J.5_Section_L._Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

Solicitation: 1305M219RNMAN0004

Attachment: J.5

Source Selection Information

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

REFERENCE CONTRACT #: _______________________________

(the contract the evaluation is based on)

Evaluation for: ______________________________

Evaluator’s Name:___________________________

Evaluator’s email: ____________________ Evaluator’s Phone Number: _______________

Evaluator’s Agency or Company Name: ____________________________

Send Completed Questionnaire to Contract Specialist, James Rall no later than March 28, 2019, 2 PM EST: James.rall@noaa.gov (Cc Andrew.Hildebrandt@noaa.gov)

*Please provide comments as applicable to support your ratings. Any ratings of “exceptional” and/or

“unsatisfactory” require additional comments for consideration..

1. QUALITY OF SERVICE

Assess the contractor’s performance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g. commonly accepted technical, professional, or environmental standards).

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING ADJECTIVAL

RATING

DEFINITION

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the

Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were

MARGINAL

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Comments:

mailto:James.rall@noaa.gov

Solicitation #: 1305M218RNMAN0027

Attachment: J.4

Source Selection Information

2. SCHEDULE

Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance).

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING ADJECTIVAL

RATING

DEFINITION

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were

MARGINAL

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the

Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the

Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Source Selection Information

3. COST CONTROL

Assess the contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling cost.

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING ADJECTIVAL

RATING

DEFINITION

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were

MARGINAL

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the

Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the

Solicitation #: 1305M218RNMAN0027

Attachment: J.4

Source Selection Information

4. MANAGEMENT

Assess the integration and coordination of all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, and customer satisfaction.

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING ADJECTIVAL

RATING

DEFINITION

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were

MARGINAL

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the

Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the

Source Selection Information

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, IF ANY:

Evaluator’s Name:

Evaluator’s Signature:

Date:

Send Completed Questionnaire to Contract Specialist, James Rall no later than March 28, 2019, 2 PM EST:

James.rall@noaa.gov

(Cc Andrew.hildebrandt@noaa.gov) mailto:James.rall@noaa.gov