The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.
SB26-6
| Construction Project Management |
| SOLICITATION # SB26-6 |
| RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET |
| Score will be assigned as follows: |
| 0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed du to missing information |
| Firm Name: | 1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information |
| 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner |
| Evaluator: | 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner |
| 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them |
| Date: | 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP |
| Minimum Mandatory Requirements | | RFP Section | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) |
| 1 | Vendor must upload completed Attachment C: Cost Sheet | Attach C | |
| 2 | Vendor must upload Completed Attachment D: Technical Criteria Questions | Attach D | |
Scoreable Technical Criteria RFP Section Evaluator Score (0-5) Criteria Weight % of Tech Criteria Points Possible Points Earned
| A1. | Permitting and Approval Strategy: Describe your firm’s methodology for identifying, obtaining, and managing all required permits and approvals from government authorities and utility companies. | D-A1 | 10 | 7.14% | 50.00 | 0.00 |
| A2. | Project Management Methodology: Describe your firm’s approach to managing site-specific tasks, including how you ensure demolition reviews, topographical surveys, and geotechnical investigations are integrated into the early project timeline. | D-A2 | 10 | 7.14% | 50.00 | 0.00 |
| A3. | Program Oversight: Summarize your experience in managing multiple delivery methods and overseeing external consultants to maintain consistency across a broader program portfolio | D-A3 | 10 | 7.14% | 50.00 | 0.00 |
| A4. | Communication & Reporting: Detail your process for maintaining the Project Manual and disseminating weekly progress reports and meeting minutes to ensure all stakeholders are aligned. | D-A4 | 10 | 7.14% | 50.00 | 0.00 |
| B5. | Design Phase Collaboration: Explain your strategy for providing consultation during the programming, schematic design, and design development phases to ensure constructability | D-B5 | 10 | 7.14% | 50.00 | 0.00 |
| B6. | Sustainability & Efficiency: Describe your methodology for investigating and implementing environmental conservation measures. | D-B6 | 10 | 7.14% | 50.00 | 0.00 |
| B7. | Value Engineering: Summarize how your firm evaluates short-term and long-term life cycle costing for materials and systems during the design review process. | D-B7 | 10 | 7.14% | 50.00 | 0.00 |
| C8. | Site Surveillance: Outline your firm’s procedures for site inspections and how you ensure a qualified staff member is present during significant construction and testing activities. | D-C8 | 10 | 7.14% | 50.00 | 0.00 |
| C9. | Budget & Change Management: Describe your process of validating pay requests and your specific methodology for reviewing, soliciting quotes, and recommending action on change orders. | D-C9 | 10 | 7.14% | 50.00 | 0.00 |
| C10. | Compliance & Safety: Explain your approach to ensuring all employees and sub-PMs remain compliant with safety codes, particularly in environments involving minor children. | D-C10 | 10 | 7.14% | 50.00 | 0.00 |
| C11. | System Commissioning: Detail your experience in coordinating factory startups and commissioning for HVAC and electrical systems to ensure original design intent is met. | D-C11 | 10 | 7.14% | 50.00 | 0.00 |
| 12 | | | | | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| D12. | Regulatory Expertise: Summarize your firm’s familiarity with Utah Procurement Code 63G-6a and how you provide assistance to Eligible Users in following these statutes | D-D12 | 10 | 7.14% | 50.00 | 0.00 |
| D13. | Agency-Specific Requirements: Describe how you adapt your services to meet more restrictive oversight requirements, such as those for Local Education Agencies (LEAs) regarding School District Building Officials or Charter School Board Building Officer’s reporting. | D-D13 | 10 | 7.14% | 50.00 | 0.00 |
| D14. | Closeout Execution: Detail your procedure for consolidating operations manuals, warranty certificates, and as-built drawings to ensure a seamless transition to the Eligible User. | D-D14 | 10 | 7.14% | 50.00 | 0.00 |
| 16 | | | | | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| | | | 100.0% | 700.00 | 0.00 |
| Required Technical Point Threshold | RFP Section | Min Percent | Min Points Required | Points Earned | Percent Earned | Evaluation |
| Attach D | 65% | 455.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | |
| Cost | RFP Section | Low Cost Option | Offered Cost | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned |
| Attach C | | | 30% | 300.0 | 0.0 |
* Purchasing will use the following cost formula: The points assigned to each Vendors cost proposal will be based on the lowest proposal price. TheVendor with the lowest Proposed Price will receive 100% of the price points. All other Vendors will receive a portion of the total cost points based on what percentage higher their Proposed Price is than the Lowest Proposed Price. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (Lowest Proposed Price/Proposed Price).
| Total Evaluation Points | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned |
| Total Technical Evaluation Points | 70% | 700.0 | 0.0 |
| Total Cost Evaluation Points | 30% | 300.0 | 0.0 |
| Total Evaluation Points | 100% | 1,000.0 | 0.0 |
TO BE AWARDED: Proposal must obtain a total score of 650/1000 possible points. Total Score = Technical Criteria + Cost Points