5-Attachment E - Score Sheet.xls
XLS spreadsheet 41 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- MK27-1
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
This is an RFP Evaluation Scoresheet for Solicitation #MK27-1 issued by the State of Utah Division of Purchasing to procure patient mobility home modifications, vehicle modifications, and used modified vehicles. The solicitation seeks a comprehensive range of accessibility products, installations, and ongoing maintenance services to support independence and mobility for eligible users in both residential and community settings. The contract term is five years with a requirement that vendors guarantee pricing for a minimum of one year.
The evaluation scoresheet establishes a 75-25 weighted split between technical and cost components, with a maximum total of 1,333.3 points available. Technical evaluation comprises five weighted criteria categories: Experience, Knowledge, and Expertise (20%); Breadth of Offerings (20%); Ordering and Delivery Process (20%); Customer Service, Training, and Support (20%); and Maintenance, Lifecycle and Warranties (20%), each scored on a 0-5 scale with a maximum of 200 points per category. Vendors must meet three mandatory requirements including certification of scope of work compliance, submission of a technical response, and submission of a cost sheet. To receive an award, vendors must achieve a minimum technical score of 600 points and a combined total score of at least 750 points. Cost points will be allocated using a formula where the lowest bidder receives 100% of available cost points (333.3 points), with other offerors receiving proportional points based on their price variance from the lowest proposal. An administrative fee of 0.25% applies, and the RFP may result in multiple awards.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 6-Attachment B - Scope of Work.docx | DOCX document | |
| 7-Attachment C - Cost Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 1-Claim of Business Confidentiality Updated.pdf.pdf | ||
| 2-Vendor Prerequisites - Statewide RFP.pdf | ||
| 4-Attachment A - Terms and Conditions.docx | DOCX document | |
| 3-Attachment D - MMTR.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Score Sheet
| Patient Mobility Home, Vehicle Modifications and Used Modified Vehicles | ||||||||||
| SOLICITATION # MK27-1 | ||||||||||
| RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET | ||||||||||
| Score will be assigned as follows: | ||||||||||
| 0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to missing information | ||||||||||
| Firm Name: | 1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information | |||||||||
| 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner | ||||||||||
| Evaluator: | 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner | |||||||||
| 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them | ||||||||||
| Date: | 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP | |||||||||
| Minimum Mandatory Requirements | RFP Section | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) | ||||||||
| 1 | Vendor MUST certify they can meet the Scope of Work | |||||||||
| 2 | Vendor MUST upload a Technical Response | |||||||||
| 3 | Vendor MUST upload a Cost Sheet (Attachment C) | |||||||||
| 0 | ||||||||||
| Scoreable Technical Criteria | RFP Section | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Criteria Weight | % of Tech Criteria | Points Possible | Points | ||||
| Earned | Minimum Required | |||||||||
| 1 | EXPERIENCE, KNOWLEDGE, AND EXPERTISE | 40 | 20.0% | 200.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 2 | BREADTH OF OFFERINGS | 40 | 20.0% | 200.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 3 | ORDERING AND DELIVERY PROCESS | 40 | 20.0% | 200.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 4 | CUSTOMER SERVICE, TRAINING, AND SUPPORT | 40 | 20.0% | 200.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 5 | MAINTENANCE, LIFECYCLE AND WARRANTIES | 40 | 20.0% | 200.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 13 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 14 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 15 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 16 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 17 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 18 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 19 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 20 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 21 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 22 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 23 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 100.0% | 1000.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| Required Technical Point Threshold | RFP Section | Min Percent | Min Points Required | Points Earned | Percent Earned | Evaluation | ||||
| 60% | 600.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0 | ||||||
| Cost | RFP Section | Low Cost Option | Offered Cost | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned | ||||
| 25% | 333.3 | 0.0 | ||||||||
| To receive an award, a vendor must achieve a minimum technical score of 600 points and a combined total score (technical plus cost) of at least 750 points. | ||||||||||
| * Purchasing will use the following cost formula: The points assigned to each offerors cost proposal will be based on the lowest proposal price. The offeror with the lowest Proposed Price will receive 100% of the price points. All other offerors will receive a portion of the total cost points based on what percentage higher their Proposed Price is than the Lowest Proposed Price. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (Lowest Proposed Price/Proposed Price). | ||||||||||
| Total Evaluation Points | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned | |||||||
| Total Technical Evaluation Points | 75% | 1,000.0 | 0.0 | |||||||
| Total Cost Evaluation Points | 25% | 333.3 | 0.0 | |||||||
| Total Evaluation Points | 100% | 1,333.3 | 0.0 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .