Attachment 0002 Past Performance Questionnaire .docx

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

UNITED STATES ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND

TACOM CONTRACTING CENTER

6501 EAST 11 MILE ROAD

WARREN, MICHIGAN 48397-5000

REPLY TO

ATTENTION OF: CCTA-HNL-B

CCTA-HIF Date issued with RFP PCO Letter: ETA, Past Performance Questionnaire

Subject: Solicitation W50NH9-25-R-0006, Past Performance Questionnaire

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

ETA SOLICITATION

1. The G-7 Engineering Technical Assistance (ETA)_Support Services effort is a non-personal services contract to provide ETA support which include personnel and supervision, necessary to perform ETA support as defined in the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

ACC-DTA is conducting a past performance assessment in anticipation of possible contract award.

2. Offerors interested in proposing on this work have been requested to send the attached Past Performance Questionnaire to points of contact on recent and relevant contracts as defined in Section L of the solicitation. In this regard, we are requesting your assistance in completing this questionnaire so that we may evaluate the offeror in the area of past performance. The attached questionnaire has been developed for ease of electronic completion. Please provide your comments regarding the overall assessment of the contractor’s performance in each of the areas of consideration in the gray boxes for the identified contract. Any additional information, which your organization deems relevant or important, will be welcome by our evaluation team. If a question on the questionnaire is not applicable, please so indicate. It is important that your information be as factual, accurate, and complete as possible to preclude that the need for follow-up by the evaluators.

3. Upon completion of this questionnaire, please forward by email to miles.a.beaudoin.civ@army.mil. Please submit questions or comments regarding this letter to miles.a.beaudoin.civ@army.mil. .

4. Please complete and submit your questionnaire by DATE HERE

5. Thank you in advance for your assistance.

Sincerely, Miles A. Beaudoin Contracting Officer

[Encl(s)] (1) Past Performance Questionnaire Past Performance Assessment Questionnaire Please provide your candid response to the following questions. If you do not have the appropriate knowledge with the company in question, please forward this questionnaire to the person who does. Upon completion of this questionnaire, please forward by electronic email to the usarmy.detroit.acc.mbx.global-intelligence-linguist-dlite@army.mil within 24 hours of the closing date of this solicitation. Thank you for your assistance.

PART I - IDENTIFICATION (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. RELEVANT CONTRACT

Prime Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract/Task Order Number:

Contract Award Date:

Contract Period of Performance End Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion:

B. OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

Address:

E-mail Address:

PART II - EVALUATION

(To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)

RATING SCALE & DEFINITIONS

Table 1 identifies the rating scale and descriptions. Please apply the rating that most closely matches your assessment for each area of consideration listed below. Please include a written narrative for each rating applied, utilizing the adjectival rating definition in Table 1.

Table 1

1. Quality:

a. Performance Quality: Assess the quality of the contractor’s engineering analysis and technical support for technology programs as required in the performance work statement.

|_| Exceptional |_| Very Good |_| Satisfactory |_| Marginal |_| Unsatisfactory |_| Too soon to tell |_| Not Applicable

Comments:

For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault and/or if other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor played a predominant role.

b. Assess the quality of the contractor’s test and evaluation support for intelligence and cyber capabilities as required in the performance work statement.

|_| Exceptional |_| Very Good |_| Satisfactory |_| Marginal |_| Unsatisfactory |_| Too soon to tell |_| Not Applicable

Comments:

For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault and/or if other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor played a predominant role.

c. Personnel quality: Assess the extent contractor personnel met or exceeded the contractual qualifications, to include meeting contractually required staffing rates.

|_| Exceptional |_| Very Good |_| Satisfactory |_| Marginal |_| Unsatisfactory |_| Too soon to tell |_| Not Applicable

Comments:

For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault and/or if other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor played a predominant role.

2. Management / Business Relations:

a. Assess the contractor’s management and business relations efforts during the contract period. (i.e. timely and effective communication, effective management of staff levels, management quality, etc.).

|_| Exceptional |_| Very Good |_| Satisfactory |_| Marginal |_| Unsatisfactory |_| Too soon to tell |_| Not Applicable

For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault and/or if other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor played a predominant role.

b. Effectiveness of Program Management (to include use and control of subcontractors). Assess the extent the contractor responded to Government requests, handled issues (quality or otherwise), and implemented solutions.

|_| Exceptional |_| Very Good |_| Satisfactory |_| Marginal |_| Unsatisfactory |_| Too soon to tell |_| Not Applicable

Comments:

For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault and/or if other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor played a predominant role.

c. Assess the contractor’s adherence to contractual quality standards, including monitoring for risks, identifying issues, proactively implementing controls, and handling risks.

|_| Exceptional |_| Very Good |_| Satisfactory |_| Marginal |_| Unsatisfactory |_| Too soon to tell |_| Not Applicable

Comments:

For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault and/or if other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor played a predominant role.

d. Assess the contractor’s ability accommodate shifting priorities within the scope of the effort.

|_| Exceptional |_| Very Good |_| Satisfactory |_| Marginal |_| Unsatisfactory |_| Too soon to tell |_| Not Applicable

For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault and/or if other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor played a predominant role.

5. Schedule. To what extent was the contractor effective in managing timely and accurate contract requirement deliverables on this contract?

|_| Very Good |_| Satisfactory |_| Marginal |_| Unsatisfactory |_| Too soon to tell |_| Not Applicable

For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault and/or if other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor played a predominant role.

6. Regulatory Compliance. Assess the contractor’s compliance with all terms and conditions in the contract relating to applicable regulations and codes, considering aspects of performance such as compliance with financial, environmental, safety, and labor regulations as well as any other reporting requirements in the contract terms and conditions

|_| Very Good |_| Satisfactory |_| Marginal |_| Unsatisfactory |_| Too soon to tell |_| Not Applicable

Comments:

For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault and/or if other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor played a predominant role.

7. General Comments.

Any additional information, which your organization deems relevant or important, will be welcomed by our evaluation team. Please provide any other relevant or important performance information.

PART III - RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION

Please provide a point of contact who compiled or completed this questionnaire and who, if needed, may be contacted by our evaluation team regarding the information provided in this questionnaire.

Organization:

Address:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

E-mail Address:

Once Filled In, this document is considered Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104 image1.png image2.png