A0004 36C25622R0140 - RFIs_ 021823 (003).pdf

36C25622R0140, Construct Inpatient Dialysis

Request for Information - AVCOR Construction, LLC

1. Paragraph 14.9 of the SOW references a Sample Form 014500, but no Sample Form is attached and no hyperlink. Will the VA provide the referenced Sample Form as part of the Solicitation documents?

A: Sample Form 014500 is uploaded as an attachment to the amendment.

2. Paragraph 16.5 of the SOW states "General Contractor’s employees are subject to rules of CAVHS Medical Center applicable to their conduct." Will the VA provide the relevant rules of CAVHS Medical Center regarding conduct to which the General Contractor's employees will be subject to?

Does this extend to subcontractors as well?

A: See attached Contractor Rules of Behavior (“ROB”). Yes, subcontractors subject to “ROB”.

3. Will the VA provide internal ILSM / Fire & Life Safety plans?

A: See section 01 35 26.1.14 which requires contractor to " Establish and maintain a site-specific fire protection program in accordance with 29 CFR 1926."

4. What patient activities occur in the areas adjoining the area where construction work is to be performed? What patient activities occur above and below the area where the construction work is to be performed?

A: Community Living Centers (CLCs), office environments, clinic environments

5. Are there any patient activities that are performed in the adjoining areas (beside, above and below) that would require special consideration as it relates to construction activities, including but not limited to quiet hours or reduced days per week for construction activities?

A: See Q4 response

6. Drawing HA101 dated 2020.02.12 "GENERAL NOTES-ASBESTOS ABATEMENT" states "GENERAL

CONTRACTOR AND SUB-CONTRACTORS ARE TO COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN

THE ASBESTOS ABATEMENT SPECIFICATIONS DOCUMENT ENTITLED ASBESTOS ABATEMENT

DESIGN FOR GROUND FLOOR SPS AND 5TH FLOOR DIALYSIS." The Solicitation documents do not include a document entitled "Asbestos Abatement Design for Ground Floor SPS and 5th Floor Dialysis." Is this in reference to EJT or another project at JLM? If this is in reference to another project, will the VA provide an Asbestos Abatement Design for this project?

A: Disregard reference to separate project. VA TIL asbestos abatement specifications apply.

7. Has asbestos testing been conducted? If so, will the VA provide the asbestos testing report generated from previously conducted asbestos testing?

A: Reference the construction drawings to asbestos abatement.

8. If roof penetrations are required who holds the warranty on that portion of the roof, and is it still applicable?

A: This project is on the 1st Floor of a 3-floor facility. No roof penetration expected, should this become an issue matter to be discussed with Awardee.

9. Do any of the sinks in clean rooms require a sink apron or shroud? If they do they VA provide drawings specifications and list salient characteristic for minimum requirements.

A: This inquiry cannot be answered; it lacks clarity, which may provide inaccurate information if the Government attempted to respond to this question as is. Clarify requires exactly what rooms / sinks are being referred to.

10. Detail D6 page AE403 shows lockers with a sloped top. Does this standard locker form you Basis of Design?

A: The answer can be found in Section 10 51 13.

11. Drawing AE501 references "Horcher" ceiling mounted patient lift. Is there a J&A for this specified product? Will the VA please specify all salient performance/design criteria/characteristics to establish minimum requirements for the ceiling mounted patient lift?

A: The equipment listed is the basis of design. All substitutions are to be submitted for VA approval before any equipment is ordered.

12. Drawing AE501 references "Horcher" ceiling mounted patient lift. Horcher’s website indicates that they are no longer taking new customers (http://www.horcherlifts.com/), see image below. Will the government advise on the salient performance/design criteria/characteristics to establish minimum requirements for the ceiling mounted patient lifts?

A: See Q11 response

13. General Note 1 on AE501 says "CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FINAL DESIGN AND STRUCTURAL ATTACHMENTS AS A DELEGATED DESIGN". Is this typical to see? Can the manufacturer provide this delegated design? Confirm it is the VA's intention for the contractor to provide design services for the final design and structural attachments?

A: Design is correct as shown. Please bid in compliance with information currently provided in the plans and specs. (No amendment will be issued to clarify.)

14. Please refer to specification 11 73 00 para 1.4.A.2. Shop drawings and structural calculations shall be signed and stamped by a registered structural engineer, and shall meet all code requirements in http://www.horcherlifts.com/ the jurisdiction having authority. Please confirm that bidders are required to provide structural engineer stamp drawing as indicated in the specifications.

15. The Acrovyn (same as 3H) wall covering is listed in the finish legend of the drawings but there is no specifications for High Impact Wall Protection or Covering. Will the VA furnish this specification in an Amendment?

A: This inquiry cannot be answered; it lacks clarity, which may provide inaccurate information if the Government attempted to respond to this question as is. The term "High Impact Wall Protection" does not appear on Sheet IN101.

16. Please reference refer to AD111 note D41. Pneumatic Tubing System above ceiling must be protected. During walk through it was not clear as to the path of the tube as we looked in the ceiling. Would the VA furnish a detail drawing of the path and tube protection required?

A: See construction phase of the construction drawings that reflect what needs are required.

17. Is the pneumatic tubing to remain functional during construction activities?

A: Yes

18. Has a Commissioning Agent been contracted for this project to perform a Commissioning Design Review and Commissioning responsibilities for this project? If so, please identify the Commissioning Agent contracted for this project. If a Commissioning Agent has been contracted by the VA, who pays for commissioning, the VA or Contractor?

A: Yes, the Cx Agent is Kenny Hiegel (Bernhard TME) and they are under a separate contract.

19. What is the required submittal exchange software required for this project? Will the government provide said submittal exchange for the contractor to upload submittal data?

A: General Contractor is responsible for acquiring these services and maintain this service thru the life of this contract. (See SOW 3.1 & submittal section 01 33 23)

20. What are the specific characteristics/capabilities that the submittal exchange software must have to meet minimum requirements?

A: General Contractor will verify software requirements, see Q19 response.

21. The warranty language throughout says "Manufacturer shall warranty their PRODUCT (could be numerous products) from the date of installation and final acceptance by the Government. Would the VA clarify from date of installation or final acceptance? Will the VA clarify what final acceptance means?

A: Warranty shall comply with FAR 52.246-21. Final acceptance represents the project not installation of material/equipment. GC will have warranty coverage listed in close-out documents.

22. The SOW references VA Form 10-6001 required with all payment requests. Will the government please confirm this form must be included/ utilized for payment requests? If VA Form 10-6001 is required, will the VA provide a copy of this form in an Amendment?

A: Disregard VA Form 10-6001, use AIA G702 for payment request and AIA G703 for supporting documentation for line-item breakdown.

23. Sheet AE501 General Note #1 states that the contractor shall provide final design and structural attachments for the patient lifts. Will the VA please confirm that the VA wants the Contractor to provide this in lieu of the A/E of record?

plans and specs.

24. If the final design and structural attachments for the patient lifts is to be done by the general contractor, then this would make this portion of the contract now a design build. If so, what it the timeline for the design and at what budget should the GC’s use?

25. Can the contractor site superintendent, quality control, and site safety and health functions all be performed by the same (one) individual?

A: No, they are separate individuals.

26. There shows on the floor plans to have 12 new floor drains in various locations. The note says to slope floor. How much slope should be figured for these locations? In order to slope a new floor a topping slab must be installed to get the desired slope. Will the slope meet ADA requirements?

Can the VA provide a detail with leveling underlayment plan?

A: Intent is that there be positive slope to drain within a 6-inch radius from drain body. No topping slab is required or anticipated.

27. During demolition and build-back, will it be necessary to have shoe covers to be worn and changed each time you enter or leave the job since there are already sticky mats at the entrance and the area will be moped and swept all during the day?

A: GC will ensure the interior corridor is kept clean to prevent tracking dust and debris throughout the medical facility. This will be discussed with the awardee if needed.

28. Will the VA please provide patient lifts warranty requirements? The Specification appears to be silent on this.

A: GC will have warranty coverage listed in close-out documents.

29. POP is shown as 300 days. After concurring with several trades and trying to put together a schedule, meeting the 300 POP will not be possible. Will the VA increase the POP to 365 days due to raw material shortages and pandemic related delays?

A: PoP is the current construction performance. If POP is warranted, the VA is open to revisiting the number of performance days.

30. If the government extends the period of performance, does the government want offerors to include a schedule with the revised POP with their bid package?

A: Unless the “POP” is changed the schedule should reflect the required days.

31. If the contractor accounts for general conditions for a period less than the stated period of performance, and then runs out of general conditions because the project is taking longer than the contractor originally accounted for, will the government issue a change order/modification for addition general conditions to complete the original work within the original period of performance?

A: The goal is to complete the project within the allotted time. It is not the Government’s position to go into a “what if” scenario. Extrapolate your contractor’s general conditions and have dollar amount reflected in offeror’s proposal for review.

32. The State of Arkansas requires sales tax to be included in pricing unless the government issues a sales tax exemption certificate. Will the government issue a sales tax exemption certificate on this project?

A: Request to be taken under advisement.

33. Will there be a laydown area provided? If so, where?

A: This will be discussed with the Awardee.

34. Will the elevators in the lobby area next to corridor C1C-170 be available for use to take equipment to ground level if stairs cannot be utilized?

A: There are service elevators nearby for use by the GC.

35. Will the VA provide current as-built drawings (specifically for previous renovation projects in the construction area) for the mechanical/electrical/plumbing so that proper access for the under floor work can be planned accordingly?

A: This will be discussed with the Awardee.

36. Has the VA performed a Xray/scan of existing slab to determine if any piping or reinforcing will interfere with concrete boring?

A: No

37. What are the internal VA Fire/ISLM requirements for this project?

A: The answer can be found in Section 01 35 26.1.14 which requires contractor to " Establish and maintain a site-specific fire protection program in accordance with 29 CFR 1926."

38. Staff room 1C-102, HAC 1C-104 and Storage 1C-106 have exceptionally low ceiling heights (exp. 7’- 2”) as compared to the remainder of the project. New Ceiling in that area will only be 7’-3”. Will this allow enough room above ceiling tiles to install new light fixtures?

A: Design firm will provide answers

39. Can the VA explain why the ceiling heights in those areas is so low and only going back 1” higher?

A: Design firm will provide answers

40. Instructions to Offerors states: “The offeror shall submit two (2) separate proposals: Technical, Past Performance, Schedule, and Price identified accordingly.” Does the government want two separate proposals, or the four separate proposals identified after the colon?

A: Two (2) separate proposals: Technical, Past Performance, and Schedule submitted as part one (1) proposal and Price submitted as part two (2) proposal.

41. Will the VA confirm that surveillance is not part of this project? This does not appear to be included in this project.

A: VA personnel will perform daily site visits to the jobsite. The GC QA/QC and SSHO should be doing their own jobsite surveillance.

42. There are access control symbols on the plans. Please indicate which division is to provide and install door hardware.

A: The Government will not direct construction/execution approach for this portion of the work. This shall be at the Contractor’s discretion. See Spec, Division 8, section 08 71 00 Door Hardware

43. Please provide a picture of the data closet of the front and back of the existing telecommunications rack. This area was not accessible during the site visit.

A: Refer to construction drawings for information.

44. The data closet was not available during the site visit, will the VA permit a second site visit for Contractors to inspect this area?

A: Not at this me.

45. Please indicate the type of category communication cable that shall be used (example: Cat6, Cat6e, Cat6a). Is the cable is to be shielded or unshielded? Please note that Cat6e could have significant lead times compared to the other category cables mentioned.

A: Cat6 unshielded

46. On page EP101 there are TV icons. Per the legend on page EK101 TV icons shall receive(1) coax cable and (2) data cables. Looking at page EP101 the TV icons are also accompanied by a triangle which would indicate a (2) data drop per the legend on page EK101. Should the telecommunication contractor assume that the (2) data triangle and the (2) data with the TV icon are the same cables?

47. On page EP101 there are triangles with a “W” next to them. This icon is not referenced in the legend on page EK101. Please indicate what is required at this drop location.

A: Wall mounted location for owner furnished owner installed telephone

48. On page EP102 there are “ENT” icons which indicate a conduit box for “access control entrance device” should it be assumed that this comment is referring to a card reader?

A: Assumptions are at the risk of contractor – coordinate with COR should if you are uncertain /

Combination card reader and keypad

49. Per the legend on page EK101 data locations are to receive a category 6e cable and per specs all telecommunication category cables shall be 6 or better. Should the telecommunications contractor bid using category 6 or category 6e?

A: see Q45, Cat6 unshielded

50. Per page 08 71 00-25 door hardware set “2A” Hes model door strikes shall be used. However, on page EP102 of the plan’s doors are shown to receive “ML”. Please indicate if the doors shall receive electric strikes, or magnetic locks.

A: This inquiry cannot be answered; it lacks clarity, which may provide inaccurate information if the Government attempted to respond to this question as is. HW set 2A does not appear in door schedule.

51. Please indicate which Division is responsible for the purchasing, installation, and wiring of the access control devices (electric strikes, RTE, card readers, motions, etc.).

A: Means and Methods are the GC’s discretion with the Government approval. The Government will not direct construction/execution approach for this portion of the work.

52. Please refer to FA101 note 7. Contractor to provide new SLC and audio circuits from existing EST panel on lower floor in GB-113-170, which will come up to this floor in telephone 1B-125-170 and route corridors to new panel. Allocate 400' path between panels. Contractor to coordinate work through occupied areas. However, during the visit, the electrical GB113-170 and telephone GB112- 170 rooms were not shown, only the machine room on the ground floor next to the corridor CGB5- 170.Will the VA set up a new site visit to look at the conditions of these spaces? Will the VA provide detailed photographs?

A:

53. Please refer to the partition type E14c note on page AE102. According, to the partition notes and legend on page GI002, acoustical insulation is not required. Please confirm that this partition doesn't need to be insulated.

A: The inquiry will be clarified by a future amendment if required

54. Plan Page PK101 – The Plumbing Specialties Schedule and the Plumbing Fixture Schedule both show (WB) dialysis box. The descriptions lay out two different boxes. Please clarify which box is to be used.

A: The answer can be found on Sheet PK101 issued with Addendum #2

55. Please clarify the intent of the wall around the nurse station counter desks. Will the specified finishes (SS-01, PL-01) on detail B6/page AE50 be installed along the c path?

A: See AE502; details B6 & D6

56. Note #1 on partition type legend on sheet G1002 indicates walls that are not smoke or acoustical to terminate 4” above ceiling. Please confirm wall type J_4w extends to floor deck above with mold and mildew resistant gyp board on each side of the wall with mold and mildew resistant gypsum board extending to deck?

A: The inquiry will be clarified by a future amendment if required

57. Are the temporary walls that will be built in the corridor for dust protection and negative air to be

2 hours fire rated? If not 2 hours, what will be the rate required?

A: The answer can be found in Section 01 35 26, Paragraph 1.14.C

58. Please provide wall type and placement of temporary partitions required to seal off construction area from adjacent corridor, and satellite pharmacy, and North corridor.

59. Instruction to offerors: Whose personal business experience is considered to determine past performance? What are the factors for the personal business experience past performance rating determination?

A: Contractor’s references. See Exhibit B of the solicitation.

60. Instruction to offerors: With regard to Factor 2, will the government consider experience for projects which is substantially complete for Exhibit A and Exhibit B? This would ensure consistency with Factor 1 that evaluates projects that are “successfully completed or in progress” AND the instructions listed in Exhibit A.

A: No, Factor 1 lends itself to contractor’s breath of experience, Factor 2 will provide a view of contractor’s result in completing required work.

61. Instruction to offerors: Instructions for Exhibit A state that “Projects may be on-going and cannot have been completed more than 5 years prior to the solicitation issue date.” Will the government consider experience which is in progress for Exhibit A and Exhibit B?

A: Exhibit B, bottom of page 1, key personnel can be selected.

62. Instruction to offerors: What form do contractors use to provide past performance of Key Personnel if they are not subcontractors?

A: Exhibit B, bottom of page 1, key personnel can be selected.

63. Instruction to offerors: Will the VA provide the applicable form for contractors to use to provide past performance of Key Personnel who are not subcontractors?

A: Select appropriate block(s) on Exhibit B, bottom of page 1.

64. Instruction to offerors: What are the performance confidence ratings? Please provide definitions for the confidence performance ratings.

A: See Exhibit A for Performance Relevancy, along with Exhibit B Past and Present Questionnaire.

Combined with all relevant factors of the evaluation elements, the Government is assured of a successfully completed project. A cumulation of all elements produces the performance confidence rating.

65. Instructions to Offerors: Performance Currency, Trends, and Relevancy paragraph states “The evaluation will consider the sub-factors as described herein” relating to Performance Confidence Ratings. It is not clear what the sub-factors are for Performance Confidence Ratings. Please provide the sub-factors to be evaluated for Performance Confidence Ratings.

A: See Q64 response

66. Instructions to Offerors: The Past Performance evaluation information in the Instructions indicates the evaluation is a two-step process (Performance Relevancy Rating and Performance Confidence Rating). The instructions only state and define the Performance Relevancy Ratings. What are the Performance Confidence Ratings and definitions that will be evaluated?

A: See Q64 response

67. Will the government provide at a minimum of a two-week bid due date extension from the date the final RFI’s are answered so that the contractor can have the bidding instructions clarified and have adequate time to prepare a response? GC’s also need adequate time to disseminate this information to all subcontractors and allow subcontractors to review the information and provide accurate pricing based on those answers.

A: An extension will be given considering the VA’s response to current RFI.

68. Instruction to offerors: How does the government perform a risk rating for each contractor?

A: Based on the cumulative rating of performance currency, trends, and relevancy.

69. Instruction to offerors: Will the VA provide the Risk Ratings and definitions for each Risk Rating that will be evaluated? If yes, what are the Risk Ratings and Definitions for each Risk Rating to be evaluated?

A: Refer to the chart on page 4 and 5 (Combined Technical/Risk Ratings) in Instructions to Offerors.

70. Please refer to the demolition note D2 clouded in room 1C-102. Will the VA consider vacating pharmacy room 107-170 to build the new 1hr partition so as not to interfere with activities during construction?

A: This will be discussed with winning offeror

71. Please refer to PL102 note 1. The existing 6" sanitary line is located in the crawl space and exits building in the direction of plan north. During the visit, no crawl space was accessible. Will the VA set up a new site visit to allow contractors and subcontractors to look at the conditions of this area? Will the VA provide photos?

A: Not at this time

72. Plan AH101 reference “Any actions taken by the contractor without obtaining guidance from the

Atoka, Inc., shall become the sole risk and responsibility of the GC / asbestos abatement contractor.

all costs incurred due to such action are also the responsibility of the GC / asbestos abatement contractor”. The plan also states, “the GC will incur all costs of Atoka, Inc., PIH, including all sampling/analytical costs to assure compliance with OSHA/EPA/state requirements related to failure to comply with the regulations applicable to the work”. Will the VA clarify what role ATOKA, Inc. had or will have in the project?

73. Will the VA provide their contract with ATOKA, Inc. that outlines the terms, conditions, and pricing, so the contractor can include in their price proposal?

74. Will VA organize a second site visit after receiving the answers of the RFIs?

A: Not at this time.

75. Please refer to note 2 on page QH101. “Coordinate locations for A5215 - bracket, television, ceiling mounted 36" x 6" and M0506 - television, flat screen with RCP and interior elevations”. Will the VA provide the product data for the televisions to be furnished and installed by the VA so the contractor can estimate for the appropriate blocking to be installed and the specific location of the blocking?

A: Television are user provided.

76. Can the VA provide the manufacturer requirements for the backing/blocking for the installation of the VA furnished and/or installed equipment (all those items listed as VV on the equipment schedule)?

77. Will the VA provide the specifications (weight size, etc.) listed as VV on the equipment schedule?

78. During the site visit organic growth (mold) was found in the chase between the restrooms 1C-170 and 1C-167. Has the organic growth been tested? If the organic growth has not been tested, should the contractor include testing in their bid?

A: Will verify with Safety.

79. Should the contractor include remediation on their bid?

A: Refer to requirements in Specs and SOW.

80. How does the VA wants the contractor to proceed if organic growth is found in other locations of the construction area?

A: See Q79

81. Will the VA provide a change order for the cost of remediation if other discoveries of organic growth are found during construction activities?

A: Contractor proposal should represent best offer; VA projects are presented with the idea that change orders are not forthcoming. Unforeseen conditions will be handled accordingly with the Awardee.

82. Please refer to specifications 11 73 00 para 1.4.A.4. Manufacturer shall provide BIM (Building Information Model) for clash detection on the request of the Resident Engineer (RE), VA Construction Agent, or General Contractor. Will the VA include the 3D Modeling of the MEP installations as part of bid requirements to verify any possible conflicts?

83. Where will the designated parking area be for workers accessing the construction site?

A: To be determined in conjunction with Awardee.

84. Is TB screening required for this project? If TB screening is required will screening in the last two years be sufficient?

A: See Specification: 1.13 Tuberculosis Screening

85. Will we be permitted to use exit door by room 1C-165A for use in stocking materials into work areas?

A: To be determined.

86. Please verify specification section 01 32 16.15-4 1.5.F and verify the amount of work activities to be included in the project schedule.

A: Perform to contract terms and condition and any question(s) that arise can be coordinated with the COR.

87. Please confirm that a continuous water membrane is required before the application of the resinous flooring?

A: The answer can be found in Section 09 67 23.20, Paragraph 2.2.C

88. Please confirm that there will be existing fire alarm coverage during construction. (i-e change existing smoke detectors to heat detectors). Ref. FA101 A: Refer to construction drawings

89. Will the fire sprinklers head be required to turned up during demolition?

A: Per the VA TIL requirements

90. Please confirm that HVAC test and balance are by General Contractor.

91. PL 101, PL102, indicates significant amount of plumbing work. Please confirm that engineer has performed a coordination survey of existing mechanical equipment and devices to ensure proper accesses to the under-floor plumbing.

A: This inquiry cannot be answered; it lacks clarity, which may provide inaccurate information if the Government attempted to respond to this question as is.

92. What is the scope of drawing ED 102 & ED 101 Power and System demolition? Please clarify.

A: This inquiry cannot be answered; it lacks clarity, which may provide inaccurate information if the Government attempted to respond to this question as is.

93. Please confirm that the new lighting fixtures requires any steel supports.

A: This inquiry cannot be answered; it lacks clarity, which may provide inaccurate information if the Government attempted to respond to this question as is. Which fixtures specifically and what is the source of a requirement for steel supports?

94. #1 Flush mounted boxes for data, Specs call out for 4-11/16in square 3-5/8in deep. The deep specified is greater than standard size manufacture. Will 2-1/8” deep or 3-1/4 deep be allowed?

A: 3-1/4” depth is approved

95. Will Contractor be required to cart rubbish through hallway, or will owner allow window to be removed for rubbish removal?

A: Refer to Construction documents concerning windows

96. On drawing EJ101 Note D3 shows a 1” conduit to be stub up Spec section 27 05 33 2.1 A states a minimum size of 3/4”. Is ¾ acceptable for data?

A: ¾ “ is approved

97. Will the different EMT system ran in conduit above ceiling have to be painted per system?

A: Design is correct as shown. Please bid in compliance with information currently provided in the plans and specs.

98. Will the VA consider allowing the awarded contractor some space inside the work site or in the immediate area surrounding the site to setup a desk for the onsite superintendent? This will allow him/her to have constant presence inside the facility and the work site.

A: To be determine in coordination with the Awardee.

99. Please refer to FS 101 detail F1. The fire suppression line extends beyond 1C-173 and goes through the corridor on the other side of the new wall. This will require ACT removal, reinstallation, HEPA, ICRA, etc. Will the VA want the existing grid reinstalled or go back with new grid?

A: TBD

100. Please refer to the ICRA plan on page GC 101 detail F5. The plan calls for ICRA level 4 in the area, but that area is office space only which should not drive a level 4 requirement. Will the VA confirm that ICRA 2 is sufficient for this area similar to that beyond the conference room 112- 170?

101. Please refer to GC 101 detail F5. The corridor C1C1-170 calls for ICRA level 4. Is this accurate or should this be ICRA level 2 similar to the connecting Corridor C1B3-170?

A: Design is correct as shown. Please bid in compliance with information currently provided in the plans and specs.

102. Shall the corridor C1C1-170 be cordoned off from pedestrian traffic the entire duration of the project?

103. Is the abatement allowed to be conducted during normal working hours or should it be done at night after hours?

A: Normal working hours

104. Is the contractor responsible for moving the existing furniture and equipment from the associated areas or is the VA going to empty the space prior to beginning construction?

A: Area will be vacated and emptied

105. If the VA requires the Contractor to move existing furniture and equipment from the associated areas, will the VA ensure all information and effects of VA personnel and patient records are removed by VA personnel prior to the construction site being turned over to the contractor?

106. Will the VA ensure that ALL documents, specifically patient records, are removed from the entire construction site PRIOR to the site being turned over to the contractor for mobilization?

107. The abatement crew will need water for surfactant. Are any of the water sources, taps, drains, or restrooms in the workspace active and available for use?

A: TBD in coordination with Awardee.

108. Have the areas in 1C-108, 105, 104, 106, 101, 170, 167, 101A, 101B been sampled for abatement?

A: Refer to HA-101

109. There is a wall type conflict between GI005 and HA101/AD101 on what the existing condition of walls separating the workspace from existing Copier/Fax 110-170 and existing Assistant Director 109-170. They are not shown as 1 hour rated on GI005 but are shown as rated on HA101/AD101. Can we assume these are 1 hour rated walls and will NOT need to be extended to deck to meet the ICRA Class IV requirement?

A: Do not assume if answer will impact proposal contact COR, otherwise to be addressed with Awardee.

110. Does ACM floor tile/mastic go under walls? Is the same ACM tile/mastic on the Corridor on the North 1C-C1?

A: if answer will impact proposal contact COR, otherwise to be addressed with Awardee.

111. Sheet AG101 show the Existing North Corridor hatched in Red which indicates Area not in

Contract but has signage symbols denoted. Please confirm the signage in the existing Corridor is part of the contract.

A:

112. To create the pattern in the epoxy, aluminum strips will be needed. Please advise if this is acceptable? Similar to what is used for Terrazzo flooring.

113. Trane is experiencing substantial delays in equipment manufacturing and delivery timeframes on a global level. In an effort to reduce major schedule impacts, will the government permit an administrative Notice to Proceed so that submittals can be reviewed, approved and material ordered prior to mobilization?

A: To be discussed with Awardee if warranted

114. Due to the global equipment and personnel deficiencies that are currently being experienced with any Trane equipment, controls, or manpower requirement, will the government provide a substitute for Trane?

A: To be discussed with Awardee if warranted

115. Paragraph 4.12 of the Solicitation incorporates FAR 52.236-21 SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS

FOR CONSTRUCTION (FEB 1997) ALTERNATE II (APR 1984)

(a) The Contractor shall keep on the work site a copy of the drawings and specifications and shall at all times give the Contracting Officer access thereto. Anything mentioned in the specifications and not shown on the drawings, or shown on the drawings and not mentioned in the specifications, shall be of like effect as if shown or mentioned in both. In case of difference between drawings and specifications, the specifications shall govern. However, this FAR Clause appears to differ from what is found in Demolition Note 6 on Drawing AD201 states "IN THE EVENT OF A CONFLICT

BETWEEN THE SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS – DURING THE BIDDING PROCESS – THE

CONTRACTOR SHALL BID THE MORE EXPENSIVE OPTION; IN THE EVENT OF THE CONTRACTOR

BIDDING THE LEAST EXPENSIVE OPTION, AND THE DESIGN REQUIRING THE MORE EXPENSIVE

OPTION – THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING THE MORE EXPENSIVE

OPTION AT NO ADDITIONAL EXPENSE TO THE VA. Will the VA please advise if the FAR Clause or the note on said drawing prevail?

116. Instructions to Offerors, Evaluation Factors, Factor 1 – Technical Construction Management, Subfactor 1 states G.C.’s must have a minimum of 3 projects completed or in progress of similar size, scope, and complexity within the past 5 years. As this Solicitation is set-aside for small businesses (SDVOSB), will the government expand the timeframe of which those 3 projects can be in progress or completed from 5 years to 10 years to increase open competition?

117. FAR 36.521 Specifications and drawings for construction states, in part, “The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.236-21, Specifications and Drawings for Construction, in solicitations and contracts when a fixed-price construction contract or a fixed-price dismantling, demolition, or removal of improvements contract is contemplated and the contract amount is expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold.” This project exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold. FAR 52.236-21 (Feb 1997) Alternate II (Apr 1984) is included on page 35 of the Solicitation. Paragraph (a) of FAR 52.236-21(a) states, in part, “In case of difference between drawings and specifications, the specifications shall govern.” However, Demolition Note 6 on Drawing AD201 states "IN THE EVENT OF A CONFLICT BETWEEN THE SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS – DURING THE BIDDING PROCESS – THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BID THE MORE EXPENSIVE OPTION; IN THE EVENT OF THE CONTRACTOR BIDDING THE LEAST EXPENSIVE OPTION, AND THE

DESIGN REQUIRING THE MORE EXPENSIVE OPTION – THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE

FOR PROVIDING THE MORE EXPENSIVE OPTION AT NO ADDITIONAL EXPENSE TO THE

VA. This demolition note directly contradicts FAR 52.236-21 and/or appears to modify the intent of the order of precedence clause. Is FAR 52.236-21 not applicable to this project?

https://www.acquisition.gov/far/52.236-21#FAR_52_236_21

118. Notes throughout the design drawings, including Demolition Note 6 on Drawing AD201 states "IN

THE EVENT OF A CONFLICT BETWEEN THE SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS – DURING THE

BIDDING PROCESS – THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BID THE MORE EXPENSIVE OPTION; IN THE EVENT OF THE CONTRACTOR BIDDING THE LEAST EXPENSIVE OPTION, AND THE DESIGN REQUIRING THE MORE EXPENSIVE OPTION – THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING THE MORE EXPENSIVE OPTION AT NO ADDITIONAL EXPENSE TO THE VA. Define what is meant by the term “design” as used in this note. Does “design” mean drawings? Is this intended to mean “design intent”?

119. Notes throughout the design drawings, including Demolition Note 6 on Drawing AD201 states "IN

THE EVENT OF A CONFLICT BETWEEN THE SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS – DURING THE

BIDDING PROCESS – THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BID THE MORE EXPENSIVE OPTION; IN THE EVENT OF THE CONTRACTOR BIDDING THE LEAST EXPENSIVE OPTION, AND THE DESIGN REQUIRING THE MORE EXPENSIVE OPTION – THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING THE MORE EXPENSIVE OPTION AT NO ADDITIONAL EXPENSE TO THE VA. Please define the VA’s interpretation of the use of the word “conflict” in this note. Per the order of precedence clause in FAR 52.236- 1(a), if there is a “difference” between the drawings and specifications, the specifications shall govern.

A: The inquiry will be clarified by a future amendment if needed – Not acceptable response

120. Specification 11 73 00, paragraph 3.4(2) states: Periodic Inspection shall be provided by the manufacturer on a yearly basis in compliance with ISO 10535. Will the VA provide minimum terms of periodic inspection requirements?

121. The Cover Sheet the Addendum 1 – Construction Documents states “MAINTENANCE OF

EMERGENCY EXITS AND COMMUNICATION DURING CONSTRUCTION: CONTRACTORS AND STAFF

SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 241 “STANDARD FOR SAFEGUARDING CONSTRUCTION, ALTERATION,

AND DEMOLITION OPERATIONS” 2019 EDITION. A more recent version of NFPA 241 was issued in 2022. Does the VA want the contractor to comply with the most recent 2022 version of NFPA 214?

122. Drawing AE403 depicts the lockers with a sloped top. Specification 10 51 13 para. 2.1 references

“Republic Storage “Standard Lockers” as the basis of design. Para 2.2.A.6 states “Sloping top – 20 gage.” Para 2.2.A.7 states “Flat top – 20 gage.” Also, a review of Republic Locker’s Size table on their website for their “Standard Locker” does not show that a sloped top is available. Para 2.3.G states ”Provide flat top, closed ends and trim. Trim shall be anchored to lockers with concealed fasteners.” Para. 2.3.H states “Provide continuous sloping tops constructed to resist denting and sagging with no exposed fasteners.” Does the VA want the contractor to price a sloped top or flat top locker? Are both flat top and sloped top lockers required in different locations? If so, please provide details of where the flat top lockers and/or should be and how many in each location?

plans and specs. 2023 Republic Locker Guide shows sloped tops as options for all lockers.

123. A discrepancy exists in Specification 10 51 13 as it relates to the identification of “Republic Storage

‘Standard Lockers’” as the Basis of Design product and the product specifications of Republic Storage’s Standard Lockers. Several of the salient characteristics outlined in Specification 10 51 13, Part 2 for metal lockers are not consistent with the specifications (product material composition) published by Republic Storage for their “Standard Lockers” on their website and it appears that these “Standard Lockers” could not be approved under the current specification requirements.

Specifically:

a) Hinges – Para. 2.2.A.C.1 of the Specification states “Hinges shall be not less than 2" high, 0.050" thick steel with nonremovable pin.” Para. 2.3.9 of Republic Storage’s Standard Lockers specification reads “HINGES: Hinges shall be 2" high, 5-knuckle, full loop, tight pin style, securely welded to frame and double riveted to the inside of the door flange.”

(emphasis added). It is not possible to have a nonremovable pin and a tight pin style in the same product. Does the VA want the contractor to include pricing in accordance with the Specification and outlined salient characteristics as written? If no, will the VA provide a revised Specification for metal lockers?

b) Handles – Para. 2.2.A.C.2 of the Specification requires handles to be “chrome-plated, die cast zinc alloy, with cadmium plated lock lifting mechanism.” Republic Storage’s “Standard Lockers” specification reads: 2.3.8 HANDLES: A non-protruding 14 gauge lifting trigger and slide plate shall transfer the lifting force for actuating the lock bar when opening the door. The exposed portion of the lifting trigger shall be encased in a molded ABS thermoplastic cover that provides isolation from metal-to-metal contact and be contained in a formed 20 gauge stainless steel recessed pocket. This stainless steel pocket shall contain a recessed area for the various lock types available and a mounting area for the number plate. (emphasis added). Does the VA want the contractor to include pricing in accordance with the Specification and outlined salient characteristics as written? If no, will the VA provide a revised Specification for metal lockers?

124. Please refer to plan MH101. The drawing shows a new exhaust fan passing through the courtyard.

The Demolition Floor Plan Keyed Note D16 states, "Existing exterior window to remain," meaning The contractor will need to lintel off the exterior brick to make an opening for the new exhaust fan to pass through the wall into the building. How does the VA want the contractor to reinforce that brick veneer wall to prevent it from collapsing? Will the VA provide a design drawing showing how to secure that opening?

125. The specifications do not include Masonry. However, it will be required to work around the new opening/exhaust fan area. Will the VA provide this specification?

126. Please refer to specifications 11 73 00 Para. 1.3.C. Certification of compliance with VA requirements shall be provided by an independent third party, Inspector of Record (IOR), who will observe installation and manufacturer’s testing to ensure that the ceiling structure, ceiling lift, and charging system is safe and compliance with shop drawings, structural calculations, specifications, ISO 10535 requirements, and code requirements. IOR shall be a registered structural engineer in the state of installation. Will the VA clarify if the contractor will have to include the expenses of the IOR in their bid?

127. Please refer to specifications 11 73 00 Para. 1.4.A.2. Once the purchase order is accepted by the vendor, a set of stamped drawings shall be provided by the vendor. Shop drawings and structural calculations shall be signed and stamped by a registered structural engineer and shall meet all code requirements in the jurisdiction having authority. Structural engineer shall ensure ceiling minimum structure capacity shall support the loads specified in the shop and installation drawings and be in compliance with local structural and seismic codes. Will the VA clarify if the contractor will have to include the expenses of the Structural Engineer in their bid?

128. What type of slings are required to price reusable or disposable?

A: The Government is unclear on the question being asked.

129. Would the government consider dropping the patient lifts weight capacity from 1000lb system to 880lb?

130. Drawing AE501 references “Horcher” ceiling lift system. Is this intended to be a purchase description or a performance specification?

A: Horcher is a Basis-of-Design product.

131. If this is intended to be a purchase description, will the VA accept a substitution for a different brand (Guldmann, Handicare, etc.) with equal weight-lifting capacity? If not, will the VA provide the Justification and Approval documentation?

A: Horcher is a Basis-of-Design product.

132. The drawing specifies the window frame type Kawneer -1630 SS IR- (Wet Glazed) curtain system as the basis of design on page AE503. Is this intended to be a purchase description or a performance specification? If this intended to be a purchase description will the VA accept a substitution for a brand name or equal with a similar sightline and depth? If not, will the VA provide the required Justification and Approval documentation?

133. Stonehard, Stontec is specified as a Basis of Design for the resinous materials to be used. This product has a high failure rate in this building alone. Will the VA confirm this is the basis of design system that the VA wants in this facility?

A: Stonhard is a Basis-of-Design product.

134. There is a note on Drawing IN101 referencing "Stonhard, Stontec" as the basis of design. Is this intended to be a product description or a performance specification? Will the VA accept a substitution for a different brand (Sikafloor/ DecoDur Flake FX; Dura-A-Flex/ Hybri-Flex EC, Etc.)

with the same flake broadcast system? If not, will the VA provide the justification and Approval documentation?

A: Stonhard is a Basis-of-Design product.

135. The finish legend on Drawing IN101 shows the “TRU DOOR” brand as the door's basis of design.

Will the VA accept a substitution for a brand with similar characteristics? If not, will the VA provide

136. The finish legend on Drawing IN101 shows the “Corian” brand as the solid surface's basis of design.

Will the VA accept a substitution for a brand with similar characteristics? If not, will the VA provide

A: Corian is a Basis-of-Design product.

137. The finish legend on Drawing IN101 shows the “ACROVYN” brand as the wall protection's basis of design. Will the VA accept a substitution for a brand with similar characteristics? If not, will the VA provide the Justification and Approval documentation?

A: Acrovyn is a Basis-of-Design product.

138. The finish legend on Drawing IN101 shows the “In Pro-Click EZ” brand as the cubicle curtain basis of design. Will the VA accept a substitution for a brand with similar characteristics? If not, will the VA provide the Justification and Approval documentation?

A: In Pro-Click EZ is a Basis-of-Design product.

139. Please refer to specification 27 52 23 para. 2.3.A. “The products specified shall be new, FCC and

UL Listed, labeled and produced by OEM manufacturer of record. The basis of design OEM is NOVUS CONNECT by WEST-COM. Will the VA accept a substitution for a brand with similar characteristics?

If not, will the VA provide the Justification and Approval documentation?

A: The equipment listed is the basis of design. All substitutions are to be submitted for approval

140. Specification 28 13 00, paragraph 1.1 Description states, in part, “This installation shall be fully compatible with and identical in operation to match the existing systems, and so basis of design is the HIRSCH system by IDENTIV. No alternate system will be considered if it is not fully compatible with the basis of design system.” Will the VA publish the supporting Justification and Approval as required by FAR part 11 (11.107) for this “brand name [or equal” purchase description?

141. Specification 28 13 00, paragraph 1.1 Description states, in part, “This installation shall be fully compatible with and identical in operation to match the existing systems, and so basis of design is the HIRSCH system by IDENTIV. No alternate system will be considered if it is not fully compatible with the basis of design system.” Will the VA provide the specific and minimum characteristics that an alternative/equal product must meet to be approved?

142. Will the VA amend the Solicitation to incorporate FAR 52.211-6 – Brand Name or Equal?

A: Yes; However, the equipment listed is the basis of design. All substitutions are to be submitted for approval before any equipment is ordered.

143. Does the VA intend for the term “basis of design” utilized throughout the Specifications and

Drawings to be a “brand name or equal” requirements? If so, will the VA publish the supporting Justification and Approval as required by FAR part 11 (11.107) for this “brand name [or equal” purchase description for each item identified by brand name throughout the Solicitation?

144. The Instruction to Bidders states “*EXHIBIT A PERFORMANCE RELEVANCY SURVEY and cover pages do not count against the 30-page limit for Past Performance” and “EXHIBIT A

“PERFORMANCE RELEVANCY SURVEY,” EXHIBIT B “PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE

QUESTIONNAIRE” and Attachment D “SUBCONTRACTOR FORM” does not count against the page limit per factor e.g., Technical, Past Performance, Schedule, and Price proposal.” However, the Instruction to Bidders attached to Amendment 1 states “The total number of pages addressing submitted factors shall not exceed (70) seventy.” Will the VA confirm that Exhibit A, Exhibit B and Attachment D do not count towards the page limit per factor AND the overall restriction to (70) seventy pages?

145. The project documents reference a “Medication Prep Room” that will be part of the completed project. Will personnel working in the “Medication Prep Room,” once operational, “receive, prepare, administer, transport or otherwise come in contact with hazardous drugs”? If yes, are there specific requirements for construction of such facilities that have not been incorporated into the Solicitation of which the Contractor should be aware? If yes, are there specific requirements for construction of such facilities that have not been considered by the VA and the A/E of record?

If there are specific requirements for construction of such facilities that have not been considered by the VA and the A/E of record, please identify what they are?

A: The construction drawings are designed to requirements required from the user.

146. Will personnel working in the in any area of the completed Dialysis Clinic, once operational, who “receive, prepare, administer, transport or otherwise come in contact with hazardous drugs”? If yes, are there specific requirements for construction of such facilities that have not been incorporated into the Solicitation of which the Contractor should be aware?

147. The Cover Sheet the Addendum 1 – Construction Documents states “MAINTENANCE OF

EMERGENCY EXITS AND COMMUNICATION DURING CONSTRUCTION: CONTRACTORS AND STAFF

SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 241 “STANDARD FOR SAFEGUARDING CONSTRUCTION, ALTERATION,

AND DEMOLITION OPERATIONS” 2019 EDITION. A more recent version of NFPA 241 was issued in 2022. Does the VA want the contractor to comply with the most recent 2022 version of NFPA 214?

148. The drawings contain the following phrase…