Attach_14_-_PPQ.docx
DOCX document 26 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Flight Test Support Services
- Solicitation number
- FA2823-18-R-0001
About this file
Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| FA2823-18-R-0001_Amend_01.pdf | ||
| Attach_1-__PWS_22_May_2018.pdf | ||
| Attach_15_-_FRQ.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attach_12_-_First_TO_Price_Proposal.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attach_13_-_PPI.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attach_6_-_Annex_A.pdf | ||
| Attach_2_-_QASP.pdf | ||
| Attach_16_-_252-209-7999_Cert.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attach_3_-_Draft_DD254.pdf | ||
| Exhibit_A_-_CDRL.pdf | ||
| Attach_9_-_Annex_D.pdf | ||
| Attach_5_-_Price_List_Tables.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attach_10_-_Annex_E.pdf | ||
| Attach_11_-_SOW_First_TO.pdf | ||
| Attach_4_-_WD_2015-4531_Rev_6.pdf | ||
| FA2823-18-R-0001.pdf | ||
| Attach_8_-_Annex_C.pdf | ||
| Attach_7_-_Annex_B.pdf | ||
| Attach_4_-_Exhibit_B.pdf | ||
| Attach_1_-_PWS.pdf | ||
| Attach_2_-_QASP.pdf | ||
| Attach_3_-_Exhibit_A.pdf |
Show all 22
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Request for Proposal: FA2823-18-R-0001 Flight Test Support, Eglin AFB, FL 32542
To Be Completed by Offeror/Contractor:
Name of Contractor:
Point of Contact:
Telephone #:
E-Mail:
We are currently in the process of preparing our proposal for Solicitation Number FA2823-18-R-0001, to provide Flight Test Support at Eglin AFB, Florida. As part of our proposal, we have offered as a reference on our performance for this type of work, under the previous/current contract listed below, with your company. Your input on our performance is therefore requested. Please complete this survey and provide a sufficient description so this contract may be evaluated whether it is the same or similar in scope to this solicitation. Please return to the Point of Contact listed above so that it may be provided with proposal, per solicitation instructions. Thank you. Survey is due no later than
To Be Completed by Assessor:
1. Name of Prime Contractor: _______
Contract or Identifying Number: ______________
Title/Description of Contract: ______________
Based upon the definitions below, indicate your assessment of the contractor’s performance on your contract. Your assessment should consider the contractor’s performance in accordance with the contractual requirements.
2. Brief description of scope of work:
EVALUATION: Please rate the Contractor utilizing the guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.
| Assessment |
| Definition |
| Substantial Confidence (SC) |
| Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
Satisfactory Confidence
(SAT)
Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, The Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Neutral Confidence
(UNK)
No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.
Limited Confidence
(LC)
Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, The Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
No Confidence
(NC)
Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, The Government has no expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Contract or Identifying Number: ______________
| # |
| Performance Objectives |
| Confidence |
| 01 |
| Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary qualified personnel during the contract period (i.e. aircrew and maintenance staff were authorized, trained, qualified, and current for operations.) |
| SC |
| SAT |
| LC |
| NC |
| UNK |
| 02 |
| Followed approved quality control plan. |
| SC |
| SAT |
| LC |
| NC |
| UNK |
| 03 |
| Provided effective quality control and /or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements. |
| SC |
| SAT |
| LC |
| NC |
| UNK |
| 04 |
| Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures. |
| SC |
| SAT |
| LC |
| NC |
| UNK |
| 05 |
| Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies. |
| SC |
| SAT |
| LC |
| NC |
| UNK |
| 06 |
| Identified risks/problems as they occurred. |
| SC |
| SAT |
| LC |
| NC |
| UNK |
| 07 |
| Displayed initiative to solve problems. |
| SC |
| SAT |
| LC |
| NC |
| UNK |
| 08 |
| Met established project schedules. |
| SC |
| SAT |
| LC |
| NC |
| UNK |
| 09 |
| Was responsive to contract changes. |
| SC |
| SAT |
| LC |
| NC |
| UNK |
| 10 |
| Provide adequate project supervision. |
| SC |
| SAT |
| LC |
| NC |
| UNK |
| 11 |
| Cooperated with Government personnel after award. |
| SC |
| SAT |
| LC |
| NC |
| UNK |
| 12 |
| Demonstrated responsiveness to short notice tasking (i.e. performed flight within required timeframe) |
| SC |
| SAT |
| LC |
| NC |
| UNK |
| 13 |
| Demonstrated the ability to properly control classified data. |
| SC |
| SAT |
| LC |
| NC |
| UNK |
| 14 |
| Had resources available to modify aircraft IAW FAA regulations and assured compliance during flight test operations. |
| SC |
| SAT |
| LC |
| NC |
| UNK |
| 15 |
| Had required aircraft available and capable of flying mission prior to flight test operations. |
| SC |
| SAT |
| LC |
| NC |
| UNK |
| 16 |
| Demonstrated the ability to complete sorties as scheduled. |
| SC |
| SAT |
| LC |
| NC |
| UNK |
| 17 |
| Demonstrated ability to support military test authorization process. |
| SC |
| SAT |
| LC |
| NC |
| UNK |
| 18 |
| Displayed engineering design ingenuity in responding to customer requirements. |
| SC |
| SAT |
| LC |
| NC |
| UNK |
| 19 |
| Demonstrated the ability to support TDY off-site test locations. |
| SC |
| SAT |
| LC |
| NC |
| UNK |
| 20 |
| Demonstrated the ability to conduct flight test using military runways and ranges. |
| SC |
| SAT |
| LC |
| NC |
| UNK |
| 21 |
| Demonstrated the ability to legally and ethically conduct business with other contractors (while considering security, proprietary information, and customer’s requirements). |
| SC |
| SAT |
| LC |
| NC |
| UNK |
| 22 |
| Did the contractor exhibit proper care for GFE property and return it in working condition? |
| SC |
| SAT |
| LC |
| NC |
| UNK |
| 23 |
| How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? |
| SC |
| SAT |
| LC |
| NC |
| UNK |
| 24 |
| Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.” |
| YES |
| No |
| 25 |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” |
| YES |
| No |
| 26 |
| Is the contractor rated in CPARS? |
| YES |
| No |
BRIEF EXPLANATION OF OVERALL RATING GIVEN:
Contract or Identifying Number:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
Name of Person Completing Evaluation:
Base/Company: Date:
Position Title/Grade: Phone:
Email: Fax:
PPQ for FA2823-18-R-0001 Flight Test Support Services at Eglin AFB, FL
File details come from the government source that posted it.