Past_Performance_Questionnaire.doc
DOC document 62 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Ari Advisor Academy
- Solicitation number
- FA3002-12-R-0007
About this file
PPQ due date changed to 18 Jan 12.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Questions 13 Jan 12 | — | |
| New Performance Work Statement - 4 Jan 12 v2.doc | DOC document | |
| 2010 AA POI.pdf | ||
| QA Conference 27 Dec 11 v2.doc | DOC document | |
| Tab 3 Air Advisor Syllabus for 2012B.pdf | ||
| Amendment 01.doc | DOC document | |
| Past_Performance_Questionnaire.doc | DOC document | |
| Wage Determination.pdf | ||
| Attachment 4 SB Sheet.doc | DOC document | |
| Blank site visit reservation form dtd 3 Nov 11 | — | |
| New Performance Work Statement - 29 Nov 11.docx | DOCX document | |
| Blank site visit reservation form dtd 3 Nov 11 | — |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Past Performance Questionnaire – Attachment 2
Past Performance Questionnaire – Attachment 2
QUESTIONNAIRE COVER LETTER
MEMORANDUM FOR
(Date)
FROM: ________________________
On Behalf Of: AETC CONS
2021 First Street West
Randolph AFB, TX 78150-4302
SUBJECT: Past Performance Questionnaire for Solicitation Number FA3002-12-R-0007
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
The Air Education and Training Command (AETC) Contracting Squadron (CONS) is in the process of selecting a contractor for the Air Advisor Academy Pre-Deployment training requirement. The Air Advisor Pre-Deployment training requirement consists of mission, culture, and combat skills training. In addition, this requirement contains courseware development and maintenance.
One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors' past and present performance on contracts, which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We have referenced your contract number ______________________ with our company as a candidate for providing past/present performance information. AETC CONS is depending on information received from agencies and companies such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with our company, for the evaluation of our performance on the identified contract.
The areas of interest regarding our performance are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. We sincerely request that you please complete the questionnaire and send it directly to the Contracting Officer (Mr. Robert Miller) for the Air Advisor Academy Pre-Deployment Training solicitation by the date set for receipt of proposals, 18 Jan 12. This schedule will allow AETC CONS sufficient time to analyze the data prior to the start of discussions, if held.
To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out either electronically or by hand, and either e-mailed or faxed to the attention of Robert Miller at robert.miller.17@us.af.mil (210) 652-5733 (DSN 487-5733) or April Kreps at april.kreps@us.af.mil (210) 652-7757. Please call Mr. Miller or April Kreps prior to a fax transmission, if you have any questions, or if receipt of your questionnaire is not acknowledged. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official Source Selection records.
Your help is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection. Thank you.
Signature/Title
Atch:
Past Performance Questionnaire, 2 pgs A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Contractor’s Name:
Address:
Telephone Number:
Fax Number:
Point of Contact:
Project Title or Brief Description of Work:
Contract Number Provided by Offeror:
Dollar Amount:
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror:
*Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
Contractor performed as the: ( Prime Contractor ( Sub-Contractor ( Key Personnel.
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name of Respondent: ________________ Title: ________________________________ Address: __________________________ Telephone Number: _____________________
Fax Number: ______________________ Email Address: ________________________ C. FAX/SCAN COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO: robert.miller.17@us.af.mil (Fax 210-652-2304) D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 0 to 5 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation.
PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS.
PERFORMANCE
RATING
DEFINITION
(5) Exceptional
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
(4) Very Good
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
(3) Satisfactory
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
(2) Marginal
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
(1) Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
| (0) Not Applicable |
| Unable to provide a score. Performance in this area is not applicable to the effort assessed. |
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: ________________________
CONTRACT NUMBER___________________
The contractor:
| 1. |
| Provided experienced managers and supervisors with technical and administrative abilities to meet contract mission, culture, and combat skills training requirements. |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 2. |
| Demonstrated the ability to manage and execute an academic schedule and graduate students on time. |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 3. |
| Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements. |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 4. |
| Corrected deficiencies with mission, culture, and combat skills training in a timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures. |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 5. |
| Identified training issues as they occurred and displayed initiative to solve problems with a timely resolution. |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6. |
| Proactive with suggestions on overall course improvement. |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 7. |
| Developed/met realistic progress schedules. |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 8. |
| Responsive to contract modifications/changes. |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 9. |
| What rating would the academics facilities merit? |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 10. |
| What rating would the mission, culture, and combat skills training equipment merit? |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 11. |
| Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task. |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 12. |
| How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 13. |
| Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.” |
| YES/NO |
| 14. |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” |
| YES/NO |
| 15. |
| Is the contractor rated in CPARS? |
| YES/NO |
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: ________________________
CONTRACT NUMBER ___________________
Remarks:_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .