Attachment_L_-_Phase_One_Evaluation_Criteria_Score_Sheet.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 29 KB Posted
- Attached to
- RFP - PW - Curb Management Technology
- Solicitation number
- 0000004185
- Issued by
- Hennepin County, Minnesota
About this file
This is a Phase One Evaluation Criteria Score Sheet for the RFP – PW – Curb Management Technology solicitation issued by the City of Minneapolis in partnership with the City of Seattle. The evaluation template is designed to assess vendor proposals across seven distinct technology categories: Fixed Traffic Monitoring Systems, Fixed Curb Activity Detection Sensors, Mobile or Portable Curb Data Collection Systems, Emergency and Dynamic Curb Control Integration Systems, Dynamic Curb Communication and Display Systems, Curb and Mobility Data Aggregation, and Freight and Commercial Vehicle Data Package. Each technology category is evaluated on a 300-point scale across four evaluation criteria: Technical Maturity (20%), Vendor Qualifications and Team Experience (20%), Functional and Technical Specifications (40%), and Cost of Services Proposed (20%).
The scoring template allocates 120 points to Sections 1 and 2 combined, which assess proposal thoroughness, professional quality, technical expertise, project references, team availability and adaptability, and team experience. For Section 3 (Functional and Technical Specifications), point distributions vary by technology category but generally emphasize General capabilities, Deployment and Operations, Performance, and Data considerations, with specific weightings adjusted for aerial operations or fixed mountable sensors where applicable. Section 4 (Cost) allocates up to 60 points per technology category, with evaluation based on one-time costs such as hardware and installation and monthly subscription costs for software-as-a-service, data storage, and related services. The template accommodates three vendors and is blank, indicating it is a template for evaluators to complete during the proposal review process.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment I.2 Disclosure-of-lobbying-activities-form.docx | DOCX document | |
| eSupplier_Bidding_Guide.pdf | ||
| Attachment I.4 Debarment_and_Suspension_Certification.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_F_Technical_Specifications.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_J_-_SMART_Grant_Stage_2_Agreement.pdf | ||
| RFP_-_PW_-_Curb_Management_Technology.pdf | ||
| 2026_44_RFP_PW_Curb_Management_Technology.pdf | ||
| Attachment I.5 City_of_Seattle_Technology_Contract 8.5.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment I.1 Questionnaire for Federal Contracts.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment I.3 Lobbying Certification.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Scoring Template
| Evaluation Criteria | Points | Vendor 1 | Vendor 2 | Vendor 3 | |||||
| 1. Technical Maturity (20%) | |||||||||
| Scoring based on the evaluator's overall impression of the RFP response | |||||||||
| Thoroughness of proposal | 20 | ||||||||
| Overall quality and level of professionalism | 20 | ||||||||
| Technical expertise of team members | 20 | ||||||||
| Section Subtotal | 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
| 2. Vendor Qualifications and Team Experience (20%) | |||||||||
| Scoring based on the evaluator's overall impression of the RFP response | |||||||||
| Project references | 30 | ||||||||
| Team availability and adaptability | 15 | ||||||||
| Team experience as related to the project | 15 | ` | ` | ` | ` | ` | |||
| Section Subtotal | 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
| Subtotal: Section 1 and 2 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Fixed Traffic Monitoring Systems | Fixed Curb Activity Detection Sensors | Mobile or Portable Curb Data Collection Systems | Emergency and Dynamic Curb Control Integration Systems | Dynamic Curb Communication and Display Systems | Curb and Mobility Data Aggregation | Freight and Commercial Vehicle Data Package | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Points | Vendor 1 | Vendor 2 | Vendor 3 | Points | Vendor 1 | Vendor 2 | Vendor 3 | Points | Vendor 1 | Vendor 2 | Vendor 3 | Points | Vendor 1 | Vendor 2 | Vendor 3 | Points | Vendor 1 | Vendor 2 | Vendor 3 | Points | Vendor 1 | Vendor 2 | Vendor 3 | Points | Vendor 1 | Vendor 2 | Vendor 3 | |||||||
| Subtotal: Section 1 and 2 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Subtotal: Section 1 and 2 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Subtotal: Section 1 and 2 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Subtotal: Section 1 and 2 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Subtotal: Section 1 and 2 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Subtotal: Section 1 and 2 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Subtotal: Section 1 and 2 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3. Functional and Technical Specifications: Fixed Traffic Monitoring Sensors (40%) | 3. Functional and Technical Specifications: Fixed Curb Activity Detection Sensors (40%) | 3. Functional and Technical Specifications: Mobile or Portable Curb Data Collection Systems (40%) | 3. Functional and Technical Specifications: Emergency and Dynamic Curb Control Integration Systems (40%) | 3. Functional and Technical Specifications: Dynamic Curb Communication and Display Systems (40%) | 3. Functional and Technical Specifications: Curb and Mobility Data Aggregation (40%) | 3. Functional and Technical Specifications: Freight and Commercial Vehicle Data Package (40%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Scoring based on responses provided in the Scope of Services section and the Technical Specifications Worksheet | Scoring based on responses provided in the Scope of Services section and the Technical Specifications Worksheet | Scoring based on responses provided in the Scope of Services section and the Technical Specifications Worksheet | Scoring based on responses provided in the Scope of Services section and the Technical Specifications Worksheet | Scoring based on responses provided in the Scope of Services section and the Technical Specifications Worksheet | Scoring based on responses provided in the Scope of Services section and the Technical Specifications Worksheet | Scoring based on responses provided in the Scope of Services section and the Technical Specifications Worksheet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| General | 30 | General (including Fixed Mountable Sensors section) | 30 | General (including Aerial Operations section) | 30 | General | 35 | General | 35 | General | 35 | General | 35 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Warranty and Technical Support | 15 | Warranty and Technical Support | 15 | Warranty and Technical Support | 15 | Deployment and Operations | 30 | Deployment and Operations | 30 | Warranty and Technical Support | 15 | Deployment and Operations | 20 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Deployment and Operations | 30 | Deployment and Operations | 30 | Deployment and Operations | 30 | Performance | 25 | Performance | 25 | Deployment and Operations | 20 | Performance | 30 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Performance | 20 | Performance | 20 | Performance | 20 | Data | 30 | Data | 30 | Performance | 20 | Data | 35 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Data | 25 | Data | 25 | Data | 25 | Data | 30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Section Subtotal | 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Section Subtotal | 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Section Subtotal | 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Section Subtotal | 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Section Subtotal | 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Section Subtotal | 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Section Subtotal | 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4. Cost of services proposed: Fixed Traffic Monitoring Systems (20%) | 4. Cost of services proposed: Fixed Curb Activity Detection Sensors (20%) | 4. Cost of services proposed: Mobile or Portable Curb Data Collection Systems (20%) | 4. Cost of services proposed: Emergency and Dynamic Curb Control Integration Systems (20%) | 4. Cost of services proposed: Dynamic Curb Communication and Display Systems (20%) | 4. Cost of services proposed: Curb and Mobility Data Aggregation (20%) | 4. Cost of services proposed: Freight and Commercial Vehicle Data Package (20%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Scoring based on responses provided in the Costs Worksheet | Scoring based on responses provided in the Costs Worksheet | Scoring based on responses provided in the Costs Worksheet | Scoring based on responses provided in the Costs Worksheet | Scoring based on responses provided in the Costs Worksheet | Scoring based on responses provided in the Costs Worksheet | Scoring based on responses provided in the Costs Worksheet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| One-time costs (hardware, installation, etc.), per unit | 25 | One-time costs (hardware, installation, etc.), per unit | 25 | One-time costs (hardware, installation, etc.), per unit (or per aerial flight hour if aerial operation is proposed) | 25 | One-time costs (hardware, installation, etc.), per unit | 20 | One-time costs (hardware, installation, etc.), per unit | 30 | One-time costs (hardware, installation, etc.) | 20 | One-time costs (hardware, installation, etc.) | 20 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Monthly subscription costs (Saas, data storage, etc.) | 35 | Monthly subscription costs (Saas, data storage, etc.) | 35 | Monthly subscription costs (Saas, data storage, etc.) | 35 | Monthly subscription costs (Saas, data storage, etc.) | 40 | Monthly subscription costs (Saas, data storage, etc.) | 30 | Monthly subscription costs (Saas, data storage, etc.) | 40 | Monthly subscription costs (Saas, data storage, etc.) | 40 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Section Subtotal | 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Section Subtotal | 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Section Subtotal | 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Section Subtotal | 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Section Subtotal | 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Section Subtotal | 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Section Subtotal | 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Overall Score of RFP Response | 300 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Overall Score of RFP Response | 300 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Overall Score of RFP Response | 300 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Overall Score of RFP Response | 300 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Overall Score of RFP Response | 300 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Overall Score of RFP Response | 300 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Overall Score of RFP Response | 300 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .