QsandAsREP7Mar08.xls

XLS spreadsheet 254 KB Posted

Attached to
Retail Electric Provider Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA3002-08-R-0002
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Installation and Mission Support Center Installation Contracting Agency

About this file

Updated Q A - 7 Mar 08

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Retail Electric Provider, newest first.
File Type Posted
QsandAsREP18Mar08.xls XLS spreadsheet
QsandAsREP13Mar08.xls XLS spreadsheet
FA3002-08-R-0002-0003.doc DOC document
QsandAsREP5Mar08.xls XLS spreadsheet
Attendees.pdf PDF
Pre-ProposalConfMinutes.pdf PDF
QsandAsREP.xls XLS spreadsheet
Pre-PropConfSlidesREP.ppt PPT presentation
Q AFormat.doc DOC document
FA3002-08-R-0002-0002.doc DOC document
Pre-proposalConferenceAgenda.doc DOC document
RandolphAFBMap.ppt PPT presentation
Pre-proposalConferenceNotice.doc DOC document
FA3002-08-R-0002-0001.doc DOC document
SectionMAtch1-SubcontractingPlanChecklist.doc DOC document
SectionLAtch4-SubcontractingWorksheet.xls XLS spreadsheet
FA3002-08-R-0002.doc DOC document
SectionLAtch2-PPQuestionnaire.doc DOC document
SectionLAtch1-PPWorksheet.doc DOC document
SectionLAtch3-EvaluationSpreadsheet.xls XLS spreadsheet
DCAAPre-Audits.doc DOC document
Show all 21

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Contracting

This is the official Bidder Question and Answer log for the Retail Electric Provider (REP), solicitation number FA3002-08-R-0002 All Questions and Answers will be posted to this log. Before submitting a Question in the approved format, please review this log to ensure that your question has not already been answered.
Question NumberDate SubmittedQuestion and AnswerRFP/PWS Reference
R-128-Feb-08Q: Will you accept our contract form, or are we required to use an Air Force document? A: The Air Force (as well as all Government agencies) use specific types of contract forms, depending on the type of contract. The apparent successful offeror would also sign the Air Force contract (bilateral agreement) along with a warranted contracting officer.NA
R-228-Feb-08Q: Will REP’s be disqualified if the sub-contracting goals cannot be met? How do we prove/meet this requirement? A: Offerors should propose small business subcontracting goals based on what they feel is achievable. The Air Force goals are not mandatory. The small business subcontracting plan must include information to support how the offeror intends to meet those goals. After award annual reports are required with the actual percentages of small business subcontracting accomplished for the previous year. If the goals are not met, clause 52.219-16, Liquidated Damages - Subcontracting Plan would be used to address this.NA
R-328-Feb-08Q: In event the contract is terminated and hedges are in place post termination date, what is the calculation for determining early termination fees? It states that if the contract is terminated, Government and Contractor shall “negotiate and equitable distribution of all property produced or purchased under the contract, based upon the share of costs incurred by each.” Sec 52.232-22k. However it sounds like the Government’s obligation is limited only to the total amount that was currently allotted to the contract (Sec 252.232-7007). Please verify and/or clarify. A: In the case of a termination, the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) would conduct and audit and termination costs would be negotiated. This may or may not exceed the obligated funds on the contract.Sec 252.232-7007
R-428-Feb-08Q: Please define “Bilateral Modification” for incremental load? Are new esiis expecting to be added at contract price or hopefully market price at time of add? A: A bilateral modification is a mutual agreement to an equitable adjustment should any load be added. During the first six months of supply the government does not anticipate any such addition and the initial pricing should be developed based on what is in the RFP.NA
R-528-Feb-08Q: Due to the volatile nature of the market, it will be extremely difficult to keep the heat rate pricing open for 120 days. (per section L-900 Proposal Due Date Schedule). A: The question indicates a misunderstanding of the Heat Rate Factor. The intent of the factor is to convert a future market price for gas into the relevant electric price. The future market price for gas will be a six month strip price on a date chosen by the government after contract award.L-900
R-628-Feb-08Q: Should we use historical data provided by the TDSP to price the 6 mos Heat Rate Pricing? The RFP indicated that the “minimum quantity to be ordered under this contract during the first year is 7,000,000 kwh.” The Max is 275,000,000kWh. Yes, you should use the historical data.NA
R-728-Feb-08Q: More clarification on the Mobilization price. Mobilization is period of time between Contract Award and Initial Delivery of electricity. This is a one time price which includes development of the SSP, est of SREP, traveling to each of the bases, etc. A: Yes, correctly stated.NA
R-828-Feb-08Q: Sec 52.232-19 states that “Funds are not presently available for performance under this contract beyond 9/30/08.” Due to the indefinite nature of this contract, does this clause exclude the government from its obligation to pay for the Heat Rate portion since it falls during that time period? A: No. Government funds are issued on a fiscal year basis (1 Oct - 30 Sep), however, task orders will be issued and funded for the first 6 months of performance.Sec 52.232-19
R-95-Mar-08Q: Please explain the scope and purpose of the Pre-Award Audit? A: The purpose of the audit is your accounting system must be determined adequate for your company to be eligible for award. The scope is specifically outlined in the attached DCAA preaward accounting system audit program and SF 1408. The purpose of the audit of your financial capability is to provide assistance to the contracting officer for the determination of financial responsibility which is required for your company to be eligible for award. The scope is specifically outlined in the attached DCAA financial capability audit program.NA
R-10Q: Will any information provided to AETC pursuant to this RFP that is labeled as confidential and proprietary be treated as such by the federal government? A: Yes. As stated in Section L, L-903, paragraphs 2.2.1 and 2.2.2, information marked as proprietary IAW FAR 52.215-1(e) will be protected IAW FAR 3.104-4. The release of proposal information is strictly regulated. Penalties for improper release of information include fines and/or prison and loss of employment.
R-11Q: Will any information provided to AETC pursuant to the release letter requested on page 54 be treated as confidential even if the information is not marked as such by the Public Utility Commission of Texas? A: Yes. The Freedom of Information Act, Department of Defense (DoD) Freedom of Information Act Program, DoD Regulation 5400.7/Air Force Supplement paragraoh C3.2.1.4.2 prohibits the release of "information concerning contract performance, income, profits,losses, and expenditures."
R-12Q: To whom should the letter on page 54 be directed at the Public Utility Commission to insure that AETC gets the information that it seeks? A: The Contracting Officer will send the letter to the PUCT Deputy Director of General Law.
R-13
R-14
R-14 CONT
R-15
R-17
R-18
R-19
R-20
R-21
R-22
R-23
R-24
R-25
R-26
R-27
R-28
R-29
R-30
R-31
R-32
R-33
R-34
R-35
R-36
R-37
R-38
R-39
R-40
R-41
R-42
R-43

&L&N&CFOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY&R&D

Technical Questions

This is the official Bidder Question and Answer log for the Retail Electric Provider (REP), solicitation number FA3002-08-R-0002 All Questions and Answers will be posted to this log. Before submitting a Question in the approved format, please review this log to ensure that your question has not already been answered.
Question NumberDate SubmittedQuestion and AnswerRFP/PWS Reference
T-126-Feb-08Q: Please clarify/define exactly what is meant by SREP? Is the establishment of a sub-QSE enough to satisfy this requirement? A: A sub-QSE does NOT satisfy this requirement. An SREP (subordinate REP) is defined in the RFP and is a fully certified REP operating under the control of the contractor REP.C - 2
T-228-Feb-08Q: Can we use a monthly load weighted NYMEX price rather than simple average off some benchmark volumes (i.e., historical usage)? We are not sure by how much the monthly load varies on these accounts but, if it is a significant variance we will be open to spread risk between individual month’s (NYMEX curve shape). How long is open between when we bid our heat rate and the June 1st gas lock date? Also, in Section 2.2.2 Factor: Price; the Natural gas price is set at $7.50. A: Historical data is provided in the Technical Library, as well as, access to TDSP data for each base. Analyses of the load requirements for the first six months is at the offeror's discretion. A monthly load weighted NYMEX price is not acceptable. The gas price of $7.50 is for evaluation purposes only. After contract award the government will select a pricing day and the gas price for calculating the electricity price for the first six months will be determined then. The government believes that this pricing mechanism reduces the price risk for the contractor.Section 2.2.2
T-328-Feb-08Q: I’m not sure what the difference is between a “sleeve adder” and the “service fee adder”. If we procure other generation resources wouldn’t we just be able to schedule it thru our sub-qse and continue to charge the service fee adder? A: The only access to the government meters is through the SREP/QSE. If a situation occurs that necessitates the delivery of other than directly supplied power a sleeving situation may occur. Under the scenario where such a sleeving activity does occur the Sleeving Price Adder will be used instead of the Price Adder as compensation to the Contractor. At your discretion, the Sleeving Price Adder may differ from the Price Adder.NA
T-428-Feb-08Q: Please verify that Heat Rate Factor should include all ancillary costs. A: Correct.NA
T-528-Feb-08Q: No Heat Rate Bandwidth/Swing was provided in the solicitation documents. A: That is correct and it was felt that none was required. Please recognize that the government is not seeking a heat rate - but a "factor" that will convert the NYMEX 6-month strip price to a firm fixed price for electricity for the first six months. Please read the answer to Question T-2 above.NA
T-629-Feb-08Q: Please tell me why the QSE Level IV is required? Will a Level II suffice? A: The government intends to take advantage of all aspects of the deregulated market, to include participating in Ancillary Services. Only a Level IV QSE can engage in Ancillary Services, so a Level II is not acceptable.Page 10 para B4
T-729-Feb-08Q: The referenced section notes that the Contractor must provide a letter of authorization “allowing the Contracting Officer access to their historical load data from the Public Utility Commission of Texas.” This is in addition to providing the Contracting officer with historical load served in the 12 months between December 1, 2006 and November 30, 2007. Why is this necessary? A: The contracting officer must have access to PUC data in order to have independent audit verification of load served.Pg 53 section 7.2.6
T-85-Mar-08Q: After award, will the HR submitted with our initial response be used to compute the fixed priced based on the NYMEX Gas prices determined on the day of pricing? Per answer to Question T-2 - the day of pricing will be determined by the Government after awarding the contract. A: Yes, the HR Factor will be used to price the first six months of electric deliveries.Pg 58 Para 2.2.2
T-95-Mar-08Q: Please explain how the SREP is expected to execute separate power purchase agreements for block sizes less than 25 mw? A: The government is unaware of any restrictions on the size of a block purchase.Pg 10 Para C1.e.13
T-105-Mar-08Q: Can the SREP also service customers other than the 3 AETC locations pursuant to the RFP? A: No. The solicitation says that the SREP will handle only the three AETC bases.Pg 10 Para C.2
T-11
T-12
T-13
T-14
T-15
T-15 CONT
T-16
T-17
T-18
T-19
T-20
T-21
T-22
T-23
T-24
T-25
T-26
T-27
T-28
T-29
T-30
T-31
T-32
T-33
T-34
T-35
T-36
T-37
T-38
T-39
T-40
T-41
T-42
T-43
T-44
T-45
T-46
T-47
T-48
T-49
T-50
T-51
T-52
T-53
T-54
T-55
T-56
T-57
T-58
T-59
T-60
T-61
T-62
T-63
T-64
T-65
T-66
T-67
T-68
T-69
T-70
T-71
T-72
T-73
T-74
T-75
T-76
T-77
T-78
T-79
T-80
T-81
T-82
T-83
T-84
T-85
T-86
T-87
T-88
T-89
T-90
T-91
T-92
T-93
T-94
T-95
T-96
T-97
T-98
T-99
T-100
T-101
T-102
T-103
T-104
T-105
T-106
T-107
T-108
T-109
T-110
T-111
T-112
T-113
T-114
T-115
T-116
T-117
T-118
T-119
T-120
T-121
T-122
T-123
T-124
T-125
T-126
T-127
T-128
T-129
T-130
T-131
T-132
T-133
T-134
T-135
T-136
T-137

&L&N&CFOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY&R&D

MBD00110623/Audit Program.pdf

Master Document – Audit Program

Activity Code 17740 Preaward Survey of Prospective Contractor Accounting System

Version 5.3, dated October 2006

B-1 Planning Considerations

Purpose and Scope

• The major objectives of this audit are to obtain an understanding of the accounting system to appropriately complete the Preaward Survey of Prospective Contractor Accounting System, SF 1408, and to opine as to whether the design of the contractor’s system is acceptable for the award of a prospective Government contract.

• If requested to perform a Preaward Survey of Prospective Contractor Accounting System Audit on a contractor that has an active Government contract, and a recent post contract award accounting system audit has not been performed, contact the requestor to ascertain if a post contract award accounting system audit report would be more useful. If a post contract award accounting system audit has been performed, consider providing a copy of the report to the requestor. Discuss with your supervisor.

References

1. CAM 5-200, “Pre-Award Surveys and Adequacy of Accounting System for Contractual Requirements”

2. FAR 9-105, “Procedures (for determining contractor qualifications)”

3. FAR 9.106, DFARS 209.106, PGI 209.106, “Preaward Surveys”

4. FAR 52.216-16, “Quarterly Limitation on Payments Statement” (FPI contracts); FAR 52.232-20 and FAR 52.232-21, “Limitation of Cost;” FAR 52.232-22(b), “Limitation of Funds.”

5. CAM 14-300, “Contractor Financial Capability Audits and Reporting”

B-1 Preliminary Steps WP Reference

1. Research and Planning

a. Review the audit request to ensure the audit scope addresses any customer concerns. If the contracting officer requests the company’s financial capability to be addressed during this audit, set up a separate Code 17600 – Financial Capability assignment to perform a financial capability risk assessment (CAM 14-300). If the audit request does not specifically ask for the financial capability to be audited as part of this audit, contact the contracting officer to determine if he/she wants a financial capability risk assessment performed. Notify the contracting officer of the commencement of the audit and the expected completion date

(CAM 4-103).

b. Obtain information on the proposed Government contract (e.g., type and amount of contract, special contract provisions, etc.).

c. If a previous preaward accounting system survey was completed, summarize any accounting system deficiencies found in the permanent file and the impact of these deficiencies on this audit.

If a perm file does not exist or is not current, provide a list of items (e.g., organizational charts, financial statements, policies and procedures, etc.) to be obtained during the field visit to the contractor in advance of the entrance conference, so the contractor has additional time to gather the information. Update the permanent file (See CAM 4-405.1).

d. If the evidential matter to be obtained during the audit is highly dependent on computerized information systems, document on working paper B (section 5) the type/brand of the accounting software used and your understanding of the design of the system.

Determine if the controls are adequately designed to ensure the reliability of the computer based data.

When sufficient work is not performed to determine reliability (i.e., reduce audit risk to an acceptable level), qualify the audit report in accordance with CAM 10-210.4a.

e. In planning and performing the examination, consider the fraud risk indicators specific to the audit. The principal sources for the applicable fraud risk indicators are:

• Handbook on Fraud Indicators for Contract Auditors, Section II. (IGDH 7600.3, APO March 31, 1993) located at www.dodig.osd.mil/PUBS/index.html, and

• CAM Figure 4-7-3.

Document in working paper B any identified fraud risk indicators and your response/actions to the identified risks (either individually, or in combination). This should be done at the planning stage of the audit as well as during the audit if risk indicators are disclosed (see CAM 4-702). If no risk indicators are http://www.dodig.osd.mil/PUBS/index.html identified, document this in working paper B.

2. Entrance Conference and Preparation

Arrange and conduct an entrance conference (see CAM 4-302).

Explain to the contractor's representatives that as issues are developed during the audit, they will be furnished to the contractor for fact-finding and timely resolution. This process should facilitate reduced audit cycle time and efforts to respond to and issue the audit report.

3. Initial Risk Assessment

Using the information obtained in steps 1 and 2, prepare an initial risk assessment to determine the scope of the examination (W/P B).

C-1 Preaward Survey (SF 1408) WP Reference

Prepare “Preaward Survey of Prospective Contractor Accounting System” (SF 1408) by completing the following audit steps:

1. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Through observation or discussion, verify that the contractor’s accounting system is in accordance with GAAP. Determine if the contractor has or intends to have an accrual basis accounting system. (SF 1408, Section I)

2. Proper segregation of costs. Verify that controls exist to preclude direct charging of indirect expense and indirect charging of direct contract costs. (SF 1408, Section II, 2a)

3. Direct costs by contract. Verify that the contractor has either a subsidiary job costs ledger or account receivable ledger which accumulates costs by contract at a level of detail consistent with that used by the prospective contractor in its proposal. (SF 1408, Section II, 2b)

4. Allocation of indirect costs. Verify that the indirect costs are accumulated in logical groupings and determine that the groupings are allocated based on benefits accrued to intermediate and final cost objectives. Is the cost accounting system formally documented, with a written description of the contents of bases and pools? (SF 1408, Section II, 2c)

5. Accumulation of costs under general ledger control. Verify that the contractor’s job cost ledger and other books of account are reconcilable and currently posted to the general ledger control accounts. (SF 1408, Section II, 2d)

6. Timekeeping system. Verify that labor is charged to intermediate and final cost objectives based on a timekeeping document (paper or electronic timecards) completed and certified by the employees and approved by the employees’ supervisors. (SF 1408, Section II, 2e)

7. Labor distribution. Verify that labor cost distribution records are reconcilable to payroll records and that labor distribution records trace to and from the cost accumulation records in labor subsidiary or general ledger accounts. (SF 1408, Section II, 2f)

8. Interim determination of costs. Determine that the contractor posts contract costs at least monthly to books of account. (SF 1408, Section II, 2g)

9. Exclusion of Unallowables. Evaluate the contractor’s plan to identify and exclude unallowable cost if the contract is awarded. (FAR 31.201-

6) (SF 1408, Section II, 2h).

10. Costs by Contract Line Item: Can the system be expanded to the requisite level of detail, and does the contractor have procedures to determine what this level might be? (SF 1408, Section II, 2i)

11. Preproduction Costs (Applies primarily to manufacturing contracts):

Are these costs routinely segregated to assist in repricing or follow-on contract pricing? (SF 1408, Section II, 2j)

12. Limitation of Costs: Can the interim indirect expense rates be readily calculated from the books of accounts, and are the interim rates routinely monitored?

Who is responsible for monitoring total contract expenditure against contract limitations on price or cost, and how frequently is this reviewed? Are controls in place to ensure compliance with the reporting requirements of FAR 52.216-16 or FAR 52.232-20, -21 and -22? (SF 1408, Section II, 3a)

13. Billings (e.g. progress payments, public vouchers): Does the contractor have controls or procedures that would provide that interim billings of direct cost are prepared directly from the books and records, excluding unallowable costs. Does the contractor have procedures to ensure that subcontractor and vendor costs are only included in billings if payment to the subcontractor or vendor will be made in accordance with the terms and conditions of the subcontract or invoice and ordinarily within 30 days of the contractor’s payment request to the Government? Can billings be reconciled to the cost accounts for both current and cumulative amounts claimed? (CAM 6-

1006) (SF 1408, Section II, 3b)

14. Adequate, Reliable Data: Is the contractor’s system capable of producing cost information at a sufficient level of detail for use in pricing follow-on contracts. (SF 1408, Section II, 4)

15. Accounting system in operation. Is the accounting system in full operation? If not, which portions are in operation and what is the status of implementing the full accounting system? (SF 1408, Section

II, 5)

A-1 Concluding Steps WP Reference

1. Summary Steps

a. If there are open or partially completed items, follow-up and resolve them at this time and summarize audit results.

b. Complete, index and cross reference working papers.

c. Discuss results of audit with your supervisory auditor. Hold and document an exit conference.

d. Take appropriate action to effect correction of noted deficiencies.

This may include additional evaluation under an assignment in another audit area, noncompliance or system deficiency reports, cost suspension or disapproval, etc.

e. Prepare draft report and SF 1408 to be furnished as part of the audit report.

f. Prepare or update ICQ, as appropriate, based on the results of this audit. Once complete, file document in Electronic Permanent File for future use.

g. Update the permanent file.

MBD00110624/FC Audit Program.pdf

Master Document – Audit Planning

Activity Code 17610 Financial Capability, Modified Financial Condition Risk Assessment

Version 3.1, dated July 2007 B-1 Planning Considerations

Purpose and Scope

The purpose of the modified financial condition risk assessment is to determine if there are any significant indicators of financial distress that would warrant performance of a detailed financial condition risk assessment or financial capability audit. A modified risk assessment consists of analyzing the trends of the contractor’s key financial statement elements and any significant events which would impact the contractor’s financial condition. FAOs will perform annually either a detailed or modified financial condition risk assessment for all contractors with Government sales over $15 million in accordance with CAM 14-303. FAOs will perform an annual modified financial condition risk assessment for contractors with Government sales between $1 million and $15 million, in conjunction with other field visits (CAM 14-303b).

References

1. FAR 9.104-1, General Standards

2. DFARS 232.072, Financial Responsibility of Contractors

3. SAS 59, The Entity's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern

4. CAM 14-304, Financial Condition Risk Assessment Procedures

B-1 Preliminary Steps

Version 3.1, dated July 2007 WP Reference

1. Research and Planning

a. Financial condition risk assessments/financial capability audits are generally performed at the parent company. If this is a risk assessment covering a contractor segment, ensure that an exception for performing the risk assessment at the segment level applies

(CAM 14-302).

b. Contact the contract administrative office to determine if there are any specific areas of concern. Request the details of any financial analyses already performed by their offices to avoid duplication

(i.e., financial ratio analyses, bond rating analyses, etc.).

c. Conduct an entrance conference. Ask the contractor if there are any significant events that have occurred (sale of a division, loss of a contract, large layoff, new contract, buying larger plant, etc.).

d. Document any significant or unfavorable events that would impact the contractor’s financial status (loss of a contract, major layoff, sale of a division, etc.). The existence of this type of information may be contained within the permanent files, audit lead sheets, ICAPS/ICQ, or local newspaper articles or obtained through discussions with the contractor, supervisor, or auditor that normally works at the contractor location.

2. Risk Assessment

a. Trend Analysis of Key Financial Statement Elements. Review the trends of the following financial statement elements for the most recently completed fiscal year and the previous two fiscal years.

(CAM 14-304f). If the financial statements are unaudited, the auditor should consider additional steps to verify the financial information prior to analyzing the trends, [e.g., compare key financial statement amounts (total assets, total liabilities, etc.) to the general ledger or tax returns to validate data in the unaudited financial statements]. If consistent unfavorable or adverse trends are noted, obtain and verify any explanation from the contractor and any actions being taken to improve the conditions.

(1) Analyze the trends of the following financial statement elements:

• Profit/loss

• Sales

• Cash Flow from:

o Operating activities o Investing activities o Financing activities

• Working Capital (Current assets minus current liabilities)

• Net Worth (Total assets minus total liabilities)

• Long-term Liabilities

(2) The notes to the financial statements and/or the SEC filings (10K and 10Q) should be reviewed for any conditions or statements that may indicate financial risk requiring further inquiry/review. Determine if there is a going concern comment in the most recent financial statements. If so, this is a high risk indicator that requires further analysis.

b. Timely Payment of Payroll Taxes. Determine if the contractor is paying its payroll taxes on a timely basis (CAM 14-304h). [Note:

Contractor delays or the nonpayment of payroll taxes may affect the allowability of claimed and billed costs and should be promptly discussed with the Supervisory Auditor.]

c. Document whether there are any (1) significant unfavorable or adverse trends or (2) issues relating to the payment of payroll taxes that would have a detrimental impact on the contractor’s financial condition that would require the performance of a detailed financial condition risk assessment.

A-1 Concluding Steps

Version 3.1, dated July 2007 WP Reference

1. Summarize the results of the modified risk assessment in a Memorandum for Record if no significant indicators of financial distress were disclosed. [If results of this assessment indicate that a detailed financial condition risk assessment needs to be performed, close this assignment and begin a new APPS Working Paper Assignment using a 17600 code for Financial Capability Audit.]

2. Coordinate the results of the modified risk assessment with the Supervisory Auditor.

3. Hold an exit conference with the contractor and disclose that we are closing our financial condition evaluation without performing any additional risk assessment procedures, and that a report will not be issued.

4. If the modified risk assessment is performed at a parent or a corporate office, distribute the memorandum to all cognizant DCAA offices.

Include a transmittal letter advising that the memorandum contains sensitive information and should not be released outside of DCAA.

5. Update permanent files.

B-1

Planning Considerations

MBD00110622/Sf1408.pdf

���35263(&7,9(�&2175$&725 6�$&&2817,1*�6<67(0�,6�$&&(37$%/(�)25�$:$5'�2)�35263&7,9(�&2175$&7

<(6 12��([SODLQ�LQ����1$55$7,9(�

<(6��:,7+�$�5(&200(1'$7,21�7+$7�$�)2//2:�21�$&&2817,1*�6<67(0�5(9,(:�%(�3(5)250('�$)7(5�&2175$&7�$:$5'

�([SODLQ�LQ����1$55$7,9(�

35($:$5'�6859(<�2)�35263(&7,9(�&2175$&725

$&&2817,1*�6<67(0

3XEOLF�UHSRUWLQJ�EXUGHQ�IRU�WKLV�FROOHFWLRQ�RI�LQIRUPDWLRQ�LV�HVWLPDWHG�WR�DYHUDJH����KRXUV�SHU�UHVSRQVH��LQFOXGLQJ�WKH�WLPH�IRU�UHYLHZLQJ LQVWUXFWLRQV��VHDUFKLQJ�H[LVWLQJ�GDWD�VRXUFHV��JDWKHULQJ�DQG�PDLQWDLQLQJ�WKH�GDWD�QHHGHG��DQG�FRPSOHWLQJ�DQG�UHYLHZLQJ�WKH�FROOHFWLRQ RI�LQIRUPDWLRQ���6HQG�FRPPHQWV�UHJDUGLQJ�WKLV�EXUGHQ�HVWLPDWH�RU�DQ\�RWKHU�DVSHFW�RI�WKLV�FROOHFWLRQ�RI�LQIRUPDWLRQ��LQFOXGLQJ VXJJHVWLRQV�IRU�UHGXFLQJ�WKLV�EXUGHQ��WR�)$5�6HFUHWDULDW��956���2IILFH�RI�)HGHUDO�$FTXLVLWLRQ�DQG�5HJXODWRU\�3ROLF\��*6$��:DVKLQJWRQ� '&��������DQG�WR�WKH�2IILFH�RI�0DQDJHPHQW�DQG�%XGJHW��3DSHUZRUN�5HGXFWLRQ�3URMHFW��������������:DVKLQJWRQ��'&�������

6(&7,21�,���5(&200(1'$7,21

���1$55$7,9(��&ODULILFDWLRQ�RI�GHILFLHQFLHV��DQG�RWKHU�SHUWLQHQW�FRPPHQWV����,I�DGGLWLRQDO�VSDFH�LV�UHTXLUHG��FRQWLQXH�RQ�SODLQ�VKHHWV�RI�SDSHU��

6(5,$/�12���)RU�VXUYH\LQJ�DFWLYLW\�XVH�

35263(&7,9(�&2175$&725

20%�1R�����������

([SLUHV� ��������

���6859(< 0$'(�%<

���6859(< 5(9,(:,1* 2)),&,$/

D��6,*1$785(�$1'�2)),&(��,QFOXGH�W\SHG�RU�SULQWHG�QDPH�

D��6,*1$785(�$1'�2)),&(��,QFOXGH�W\SHG�RU�SULQWHG�QDPH�

E�7(/(3+21(�12�

�LQFOXGH�DUHD�FRGH�

E�7(/(3+21(�12�

�LQFOXGH��DUHD�FRGH�

F��'$7(�6,*1('

F��'$7(�5(9,(:('

67$1'$5'�)250�������5(9�������

3UHVFULEHG� E\�*6$

)$5�����&)5�����������I�

,)�&217,18$7,21�6+((76 $77$&+('���0$5.�+(5(

$87+25,=('�)25�/2&$/�5(352'8&7,21

3UHYLRXV� HGLWLRQ� XVDEOH

6(&7,21�,,���(9$/8$7,21�&+(&./,67

0$5.��;��,1�7+(��$335235,$7(���&2/801���([SODLQ��DQ\�GHILFLHQFLHV���LQ�6(&7,21��,�1$55$7,9(� <(6 12

$33/,&�

�� (;&(37�$6�67$7('�,1�6(&7,21�,�1$55$7,9(��,6�7+(�$&&2817,1*�6<67(0�,1�$&&25'�:,7+�

*(1(5$//<�$&&(37('�$&&2817,1*�35,1&,3/(6�$33/,&$%/(�,1�7+(�&,5&8067$1&(6"

�� $&&2817,1*���6<67(0���3529,'(6���)25�

D� 3URSHU�VHJUHJDWLRQ�RI�GLUHFW�FRVWV�IURP�LQGLUHFW�FRVWV�

E� ,GHQWLILFDWLRQ�DQG�DFFXPXODWLRQ�RI�GLUHFW�FRVWV�E\�FRQWUDFW�

F� $�ORJLFDO�DQG�FRQVLVWHQW�PHWKRG�IRU�WKH�DOORFDWLRQ�RI�LQGLUHFW�FRVWV�WR�LQWHUPHGLDWH�DQG�ILQDO�FRVW�

REMHFWLYHV����$�FRQWUDFW�LV�D�ILQDO�FRVW�REMHFWLYH��

G� $FFXPODWLRQ�RI�FRVWV�XQGHU�JHQHUDO�OHGJHU�FRQWURO�

H� $�WLPHNHHSLQJ�V\VWHP�WKDW�LGHQWLILHV�HPSOR\HHV

�ODERU�E\�LQWHUPHGLDWH�RU�ILQDO�FRVW�REMHFWLYHV�

I� $�ODERU�GLVWULEXWLRQ�V\VWHP�WKDW�FKDUJHV�GLUHFW�DQG�LQGLUHFW�ODERU�WR�WKH�DSSURSULDWH�FRVW�REMHFWLYHV�

J� ,QWHULP��DW�OHDVW�PRQWKO\��GHWHUPLQDWLRQ�RI�FRVWV�FKDUJHG�WR�D�FRQWUDFW�WKURXJK�URXWLQH�SRVWLQJ�RI�

ERRNV RI�DFFRXQW�

K� ([FOXVLRQ�IURP�FRVWV�FKDUJHG�WR�JRYHUQPHQW�FRQWUDFWV�RI�DPRXQWV�ZKLFK�DUH�QRW�DOORZDEOH�LQ�WHUPV�RI�

)$5�����&RQWUDFW�&RVW�3ULQFLSOHV�DQG�3URFHGXUHV��RU�RWKHU�FRQWUDFW�SURYLVLRQV�

L� ,GHQWLILFDWLRQ�RI�FRVWV�E\�FRQWUDFW�OLQH�LWHP�DQG�E\�XQLWV��DV�LI�HDFK�XQLW�RU�OLQH�LWHP�ZHUH�D�VHSDUDWH�

FRQWUDFW��LI�UHTXLUHG�E\�WKH�SURSRVHG�FRQWUDFW�

M� 6HJUHJDWLRQ�RI�SUHSURGXFWLRQ�FRVWV�IURP�SURGXFWLRQ�FRVWV�

�� $&&2817,1*���6<67(0���3529,'(6���),1$1&,$/���,1)250$7,21�

D� 5HTXLUHG�E\�FRQWUDFW�FODXVHV�FRQFHUQLQJ�OLPLWDWLRQ�RI�FRVW��)$5�����������DQG�����RU�OLPLWDWLRQ�RQ�

SD\PHQWV��)$5������������

E� 5HTXLUHG�WR�VXSSRUW�UHTXHVWV�IRU�SURJUHVV�SD\PHQWV�

�� ,6�7+(�$&&2817,1*�6<67(0�'(6,*1('��$1'�$5(�7+(�5(&25'6�0$,17$,1('�,1�68&+�$�0$11(5

7+$7�$'(48$7(��5(/,$%/(�'$7$�$5(�'(9(/23('�)25�86(�,1�35,&,1*�)2//2:�21�$&48,6,7216"

�� ,6�7+(��$&&2817,1*���6<67(0��&855(17/<���,1�)8//��23(5$7,21"

�,I�QRW��GHVFULEH�LQ�6HFWLRQ�,�1DUUDWLYH�ZKLFK�SRUWLRQV�DUH

����LQ�RSHUDWLRQ������VHW�XS��EXW�QRW�\HW�LQ�RSHUDWLRQ�

����DQWLFLSDWHG��RU�����QRQH[LVWHQW��

*6$�)250�������5(9������� �%$&.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .