1-Southwest Tech AV RFP Score Sheet.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 78 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- GJ26-116
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
This is an evaluation scoresheet for a Multipurpose Room Audiovisual (A/V) System Upgrade at Southwest Technical College in Utah (Solicitation GJ26-116). The project involves upgrading the college's multipurpose room with a commercial-grade A/V system that integrates existing speakers and wireless microphone systems, supports dual-display video and hybrid meeting environments, and includes a simplified control solution with assistive listening capabilities. The solicitation required questions to be submitted by April 1, 2026, with proposals due May 1, 2026, directed to Jeff Swift at jswift@stech.edu. The evaluation process included six mandatory requirements that bidders must pass, including experience with commercial or higher-education A/V installations, integration capability, dual-display support, non-touch-panel control, and accessibility compliance.
The evaluation scoresheet allocates 70 percent of total points (5,000 points) to technical criteria and 30 percent (2,142.9 points) to cost evaluation. Technical scoring is distributed across four criteria: Proposed Work Plan & System Design (30 percent), Usability & Control Simplicity (30 percent), Vendor Experience & Qualifications (20 percent), and Accessibility & Hybrid Meeting Capability (20 percent). Scoring ranges from 0 to 5, with a minimum required threshold of 3,200 technical points (64 percent). Cost points are awarded using a comparative formula where the lowest-priced proposal receives 100 percent of cost points, and all other proposals receive points based on their percentage difference from the lowest price. The scoresheet reviewed shows one evaluator's assessment resulting in 3,200 points earned from technical criteria and 0 points from cost criteria.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2-REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (1).pdf | ||
| 3-Scope of Work (Multipurpose Room A V System Update).pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Score Sheet
Multipurpose Room A/V System Upgrade – Southwest Technical College
RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET
| Score will be assigned as follows: | |
| 0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed du to missing information | |
| Firm Name: | 1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information |
| 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner | |
| Evaluator: | 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner |
| 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them | |
| Date: | 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP |
| Minimum Mandatory Requirements | RFP Section | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) | |
| 1 | Experience with commercial or higher-education A/V system installations | ||
| 2 | Ability to integrate existing speakers and wireless microphone systems | ||
| 3 | Support for dual-display video and hybrid meeting environments | ||
| 4 | Provision of simplified, non-touch-panel control solution | ||
| 5 | Inclusion of assistive listening system and accessibility compliance | ||
| 6 |
| Scoreable Technical Criteria | RFP Section | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Criteria Weight | % of Tech Criteria | Points Possible | Points | ||||
| Earned | Minimum Required | |||||||||
| 1 | Proposed Work Plan & System Design | 4 | 300 | 30.0% | 1500.00 | 1200.00 | ||||
| 2 | Usability & Control Simplicity | 4 | 300 | 30.0% | 1500.00 | 1200.00 | ||||
| 3 | Vendor Experience & Qualifications | 4 | 200 | 20.0% | 1000.00 | 800.00 | ||||
| 4 | Accessibility & Hybrid Meeting Capability | 200 | 20.0% | 1000.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 5 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 6 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 7 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 8 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 9 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 10 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 11 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 12 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 13 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 14 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 15 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 16 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 17 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 18 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 19 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 20 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 21 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 22 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 23 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 100.0% | 5000.00 | 3200.00 | 0.00 |
| Required Technical Point Threshold | RFP Section | Min Percent | Min Points Required | Points Earned | Percent Earned | Evaluation |
| 0.0 | 3200.0 | 64.0% |
| Cost | RFP Section | Low Cost Option | Offered Cost | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned |
| 30% | 2,142.9 | 0.0 |
* Purchasing will use the following cost formula: The points assigned to each offerors cost proposal will be based on the lowest proposal price. The offeror with the lowest Proposed Price will receive 100% of the price points. All other offerors will receive a portion of the total cost points based on what percentage higher their Proposed Price is than the Lowest Proposed Price. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (Lowest Proposed Price/Proposed Price).
| Total Evaluation Points | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned |
| Total Technical Evaluation Points | 70% | 5,000.0 | 3200.0 |
| Total Cost Evaluation Points | 30% | 2,142.9 | 0.0 |
| Total Evaluation Points | 100% | 7,142.9 | 3200.0 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .