ATTACHMENT L-4 Past Performance Questionaire.pdf

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

FA2823-09-R-0007

Attachment L-4

PAGE 1of 5

Attachment L-4

COVER LETTER and QUESTIONNAIRE for the

Eglin Simplified Acquisition Base Engineering Requirements

PAGE 2of 5

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

HEADQUARTERS AIR ARMAMENT CENTER (AFMC)

EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE, FLORIDA

MEMORANDUM FOR QUESTIONNAIRE EVALUATORS

FROM: 96 CONS/PKA

SUBJECT: Request for Source Selection Information

The 96 th Contracting Squadron at Eglin Air Force Base (AFB), FL is in the process of selecting a contractor for the Simplified Acquisition Base Engineering Requirements (SABER) contract.

Detailed information regarding this solicitation may be found at www.fbo.gov (refer to RFP

FA2823-09-R-0007).

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offeror’s past and present performance on contracts, which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from agencies such as yours, which have had first hand experience with an offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts.

Our areas of interest in the offeror are summarized in the attached questionnaire. Our schedule is extremely tight; therefore, your written response is needed no later than 5 working days from the receipt of this letter. The preferred method of transmission is FAX. The Offeror’s POCs may fax their completed Past/Present Performance Questionnaires directly to Captain Brian

Hurley at (850) 882-6066. Mailing the questionnaires to the address listed below is an acceptable alternative method of transmission. If mailing, the outside of the envelope must be marked as follows: TO BE OPENED BY ADDRESSEE ONLY. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official source selection records. To facilitate open and honest responses, the completed questionnaires are to be sent directly to the POC listed below. Do not return questionnaires to the Offeror.

Source Selection Facility

ATTN: Captain Brian Hurley, AAC/PKET

205 West D Avenue, Building 373

Eglin AFB, FL 32542

Your assistance is greatly appreciated, and your prompt response will be important to the successful and timely completion of this source selection.

//ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED//

BRIAN J. HURLEY, CAPT, USAF

Contracting Officer

Attachment:

Past/Present Performance Questionnaire www.fbo.gov%20

PAGE 3of 5

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Request for Proposal: FA2823-09-R-0007 Eglin Simplified Acquisition Engineering Requirements

(SABER)

1. Instructions: Please complete this questionnaire based on the following guidance.

Please take the time to answer the questions to the best of your knowledge. Circle the responses that best describe the contractor’s performance, and write in a narrative explanation for your answer. Use a N/A rating to indicate that you have no performance information for that particular area, or the question does not apply to you. Each question has space for your comments. If more space is needed, please attach additional sheets to the end of the questionnaire and reference the respective question. Handwritten (ink) responses are sufficient.

We urge you to supplement your own knowledge of the offeror’s performance with the judgment of others in your organization. In addition to completing the attached questionnaire for the identified contract, we solicit your comments on other similar programs for which your office has contracts with this offeror.

Name of Contractor: _____________________________

Title/Description of Proposed Project:

Based upon the definitions below, indicate your assessment of this contractor’s performance on your project described on the Fax Cover Sheet. Your assessment should consider the contractor’s performance in accordance with the contractual requirements.

Assessment Definition

Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has an expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Limited Confidence Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Unknown Confidence No performance record is identifiable or the offeror’s performance record is so limited that no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

CONFORMANCE TO SPECIFICATIONS AND CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

1. Contractor developed realistic progress schedules and completed the project within the established schedule.

Substantial Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Limited Confidence No Confidence Unknown

BRIEF EXPLANATION OF RATING GIVEN:

PAGE 4of 5

2. Contractor provided submittals in a timely manner. Submittals were well researched and clearly identified the proposed item.

Substantial Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Limited Confidence No Confidence Unknown

BRIEF EXPLANATION OF RATING GIVEN:

3. Contractor provided timely and accurate payrolls with no known labor violations (Davis-Bacon Act) or labor claims.

Substantial Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Limited Confidence No Confidence Unknown

BRIEF EXPLANATION OF RATING GIVEN:

MANAGEMENT OF THE PROJECT

4. Contractor provided experienced managers and supervisors, with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

Substantial Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Limited Confidence No Confidence Unknown

BRIEF EXPLANATION OF RATING GIVEN:

5. Contractor hired quality subcontractors and effectively managed them.

Substantial Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Limited Confidence No Confidence Unknown

BRIEF EXPLANATION OF RATING GIVEN:

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

6. Contractor identified problems as they occurred. Suggested approaches to problems. Displayed initiative and cooperation to solve problems. Provided adequate information and pricing for change orders and negotiated them in good faith.

Substantial Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Limited Confidence No Confidence Unknown

BRIEF EXPLANATION OF RATING GIVEN:

QUALITY CONTROL

7. Contractor provided effective quality control, which resulted in a quality-finished product.

Substantial Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Limited Confidence No Confidence Unknown

BRIEF EXPLANATION OF RATING GIVEN:

PAGE 5of 5

8. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract?

If yes, explain in “comments.” Yes No

Comments:

9. Would you hire this contractor again?

If no, explain in “comments.” Yes No

BRIEF EXPLANATION OF RATING GIVEN:

Overall Rating: _________________________________

Name of Evaluator: ________________________ E-Mail: ____________________________________

Position Title /Grade: ______________________ Phone (Commercial/DSN):_____________________

Company/City or Base: _____________________ Date questionnaire completed: ____________________

THANK YOU FOR YOUR PROMPT RESPONSE AND ASSISTANCE!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

Mailing address: Source Selection Facility

ATTN: Captain Brian Hurley, AAC/PKZB

205 West D Avenue, Building 373

Eglin AFB, FL 32542

Or FAX to: (850) 882-6066