Attachment-G2-ACF_Business Impact Analysis.docx_V1.0.docx
DOCX document 114 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Legal Services for Unaccompanied Alien Children (UAC) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 75P00126R00003
- Issued by
- Not on record
About this file
This is a Business Impact Analysis document supporting a Request for Proposals (RFP) for legal services for Unaccompanied Alien Children (UAC). The solicitation (75P00126R00003) seeks comprehensive legal services for UAC currently in or released from the care of the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) under the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The acquisition is conducted under full and open competition using FAR 12 and 15 procedures. The most recent proposal due date, as extended by Amendment 0009 (03/20/2026), is April 3, 2026, at 2:00 PM Eastern Time. Questions must be submitted to Azeb Mengistu (Azeb.Mengistu@hhs.gov) with a copy to Christopher McGucken (Christopher.McGucken@hhs.gov), with subject line "Questions - Legal Services for Unaccompanied Children - Solicitation 75P00126R00003."
The solicitation has undergone significant revisions through nine amendments addressing accessibility issues, proposal deadline extensions, pricing worksheet corrections, and substantive changes to requirements. Key attachments include the Performance Work Statement (PWS), pricing worksheets, ORR facilities listing by state, Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP), ACF External System Control Implementation Policy and Procedures, ATO templates, and a Past Performance Questionnaire. Contractors must submit proposals electronically to the specified HHS email addresses. The document indicates this is a template or administrative file rather than a standalone substantive requirement document, serving to support the broader RFP structure and evaluation criteria for legal service providers to vulnerable UAC populations.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 50
Legal Services for Unaccompanied Alien Children (UAC) has more files on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Enter System Name ACF
Business Impact Analysis Enter System Name Select System Category
Version 1.0 Dated: 6/26/25
Table of Contents
| 1. Introduction and Purpose | 2 |
| 2. System Overview | 2 |
| 3. Critical Business Functions | 2 |
| 4. Impact Analysis | 2 |
| 4.1 Outage Overview | 2 |
| 4.2 Outage Impact Details | 3 |
| 4.2.1 Overall Impact on Business Processes | 3 |
| 5. Downtime and Recovery Objectives | 5 |
| 6. Recovery Priorities | 6 |
| 7. Approval and Authorization | 7 |
| Document Revision History | 8 |
1. Introduction and Purpose Identify and prioritize critical system components based on their support for mission and business processes and to assess the impact of system unavailability.
2. System Overview Include a link to the System Security Plan (SSP) to provide a system overview. Be sure it includes the system name, system acronym, FIPS 199 impact level, operating environment, physical location, general location of users, partnerships with external organizations and systems, and an architectural diagram.
Enter link to System Security Plan (SSP)
3. Critical Business Functions Identify the business processes that rely on the system and explain the purpose of each.
Table 1. Business Processes and Their Purpose
| Business Process |
| Description |
4. Impact Analysis
4.1 Outage Overview
Briefly describe the overall impact of a system outage.
Enter overall impact
4.2 Outage Impact Details
Identify impact categories that represent critical areas if a disruption occurs. Describe the nature of each impact value.
Table 2. Business Processes and Their Purpose
| Impact Category |
| Severe Value |
| Moderate Value |
| Minimal Value |
4.2.1 Overall Impact on Business Processes
Identify the overall impact on each process if the system became unavailable.
4.2.1.1 Potential impact of damage to public goodwill, image, or reputation
Impact Category
☐ Not Applicable
☐ Minimal: At worst, limited or short-term damage to public trust and the reputation of any party or ACF organization.
☐ Moderate: At worst, serious short-term or limited long-term damage to public confidence, trust, goodwill, or the reputation of any party or ACF organization.
☐ Severe: Severe long-term damage to public confidence, trust, goodwill, or the reputation of any party or ACF organization.
4.2.1.2 Potential impact of financial loss
Impact Category
☐ Not Applicable
☐ Minimal: At worst, a minor unrecoverable financial loss to any party or a negligible agency liability.
☐ Moderate: At worst, a serious unrecoverable financial loss to any party, or a serious agency liability.
☐ Severe: Severe or catastrophic unrecoverable financial loss to any party, or severe or catastrophic agency liability.
4.2.1.3 Potential impact of capability degradation on agency operations or programs:
Impact Category
☐ Not Applicable
☐ Minimal: At worst, a limited adverse effect on organizational operations or programs.
Examples of limited adverse effects:
· Reduced effectiveness in performing primary functions.
· Minor damage to operations or programs.
☐ Moderate: At worst, a serious adverse effect on organizational operations or programs. Examples of serious adverse effects:
· Major loss of ability to perform primary functions effectively.
· Significant damage to operations or programs.
☐ Severe: A severe or catastrophic adverse effect on organizational operations or programs. Examples of severe or catastrophic effects:
· Total inability to perform one or more primary functions.
· Extensive damage to operations or programs.
4.2.1.2 Potential impact to personal safety:
Impact Category
☐ Not Applicable
☐ Minimal: At worst, minor injury not requiring medical treatment.
☐ Moderate: At worst, moderate risk of minor injury or limited risk of injury requiring medical treatment.
☐ Severe: A risk of serious injury or death.
4.2.1.2 The potential impact of non-compliance to Federal, or Congressional laws and regulations:
Impact Category
☐ Not Applicable
☐ Minimal: At worst, a limited adverse effect on non-compliance with Federal or Congressional laws and regulations.
☐ Moderate: At worst, a serious adverse effect on non-compliance with Federal or Congressional laws and regulations.
☐ Severe: At worst, a severe or catastrophic adverse effect on non-compliance with Federal or Congressional laws and regulations.
5. Downtime and Recovery Objectives Describe alternate means for recovering the business processes that rely on the system. If there are no alternate means, state that.
Enter alternate means details
Identify the following acceptable downtime metrics for each business process. Please use hourly increments.
· Maximum Tolerable Downtime (MTD). The longest time that managers are willing to tolerate a disruption to a mission or business function.
· Recovery Time Objective (RTO). The maximum period that a system can be down before it starts to negatively affect other systems or business processes.
· Recovery Point Objective (RPO). The point in time to which data must be recovered after an event occurs; generally measured by the time elapsed since the last successful backup.
Table 3. Business Process Downtime
| Business Process |
| MTD |
| RTO |
| RPO |
6. Recovery Priorities List the prioritized recovery order for system resources and identify the expected recovery time following a worst-case disruption (e.g., complete rebuild or replacement).
The complete list of resources should be found in the Enter link to Asset Inventory
Table 4. Order of Recovery
| Priority |
| System Resource Component |
| Recovery Time Objective |
7. Approval and Authorization The undersigned acknowledge they have reviewed this Business Impact Analysis (BIA) and agree with the approach it defines. Changes to this BIA will be coordinated with and approved by the undersigned or their designated representatives.
Enter Business Owner name Digital Signature – Date
Enter System Owner name Digital Signature – Date
John Talieri, CISO or Christopher Miller, Deputy CISO Digital Signature - Date
Document Revision History
| Date |
| Version |
| Comments |
Version 1.0 Business Impact Analysis 1 image1.png image2.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .