Atch 44- Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 334 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Nellis/Creech AFB Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC) Solicitation Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA486119RA001
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a contractor and details regarding a federal contract opportunity with the Department of the Air Force Air Combat Command. The past performance questionnaire seeks evaluations from customers on previous contracts and includes sections for contract identification, customer agency identification, evaluator identification, and a performance evaluation. The related federal contract opportunity is a multiple award construction contract solicitation for Nellis/Creech Air Force Bases, seeking general construction services such as civil, structural, electrical, and mechanical work. Relevant response dates or award dates are not provided.
Not Listed
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 50
Nellis/Creech AFB Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC) Solicitation has more files on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
FA4861-19-R-A001
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 3.104
NELLIS-CREECH MACC
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
A. Contractor:
B. Cage Code under which contract was performed:
C. Contract number / Program Title:
D. Contract type (ex: FFP, Cost, T&M):
E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes No
F. Was it a design-build contract? Yes No
G. Period of Performance:
H. Performs duties as: prime contractor _________ sub-contractor________
I. Initial (at time of award) contract value: $ (Basic plus all options)
J. Current/final contract value: $ (Basic plus exercised options)
K. Reasons for differences between initial contract value and final contract value:
L. Description of work provided:
M. Are there Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) Evaluation or other Past Performance Reports available for this contract? Yes No _
N. To help determine program relevancy, please indicate below the work the contractor has or is performing under this contract by placing an “X” in the appropriate block:
A-E Design work
Civil (pavements, site utilities) and/or Structural work
Electrical and/or Communications work
PAST PERFORMANCE
QUESTIONNAIRE FA4861-19-R-
A001
Mechanical (plumbing, HVAC) work
Fire Protection work
Security (secure rooms for classified work) and/or Force Protection work
New Construction (including building additions)
Interior renovation
SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION
A. Customer or Agency Name: ____________________________________________________
B. Customer or Agency description (if applicable):
C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other commands:
SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION
A. Evaluator’s name:
B. Evaluator’s title:
C. Evaluator’s phone/fax number:
D. Evaluator’s email address: ___________________________________________
E. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract:
SECTION 4: EVALUATION
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by marking the performance scale indicated in the appropriate block. The scale is defined as follows:
* Please provide comments for each response you indicated as “Did Not Meet” or “Exceeded” in response to the questions below.
A. Management:
Did Not Meet* Met Exceeded*
A1. Communicated with Government team and with on-site supervisors to ensure accurate/timely information flow.
A2. Required minimal Government direction regarding contract and technical requirements already available to them (i.e. they read/understand the contract in its entirety).
Remarks:
B. Schedule Did Not Meet* Met Exceeded*
B1. Adhered to contract performance schedule, to include timely submission of submittals, close-outs, etc.
B2. Contractor was responsive to warranty calls and quickly fixed legitimate problems.
Remarks:
C. Cost Control Did Not Meet* Met Exceeded*
E4. Met and performed within originally awarded contract costs.
E5. Alerted Government of potential unforseen costs/changes before they occur, and submitted cost proposals timely.
Remarks:
D. Quality Did Not Meet* Met Exceeded*
F1. Complied with quality control plan and followed contract quality assurance requirements.
F2. Complied with technical requirements and contract specifications.
Remarks:
Evaluator’s Signature Date
F3. Ensured poor performance by subcontractors or in-house personnel is not repeated.
| SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION |
| SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION |
| SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION |
| SECTION 4: EVALUATION |
| B. Schedule |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .