ATTACH_-_5 _Past_ _Present_Performance_Questionnaire.doc

DOC document 86 KB Posted

Attached to
Hangar Door Maintenance Services Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA4621-14-R-0001
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Air Mobility Command

About this file

Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Show all 13

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

FA4621-14-R-0001

Attachment 5 Hangar Door Maintenance Services Past and Present Performance Questionnaire McConnell AFB Kansas 3 September 2014

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Reference: FA4621-14-R-0001, Hangar Door Maintenance Services

When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive Information IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104 SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation

TO: _______________________________________

You have been identified as a point of contact for a past performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached questionnaire. This firm is currently being considered for the Hangar Door Maintenance Services contract at McConnell Air Force Base, Kansas.

Your prompt attention to this questionnaire will be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions concerning this request, I can be contacted at (316) 759-4516.

KENNETH A. BUTLER

Contracting Officer Attachment:

Past and Present Performance Questionnaire

GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:

Contractor’s Name: ____________________________________

Address: _____________________________________________ Telephone Number: ____________________________________ Fax Number: _________________________________________ Point of Contact: ______________________________________ Project Title or Brief Description of Work:

Contract Number: _____________________*

Dollar Amount: $_________________ per _________________* ( Dollar value should include period of performance that applies to this contract, i.e 6-months, 1 year or 5 years)

Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: _______________________*

*Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

Contractor performed as the:

( Prime Contractor ( Sub-Contractor ( Key Personnel

A. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent: __________________________________ Title: _______________________________________________ Company Name/Address: _______________________________ Telephone Number: ____________________________________ Fax Number: _________________________________________ Email Address: ________________________________________

B. E-MAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO:

SSgt Quarteeya Garner, quarteeya.garner@us.af.mil and SSgt Daniel Parks, daniel.parks.2@us.af.mil C. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF “M” OR “U”.

E
G
S
M
U
N
EXCEPTIONAL
GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSATISFACTORY
NEUTRAL
Performance meets / met contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets / met contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Performance meets / met contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance does not / did not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Performance does not / did not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: _____________________________

CONTRACT NUMBER: _______________________________

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

The contractor:
E
G
S
M
U
N
1.
Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
2.
Provided adequate project supervision.
3.
Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
The contractor:
E
G
S
M
U
N
4.
Home office participated in solving significant local problems.
5.
Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
6.
Corrected deficiencies in a timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
7.
Identified problems as they occurred.
8.
Suggested alternative approaches to problems.
9.
Displayed initiative to solve problems.
10.
Met established project schedules.
11.
Was responsive to contract changes.
12.
Complied with all federal, state and local laws and regulations to include appropriate licensing.
13.
Complied with all USAF regulations.
14.
Cooperated with Government personnel after award.
15.
How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?
16.
Was the Contractor responsible for accepting emergency service calls and repairs?
YES / NO

17.

Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “Remarks” section.
YES / NO
18.
Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “Remarks” section.
YES / NO

19.

Is the contractor rated in CPARS?
YES / NO

20.

Did this project include work on a flight line?
YES / NO

21.

Did this project include work on a military installation?
YES / NO
22.
Did the Contractor stayed within the budget of the contract?

YES / NO

WORK PERFORMANCE QUESTIONS:

1. Did the Contractor service electric and/or non-electric hangar doors? YES/NO If yes, how many doors and how often were they serviced? _____________________________________

2. Did the Contractor service rollup, coiling and/or overhead doors? YES/NO If yes, how many doors and how often were they serviced? __________________________________________

3. Has the Contractor worked on mega doors? YES/NO If yes, what types of mega doors and how often were they serviced? __________________________________________________

4. Has the Contractor performed any service on tail doors? YES/NO If yes, what types of tail doors and how often were they serviced? __________________________________________

5. Does your contract include monthly, quarterly, or yearly inspections? How were these inspections documented? ________________________________________________________

6. Has the Contractor worked on aluminum and/or steel doors? YES/NO If yes, how often and how often were these doors serviced? _______________________________________________

REMARKS: ________________________________________________________________

Signature of Reviewer

Date

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .