B08_Solit_PSP_Vol_I_&_II.docx

DOCX document 89 KB Posted

Attached to
Replace Anacapa Stiff-Leg Derrick Crane with a Two-Crane System Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
140P2019R0033
Issued by
Department of the Interior National Park Service National Office

About this file

Proposal Submission Package VOL I & II

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Replace Anacapa Stiff-Leg Derrick Crane with a Two-Crane System, newest first.
File Type Posted
B09_Solic_Amendment_No._3_140P2019R0033_SF_30.pdf PDF
Amend_2.pdf PDF
B09_Solic_Amendment_No._1_Site_Visit_Sign_In_Sheet.pdf PDF
B09_Solic_Amendment_No._1_140P2019R0033_SF_30.pdf PDF
B09_Solic_Amendment_No._1_Drawing_Sheet_2_G1.pdf PDF
A06_Specifications_CHIS_185164.pdf PDF
B08_Solit_140P2019R0033_SF_1442_&_Clauses.pdf PDF
B03_DOL_Wage_Determ_CA15_2-1-2019.pdf PDF
A06_Drawings_CHIS_185164_Combined_Set.pdf PDF
B08_Solit_140P2019R0033_Attach_7.pdf PDF
A06_Dwgs-Specs_Anacapa_Rock_Engineering_Report_Final,_01-13-2017.pdf PDF
Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Channel Islands National Park

Solicitation #140P2019R0033

Project Title:

Replace Anacapa Stiff-Leg Derrick Crane with a Two Crane System

CHIS PMIS #185164

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

(RFP)

Proposal Submission Package

NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

DENVER SERVICE CENTER

For Technical Volume I:

1. Past Performance Questionnaire

For Business & Price Volume II:

1. Contract Price Schedule

2. General References

3. Proposed Equals

4. Hazardous Materials Identification Listing

5. Report on Limitation on Subcontracting

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

INSTRUCTIONS: Offeror to complete Sections A and B and transmit questionnaire to reference.

Reference to complete Sections C and D and transmit back to Contracting Officer listed in section E.

A. CONTRACTOR INFORMATION

Company Name
Company
Street Address
Address
City
City
State
State
Zip Code
XXXXX
DUNS Number
XXXXXXX
Point of Contact
Name, Email, Phone

B. CONTRACT INFORMATION

Project Title
Title
Contract Number
XXXXXXXXXX
Contract Type
Firm Fixed Price / Time & Materials / Cost Reimbursable / Other
Awarded Contract Price
$X,XXX,XXX
Current / Final Price
$X,XXX,XXX
Contract Award Date
XX/XX/XXXX
Contract Completion Date
XX/XX/XXXX
Period of Performance
XX/XX/XXX – XX/XX/XXX
Project Location
Park or Street address, City, State
Client / Owner
Company
Brief description of the contract & work effort:
Scope of work description

C. REFERENCE:

Name
First, Last
Position / Title
Title
Organization
Agency or Company
Phone Number
XXX-XXX-XXXX
Email Address
Email
Signature
Signature
Date
XX/XX/XXXX

D. EVALUATION

Rating
Definition
Exceptional
Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded many to the owner’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good
Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded some to the owner’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory
Performance met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Evaluation Area
Rating

Quality

Quality of workmanship (including subcontractors)?
Choose an item.
Quality of and adherence to quality control plan?
Choose an item.
Quality of informational and technical submittals?
Choose an item.
Overall Quality Rating
Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Schedule (& Time Management)

Met project schedule milestones?
Choose an item.
Responded to owner requests in a timely manner?
Choose an item.
Informational and technical submittals submitted timely?
Choose an item.
Promptly addressed scheduling issues?
Choose an item.
Overall Schedule (& Time Management) Rating
Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Cost Control

Addressed differing & unforeseen site conditions so as to minimize additional costs?
Choose an item.
Provided fair and reasonable pricing for contract modifications?
Choose an item.
Submitted accurate and complete invoices?
Choose an item.
Promptly paid subcontractors and suppliers?
Choose an item.
Overall Cost Control Rating
Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Management

General oversight by project manager and superintendent?
Choose an item.
Coordination with and control of subcontractors?
Choose an item.
Avoidance of accidents & safety violations?
Choose an item.
Addressed location factors (especially remote locations)?
Choose an item.
Maintained good working relationship with owner representatives?
Choose an item.
Demonstrated flexibility, innovativeness and cooperation in resolving potential problems?
Choose an item.
Overall Management Rating
Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Small Business Subcontracting (& Labor Standards)

Met regulatory and contractual labor standards?
Choose an item.
Successfully contracted with small and socio-economically disadvantaged businesses?
Choose an item.
Quality and adherence to applicable subcontracting plans?
Choose an item.
Overall Small Business Subcontracting (& Labor Standards) Rating
Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Regulatory Compliance

Met building and life safety codes?
Choose an item.
Overall Regulatory Compliance Rating
Choose an item.
Overall Recommendation:
Given what I know today about the contractor's ability to perform in accordance with the contract’s most significant requirements, I would recommend them for similar contracts:
Choose an item.
Overall Comments:

E. RETURN:

Return by
Time / Date
Name
CO or CS name
Title
Contracting Officer / Contract Specialist
Organization
National Park Service – Denver Service Center
Email
First_Last@nps.gov

CONTRACT PRICE SCHEDULE

SOLICITATION NUMBER: 140P2019R0033

PARK - PMIS: CHIS 185164

DEVELOPED AREA: Channel Islands National Park, Anacapa Island

PROJECT TITLE: Replace Anacapa Stiff-Leg Derrick Crane with a Two Crane System

Notice: Offerors are required to submit, a minimum, an offer that conforms to the solicitation documents with pricing for Base line items and all option line items. Failure to do so may render the proposal unacceptable. On lump-sum line items, provide the total price only. For all unit-priced line items, provide the unit price and the extended total price. If no specific line item exists for a portion of the work, include the costs in a related item. In case of error in calculation of extended prices, the unit price governs. In case of summation error, the total corrected amounts govern. Round totals & extended prices to whole dollars.

CONTRACT LINE ITEM NUMBER (CLIN)
CONTRACT LINE ITEM (CLI) TITLE
QUANTITY
UNIT OF MEASURE
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL PRICE
1
Construct New Cargo Handling System
1
LS
$0.00
$0.00
TOTAL BASE PRICE (Contract Line Item Number 1) ------------------------------------------------------
$0.00
2
Option A: 45ft telescoping boom in lieu of 40ft in base CLIN
1
LS
$0.00
$0.00
TOTAL PRICE FOR ALL OPTIONS (Contract Line Item Number 2) ---------------------------------------
$0.00
TOTAL PROPOSED PRICE – BASE PLUS ALL OPTIONS (Contract Line Item Numbers 1 and 2) ----
$0.00

All measurement and payment information is included in the project specifications, Section 012700.

PROPOSED EQUALS

In accordance with Provision 52.211-06 (Section L), the following products are being proposed as equals. Provide all attachments required by the provision, as applicable. Use additional sheets of paper as necessary.

Section No.
Paragraph No.
Product/Model No.
Proposed Product/Model No.

A. By submitting the proposed equal, the contractor certifies that it:

1. Has investigated the proposed item and determined that it is equal or superior in all respects to that specified.

2. Will provide, as a minimum, the same warranties for the proposed item as for the item specified.

3. Has determined that the proposed item is compatible with interfacing items.

4. Will coordinate the installation of an approved item and make all changes required in other elements of the work because of the substitution.

5. Waives all claims for additional expenses that may be incurred as a result of the substitution.

B. The Contractor is encouraged to submit for approval products that exceed accessibility standards, are sustainable and/or made from recycled or environmentally responsible material. Every effort will be made to approve these materials.

General References READ CAREFULLY: The purpose of this form is for the offeror to provide the Government with general references in the spaces provided as described in the Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors (Section L). Include Area Codes with all telephone numbers. Fill in the information by typing or printing legibly.

It is especially important that the offeror disclose instances in which their relationships with the references may be considered less than fully satisfactory. The offeror should tell their side of the story and describe remedial corrective action that has been taken or will be taken to correct the deficiency. Failure to do so may result in a determination that an offeror has been less than candid with the Government, which could result in an unfavorable assessment of the offeror’s past performance record. Provide explanations on separate sheets as necessary.

Name of Contractor/Offeror:

Surety

Name of Surety:

Address of Surety:

Name of Agent:

Telephone Number:

Corporate Bank

Name of Bank:

Address of Bank:

Name of Agent:

Telephone Number:

Types and Numbers of Accounts:

Corporate Bank

Name of Bank:

Address of Bank:

Name of Agent:

Telephone Number:

Types and Numbers of Accounts:

Insurance Company

Name:

Address:

Name of Agent:

Telephone Number:

Types of Policies:

Subcontractor

Name:

Address:

Name of Contact:

Telephone Number:

Area of Specialized Work:

Subcontractor

Name:

Address:

Name of Contact:

Telephone Number:

Area of Specialized Work:

Subcontractor

Name:

Address:

Name of Contact:

Telephone Number:

Area of Specialized Work:

Material Supplier

Name:

Address:

Name of Contact:

Telephone Number:

Types of Material:

Material Supplier

Name:

Address:

Name of Contact:

Telephone Number:

Types of Material:

MATERIAL Supplier

Name:

Address:

Name of Contact:

Telephone Number:

Types of Material:

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS IDENTIFICATION LISTING

In accordance with Clause 52.223-3, Hazardous Material Identification and Material Safety Data, of the Contract, contractor is required to identify any hazardous materials that will be delivered under this contract.

List below all known hazardous materials to be used in performance of the work and submit with the proposal/bid. If material components are unknown at the time of submission, respond with a statement to that effect.

image1.wmf image2.emf

File details come from the government source that posted it.