Categorical Exclusion Form (NEPA).pdf

EFLHD NEPA Categorical Exclusion Form EFL-TM-ENV-23(02)

VA ERFO FS GWJEF808 2020-2(1)

Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division NEPA Categorical Exclusion Form

Project Number: VA ERFO FS GWJEF808 2020-2(1) Date: 3/6/2025

Project Name: Repairs to Punch and Judy, Little Stony, Blackhorse, Dry Run, and Hussy Mountain Sites

Location: Blackhorse Gap East – Bedford County

VA (37.406780, -79.745920)

Dry Run Road – Wythe County VA (36.772056, -81.176861)

Punch and Judy Road – Tazewell County

VA (37.003889, -81.461000)

Little Stony Road – Scott County VA (36.864500, -82.509944)

Hussy Mountain Horse Camp Road – Wythe County VA (36.771663, - 81.143004)

FHWA CE

Category

23 CFR 771.117(c)(22): Projects, as defined in 23 U.S.C. 101, that would take place entirely within the existing operational right-of-way [...]

USFS CE

Category

36 CFR 220.6(d)(4): Repair and maintenance of roads, trails, and landline boundaries

Project Description

The Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division (EFLHD) of the Federal Highway Administration, in cooperation with the United States Forest Service (USFS), is proposing to conduct repairs on multiple forest service roads (FSRs) in George Washington and Jefferson National Forest (Forest).

The road repairs are needed to address storm damage that occurred in spring 2020, which resulted in flooding and erosion of road surfaces, failure of road embankment slopes, scouring, and damage to drainage systems and several low water crossings throughout the Forest.

A summary of the damages at each site and the proposed repairs is provided below.

Blackhorse Gap East Road (FSR 186) o The triple barrel culvert low water crossing at Day Creek became clogged with debris and overtopped, resulting in a loss of roadway fill and retaining fill, as well as damage to the culvert base.

EFLHD NEPA Categorical Exclusion Form EFL-TM-ENV-23(02) o Proposed repair work includes debris removal, replacement of the triple barrel culvert low water crossing with a single open bottom concrete box culvert, resurfacing and fortifying of both approaches, and placement of riprap to protect/stabilize adjacent stream banks. A temporary bridge would be required to facilitate replacement of the low water crossing.

Dry Run Road (FSR 14) o Experienced road embankment slope failures and bridge and roadway scouring from debris laden flood waters.

o Proposed repair work includes 0.5-mile of roadway resurfacing, culvert replacement, slope revetment repairs along to Francis Mill Creek, and placement of riprap at scour holes of East Fork Dry Run and Francis Creek Mill bridge abutments.

Punch and Judy Road (FSR 618) o Experienced road embankment slope failures at several locations across approximately 326-linear feet. Area 1 is approximately 30-feet high x 12-feet width; Area 1A is approximately 28-feet high x 20-feet width; Area 2 is approximately 31-feet high x 35-feet width; Area 3 is approximately 30-feet high.

o Proposed repair work includes repairing failed road embankment slopes with gabions, vegetation matting, gravel road resurfacing, and placement of riprap at the outlet of an existing 18-inch culvert.

Little Stony Road (FSR 700) o Experienced large embankment slope failures (approx. 80-feet high x 54-feet long) due to heavy rain and underground seepage.

o Proposed repair work includes deep patch embankment repair using gabions, soil nails and vegetation matting.

Hussy Mountain Horse Camp Road (FSR 14A) o The 2020 high-water storm event and resulting debris flow, overtopped and scoured out the substructure of a USFS self-built, low-water crossing at the Hussy Mountain Horse Camp recreation site, resulting in closure of the access road and damage to utilities.

o Proposed repair work includes raising the road profile along 0.1-mile of the roadway approximately 2-3 feet and resurfacing with crushed aggregate, small culvert replacement, wood fence replacement, replacement of the low water crossing with a 10-foot x 4.5-foot concrete open bottom box culvert, placement of riprap stream bank revetment (approx. 60 linear feet), and road surface repairs at both approaches to the low water crossing.

EFLHD NEPA Categorical Exclusion Form EFL-TM-ENV-23(02)

Environmental Commitments and Mitigation Measures The proposed activities would occur within the existing developed roadway corridors.

Impacts to adjacent forests and streams would be avoided to the extent possible.

Best management practices (BMPs) would be utilized for erosion and sediment control to minimize potential impacts to nearby and adjacent water bodies.

Temporary lighting used during construction would be directed away from suitable bat habitat (away from trees) during the active season between April 1 – November 15.

No tree trimming/tree removal will occur between April 1 – November 15.

No in-water work will occur at Little Stony Road.

No in- water work will occur between April 1 – September 30 at Punch and Judy Road.

No in-water work will occur between March 15 – June 30 at Dry Run Road and Hussy Mountain Horse Camp Road

Summary of Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act Compliance FHWA, acting as the lead federal agency for compliance under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA), obtained official species lists from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s (USFWS) Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) system on 5/28/2024 for Punch and Judy Road (Project Code 2022-0042621), 9/4/2024 for Little Stony Road (Project Code 2022- 0042506), 5/21/2024 for Hussy Mountain Horse Camp Road (Project Code 2022-0042526), 6/21/2024 for Dry Run Road (Project Code 2022-0042640), and 11/13/2023 for Blackhorse Gap East Road (Project Code 2022-0042653).

FHWA submitted 6-step project review packages under each Project Code along with completed Self-Certification Letters per the USFWS Virginia Field Office online project review process guidance. In the project review packages, FHWA determined the proposed action would have no effect or may affect but is not likely to adversely affect thirty-three listed and proposed species, as indicated in each project review package. Per 50 CFR § 402.13(c)(2) and the Virginia Field Office’s online project review process guidance, if USFWS does not respond to the project review package within 60 days of the submission, the Self-Certification Letter and project review package “complete the review of the project in accordance with the ESA of 1973, as amended”.

Only one comment was received from USFWS within the 60-day submission window regarding the effects determinations for Little Stony Road (Project Code 2022-0042506). FHWA resubmitted the project review package per discussion with USFWS with updated effects determinations. No comments were received from USFWS on the four other project review packages.

EFLHD NEPA Categorical Exclusion Form EFL-TM-ENV-23(02)

Summary of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act Compliance On 11/6/2024 and 11/12/2024, the USFS – acting as the lead federal agency for compliance under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act – found that the proposed project activities fall under a standard road maintenance activity, which is within the scope of their Programmatic Agreement with the Virginia Department of Historic Resources. Compliance documentation from the Assistant Forest Heritage Program Manager is enclosed.

Additional Agency Coordination and Compliance On 6/17/2021, the USFS District Ranger finalized a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for the Bobblets Gap Vegetation Project Environmental Assessment (EA) in George Washington and Jefferson National Forests. The scope of work covered within the EA and FONSI included safety improvements to FSR 186, such as day-lighting the roadway, as well as repairs the triple barrel culvert crossing and approaches at Day Creek.

FHWA coordinated with state-level biological resource agencies as a courtesy. Project reviews were requested through the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation’s (VDCR) Natural Heritage Data Explorer Web Service for the repairs on Blackhorse Gap East Road, Little Stony Road, Hussy Mountain Horse Camp Road, and Punch and Judy Road. VDCR responded on 11/28/2023 (Blackhorse Gap) and 12/5/2023 (Little Stony, Hussy Mountain, Punch and Judy) with recommendations to reduce or minimize impacts to sensitive resources and habitats within and adjacent the project vicinity, including the use of strict erosion and sediment control measures and the minimization of disturbance to the extent practicable. VDCR also noted that the Tennessee dace (Chrosomus tennesseensis), a state listed species, may occur in Punch and Judy Creek and would require time of year restrictions for in water work.

Prior to construction, erosion and sediment control plan review and approval from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) will be conducted per the consolidated Virginia Erosion and Stormwater Management Act (Act) – previously the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Act and the Virginia Stormwater Management Act. Additionally, any project sites which do not meet the “routine maintenance” exemption for compliance with the water quantity and water quality technical criteria under the Act will be reviewed by DEQ. DEQ may waive the requirements for the preparation and implementation of a stormwater management plan based on site conditions.

EFLHD NEPA Categorical Exclusion Form EFL-TM-ENV-23(02)

VA ERFO FS GWJEF808 2020-2(1)

Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division NEPA Categorical Exclusion Form

Categorical Exclusion Recommendation:

On the basis of the environmental impact information in the statutory compliance file, with which I am familiar, I believe the project should be categorically excluded from further NEPA analysis.

Kim Campo-Allen Environmental Protection Specialist Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division Federal Highway Administration

Date

Categorical Exclusion Determination:

On the basis of the environmental impact information in the statutory compliance file, with which I am familiar, I am categorically excluding the described project from further NEPA analysis. The project meets the 23 CFR 771.117(a) definition of a categorical exclusion. No unusual circumstances per 23 CFR 771.117(b) apply.

Kevin S. Rose Environmental Team Leader Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division Federal Highway Administration

Date

3/11/2025

3/11/2025

EFLHD NEPA Categorical Exclusion Form EFL-TM-ENV-23(02)

USFS Categorical Exclusion Determination:

This project meets the 36 CFR 220.6(d)(4) definition of categorical exclusion for repair and maintenance of roads, trails, and landline boundaries.

Date

EFLHD NEPA Categorical Exclusion Form EFL-TM-ENV-23(02)

Appendix A: Environmental Checklist

Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act:

Are Federally-listed species potentially present in the study area? ☒Yes, see Notesi ☐No

If Yes, effects determination:

☒No Effect ☒May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect ☐May Affect, Likely to Adversely Affect

Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act:

Are historic properties known to be present in the study area? ☒Yes ☐No

If Yes, will they be impacted by the project? ☐Yes ☒No Will previously undisturbed ground be disturbed?

☐Yes ☒No Effects determination:

☐No Historic Properties Affected ☒No Adverse Effect ☐Adverse Effect, MOA Executed Was tribal consultation completed? ☐Yes ☒No

Water and Wetlands:

Section 404 of the Clean Water Act

Are impacts to Waters of the US anticipated? ☒Yes ☐No If Yes, approval anticipated:

☒Nationwide Permit (NWP) ☐Regional General Permit ☐Individual Permit

Section 401 of the Clean Water Act ☒NWP certified by State ☐Individual Certification

Section 402 of the Clean Water Act (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System) Will the land disturbance threshold likely be exceeded to require a permit and SWPPP?

☐Yes ☒ No

Is post-construction stormwater management review/approval anticipated? ☐Yes ☒No ☒Project is consistent with Executive Order 11990, Protection of Wetlands

Floodplains:

Is the project in a FEMA floodplain?

☐Yes ☒No ☐ Floodplain not mapped ☒ Project is consistent with Executive Order 11988, Floodplain Management

Section 4(f) of the USDOT Act:

Does the project meet the Section 4(f) exemption for Federal lands transportation facilities under

Section 1119(c)(2) of MAP-21, 23 U.S.C. 138(a)? ☒Yes ☐No Is there a use of a Section 4(f) property in the study area? ☐Yes ☒No

If Yes, De Minimis Finding:☐ Programmatic:☐ Individual 4(f): ☐ Section 6(f) of the Land and Water Conservation Fund:

Was the property purchased with grant funds from the Land and Water Conservation Fund?

☐Yes ☒No

EFLHD NEPA Categorical Exclusion Form EFL-TM-ENV-23(02)

If Yes, was documentation of approval from National Park Service Director received for the conversion or replacement of 6(f) property? ☐Yes ☐No

Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972:

Is the project in a Coastal Zone? ☐Yes ☒No If yes, will a Federal Consistency Review be completed? ☐Yes ☐No

Right of Way:

Is the project completely within the transportation facility’s right-of-way? ☒Yes ☐No If no, will the project require relocations or easements? ☐Yes ☐No

Hazardous Waste and Materials:

Are hazardous materials or contamination exceeding regulatory thresholds (as set by U.S. EPA, County Environmental Health, etc.) present? ☐Yes ☒No If Yes, is the nature and extent of the hazardous materials or contamination fully known? ☐Yes ☐No, plan for securing information provided in Notes Section 7(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act:

Are there Wild and Scenic Rivers? ☐Yes ☒No ☐Eligible If Yes, has review by the river-administering agency been completed? ☐Yes ☐No

Clean Air Act:

Is the project in a non-attainment area? ☐Yes ☒No

If Yes, is the project on the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)/State Implementation Plan(SIP)? ☐ Yes ☐No

Highway Traffic and Construction Noise Regulations:

☐ The proposed project is a Type I project (highway on a new location, substantial horizontal or vertical alteration, new through or auxiliary lanes). Noise analysis is required.

☐ The proposed project is a Type II project (retrofit for noise abatement).

☒ The proposed project is a Type III project (noise analysis not required).

☐ Does not apply.

Farmland Protection Policy Act for Highway Projects:

Does the project displace, require acquisition of, or require an easement from farmland?

☐Yes ☒No Does the project affect any other resources not listed above? Explain below and list anticipated permits:

Anticipated permits: Clean Water Act Section 404 Nationwide Permit (NWP) authorization, Erosion and Sediment Control plan review and approval, Stormwater Management plan review and approval or waiver.

EFLHD NEPA Categorical Exclusion Form EFL-TM-ENV-23(02)

VA ERFO FS GWJEF808 2020-2(1)

Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division NEPA Categorical Exclusion Form i Federally-listed species per U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s IPaC (note, the below list of species varies between project site, refer to the project review packages located in the project record for each site for the species list at each location):

Northern Long-eared Bat (Myotis septentrionalis) (Endangered) Indiana Bat (Myotis sodalis) (Endangered) Gray Bat (Myotis grisescens) (Endangered) Virginia Big-eared Bat (Corynorhinus (=Plecotus) townsendii virginianus) (Endangered) Rock Gnome Lichen (Gymnoderma lineare) (Endangered) Candy Darter (Etheostoma osburni) (Endangered) Blackside Dace (Phoxinus cumberlandensis) (Threatened) Slender Chub (Erimystax cahni) (Threatened) Yellowfin Madtom (Noturus flavipinnis) (Threatened) Cracking Pearlymussel (Hemistena lata) (Endangered) Cumberlandian Combshell (Epioblasma brevidens) (Endangered) Dromedary Pearlymussel (Dromus dromus) (Endangered) Fanshell (Cyprogenia stegaria) (Endangered) Finerayed Pigtoe (Fusconaia cuneolus) (Endangered) Fluted Kidneyshell (Ptychobranchus subtentus) (Endangered) Littlewing Pearlymussel (Pegias fabula) (Endangered) Longsolid (Fusconaia subrotunda) (Threatened) Oyster Mussel (Epioblasma capsaeformis) (Endangered) Pink Mucket (pearlymussel) (Lampsilis abrupta) (Endangered) Purple Bean (Villosa perpurpurea) (Endangered) Rough Rabbitsfoot (Quadrula cylindrica strigillata) (Endangered) Sheepnose Mussel (Plethobasus cyphyus) (Endangered) Shiny Pigtoe (Fusconaia cor) (Endangered) Slabside Pearlymussel (Pleuronaia dolabelloides) (Endangered) Snuffbox Mussel (Epioblasma triquetra) (Endangered) Spectaclecase (mussel) (Cumberlandia monodonta) (Endangered) Tricolored Bat (Perimyotis subflavus) (Proposed Endangered) Little Brown Bat (Myotis lucifugus) (State Endangered) Yellowfin Madtom (Noturus flavipinnis) (Experimental pop.)

Cumberland Moccasinshell (Medionidus conradicus) (Proposed Endangered) Tennessee Clubshell (Pleurobema oviforme) (Proposed Endangered) Tennessee Pigtoe (Pleuronaia barnesiana) (Proposed Endangered) Monarch Butterfly (Danaus plexippus) (Candidate)

Section 106 Correspondence

From: Mihich, Martha - FS, VA To: Setering, Michael (FHWA); Madden, Michael - FS, VA; Mason, Gwendolyn - FS, VA; Slezak, Gregg - FS, VA Cc: Guercin, Richard - FS, VA; Mayes, Jonathan - FS, VA Subject: RE: VA ERFO FS GWJEF808 2020-2(1) - Field Review (NOV 19-20) Date: Wednesday, November 6, 2024 10:38:25 AM Attachments: image001.png image002.png image003.png image004.png image005.png

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the Department of Transportation (DOT). Do not click on links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Good Morning Michael, After reviewing the Cultural Resources Atlas, GIS database, and the Virginia Cultural Resources Information Service, we have determined that the following locations are devoid of cultural resources, and that the planned activities fall within standard road maintenance as described within our Programmatic Agreement with the VA DHR; therefore, the following road repair locations can proceed and have no further Section 106 concerns:

1. Black Horse Gap Road (37°24'24.3"N 79°44'45.4"W)

2. Little Stony Road (36°51'52.2"N 82°30'36.4"W)

3. Punch and Judy Road (37°00'13.7"N 81°27'40.0"W)

4. Hussy MTN Horse Camp Road (36°46'19.0"N 81°08'36.4"W)

5. East Fork Dry Run Bridge (36°46'19.3"N 81°10'36.8"W)

However, the Francis Mill Creek Bridge and the Dry Run Creek Bank Failure in Wythe County requires further investigation and field visits. We’ll be able to visit these locations prior to the November 19-20 field trip and determine whether we’ll need to ask questions or set implementation guidelines.

We also need locations for the temp roads for the trail bridge repair before we can make a determination on the section 106 requirements.

Let me know if you have any questions, Martha Mihich Assistant Forest Heritage Program Manager & Tribal Liason Forest Service George Washington & Jefferson National Forest p: 540-265-5104 martha.mihich@usda.gov 5162 Valleypointe Pkwy Roanoke, VA 24019 www.fs.usda.gov mailto:Martha.Mihich@usda.gov mailto:michael.setering@dot.gov mailto:michael.j.madden@usda.gov mailto:Gwendolyn.Mason@usda.gov mailto:gregg.slezak@usda.gov mailto:richard.guercin@usda.gov mailto:Jonathan.Mayes@usda.gov mailto:martha.mihich@usda.gov https://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.fs.usda.gov%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmichael.setering%40dot.gov%7Cd846f7492e3b4f0c312c08dcfe790b2f%7Cc4cd245b44f04395a1aa3848d258f78b%7C0%7C0%7C638665043050392684%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=tXvlzPuiDwaPxMrHK3u988if9soMbmE6zWNYDPMtJKU%3D&reserved=0

From: Mihich, Martha - FS, VA To: Setering, Michael (FHWA); Madden, Michael - FS, VA; Mason, Gwendolyn - FS, VA; Slezak, Gregg - FS, VA Cc: Guercin, Richard - FS, VA; Mayes, Jonathan - FS, VA Subject: RE: VA ERFO FS GWJEF808 2020-2(1) - Field Review (NOV 19-20) Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2024 3:05:39 PM Attachments: image001.png image002.png image003.png image004.png image005.png

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the Department of Transportation (DOT). Do not click on links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hi Michael:

We were able to go out and visit the final two locations (Francis Creek Bridge and Dry Run Creek Failure) today and determined that the resources we had concerns about would not be impacted by the repairs necessary. We will not be attending the 19-20th November field trip.

This project has no further Section 106 concerns and can proceed as planned.

Martha Mihich Assistant Forest Heritage Program Manager & Tribal Liason Forest Service George Washington & Jefferson National Forest p: 540-265-5104 martha.mihich@usda.gov 5162 Valleypointe Pkwy Roanoke, VA 24019 www.fs.usda.gov

Caring for the land and serving people

From: Setering, Michael (FHWA) <michael.setering@dot.gov> Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2024 7:41 AM To: Mihich, Martha - FS, VA <Martha.Mihich@usda.gov>; Madden, Michael - FS, VA <michael.j.madden@usda.gov>; Mason, Gwendolyn - FS, VA <Gwendolyn.Mason@usda.gov>;

Slezak, Gregg - FS, VA <gregg.slezak@usda.gov> Cc: Guercin, Richard - FS, VA <richard.guercin@usda.gov>; Mayes, Jonathan - FS, VA <Jonathan.Mayes@usda.gov> Subject: RE: VA ERFO FS GWJEF808 2020-2(1) - Field Review (NOV 19-20) mailto:Martha.Mihich@usda.gov mailto:michael.setering@dot.gov mailto:michael.j.madden@usda.gov mailto:Gwendolyn.Mason@usda.gov mailto:gregg.slezak@usda.gov mailto:richard.guercin@usda.gov mailto:Jonathan.Mayes@usda.gov mailto:martha.mihich@usda.gov https://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.fs.usda.gov%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmichael.setering%40dot.gov%7Cfe2d1c7087e547a0c64908dd03555d18%7Cc4cd245b44f04395a1aa3848d258f78b%7C0%7C0%7C638670387380899313%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=jPIUWiiuZ9Qtt13j8e%2BGtGq1r4wyEE8Cv71X5qjhHn0%3D&reserved=0 https://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fusda.gov%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmichael.setering%40dot.gov%7Cfe2d1c7087e547a0c64908dd03555d18%7Cc4cd245b44f04395a1aa3848d258f78b%7C0%7C0%7C638670387380932378%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=NVPjwkLybr242SYXKlrdklmg2eIcv9G%2FzMFWeuZvV98%3D&reserved=0 https://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fforestservice&data=05%7C02%7Cmichael.setering%40dot.gov%7Cfe2d1c7087e547a0c64908dd03555d18%7Cc4cd245b44f04395a1aa3848d258f78b%7C0%7C0%7C638670387380950642%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=mLHfyoT%2B5UjhbfQXWwqy2pPEBmeZXDrV%2FUxnUC5r654%3D&reserved=0 https://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fpages%2FUS-Forest-Service%2F1431984283714112&data=05%7C02%7Cmichael.setering%40dot.gov%7Cfe2d1c7087e547a0c64908dd03555d18%7Cc4cd245b44f04395a1aa3848d258f78b%7C0%7C0%7C638670387380967081%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=w0NOCLVanCCSjMq%2FCXF%2FSCxFCY%2B7wZeiknWU%2F2IHdnY%3D&reserved=0