Pre-PropConfSlidesREP.ppt
PPT presentation 576 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Retail Electric Provider Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA3002-08-R-0002
About this file
Pre-Proposal Conference Briefing
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| QsandAsREP18Mar08.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| QsandAsREP13Mar08.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| QsandAsREP7Mar08.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| FA3002-08-R-0002-0003.doc | DOC document | |
| QsandAsREP5Mar08.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Attendees.pdf | ||
| Pre-ProposalConfMinutes.pdf | ||
| QsandAsREP.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Q AFormat.doc | DOC document | |
| FA3002-08-R-0002-0002.doc | DOC document | |
| Pre-proposalConferenceAgenda.doc | DOC document | |
| RandolphAFBMap.ppt | PPT presentation | |
| Pre-proposalConferenceNotice.doc | DOC document | |
| FA3002-08-R-0002-0001.doc | DOC document | |
| SectionMAtch1-SubcontractingPlanChecklist.doc | DOC document | |
| FA3002-08-R-0002.doc | DOC document | |
| SectionLAtch2-PPQuestionnaire.doc | DOC document | |
| SectionLAtch1-PPWorksheet.doc | DOC document | |
| SectionLAtch3-EvaluationSpreadsheet.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| SectionLAtch4-SubcontractingWorksheet.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| DCAAPre-Audits.doc | DOC document |
Show all 21
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Develop America's Airmen Today ... for Tomorrow
Air Education and Training Command I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Welcome to the Retail Electric Provider (REP) Pre-Proposal Conference
AETC Contracting Squadron Randolph AFB, TX 4 Mar 2008
Overview
| Rules of Engagement / Administrative Comments / FedBizOpps |
| Program Description |
| Solicitation Overview |
| Proposal Instructions |
| Summary |
Rules of Engagement
| The PCO serves as the single point of contact for all inquiries and information regarding this acquisition |
| Any remarks, explanations, or answers to questions are supplemental guidance and do not override the terms of the solicitation |
| Terms of the solicitation remain unchanged unless the solicitation is formally amended in writing |
| Questions and Answers |
| Questions may be asked during the presentation |
| Questions and the answers provided will be documented in the conference minutes |
| Posted Q&A form must be used for all written questions |
| IF IT IS NOT IN WRITING, IT IS NOT OFFICIAL |
Administrative Comments
| No video / recording devices |
| Please turn off cell phones / electronic devices |
| Sign-In Sheet |
| Briefing slides and conference minutes will be posted on FedBizOpps |
| Copies of Technical Library are available |
FedBizOpps (FBO)
| Request for Proposal (RFP) posted on the Federal Business Opportunities (FedBizOpps) website on 19 Feb 08 |
| http://www.fbo.gov/ |
| Solicitation Number: FA3002-08-R-0002 |
| All supporting documents, notices, questions and responses, or any amendments will be posted on the FBO website |
| Submit questions in writing via e-mail to the PCO, Ms. Mientek, as soon as possible |
| Register to receive notification but check often |
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Program Description
Mr. John Kain REP Program Manager
AETC/A7COE
| Utility contract to deliver electricity in accordance with Texas Law |
| Unique to Department of Defense, first of it’s kind |
| Aggregates loads from Goodfellow, Laughlin and Sheppard for bulk purchase |
| Portfolio of multiple sources of supply |
| Existing utility contract ends 1 July 08 |
| Aggregated loads of 3 bases |
| 45 MW |
| 225,000 MWH |
| Wholesale Purchasing versus Retail |
| Indefinite Term Contract |
| Long Term Purchase from generators that eliminates fuel price volatility |
| Several sources – energy security & surety |
| A diversified portfolio allows for security by not concentrating the source of supply to any one place |
| Using diversified suppliers avoids potential corporate failures or loss of source generation that would affect the surety of supply |
Aggregated Annual Load Profile
(GDF, LAU, & SHP)
Aggregated Demand Block Purchases Example A B C D E A B E E E E E D C D D D D C C C C C C
Performance Work Statement
| Scope of Work (Para C.1) |
| Qualified Scheduling Entity (QSE) Level IV |
| Contractor to take full advantage of the ancillary services a Level IV provides |
| Use of all of the financial services offered by ERCOT expected to reduce the cost of supply |
| QSE can be ‘in house’ or a subcontractor |
| Purchase “green” energy to meet requirements of Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPACT05) |
| Executive Order 13423 |
| Encourage creation of new green energy generation |
The government expects to see any financial cost savings offered by ERCOT reflected in the cost of electricity.
| Subordinate Retail Electric Provider (SREP) Para C.2 |
| SREP shall be for the sole benefit of the three AETC bases |
| Maintain separate account records for all costs associated with the portfolio of supply agreements |
| Accounting records available for audit by the specific base, AETC, or Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) |
AETC will not act as it’s own REP, SREP, or QSE
| Strategic Supply Plan (SSP) Para C.3 |
| Living document to guide daily activities of the aggregated electricity purchasing program |
| Where we are, where we are going, and how to get there (source of supply; type of supply; quantity of supply from each source) |
| Developed by contractor / accepted by government |
| Plan for supporting renewable energy goals required by EPACT05 and EO13423 |
| Details approach to satisfy aggregated electricity requirements in a written document that is simple, clear and concise, and to the point |
| Identifies suppliers, amounts and types of energy |
For Example: Today: Buying volatile electrical generation, and have little or no renewable energy as part of that generation. Going: We need to meet the requirements of EPACT05 and the Executive Order. Getting there: What is the REP doing to do to meet the requirements of the RFP and to aid in achieving the goals.
| SSP (con’t) |
| Shows how the diversity of the portfolio of supply contracts helps the installations maintain security and surety of supply |
| Changes and modifications to agreements will be furnished as part of SSP modifications |
| Discusses methods used to support the development of new renewable generation sources |
| Approach to determining the energy price for each base |
| The primary goal of this contract is to mitigate the risks associated with price stability, reduce long term supply susceptible to volatility, and move to those that are not / less volatile |
The diversified portfolio allows for security by not concentrating the source of supply to any one place. Using diversified suppliers also provides the ability to avoid potential corporate failures that would affect the surety of supply.
An indefinite term contract gives the government and the REP the ability to enter into long-term generation contracts. The contracts will help mitigate some of the volatility and help in economic stability.
The major factor associated with both EPACT2005 and EO 13423 is the development of new sources of renewable generation and not just use existing ones. The primary focus of the government right now is to reduce the nations dependence on foreign oil.
| Deliverables (Para C.4) |
| Quarterly reports consisting of but not limited to: |
| Problems with scheduling or delivery of electric power to each account |
| Known TDSP problems in line losses, congestion, changes in cost, etc. |
| Imbalance problems |
| Changes in laws, regulations, or procedures by the State, ERCOT, TDSP |
| Efforts in acquiring or promoting renewable energy |
| Force Majeure actions and resolutions |
| Deliverables (continued) |
| Initial SSP – 150 days after award |
| Review and / or modifications to Initial SSP |
| Quarterly revisions |
| Annual reviews |
| Changes in source of supply |
| Monthly invoices per ESID |
| Consolidate all ESID charges per base to a single invoice |
| All associated charges shall be attachments to the Wide Area Work Flow (WAWF) invoices |
| Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) |
| Provided annually |
| Enabling Documents (Para C.5) |
| The contractor shall not enter into any enabling document that constrains the ability to contract with any generation source or meet the contract requirements |
| Constrain means to limit the contractor’s ability to: |
| Contract with any electric generating resources, especially new renewable energy sources (existing or under development) including independent generation sources |
| Compete subcontractors (i.e. generation sources) to get competitive prices |
EMSA’s or IGRT’s may limit the REP to a single source even though they may have multiple generation sources. Economic stability and supply reliability are key to our success in this venture and we expect the REP to “shop around” to get the best price for the government.
| Power Quality (Para C.7) |
| Contractor shall monitor their delivery contract with the TDSP to ensure: |
| The electric power purchased is equivalent to the account requirements |
| The correct voltage |
| The power delivered is free from any distortion, variances or harmonics |
| Notify government of any power factor problems or penalties |
| Assist government in determining power factor corrective actions |
| Electrical Load Changes (Para C.8) |
| Increases or decreases in power requirements at an installation |
| Bases are developing on-site generation |
| Changes in base population |
| Increased/Decreased mission requirements |
| Demolition of facilities |
| Contract Management (Para C.9) |
| Monitor all generation, and transportation requirements and notify the government within 24 hours of any problems |
| Provide 24 hour point of contact for customer concerns |
| Provide a web based information system to allow: |
| Access to current and historical invoices |
| Access to current and historical usage and cost data |
| Access to market data and trends |
| Mobilization (Para C.10) |
| Develop the initial draft SSP |
| Initiate the SREP |
| Visit each base |
| Switch the ESID accounts |
| Other tasks needed including setting up website |
Expectations
| AETC expects this contract to be a partnership in the development of new energy market |
| Surety of commodity supply and transportation for continuous reliability |
| Security of that supply |
| Meet all Department of Energy and Department of Defense goals |
| Development of new renewable energy sources |
| Level our costs for future estimating of requirements |
Solicitation Overview
Ms. Debbie Aguirre Procuring Contracting Officer
AETC CONS/LGCU
CCR
| Offerors must be registered in Central Contractor Registration (CCR) under NAICS 221122 to be eligible for award |
| North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) 221122, Electric Power Distribution |
| Full and Open Competitive Acquisition |
| Not a small business set aside |
| Small Business Size Standard |
| Small Business Administration (SBA) definition of a small business: |
| Less than 4 Million Megawatt Hours for last fiscal year |
| Total includes offerors and their affiliates |
| See SBA website (www.sba.gov) for definition of affiliates |
Contract Type
| Single Contract Award |
| Indefinite-Delivery / Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) Contract |
| Each base will issue a separate task orders |
| Task Orders issued on a fiscal year basis for each base |
| Bases will issue Task Orders based on availability of funds |
| All funds will be placed on the task orders |
Section B
| Cost Reimbursable CLIN (Contract Line Item Number) |
| Electricity (CLIN 0001) |
| No proposal on this CLIN |
| Firm-Fixed Price (FFP) CLINs |
| REP / QSE Services Price Adder (CLIN 0002) |
| REP / QSE Sleeving Services Price Adder (CLIN 0003) |
| Escalation Factor (CLIN 0004) |
| fixed % of adder x BLS index |
| Same for both price adders |
| Initial 6 Month Electricity (CLIN 0005) – no proposal |
| Electricity Unit Price (CLIN 000501) – no proposal |
| Heat Rate Factor (CLIN 000502) |
| Mobilization (CLIN 0006) |
Cost Reimbursable Contract Line Item for pass through electricity costs – no proposal.
Firm Fixed Price (FFP) Contract - REP Price Adder and Sleeving REP Price Adder (Fixed Price paid per KWh used) Annual Escalation Factor based on Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) index for NAICS Initial 6-month electricity price will be fixed based on the proposed heat rate factor and the NYMX rate (fixed after contract award). Only propose Heat Rate Factor Mobilization is a one time fixed price for start up costs.
Section B, con’t
| Escalation Factor for REP Price Adder and Sleeving Price Adder |
| Fixed percentage of adder to be escalated (0 – 100%) |
| Escalated annually based on Bureau of Labor Statistics Producer Price Index, Industrial Electric Power, West South Central |
PCO will calculate and modify contract annually with actual BLS escalation rate and awarded escalation factor.
Period of Performance
| Mobilization Period: | 1 Jun 08 – 31 Jun 08 | |
| Performance Starts: | 1 Jul 08 | |
| Initial 6-Months: | 1 Jul 08 – 31 Dec 08 |
| Indefinite Term Contract |
| Contract will continue until terminated by the Government |
| 365-day termination for convenience notice |
Section G
| Invoicing Instructions |
| Wide Area Work Flow (WAWF) will be used |
| Web based invoicing system |
| One consolidated invoice per base / task order |
| One line for electricity costs and one for REP adder |
| Prompt Payment Act allows the government 30 days to pay invoices |
Section H
| Special Clauses |
| Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) at AETC CONS |
| Only person authorized to make changes to the contract |
| Contractor is at risk if they react to others |
| Administrative Contracting Officers (ACO) |
| One ACO for each base |
| ACOs will issue and administer task orders for their base |
| Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) |
| Post award audits of allowable costs for electricity |
| Post award financial capability audits |
| Fluctuations in Requirements – FAR 52.241-8 |
| Termination for Convenience – 365-day notice |
Section I
| Limitation of Government’s Obligation Clause (DFARS 252.232-7007) |
| Allows the government to incrementally fund contracts |
| May be used when full funding is not available |
| Likely to be used if the government is under a Continuing Resolution |
| Competition in Subcontracting (FAR 52.244-5) |
| Agreements with Generators are considered subcontracts |
| Contractors must compete subcontracts to the maximum extent possible |
| Strategic Supply Plan must address how subcontracts were competed |
If Congress does not release funds at the beginning of the fiscal year on 1 October, then we are under a Continuing Resolution with limited funds available. Under those conditions, we are likely to fund only the first 3 months (Oct – Dec) of the task orders with full funding placed on the contract as soon as it becomes available.
Agreements or contracts with generators are considered subcontracts. The strategic purchases from multiple generators in the Strategic Supply Portfolio must address how these ‘subcontracts’ were competed or if not competed, why not.
Proposal Instructions
Proposal Organization
| Volume I – Technical Proposal |
| Volume II – Price / Contract Proposal |
| Volume III – Past Performance Proposal |
| Volume IV – Small Business Subcontracting Plan |
Technical Library
| Technical Library on CD-ROM |
| Load profile data by ESID |
| Interval data – if available |
| Letters of Authorization for access to TDSP information |
| Available upon request |
Non-Government Personnel
| Proposal information may be released for review and analysis |
| Will NOT determine ratings or ranking of offerors’ proposals |
| Objections of release of information must be provided to the Contracting Officer in writing |
| Non-government advisor: |
| Mr. Tom Sobey, Sain Engineering Associates |
Volume I Technical Proposal
| Factor - Technical Proposal |
| Rated on an overall pass / fail basis |
| Proposals will be rated either Acceptable, Reasonably Susceptible of Being Made Acceptable, or Unacceptable |
| It is not necessary or desirable to reiterate the requirements of the PWS |
| Volume I shall be specific, complete, and clearly demonstrate a thorough understanding of the requirement |
Technical Proposal, con’t
| Subfactor 1 – Technical / Mission Capability |
| Offeror shall be currently registered and certified as a Retail Electric Provider to operate in the State of Texas by the Texas Public Utility Commission and the Energy Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) |
| Must be certified Level IV Qualified Scheduling Entity (QSE) |
| Offeror, affiliate, or subcontractor |
| Strategic Supply Plan (SSP) draft narrative outline must adequately address all the elements in PWS paragraph C.3 and demonstrate ability to meet all PWS requirements |
Technical Proposal, con’t
| Subfactor 2 – Risk Management |
| Offeror shall provide a clear and complete description of their contractual and / or business arrangements and full copies of all Enabling Agreements |
| Offeror must have no Enabling Agreements which constrain the ability to: |
| Access generation resources |
| Compete subcontractors |
| Access renewable energy and independent generators |
| Diagrams provided must support the above abilities |
| Offeror shall provide acceptable procedures that minimize the impact of supply disruptions during periods of Force Majeure associated with either generation or delivery |
Technical Proposal, con’t
| Subfactor 3 – Contract Management |
| Offeror must provide acceptable 24-hour notification procedures for addressing problems |
| Offeror’s proposed web-based information system must provide government access to all data required per PWS paragraph C.9(b) |
Volume II Contract Documentation
| Section A (Standard Form 33) |
| Block 12 must allow for a minimum of 120 days acceptance time |
| Complete blocks 13, 15, 16, 17 and 18 |
| Acknowledge all solicitation amendments |
| Block 14 or Signed SF 30 |
| Section B |
| Enter price information in the following CLINs: |
| CLIN 0002 – REP/QSE price per kilowatt hour |
| CLIN 0003 – REP/QSE Sleeving price per kilowatt hour |
| CLIN 0004 – Percentage of price adders to be escalated |
| CLIN 000502 – Heat Rate Factor |
| CLIN 0006 – Mobilization price |
Contract Documentation, con’t
| Section I |
| Complete fill-ins, if any (none currently) |
| Section K |
| Clause 52.204-8 |
| Complete Online Representations and Certifications |
| State any exceptions to any terms and conditions of the solicitation |
| If there are no exceptions, include a statement to this effect |
Price
| Factor – Price |
| Technically Acceptable and Reasonably Susceptible of Being Made Acceptable offers will be ranked by price |
| Evaluated for price reasonableness: comparison of proposed prices, comparison to market prices, and comparison to the Independent Government Estimate, as appropriate |
| Unreasonably low / high or unbalanced proposed prices may be grounds for eliminating a proposal from competition on the basis that the offeror does not understand the requirement |
| Total Evaluated Price is the sole basis for evaluating price for contract award purposes and will be the only price discriminator among offerors |
| The lowest price proposal may not necessarily receive the award |
Price, con’t
| Total Evaluated Price: calculated based on the offeror’s proposed CLIN prices using the government provided evaluation spreadsheet |
| Total Evaluated Price |
| Evaluated Escalated Price Adders |
| Based on Proposed Price Adders and Escalation Factor |
| Evaluated Initial 6 Month Electricity Price |
| Based on Proposed Heat Rate Factor |
| Calculated with Gas Price and Estimated KWh |
| Fixed for Evaluation Purposes Only |
| Mobilization |
| Firm Fixed Price (FFP) Proposed Price |
The evaluation spreadsheet (Section L, Attachment 3) will be used by the Government to calculate the Total Evaluated Price. Do not send us the evaluation spreadsheet. However, it is highly encouraged that you use the spreadsheet to see what your Total Evaluated Price will be.
Evaluated Escalated Price Adders
| Proposed Prices |
| REP & Sleeving REP price per kWh |
| Escalation Factor (Percentage of price adders to be escalated) |
| Government Provided |
| Annual Escalation Rate (1.6%) |
| 19.5 year Escalation Multiplier (22.85) |
| Quantity of kilowatt hours |
| Split between REP and Sleeving REP |
| Calculated with Evaluation Spreadsheet |
To effectively evaluate the price adders, the cost is calculated over 19.5 years. Offerors can propose a percentage of the price adders (same % for both adders) to be escalated annually based on the Bureau of Labor Statistics index for this NAICS code.
Total Evaluated Price Initial 6 Month Electricity Price
| Proposed Prices |
| Heat Rate Factor |
| REP Price Adder |
| Government Provided |
| 6 month strip price for natural gas provided by the Government ($7.50 per MMBTU) |
| Quantity of kilowatt hours |
| Calculated with Evaluation Spreadsheet |
| Provides for evaluation of contractor controlled price element (heat rate factor) for the first 6 months of performance |
To allow the contractor time to establish their Strategic Supply Plan and long term contracts for the government’s benefit, the first 6 months of electricity will be based on the Natural Gas Index published by the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMX). The contractor’s proposed heat rate factor along with their REP price adder will be firm-fixed price. These factors along with numbers set by the gov’t will be calculated to determined the Evaluated Initial 6 Month Electricity Price. After award, the Natural Gas price will be locked in during Mobilization which will be multiplied by the Awarded Heat Rate Factor for the price times actual kWhrs used for each base for the Electricity Price for the first 6 months. The locked in price will be added to the contract via a modification.
Total Evaluated Price Mobilization
| Mobilization – a one time firm-fixed price for the 30-day mobilization period for: |
| Creating a Subordinate Retail Electric Provider (SREP) |
| Creating the initial draft of the Strategic Supply Plan (SSP) |
| Switching the ESID accounts |
| Travel to the 3 bases |
| All necessary administrative work to begin serving the aggregated electric load beginning 1 Jul 08 |
| Includes setting up web-based information system |
Volume III Past Performance
| Factor – Past Performance |
| An overall performance confidence assessment shall be assigned |
| Confidence in the offeror’s ability to fulfill the solicitation requirements |
| Demonstrated record of present and past performance in performing similar efforts |
| Focuses on performance that is relevant to this acquisition |
| No more than 5 contracts per offeror |
Volume III Past Performance, con’t
| Present and Past Performance Sources |
| Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) |
| Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) |
| Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT) complaint database |
| May also provide positive comments |
| Past Performance Questionnaire |
| Send to each POC identified |
| Completed questionnaires submitted directly to the Contracting Officer |
| Letter of Authorization |
| Allows PUCT to verify historical load data |
The Government will evaluate present and past performance information by analysis of contractor performance feedback obtained from the points of contact utilizing Past Performance Questionnaires and information obtained from the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) and input from any other Governmental or commercial sources.
Volume IV Small Business Subcontracting
| Factor – Small Business Subcontracting Plan |
| Intent to ensure that small businesses have the maximum practicable opportunity to participate |
| Small businesses: |
| Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB) – not required |
| Other than SDB, submit a SDB Participation Plan & Worksheet |
| Large businesses: |
| Submit a full plan |
| Submit a Subcontracting Worksheet |
| All plans: |
| Clear, detailed, logical and realistic |
| Based on a percentage of estimated contract value for the first year of $20 Million |
| Targets for first year remain in effect for life of contract |
Volume IV Small Business Subcontracting, con’t
| Plan must include all elements required by FAR 19.704(a) and DFARS 219.704(a) |
| Subcontracting Plan Checklist provided will be used to evaluate the plan |
| Evaluated on a pass / fail basis |
| Failure to submit a plan will render the offeror ineligible for award |
| Propose obtainable goals |
| If an offeror does not foresee subcontracting opportunities for small businesses they must still submit a plan with STRONG rationale explaining the lack of opportunities |
Overall Evaluation
| Technically Acceptable |
| Rank by Price |
| Past Performance Confidence Assessment |
| Other Conditions for Award |
| Meet all solicitation requirements |
| Terms and conditions |
| Representations and certifications |
| All Technical Requirements |
| DCAA Pre-Award Audit |
| Adequate accounting system |
| Financial capability |
If a pre-award audit has not already been initiated for your company, please provide the Contracting Officer with a point of contact for the audits.
Basis for Contract Award
| Performance Price Tradeoff (PPT) source selection |
| Conducted IAW Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 15.3, DFARS Part 215.3, AFFARS Part 5315.3 and the Mandatory Procedures at MP5315.3 |
| Simplified best value source selection strategy that permits a tradeoff between price and past performance |
| Technical evaluation is rated on a pass / fail basis |
| Past performance is significantly more important than price |
| Lowest priced proposal may not necessarily receive the award |
Basis for Contract Award, con’t
| Defense Contract Audit Agency pre-award audits |
| Adequate accounting system |
| Financial capability |
| Proposal shall conform to the solicitation requirements, to include all stated terms, conditions, representations, certifications, and technical requirements |
| The Government reserves the right to award without discussions based on the evaluation of the initial proposal |
Summary
| Pre-Performance Conference will be held at Randolph AFB, TX |
| AETC CONS/LGCD - contract administration |
| PWS and SSP modifications |
| Base contracting offices - task order administration |
| Issue and administer task orders |
| Contracting Officer Technical Representatives (COTRs) |
| At each base |
| Monitor performance on contract |
| Verify meter readings |
| Review and approve invoices |
Post Award Administration
Key Dates/Activities Past Performance Worksheets Due 6 Mar 08
Past Performance Questionnaires Due 13 Mar 08
Proposals Due (Volumes I, II, IV) 20 Mar 08
Anticipated Contract Award 19 May 08
Mobilization Start 1 Jun 08
Contract Performance Start 1 Jul 08
Items of Note Read all documents posted under solicitation number FA3002-08-R-0002
| Carefully read Section L, Instructions to Offerors |
| Base proposal on section L and the Performance Work Statement (PWS) |
| Section M, Evaluation Factors for Award |
| Explains how the government will evaluate proposals and determine the successful offeror |
| Answers to questions submitted are available in hard copy and will be posted to www.fbo.gov |
Items of Note, con’t
| Proposals are intended to be evaluated, and award made, without discussions |
| Proposals must be fully and clearly acceptable without additional explanation or information |
| Provide your best proposal up front |
| Provide substance – NOT ‘pretty words’ |
| Proposal shall be clear and concise containing sufficient detail for easy evaluation |
| Technical Proposal – Maximum 30 pages |
| Acknowledge all amendments |
| Currently 0001 & 0002 |
Items of Note, con’t
| The PCO serves as the single point of contact for all inquiries and information regarding this acquisition |
| Please submit questions in writing using the Q&A form via e-mail to the PCO as soon as possible |
| Submit your proposal on time |
| Closing date 20 Mar 08, 3:30PM local time |
| Offerors are strongly advised to thoroughly examine their proposals for accuracy, full documentation, clear explanations and compliance with all requirements of the RFP instructions |
Late is late!
Contact Information
| Website |
| http://www.fbo.gov/ |
| Diane.mientek@randolph.af.mil |
| Jodie.hagee@randolph.af.mil |
| Telephone |
| 210-652-3260 |
| 210-652-6388 |
| Facsimile |
| 210-652-5733 |
UNKNOWN-0.ppt
Standard Cover Slide
Arial, 32 Pt Font
Shaded; Color – Blue (upper right hand corner of palette)
Colonel Show D. Way
1 Apr 03
Arial, 18 pt, bold
CLASSIFICATION (if required)
CLASSIFICATION (if required)
Standard Slides
Charts / Graphs
Classification Markings
Helpful Hints
Any photos should relate to the text and enhance the message of the slide. Use a 1.5 point line around photos
Do not use Clipart
Standard Slides
This slide is the standard background
Title – Arial, Bold, 40 pt unless too long; no smaller than 32
Primary bullets – Arial, 28 pt
Secondary Level – Arial, 24 pt
Third Level – Arial, 20 pt should be the minimum size
Use upper and lower case as required for emphasis and readability
Bold text only for emphasis; do not use shadow
Align bullets under the point in the AF symbol
“Wipe Right” is the standard for slide transitions
Standard Slides, con’t
Colors
Title – Dark Blue (upper right hand of pallet)
Body – Black
Bullets and line spacing – use the default setting whenever possible
Bullets 100% of text
Insert spaces before and after dashes, slashes, and ellipsis unless you are writing an office symbol. For example, use “pilot / nav” and “AETC/CC”
Most importantly
Be consistent within your presentation
Charts / Graphs
Keep as simple as possible
Use the space available ... bigger charts are easier to read
Colors
Goal lines are orange
The primary colors for graphs are orange, green, and dark blue; if additional colors are needed, ensure they do not detract from the message
Red normally indicates a problem area – avoid it unless it’s the message you wish to send
Borders, axis values, and gridlines should be black
Line Charts
Good
Goal
Fiscal Year
Classification Markings
Mark title slide with overall briefing classification
Unclassified
If entire briefing is unclassified — no classification markings needed
Use Green for unclassified markings
Classified
Use classification markings if presented, or saved with other classified briefing
If ... ANY slide in briefing is classified, mark all briefing slides with appropriate classification level
Use Red for classified markings
CLASSIFICATION
CLASSIFICATION
Helpful Hints
Dry run briefings on the equipment you will use
Ensures computers can handle your presentation
Colors may not project overhead as well as they do on your computer screen
Tailor your briefing to the audience
Ensure briefings to CC / CV are presented at the executive level … strive to use 15 slides max
Only use graphics if they enhance the message of the slide
Templates, patches, etc., can be obtained from AETC/CCX, DSN 487-5844
Helpful Hints, con’t
“The Show”
Transitions are OK, but be careful; complex transitions take time and can be distracting
Dual screen briefings are OK in Martin Hall Conf Room and the AETC Conf Center … check for other locations
In both locations the left and right screens must be changed simultaneously
Build briefings with an equal number of left and right slides
Blank slides should be solid black
Chartsmanship: Be consistent!
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .