Bridge_Inspection_Report_5140-074P.pdf

PDF 2 MB Posted

Attached to
Blue Ridge Parkway Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
DTFH71-17-B-00020
Issued by
Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration

About this file

Bridge Inspection Report_5140-074P

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Blue Ridge Parkway, newest first.
File Type Posted
ROBO_-_FTNP-BLRI_2A15.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Report_5140-077P.pdf PDF
IFB_Solicitation_-_FTNP-BLRI_2A15.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Report_5140-132P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Report_5140-076P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Report_5140-088P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Report_5140-084P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Report_5140-082P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Report_5140-083P.pdf PDF
Report_Pavement.pdf PDF
ADV_Subcontracting_plan.doc DOC document
ADV_Bidder's_Qualifications_Form.doc DOC document
Bridge_Inspection_Report_5140-081P.pdf PDF
FP14_Eng.pdf PDF
Report_NEPA.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Report_5140-078P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Report_5140-075P.pdf PDF
Plans_-_FTNP-BLRI_2A15.pdf PDF
VETS-4212_Form.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Report_5140-080P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Report_5140-079P.pdf PDF
Show all 21

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

NC ROUTE 18 BRIDGE

BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY OVER NC ROUTE 18

BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY

LN

STRUCTURE NO. 5140-074P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 6/8/15

Report prepared by: ES

MILE POINT: 217.43

Federal Highway Administration KILOMETER POINT: 349.70 Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5140-074P

NC ROUTE 18 BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 6/8/15

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... FRAME NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 44.4 FT (13.5 M)

DECK TYPE: ......................... NOT APPLICABLE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 44.4 FT (13.5 M) WEARING SURFACE: .......... BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ...................... 35.8 FT (10.9 M) ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 31.8 FT (9.7 M)

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ N/A YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 2A7 / 3023 SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 8 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1983-JOINT REPAIR.

LOCATION

BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 217.43 (KM PT 349.70)

STATE: ................................. NORTH CAROLINA LOCATION: 3.1 MILES FROM NC ROUTE 1461

FACILITY CARRIED: ............ BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. NC ROUTE 18

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete frame bridge is in good condition overall. Problems at this time include minor to moderate deterioration of the mortar joints in the northwest retaining wall, moderate to severe deterioration of the vertical expansion joint filler, and a damaged vertical clearance sign on the underpass roadway. Another problem is the inadequate drainage along the shoulders of the underpass roadway, which is causing moderate ponding along the northwest retaining wall and both abutments.

Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to help prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: M. REGER, H. SALAD

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

MICHAEL REGER, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER 703-948-1424

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 12/31/15

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-074P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT COST

UNIT

ESTIMATE

COST

PRELIM.

223.1 REPOINT MORTAR JOINTS IN NORTHWEST RETAINING WALL AS NECESSARY. 50 LF

60.12, 222.9, 223.6

GRADE UNDERPASS ROADWAY SHOULDERS TO ELEVATE PONDING AT RETAINING

WALL AND BOTH ABUTMENTS.

1 LS

58.6, 60.8 RESEAL VERTICAL JOINT FILLER MATERIAL AS NEEDED. 80 LF

222.7 REPLACE DAMAGED VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGN AT WEST APPROACH. 1 EA

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS) QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST ESTIMATES

PRELIM. COST

REHAB. RECONSTR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL: ...

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140-074P

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

N

58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

OTHER

ALIGNMENT

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

FASCIA(E)

DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

TRUSSES

FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

GIRDERS OR BEAMS

BEARING DEVICES

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

OTHER

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

UTILITIES

DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

RIDEABILITY

WEARING SURFACE

EXPANSION JOINTS

DECK SLAB

ABUTMENTS

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

1.

10.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

PAINT

11.

N

N N G N N N N G G

N G

G G N G G N

N

N

N

N

58.3 MINOR MAP CRACKING THROUGHOUT PAVEMENT.

58.6 SEVERE DETERIORATION OF EXPANSION JOINT FILLER IN PARAPET

JOINTS. MINOR CRACKING OF PARAPET MASONRY MORTAR

JOINTS. MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG AND AT PARAPET

ENDS.

59.3 MINOR SPALLS/POPOUTS ON ARCH UNDERSIDE WITH EXPOSED

REBAR DUE TO INSUFFICIENT CONCRETE COVER. LONGITUDINAL

CRACK EXTENDING NORTH 12' FROM SOUTH ABUTMENT ON WEST

SIDE OF ARCH UNDERSIDE.

59.8 MODERATE EFFLORESCENCE ON FASCIA RING STONES.

60.1 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF BREASTWALLS. MINOR

EFFLORESCENCE ON WEST SIDE OF NORTH ABUTMENT, AND EAST

SIDE OF SOUTH ABUTMENT. MINOR GRAFFITI ON SOUTH

ABUTMENT BREASTWALL.

60.6 MINOR DETERIORATION OF WINGWALL MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS.

MINOR VINE GROWTH ON NORTH WINGWALLS. MINOR EROSION

ALONG SOUTHWEST WINGWALL.

60.7 MINOR EMBANKMENT LOSS FROM WEEP HOLES. SEE ALSO 60.12,

222.9, 223.6.

60.8 MODERATE TO SEVERE DETERIORATION OF JOINT FILLER IN

VERTICAL EXPANSION JOINTS.

60.12, 222.9, 223.6

MODERATE PONDING ALONG UNDERPASS ROADWAY SHOULDERS

DUE TO INADEQUATE DRAINAGE. PONDING AT BASE OF

NORTHWEST RETAINING WALL AND UP TO WEEP HOLES AT BOTH

ABUTMENTS.

BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS1. G

PILE BENTS 2. N

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS 3. N

BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS 4. N

FOUNDATIONS 5. N

WINGWALLS 6. G

WEEP HOLES7. G

EXPANSION JOINTS 8. P

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR9. G

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION10. G

SLOPE PROTECTION11. N

OTHER (DRAINAGE) 12. P

PIER(S)

N13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

N14. PILE BENTS

N15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

N16. FOUNDATIONS

N17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

N18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

N19. OTHER

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140-074P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.

ALIGNMENT1.

61. CHANNEL N

222. APPROACHES 7

OTHER 9.

ALIGNMENT8.

SIGNS 7.

SETTLEMENT6.

EROSION5.

SURFACING 4.

APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.

RELIEF JOINTS2.

1. APPROACH SLABS

(DRAINAGE)

N N N G G G G G P

223. RETAINING WALL 6

OTHER 6.

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION5.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR4.

FOUNDATION3.

WEEP HOLES2.

1. WALL

(DRAINAGE)

F N N G G P

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS D.

APPROACH GUARDRAILS C.

TRANSITIONS B.

BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 0

N N N

222.4 MINOR RANDOM CRACKING OF APPROACH PAVEMENT.

222.7 13'-7" VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGNS POSTED AT UNDERPASS

APPROACHES. DAMAGED VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGN AT WEST

APPROACH.

222.9 MODERATE MAP CRACKING ALONG SOUTH CURBLINE OF

UNDERPASS ROADWAY.

223.1 MINOR TO MODERATE DETERIORATION OF MORTAR JOINTS IN

NORTHWEST RETAINING WALL.

36.A PARAPET HEIGHT OF 1'-5" DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM SAFETY

HEIGHT GUIDELINES OF 2'-3" FOR TRAFFIC BARRIERS.

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

N

Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

Meets currently acceptable standards.

Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5140-074P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 15 14 25 23

HS 20 18 33 30

TYPE 3 18 16 30 27

TYPE 3S2 29 26 48 43

TYPE 3-3 35 32 58 53

DESIGN LOADING: H15 (M13.5)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140-074P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY (1) STATE: ....................................... 374 - NORTH CAROLINA (NC)

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... NC ROUTE 18 BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 005 - ALLEGHANY

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5140-074P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... NC ROUTE 18

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 074P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5140074P0000000

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 3.1 MILES FROM NC ROUTE

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. BLUFFS (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 2A7 (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 217.43 (KM PT 349.70)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 3023 (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

1 - CONCRETE

07 - FRAME

44.4 FT (13.5 M)

44.4 FT (13.5 M)

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

6 - N/A

6 - N/A

N - NOT APPLICABLE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 2 - H15 (M13.5) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 19.8 TONS (18.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 33.1 TONS (30.0 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 6/15 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140-074P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 31.8 FT (9.7 M) (16) LATITUDE: ............................. 36°33'24.20"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 80°54'30.40"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 25 MI (40 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 02

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 1 - HIGHWAY

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... N

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 11.3 FT (3.4 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK: ................................. N

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL: .......................... N

(62) CULVERT: ........................... N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL:

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 0NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(52) DECK WIDTH:

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:

LEFT SHOULDER:

RIGHT SHOULDER:

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:

(34) SKEW ANGLE:

(35) DECK FLARE?:

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT :

RIGHT :

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION:

MATERIAL:

DESIGN TYPE:

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:

35.8 FT (10.9 M)

29.3 FT (8.9 M)

21.3 FT (6.5 M)

4.0 FT (1.2 M)

4.0 FT (1.2 M)

0 - NO MEDIAN

8 °

NO

31.8 FT (9.7 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

3 - PARAPET ONLY

9 - OTHER

1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

2.17 FT (0.66 M)

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

13.58 FT (4.14 M)

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

N - Not over waterway.

1 - MAINTENANCE

D - MINOR

$0

$0

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1983-JOINT REPAIR.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5140-074P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-074P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTHBOUND TOWARD BLOWING ROCK

PHOTO #2 - WEST SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW

LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL CRACKING OF PAVEMENT

OVER STRUCTURE

PHOTO #5 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF

PARAPET JOINT FILLER MATERIAL,

NORTHEAST JOINT SHOWN

PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL CLEAR ZONE AT PARAPET

ENDS, NORTHWEST PARAPET END SHOWN

PHOTO #7 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO #8 - TYPICAL EXPOSED REBAR DUE TO INSUFFICIENT

CONCRETE COVER ON DECK UNDERSIDE

PHOTO #9 - LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF

DECK UNDERSIDE EXTENDING FROM SOUTH

ABUTMENT

PHOTO #10 - CLOSE-UP VIEW OF PREVIOUS

PHOTO

PHOTO #11 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH

ABUTMENT

PHOTO #12 - TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACKING OF

ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS, NORTH

ABUTMENT BREASTWALL SHOWN

PHOTO #13 - CLOSE-UP VIEW OF PREVIOUS

PHOTO; NOTE CRACKING THROUGH WEEP

HOLE

PHOTO #14 - TYPICAL EVIDENCE OF PONDING

ALONG BASE OF ABUTMENTS, SOUTH

ABUTMENT FACE SHOWN

PHOTO #15 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH

ABUTMENT

PHOTO #16 - EFFLORESCENCE ON WEST

ARCH RING

PHOTO #17 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF

VERTICAL JOINT FILLER MATERIAL,

SOUTHWEST JOINT SHOWN

PHOTO #18 - TYPICAL CONDITION OF MORTAR

JOINTS, SOUTHWEST WINGWALL SHOWN

PHOTO #19 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTHWEST

RETAINING WALL; NOTE VINE GROWTH

PHOTO #20 - DETERIORATION OF MORTAR

JOINT ON NORTHWEST RETAINING WALL

PHOTO #21 - EROSION ALONG WINGWALLS,

SOUTHWEST WINGWALL SHOWN

PHOTO #22 - DETERIORATED PAVEMENT

ALONG UNDERPASS ROAD, SOUTH EDGE

SHOWN

PHOTO #23 - DAMAGED VERTICAL HEIGHT CLEARANCE SIGN AT WEST

APPROACH

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .