122125 O3 Attachment 6 - Deviations Form to Section VI.docx.docx
DOCX document 59 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Program Integrity Case Management (PICM) and Fraud Abuse Detection (FAD) Analytics Solution
- Solicitation number
- 122125 O3
- Issued by
- Blaine County, Nebraska
About this file
The document is a Deviations Form (Attachment 6) for the State of Nebraska's Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Request for Proposal (RFP) 122125 O3 for a Program Integrity Case Management System. The form provides a structured mechanism for bidders to declare any deviations from the requirements outlined in Section VI of the RFP, with specific parts addressing different specification areas including functional and technical specifications. Bidders must complete either an "NO DEVIATIONS" or "DEVIATIONS" option, with the understanding that proposed deviations will be evaluated by the committee for potential impact on responsiveness and system requirements. The document emphasizes that submitting deviations that do not conform to system requirements may result in a "Non-Responsive Solicitation Response".
The deviations form is part of a comprehensive procurement process for a cloud-based, modular software solution supporting Medicaid program fraud detection and case management. Bidders are required to provide detailed explanations for any proposed alternatives, including why a specific requirement cannot be met and what alternative is being proposed. The evaluation process will carefully review these deviations, with the state reserving the right to determine if proposed alternatives have a material impact on the system. Vendors must understand that any proposed deviations must be clearly documented, and associated costs must be reflected in the Cost Proposal, with the ultimate goal of maintaining the integrity and functionality of the Program Integrity Case Management System for approximately 340,000 Medicaid recipients.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
50 files listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 6 Deviations to Section VI of the RFP 122125 O3 Program Integrity Case Management System
Important Instructions:
If Bidder has any deviations to the requirements outlined in Section (VI) of the Request for Proposal (RFP) including any attachments referenced under this section, all must be listed and included with the proposal response. Deviations to Section(VI) will be factored into the scoring. The evaluation committee will rely upon the information provided to assist in ascertaining responsiveness and/or determining whether a proposed alternative will be acceptable and discern its impact on the System. The State reserves the right to determine if proposed alternatives, individually or collectively, have a material impact on the system. Submitting deviations that do not conform to the system requirements may result in your proposal response being deemed as a “Non-Responsive Solicitation Response”.
Any deviations to requirements outlined in Section (VI) of the RFP are to be tabulated and submitted in a separate PDF file, clearly labeled “Deviations to Section (VI)(_)(_)” – see Exhibit 1 directly below for the sample format.
When submitting, use the respective Part(s) provided within this attachment for each section and attachments as labeled. There are three parts within this document and they are as follows:
i. Part I - Deviations to Section (VI)(A)(Except Section (VI)(A)(4)(a), (VI)(A)(4)(b)) , (VI)(B), (VI)(D) and (VI)(E).
ii. Part II- Deviations to Section (VI)(A)(4)(a) – Attachment 2 – Functional Specifications
iii. Part III -Deviations to Section (VI)(A)(4)(b) – Attachment 3 – Technical Specifications.
Additional rows may be added or deleted under the table provided in OPTION 2 - “DEVIATIONS” in all three parts of this document. Bidder must provide a signature either under OPTION 1 - “NO DEVIATIONS” or under OPTION 2 - “DEVIATIONS” in each respective Parts of deviations.
Note: Please do not include any of your acknowledgements and/or deviations to Sections II. through IV. of the RFP in Attachment 6. Acknowledgements and/or deviations to those sections are to be clearly labeled and need to be submitted in accordance with the instructions outlined in the RFP.
Exhibit 1 – Sample Format Program Integrity Case Management System
Identify RFP Section:
Section (VI)(_)(_) Requirement Description: [Indicate the requirement as listed in the RFP document]
Provide information regarding why requirement cannot be met and/or provide the proposed alternative for evaluation and approval or rejection:
Bidder’s Response:
[Provide an explanation as to why the specification/requirement cannot be met and your proposed alternative and/or information for consideration.]
RFP 122125 O3 Bidder’s Name: ________________________________
Part I - Deviations to Section (VI)(A) (Except Section (VI)(A)(4)(a), (VI)(A)(4)(b)), (VI)(B), (VI)(D), and (VI)(E) Bidder to complete the appropriate OPTION that reflects either “NO DEVIATIONS” or “DEVIATIONS” to the requirements as outlined in Sections (VI) (A, B, C, D & E) of the RFP using the format provided. OPTION 1 – NO DEVIATIONS
Our company declares that our response to the Request for Proposal (RFP) does not contain any deviations to Sections (VI) (A, B, C, D, & E) ) (Except Section (VI)(A)(4)(a), (VI)(A)(4)(b) and Section (VI)(A)(4)(c)). We can meet all the requirements as outlined in the RFP for these specific sections.
[Signature of Duly Authorized Representative]
OPTION 2 – DEVIATIONS
Our company is submitting deviations to the requirements as outlined in Sections (VI) (A, B, C, D & E) ) (Except Section (VI)(A)(4)(a) and (VI)(A)(4)(b)) of the RFP. The deviations for consideration are outlined in the tables below. In submitting deviations for consideration, we understand and agree that proposed deviations need to be completed in the correct format using the tables provided and any associated costs must be reflected in the Cost Proposal. Further, we understand proposed deviations will be reviewed by the evaluation committee to determine approval or rejection and any impact on responsiveness:
(Note: To receive due consideration for approval or denial of proposed deviations, complete the tables below for any respective requirement(s) that are not being met as indicated in the RFP for the above-mentioned section.)
Program Integrity Case Management System
Identify RFP Section:
Section (VI)(_)(_) Requirement Description: [Indicate the requirement as shown in the RFP document]
Bidder’s Response:
[Provide an explanation as to why the specification cannot be met and include detailed information about any proposed alternative.]
RFP 122125 O3 Bidder’s Name: ________________________________
Part II - Deviations to Section (VI)(A)(4)(a) Bidder to complete the appropriate OPTION that reflects either “NO DEVIATIONS” or “DEVIATIONS” to the requirements as outlined in Sections (VI) (A, B, C, D & E) of the RFP using the format provided. OPTION 1 – NO DEVIATIONS
Our company declares that our response to the Request for Proposal (RFP) does not contain any deviations to Section (VI)(A)(4)(a) (Attachment 2 – Functional Specifications) .We can meet all the requirements as outlined in the RFP for these specific sections.
Our company is submitting deviations to the requirements as outlined in Section (VI)(A)(4)(a) (Attachment 2 – Functional Specifications) of the RFP. The deviations for consideration are outlined in the tables below. In submitting deviations for consideration, we understand and agree that proposed deviations need to be completed in the correct format using the tables provided and any associated costs must be reflected in the Cost Proposal. Further, we understand proposed deviations will be reviewed by the evaluation committee to determine approval or rejection and any impact on responsiveness:
(Note: To receive due consideration for approval or denial of proposed deviations, complete the tables below for any respective requirement(s) that are not being met as indicated in the RFP for the above-mentioned section.)
Program Integrity Case Management System
Identify RFP Section:
Section (VI)(_)(_) Requirement Description: [Indicate the requirement as shown in the RFP document]
Bidder’s Response:
[Provide an explanation as to why the specification cannot be met and include detailed information about any proposed alternative.]
RFP 122125 O3 Bidder’s Name: ________________________________
Part III - Deviations to Section (VI)(A)(4)(b) Bidder to complete the appropriate OPTION that reflects either “NO DEVIATIONS” or “DEVIATIONS” to the requirements as outlined in Sections (VI) (A, B, C, D & E) of the RFP using the format provided. OPTION 1 – NO DEVIATIONS
Our company declares that our response to the Request for Proposal (RFP) does not contain any deviations to Section (VI)(A)(4)(b) (Attachment 3 – Technical Specifications) .We can meet all the requirements as outlined in the RFP for these specific sections.
Our company is submitting deviations to the requirements as outlined in Section (VI)(A)(4)(b) (Attachment 3 – Technical Specifications) of the RFP. The deviations for consideration are outlined in the tables below. In submitting deviations for consideration, we understand and agree that proposed deviations need to be completed in the correct format using the tables provided and any associated costs must be reflected in the Cost Proposal. Further, we understand proposed deviations will be reviewed by the evaluation committee to determine approval or rejection and any impact on responsiveness:
(Note: To receive due consideration for approval or denial of proposed deviations, complete the tables below for any respective requirement(s) that are not being met as indicated in the RFP for the above-mentioned section.)
Program Integrity Case Management System
Identify RFP Section:
Section (VI)(_)(_) Requirement Description: [Indicate the requirement as shown in the RFP document]
Bidder’s Response:
[Provide an explanation as to why the specification cannot be met and include detailed information about any proposed alternative.]
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .