B08i_Attachment_8_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 21 KB Posted

Attached to
NCR-NAMA: EISENHOWER FACILITY CONTRACT
Solicitation number
140P3023Q0014
Issued by

View the file

Other files

Show all 20

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

READ CAREFULLY: The purpose of this form is for the offeror to list projects performed that are similar to the work described in this solicitation. Use this form to address your familiarity with the project requirements and with the evaluation criteria described in the solicitation. Include Area Codes with all telephone numbers. Fill in the information by typing or printing legibly.

It is especially important that the offeror disclose instances in which their experience may be considered by others to be less than fully satisfactory. The offeror should tell their side of the story and describe remedial corrective action that has been taken or will be taken to correct the deficiency. Failure to do so may result in a determination that an offeror has been less than candid with the Government, which could result in an unfavorable assessment of the offeror’s experience.

PART I: Solicitation and Contract Information (to be completed by Offeror)

Information Provided in Response to Solicitation Number:

Name of Offeror:

Project Name/Location:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Contract Value:

Client Organization:

Address:

Telephone Number:

Period of Performance or Date Completed:

DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT AND SCOPE OF WORK

PERFORMANCE REMARKS

(if problems were encountered on this contract, explain corrective action taken)

Part II: Performance Assessment (to be completed by client/ reviewer) Information provided in this questionnaire is intended for use as source selection information and as such is deemed Source Selection Sensitive. Statements or comments provided in the questionnaire do not signify an express or implied endorsement of any product, supply, service, or enterprise.

This information shall not be construed as an endorsement by the Government or its employee(s) of the contractor for advertising purposes or in a manner that implies the contractor, its products, or services, are approved, endorsed, or considered by the Government to be superior to other products or services.

The contractor shall not be permitted to use any information provided in this questionnaire to publicize, or otherwise circulate, promotional materials that state or imply Governmental, organizational, group, expert, or individual endorsement or consumer testimonial of a product, service, or position which the contractor represents.

CODE
PERFORMANCE LEVEL
E
EXCEPTIONAL -
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the reviewer’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
V
VERY GOOD -
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the reviewer’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
S
SATISFACTORY -
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
M
MARGINAL -
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
U
UNSATISFACTORY-
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
N
NOT APPLICABLE -
Unable to provide a score. Performance in this area not applicable to effort assessed.

1. Quality of product or service: (please double click on check box to check and uncheck box)

E |_| V |_| S |_| M |_| U |_| N |_|

Comment:

2. Schedule: (please double click on check box to check and uncheck box)

E |_| V |_| S |_| M |_| U |_| N |_|

Comment:

3. Management: (please double click on check box to check and uncheck box)

E |_| V |_| S |_| M |_| U |_| N |_|

Comment:

4. Regulatory Compliance: (please double click on check box to check and uncheck box)

E |_| V |_| S |_| M |_| U |_| N |_|

Comment:

Name and Title of Client/ Reviewer:

Signature:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .