign and date where required.

8.3. Representations and Certifications. Complete the required Representations and Certifications or indicate if information is contained in the System for Award Management (SAM) located at https://www.sam.gov.

8.4. Supporting Price Backup Data. Certified cost or pricing data is not required. However, supporting data is requested to verify that pricing is balanced per FAR 15.404-1(g). Supporting data should explain the methodology used in developing proposed CLIN prices. Supporting data shall be provided in a table format, to include, at a minimum, a breakdown (by CLIN) of labor (labor category, number of positions and productive hours), breakout of

Other Direct Costs (ODC), direct and indirect rates, and subcontract costs. Supporting data may be submitted in a format selected by the offeror. The Government reserves the right to request additional pricing information after receipt and evaluation of proposals.

9. DEBRIEFING OF OFFERORS

9.1. Debriefings are conducted with the goal of identifying to unsuccessful offerors where changes can be made to improve future source selection participation.

9.2. Successful or unsuccessful offerors may request debriefings by providing a written request to the Procuring

CO. Debriefings shall be conducted in accordance with FAR 15.505(a) (1) for pre-award debriefings and FAR

15.506(d) for post-award debriefings.

10. DISPOSITION OF UNSUCCESSFUL PROPOSALS

10.1. In compliance with FAR Subpart 4.8, the Government will retain one hard copy of all unsuccessful proposals;

all additional copies will be destroyed by the Government.

https://www.sam.gov/

Appendix 1 to Section 6

Sample Manning Charts

Table 1 – Sample Overall Manning Chart for all contract years by CLIN

SAMPLE OVERALL MANNING CHART FY13

SITE Skill / Position Category Site Manager I/SME ID ET GA IT Position as needed Position as needed

CAT 0.5 0.3 0.2

CWD 0.7 0.7 0.7

Administrative 1.0 0.3 0.1 Position as needed Position as needed Off-Site 0.4 Total

Proposed Manning 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0

The following positions are for reference only; use what is required per the PWS

I/SME – Instructor/Subject Matter Expert

ID – Instructional

Developer ET- Education

Technologist GA-

Graphic Artist

IT – Information Technology

The CWD chart (Table 2) is to include the breakdown for Interactive Courseware (ICW) and Instructor-Led Non-

ICW development. The breakdown should show the estimated development effort for a one-hour lesson package showing the percentage of work each specialty on the CWD team contributes.

Table 2 – Sample CWD Chart

Courseware Development Effort per Hour/Unit

Product SME ID ET GA/LL CBT As Needed Total Hours per Unit

ICW (Hrs) 3 5 4 8 10 30

Non ICW 100 50 500 19 1 670

Instructor Handbook

Phase Manuals

Syllabus

Tests

Total Hours 103 55 504 27 11 0

Table 3 – Sample CWD Manning Chart SITE Skill / Position

PRODUCT

I/SME (hrs)

ID (hrs)

ET (hrs)

GA

IT

Position as needed

Position as needed

Total

Hours/Unit

New

Equivalents*

Total Hrs

Annual

Interactive Courseware 3.0 6.0 9.0 3.0 21.0 9.4 169.2

Instructor Led Package 4.0 5.0 7.0 16.0 38.8 620.8

Test Package 1.0 2.0 3.0 6.0 1.5 9.0

Training Manual 1.0 3.0 2.0 6.0 2.5 15.0

BRI Products 2.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 11.0 5.0 55.0

IRC 1.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 8.0 0.4 4.8

Additional As Needed 0.0 Proposed Manning 12.0 17.0 26.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 873.8

* New Equivalents are equal to adding the revision, reviews and new requirements. For example 100 reviews at .1 is equal to 10 new equivalents

Note: Numbers and position information presented in the tables above are for clarification purposes only. These tables are not a representative profile of workload effort for this solicitation.

(End of Summary of Changes)