Pre-PropConfSlidesREP.ppt

PPT presentation 576 KB Posted

Attached to
Retail Electric Provider Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA3002-08-R-0002
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Installation and Mission Support Center Installation Contracting Agency

About this file

Pre-Proposal Conference Briefing

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Retail Electric Provider, newest first.
File Type Posted
QsandAsREP18Mar08.xls XLS spreadsheet
QsandAsREP13Mar08.xls XLS spreadsheet
QsandAsREP7Mar08.xls XLS spreadsheet
FA3002-08-R-0002-0003.doc DOC document
QsandAsREP5Mar08.xls XLS spreadsheet
Attendees.pdf PDF
Pre-ProposalConfMinutes.pdf PDF
QsandAsREP.xls XLS spreadsheet
Q AFormat.doc DOC document
FA3002-08-R-0002-0002.doc DOC document
Pre-proposalConferenceAgenda.doc DOC document
RandolphAFBMap.ppt PPT presentation
Pre-proposalConferenceNotice.doc DOC document
FA3002-08-R-0002-0001.doc DOC document
SectionMAtch1-SubcontractingPlanChecklist.doc DOC document
FA3002-08-R-0002.doc DOC document
SectionLAtch2-PPQuestionnaire.doc DOC document
SectionLAtch1-PPWorksheet.doc DOC document
SectionLAtch3-EvaluationSpreadsheet.xls XLS spreadsheet
SectionLAtch4-SubcontractingWorksheet.xls XLS spreadsheet
DCAAPre-Audits.doc DOC document
Show all 21

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Develop America's Airmen Today ... for Tomorrow

Air Education and Training Command I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Welcome to the Retail Electric Provider (REP) Pre-Proposal Conference

AETC Contracting Squadron Randolph AFB, TX 4 Mar 2008

Overview

Rules of Engagement / Administrative Comments / FedBizOpps
Program Description
Solicitation Overview
Proposal Instructions
Summary

Rules of Engagement

The PCO serves as the single point of contact for all inquiries and information regarding this acquisition
Any remarks, explanations, or answers to questions are supplemental guidance and do not override the terms of the solicitation
Terms of the solicitation remain unchanged unless the solicitation is formally amended in writing
Questions and Answers
Questions may be asked during the presentation
Questions and the answers provided will be documented in the conference minutes
Posted Q&A form must be used for all written questions
IF IT IS NOT IN WRITING, IT IS NOT OFFICIAL

Administrative Comments

No video / recording devices
Please turn off cell phones / electronic devices
Sign-In Sheet
Briefing slides and conference minutes will be posted on FedBizOpps
Copies of Technical Library are available

FedBizOpps (FBO)

Request for Proposal (RFP) posted on the Federal Business Opportunities (FedBizOpps) website on 19 Feb 08
http://www.fbo.gov/
Solicitation Number: FA3002-08-R-0002
All supporting documents, notices, questions and responses, or any amendments will be posted on the FBO website
Submit questions in writing via e-mail to the PCO, Ms. Mientek, as soon as possible
Register to receive notification but check often

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Program Description

Mr. John Kain REP Program Manager

AETC/A7COE

Utility contract to deliver electricity in accordance with Texas Law
Unique to Department of Defense, first of it’s kind
Aggregates loads from Goodfellow, Laughlin and Sheppard for bulk purchase
Portfolio of multiple sources of supply
Existing utility contract ends 1 July 08
Aggregated loads of 3 bases
45 MW
225,000 MWH
Wholesale Purchasing versus Retail
Indefinite Term Contract
Long Term Purchase from generators that eliminates fuel price volatility
Several sources – energy security & surety
A diversified portfolio allows for security by not concentrating the source of supply to any one place
Using diversified suppliers avoids potential corporate failures or loss of source generation that would affect the surety of supply

Aggregated Annual Load Profile

(GDF, LAU, & SHP)

Aggregated Demand Block Purchases Example A B C D E A B E E E E E D C D D D D C C C C C C

Performance Work Statement

Scope of Work (Para C.1)
Qualified Scheduling Entity (QSE) Level IV
Contractor to take full advantage of the ancillary services a Level IV provides
Use of all of the financial services offered by ERCOT expected to reduce the cost of supply
QSE can be ‘in house’ or a subcontractor
Purchase “green” energy to meet requirements of Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPACT05)
Executive Order 13423
Encourage creation of new green energy generation

The government expects to see any financial cost savings offered by ERCOT reflected in the cost of electricity.

Subordinate Retail Electric Provider (SREP) Para C.2
SREP shall be for the sole benefit of the three AETC bases
Maintain separate account records for all costs associated with the portfolio of supply agreements
Accounting records available for audit by the specific base, AETC, or Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA)

AETC will not act as it’s own REP, SREP, or QSE

Strategic Supply Plan (SSP) Para C.3
Living document to guide daily activities of the aggregated electricity purchasing program
Where we are, where we are going, and how to get there (source of supply; type of supply; quantity of supply from each source)
Developed by contractor / accepted by government
Plan for supporting renewable energy goals required by EPACT05 and EO13423
Details approach to satisfy aggregated electricity requirements in a written document that is simple, clear and concise, and to the point
Identifies suppliers, amounts and types of energy

For Example: Today: Buying volatile electrical generation, and have little or no renewable energy as part of that generation. Going: We need to meet the requirements of EPACT05 and the Executive Order. Getting there: What is the REP doing to do to meet the requirements of the RFP and to aid in achieving the goals.

SSP (con’t)
Shows how the diversity of the portfolio of supply contracts helps the installations maintain security and surety of supply
Changes and modifications to agreements will be furnished as part of SSP modifications
Discusses methods used to support the development of new renewable generation sources
Approach to determining the energy price for each base
The primary goal of this contract is to mitigate the risks associated with price stability, reduce long term supply susceptible to volatility, and move to those that are not / less volatile

The diversified portfolio allows for security by not concentrating the source of supply to any one place. Using diversified suppliers also provides the ability to avoid potential corporate failures that would affect the surety of supply.

An indefinite term contract gives the government and the REP the ability to enter into long-term generation contracts. The contracts will help mitigate some of the volatility and help in economic stability.

The major factor associated with both EPACT2005 and EO 13423 is the development of new sources of renewable generation and not just use existing ones. The primary focus of the government right now is to reduce the nations dependence on foreign oil.

Deliverables (Para C.4)
Quarterly reports consisting of but not limited to:
Problems with scheduling or delivery of electric power to each account
Known TDSP problems in line losses, congestion, changes in cost, etc.
Imbalance problems
Changes in laws, regulations, or procedures by the State, ERCOT, TDSP
Efforts in acquiring or promoting renewable energy
Force Majeure actions and resolutions
Deliverables (continued)
Initial SSP – 150 days after award
Review and / or modifications to Initial SSP
Quarterly revisions
Annual reviews
Changes in source of supply
Monthly invoices per ESID
Consolidate all ESID charges per base to a single invoice
All associated charges shall be attachments to the Wide Area Work Flow (WAWF) invoices
Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs)
Provided annually
Enabling Documents (Para C.5)
The contractor shall not enter into any enabling document that constrains the ability to contract with any generation source or meet the contract requirements
Constrain means to limit the contractor’s ability to:
Contract with any electric generating resources, especially new renewable energy sources (existing or under development) including independent generation sources
Compete subcontractors (i.e. generation sources) to get competitive prices

EMSA’s or IGRT’s may limit the REP to a single source even though they may have multiple generation sources. Economic stability and supply reliability are key to our success in this venture and we expect the REP to “shop around” to get the best price for the government.

Power Quality (Para C.7)
Contractor shall monitor their delivery contract with the TDSP to ensure:
The electric power purchased is equivalent to the account requirements
The correct voltage
The power delivered is free from any distortion, variances or harmonics
Notify government of any power factor problems or penalties
Assist government in determining power factor corrective actions
Electrical Load Changes (Para C.8)
Increases or decreases in power requirements at an installation
Bases are developing on-site generation
Changes in base population
Increased/Decreased mission requirements
Demolition of facilities
Contract Management (Para C.9)
Monitor all generation, and transportation requirements and notify the government within 24 hours of any problems
Provide 24 hour point of contact for customer concerns
Provide a web based information system to allow:
Access to current and historical invoices
Access to current and historical usage and cost data
Access to market data and trends
Mobilization (Para C.10)
Develop the initial draft SSP
Initiate the SREP
Visit each base
Switch the ESID accounts
Other tasks needed including setting up website

Expectations

AETC expects this contract to be a partnership in the development of new energy market
Surety of commodity supply and transportation for continuous reliability
Security of that supply
Meet all Department of Energy and Department of Defense goals
Development of new renewable energy sources
Level our costs for future estimating of requirements

Solicitation Overview

Ms. Debbie Aguirre Procuring Contracting Officer

AETC CONS/LGCU

CCR

Offerors must be registered in Central Contractor Registration (CCR) under NAICS 221122 to be eligible for award
North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) 221122, Electric Power Distribution
Full and Open Competitive Acquisition
Not a small business set aside
Small Business Size Standard
Small Business Administration (SBA) definition of a small business:
Less than 4 Million Megawatt Hours for last fiscal year
Total includes offerors and their affiliates
See SBA website (www.sba.gov) for definition of affiliates

Contract Type

Single Contract Award
Indefinite-Delivery / Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) Contract
Each base will issue a separate task orders
Task Orders issued on a fiscal year basis for each base
Bases will issue Task Orders based on availability of funds
All funds will be placed on the task orders

Section B

Cost Reimbursable CLIN (Contract Line Item Number)
Electricity (CLIN 0001)
No proposal on this CLIN
Firm-Fixed Price (FFP) CLINs
REP / QSE Services Price Adder (CLIN 0002)
REP / QSE Sleeving Services Price Adder (CLIN 0003)
Escalation Factor (CLIN 0004)
fixed % of adder x BLS index
Same for both price adders
Initial 6 Month Electricity (CLIN 0005) – no proposal
Electricity Unit Price (CLIN 000501) – no proposal
Heat Rate Factor (CLIN 000502)
Mobilization (CLIN 0006)

Cost Reimbursable Contract Line Item for pass through electricity costs – no proposal.

Firm Fixed Price (FFP) Contract - REP Price Adder and Sleeving REP Price Adder (Fixed Price paid per KWh used) Annual Escalation Factor based on Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) index for NAICS Initial 6-month electricity price will be fixed based on the proposed heat rate factor and the NYMX rate (fixed after contract award). Only propose Heat Rate Factor Mobilization is a one time fixed price for start up costs.

Section B, con’t

Escalation Factor for REP Price Adder and Sleeving Price Adder
Fixed percentage of adder to be escalated (0 – 100%)
Escalated annually based on Bureau of Labor Statistics Producer Price Index, Industrial Electric Power, West South Central

PCO will calculate and modify contract annually with actual BLS escalation rate and awarded escalation factor.

Period of Performance

Mobilization Period:1 Jun 08 – 31 Jun 08
Performance Starts:1 Jul 08
Initial 6-Months:1 Jul 08 – 31 Dec 08
Indefinite Term Contract
Contract will continue until terminated by the Government
365-day termination for convenience notice

Section G

Invoicing Instructions
Wide Area Work Flow (WAWF) will be used
Web based invoicing system
One consolidated invoice per base / task order
One line for electricity costs and one for REP adder
Prompt Payment Act allows the government 30 days to pay invoices

Section H

Special Clauses
Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) at AETC CONS
Only person authorized to make changes to the contract
Contractor is at risk if they react to others
Administrative Contracting Officers (ACO)
One ACO for each base
ACOs will issue and administer task orders for their base
Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA)
Post award audits of allowable costs for electricity
Post award financial capability audits
Fluctuations in Requirements – FAR 52.241-8
Termination for Convenience – 365-day notice

Section I

Limitation of Government’s Obligation Clause (DFARS 252.232-7007)
Allows the government to incrementally fund contracts
May be used when full funding is not available
Likely to be used if the government is under a Continuing Resolution
Competition in Subcontracting (FAR 52.244-5)
Agreements with Generators are considered subcontracts
Contractors must compete subcontracts to the maximum extent possible
Strategic Supply Plan must address how subcontracts were competed

If Congress does not release funds at the beginning of the fiscal year on 1 October, then we are under a Continuing Resolution with limited funds available. Under those conditions, we are likely to fund only the first 3 months (Oct – Dec) of the task orders with full funding placed on the contract as soon as it becomes available.

Agreements or contracts with generators are considered subcontracts. The strategic purchases from multiple generators in the Strategic Supply Portfolio must address how these ‘subcontracts’ were competed or if not competed, why not.

Proposal Instructions

Proposal Organization

Volume I – Technical Proposal
Volume II – Price / Contract Proposal
Volume III – Past Performance Proposal
Volume IV – Small Business Subcontracting Plan

Technical Library

Technical Library on CD-ROM
Load profile data by ESID
Interval data – if available
Letters of Authorization for access to TDSP information
Available upon request

Non-Government Personnel

Proposal information may be released for review and analysis
Will NOT determine ratings or ranking of offerors’ proposals
Objections of release of information must be provided to the Contracting Officer in writing
Non-government advisor:
Mr. Tom Sobey, Sain Engineering Associates

Volume I Technical Proposal

Factor - Technical Proposal
Rated on an overall pass / fail basis
Proposals will be rated either Acceptable, Reasonably Susceptible of Being Made Acceptable, or Unacceptable
It is not necessary or desirable to reiterate the requirements of the PWS
Volume I shall be specific, complete, and clearly demonstrate a thorough understanding of the requirement

Technical Proposal, con’t

Subfactor 1 – Technical / Mission Capability
Offeror shall be currently registered and certified as a Retail Electric Provider to operate in the State of Texas by the Texas Public Utility Commission and the Energy Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT)
Must be certified Level IV Qualified Scheduling Entity (QSE)
Offeror, affiliate, or subcontractor
Strategic Supply Plan (SSP) draft narrative outline must adequately address all the elements in PWS paragraph C.3 and demonstrate ability to meet all PWS requirements

Technical Proposal, con’t

Subfactor 2 – Risk Management
Offeror shall provide a clear and complete description of their contractual and / or business arrangements and full copies of all Enabling Agreements
Offeror must have no Enabling Agreements which constrain the ability to:
Access generation resources
Compete subcontractors
Access renewable energy and independent generators
Diagrams provided must support the above abilities
Offeror shall provide acceptable procedures that minimize the impact of supply disruptions during periods of Force Majeure associated with either generation or delivery

Technical Proposal, con’t

Subfactor 3 – Contract Management
Offeror must provide acceptable 24-hour notification procedures for addressing problems
Offeror’s proposed web-based information system must provide government access to all data required per PWS paragraph C.9(b)

Volume II Contract Documentation

Section A (Standard Form 33)
Block 12 must allow for a minimum of 120 days acceptance time
Complete blocks 13, 15, 16, 17 and 18
Acknowledge all solicitation amendments
Block 14 or Signed SF 30
Section B
Enter price information in the following CLINs:
CLIN 0002 – REP/QSE price per kilowatt hour
CLIN 0003 – REP/QSE Sleeving price per kilowatt hour
CLIN 0004 – Percentage of price adders to be escalated
CLIN 000502 – Heat Rate Factor
CLIN 0006 – Mobilization price

Contract Documentation, con’t

Section I
Complete fill-ins, if any (none currently)
Section K
Clause 52.204-8
Complete Online Representations and Certifications
State any exceptions to any terms and conditions of the solicitation
If there are no exceptions, include a statement to this effect

Price

Factor – Price
Technically Acceptable and Reasonably Susceptible of Being Made Acceptable offers will be ranked by price
Evaluated for price reasonableness: comparison of proposed prices, comparison to market prices, and comparison to the Independent Government Estimate, as appropriate
Unreasonably low / high or unbalanced proposed prices may be grounds for eliminating a proposal from competition on the basis that the offeror does not understand the requirement
Total Evaluated Price is the sole basis for evaluating price for contract award purposes and will be the only price discriminator among offerors
The lowest price proposal may not necessarily receive the award

Price, con’t

Total Evaluated Price: calculated based on the offeror’s proposed CLIN prices using the government provided evaluation spreadsheet
Total Evaluated Price
Evaluated Escalated Price Adders
Based on Proposed Price Adders and Escalation Factor
Evaluated Initial 6 Month Electricity Price
Based on Proposed Heat Rate Factor
Calculated with Gas Price and Estimated KWh
Fixed for Evaluation Purposes Only
Mobilization
Firm Fixed Price (FFP) Proposed Price

The evaluation spreadsheet (Section L, Attachment 3) will be used by the Government to calculate the Total Evaluated Price. Do not send us the evaluation spreadsheet. However, it is highly encouraged that you use the spreadsheet to see what your Total Evaluated Price will be.

Evaluated Escalated Price Adders

Proposed Prices
REP & Sleeving REP price per kWh
Escalation Factor (Percentage of price adders to be escalated)
Government Provided
Annual Escalation Rate (1.6%)
19.5 year Escalation Multiplier (22.85)
Quantity of kilowatt hours
Split between REP and Sleeving REP
Calculated with Evaluation Spreadsheet

To effectively evaluate the price adders, the cost is calculated over 19.5 years. Offerors can propose a percentage of the price adders (same % for both adders) to be escalated annually based on the Bureau of Labor Statistics index for this NAICS code.

Total Evaluated Price Initial 6 Month Electricity Price

Proposed Prices
Heat Rate Factor
REP Price Adder
Government Provided
6 month strip price for natural gas provided by the Government ($7.50 per MMBTU)
Quantity of kilowatt hours
Calculated with Evaluation Spreadsheet
Provides for evaluation of contractor controlled price element (heat rate factor) for the first 6 months of performance

To allow the contractor time to establish their Strategic Supply Plan and long term contracts for the government’s benefit, the first 6 months of electricity will be based on the Natural Gas Index published by the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMX). The contractor’s proposed heat rate factor along with their REP price adder will be firm-fixed price. These factors along with numbers set by the gov’t will be calculated to determined the Evaluated Initial 6 Month Electricity Price. After award, the Natural Gas price will be locked in during Mobilization which will be multiplied by the Awarded Heat Rate Factor for the price times actual kWhrs used for each base for the Electricity Price for the first 6 months. The locked in price will be added to the contract via a modification.

Total Evaluated Price Mobilization

Mobilization – a one time firm-fixed price for the 30-day mobilization period for:
Creating a Subordinate Retail Electric Provider (SREP)
Creating the initial draft of the Strategic Supply Plan (SSP)
Switching the ESID accounts
Travel to the 3 bases
All necessary administrative work to begin serving the aggregated electric load beginning 1 Jul 08
Includes setting up web-based information system

Volume III Past Performance

Factor – Past Performance
An overall performance confidence assessment shall be assigned
Confidence in the offeror’s ability to fulfill the solicitation requirements
Demonstrated record of present and past performance in performing similar efforts
Focuses on performance that is relevant to this acquisition
No more than 5 contracts per offeror

Volume III Past Performance, con’t

Present and Past Performance Sources
Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ)
Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS)
Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT) complaint database
May also provide positive comments
Past Performance Questionnaire
Send to each POC identified
Completed questionnaires submitted directly to the Contracting Officer
Letter of Authorization
Allows PUCT to verify historical load data

The Government will evaluate present and past performance information by analysis of contractor performance feedback obtained from the points of contact utilizing Past Performance Questionnaires and information obtained from the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) and input from any other Governmental or commercial sources.

Volume IV Small Business Subcontracting

Factor – Small Business Subcontracting Plan
Intent to ensure that small businesses have the maximum practicable opportunity to participate
Small businesses:
Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB) – not required
Other than SDB, submit a SDB Participation Plan & Worksheet
Large businesses:
Submit a full plan
Submit a Subcontracting Worksheet
All plans:
Clear, detailed, logical and realistic
Based on a percentage of estimated contract value for the first year of $20 Million
Targets for first year remain in effect for life of contract

Volume IV Small Business Subcontracting, con’t

Plan must include all elements required by FAR 19.704(a) and DFARS 219.704(a)
Subcontracting Plan Checklist provided will be used to evaluate the plan
Evaluated on a pass / fail basis
Failure to submit a plan will render the offeror ineligible for award
Propose obtainable goals
If an offeror does not foresee subcontracting opportunities for small businesses they must still submit a plan with STRONG rationale explaining the lack of opportunities

Overall Evaluation

Technically Acceptable
Rank by Price
Past Performance Confidence Assessment
Other Conditions for Award
Meet all solicitation requirements
Terms and conditions
Representations and certifications
All Technical Requirements
DCAA Pre-Award Audit
Adequate accounting system
Financial capability

If a pre-award audit has not already been initiated for your company, please provide the Contracting Officer with a point of contact for the audits.

Basis for Contract Award

Performance Price Tradeoff (PPT) source selection
Conducted IAW Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 15.3, DFARS Part 215.3, AFFARS Part 5315.3 and the Mandatory Procedures at MP5315.3
Simplified best value source selection strategy that permits a tradeoff between price and past performance
Technical evaluation is rated on a pass / fail basis
Past performance is significantly more important than price
Lowest priced proposal may not necessarily receive the award

Basis for Contract Award, con’t

Defense Contract Audit Agency pre-award audits
Adequate accounting system
Financial capability
Proposal shall conform to the solicitation requirements, to include all stated terms, conditions, representations, certifications, and technical requirements
The Government reserves the right to award without discussions based on the evaluation of the initial proposal

Summary

Pre-Performance Conference will be held at Randolph AFB, TX
AETC CONS/LGCD - contract administration
PWS and SSP modifications
Base contracting offices - task order administration
Issue and administer task orders
Contracting Officer Technical Representatives (COTRs)
At each base
Monitor performance on contract
Verify meter readings
Review and approve invoices

Post Award Administration

Key Dates/Activities Past Performance Worksheets Due 6 Mar 08

Past Performance Questionnaires Due 13 Mar 08

Proposals Due (Volumes I, II, IV) 20 Mar 08

Anticipated Contract Award 19 May 08

Mobilization Start 1 Jun 08

Contract Performance Start 1 Jul 08

Items of Note Read all documents posted under solicitation number FA3002-08-R-0002

Carefully read Section L, Instructions to Offerors
Base proposal on section L and the Performance Work Statement (PWS)
Section M, Evaluation Factors for Award
Explains how the government will evaluate proposals and determine the successful offeror
Answers to questions submitted are available in hard copy and will be posted to www.fbo.gov

Items of Note, con’t

Proposals are intended to be evaluated, and award made, without discussions
Proposals must be fully and clearly acceptable without additional explanation or information
Provide your best proposal up front
Provide substance – NOT ‘pretty words’
Proposal shall be clear and concise containing sufficient detail for easy evaluation
Technical Proposal – Maximum 30 pages
Acknowledge all amendments
Currently 0001 & 0002

Items of Note, con’t

The PCO serves as the single point of contact for all inquiries and information regarding this acquisition
Please submit questions in writing using the Q&A form via e-mail to the PCO as soon as possible
Submit your proposal on time
Closing date 20 Mar 08, 3:30PM local time
Offerors are strongly advised to thoroughly examine their proposals for accuracy, full documentation, clear explanations and compliance with all requirements of the RFP instructions

Late is late!

Contact Information

Website
http://www.fbo.gov/
E-mail
Diane.mientek@randolph.af.mil
Jodie.hagee@randolph.af.mil
Telephone
210-652-3260
210-652-6388
Facsimile
210-652-5733

UNKNOWN-0.ppt

Standard Cover Slide

Arial, 32 Pt Font

Shaded; Color – Blue (upper right hand corner of palette)

Colonel Show D. Way

1 Apr 03

Arial, 18 pt, bold

CLASSIFICATION (if required)

CLASSIFICATION (if required)

Standard Slides

Charts / Graphs

Classification Markings

Helpful Hints

Any photos should relate to the text and enhance the message of the slide. Use a 1.5 point line around photos

Do not use Clipart

Standard Slides

This slide is the standard background

Title – Arial, Bold, 40 pt unless too long; no smaller than 32

Primary bullets – Arial, 28 pt

Secondary Level – Arial, 24 pt

Third Level – Arial, 20 pt should be the minimum size

Use upper and lower case as required for emphasis and readability

Bold text only for emphasis; do not use shadow

Align bullets under the point in the AF symbol

“Wipe Right” is the standard for slide transitions

Standard Slides, con’t

Colors

Title – Dark Blue (upper right hand of pallet)

Body – Black

Bullets and line spacing – use the default setting whenever possible

Bullets 100% of text

Insert spaces before and after dashes, slashes, and ellipsis unless you are writing an office symbol. For example, use “pilot / nav” and “AETC/CC”

Most importantly

Be consistent within your presentation

Charts / Graphs

Keep as simple as possible

Use the space available ... bigger charts are easier to read

Colors

Goal lines are orange

The primary colors for graphs are orange, green, and dark blue; if additional colors are needed, ensure they do not detract from the message

Red normally indicates a problem area – avoid it unless it’s the message you wish to send

Borders, axis values, and gridlines should be black

Line Charts

Good

Goal

Fiscal Year

Classification Markings

Mark title slide with overall briefing classification

Unclassified

If entire briefing is unclassified — no classification markings needed

Use Green for unclassified markings

Classified

Use classification markings if presented, or saved with other classified briefing

If ... ANY slide in briefing is classified, mark all briefing slides with appropriate classification level

Use Red for classified markings

CLASSIFICATION

CLASSIFICATION

Helpful Hints

Dry run briefings on the equipment you will use

Ensures computers can handle your presentation

Colors may not project overhead as well as they do on your computer screen

Tailor your briefing to the audience

Ensure briefings to CC / CV are presented at the executive level … strive to use 15 slides max

Only use graphics if they enhance the message of the slide

Templates, patches, etc., can be obtained from AETC/CCX, DSN 487-5844

Helpful Hints, con’t

“The Show”

Transitions are OK, but be careful; complex transitions take time and can be distracting

Dual screen briefings are OK in Martin Hall Conf Room and the AETC Conf Center … check for other locations

In both locations the left and right screens must be changed simultaneously

Build briefings with an equal number of left and right slides

Blank slides should be solid black

Chartsmanship: Be consistent!

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .