1-Contract Performance Evaluation FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY.pdf
PDF 312 KB Posted
- Attached to
- BD27-103 Atchee Ridge Fuel Break Bullhog
- Solicitation number
- BD27-103
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
Rangeland Contract Performance Evaluation and BD27-103 Atchee Ridge Fuel Break Bullhog Project
This document is a Rangeland Contract Performance Evaluation form utilized by the State of Utah Division of Purchasing in coordination with the Division of Wildlife Resources, USWFS, and BLM for evaluating contractor performance on rangeland management projects. The BD27-103 Atchee Ridge Fuel Break Bullhog project is a solicitation limited to prequalified contractors only, seeking a single contract award for wildlife habitat improvement and wildland fire hazard reduction through mechanical removal and shredding of standing live and dead pinyon and juniper trees, saplings, and brush using a wheeled or tracked mechanical mulcher/shredder/masticator. The project encompasses 260.4 acres across the Indian Spring and Augisi Ridges, Book Cliffs, and Spring Ridge, with a project completion deadline of November 30th, 2026. No mandatory site visit is required prior to bidding; however, potential bidders are strongly recommended to inspect the site to understand general and local conditions affecting cost performance. The contract term extends from the time of award through November 30th, 2026, with the vendor required to guarantee pricing through project completion.
The solicitation will result in a single contract award to the lowest cost responsive and responsible vendor. Participation is restricted to contractors currently listed on the State of Utah's Pre-approved/Pre-qualified Vendor list for rangeland projects. Contractor performance is evaluated using a rating system based on Quality of Product or Service (weighted at 8x), Timeliness of Performance (weighted at 8x), and Contract Management (weighted at 4x), with a maximum score of 100 points. Vendors must maintain a minimum average performance score of 60 to remain on the Pre-Qualification list; scores below 60 result in removal from the list for that specific treatment/acreage category and all larger acreages within the same treatment category, though vendors may still bid on open solicitations and reapply at the next RFSQ.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 6-RQS 2754 560 051 ATCHEE RIDGE FUEL BREAK PT 4.pdf | ||
| 10-BD27-103 Official Bid Results.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 8-3. Att.-A-Agency-Terms-and-Conditions-GS (1).docx | DOCX document | |
| 3-RQS 2754 560 051 ATCHEE RIDGE FUEL BREAK PT 3.pdf | ||
| AtcheeRidge_GIS.sbx | — | |
| 11-Award Memo.docx.pdf | ||
| AtcheeRidge_GIS.shx | — | |
| AtcheeRidge_GIS.prj | — | |
| AtcheeRidge_GIS.shp | — | |
| 9-BD27-103 Unofficial Bid Results.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| AtcheeRidge_GIS.sbn | — | |
| AtcheeRidge_GIS.cpg | — | |
| 7-ATT B Scope of Work BD27-103.pdf | ||
| 5-RQS 2754 560 051 ATCHEE RIDGE FUEL BREAK PT 5.pdf | ||
| AtcheeRidge_GIS.dbf | DBF file | |
| 2-Vendor Prerequisites - IFB Agency.pdf | ||
| AtcheeRidge_KMZ.kmz | KMZ file |
Show all 17
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RANGELAND CONTRACT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
DATE Address
Firm Name City, State & Zip Code
Firm Contact Phone Number
Solicitation Number & Name
Project Manager Contract Amount
Service Provided/# of Acres
Overall Rating
In accordance with Procurement Code 63G-6a-410(5)(e), the State of Utah has determined that it is in its best interest to conduct a contractor performance review for each rangeland project. The State agency project manager will complete a performance review according to the evaluation criteria listed.
Vendors will be aware of their performance status as they will be monitored throughout the project. Any corrective action will be communicated to the vendor verbally or through a 10-day letter to cure, depending on the issues. Vendors must complete any corrective action requested or required, if not this will be reflected in their performance review scores.
In order for a vendor to remain on the Rangeland Pre-Qualification list, they must maintain a minimum average performance score of 60. If a vendor's average performance score drops below 60, they will be removed from the pre-qualification list for that specific treatment/acreage category and all larger acreage within that same treatment category. If a vendor is removed from the pre-qualification list they may still be eligible to submit a bid on Open Bid solicitations. Once a vendor is removed from the pre-qualification list, the vendor may reapply at the next open RFSQ.
RATINGS GUIDE
Quality of Service
Timeliness of Performance Contract Management
5-Excellent Contractor has demonstrated an exceptional level in any of the above three categories that justifies adding a point to the score. Contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as "Good"
4-Good Contractor is in compliance with contract requirements and or delivers quality product or service.
Contractor is effective in meeting milestones and delivery schedule.
Response to inquiries, technical, service, administrative issues is effective.
3-Satisfactory Minor deficiencies in meeting contract specifications have been identified.
Contractor is usually effective in meeting milestones and delivery schedules.
Response to inquiries, technical, service, administrative issues is somewhat effective.
2-Unsatisfactory Major problems have been encountered.
Contractor is having major difficulty meeting milestones and delivery schedule.
Response to inquiries, technical, service, and administrative issues is marginally effective.
1-Fail Contractor is not in compliance & is jeopardizing achievement of contract objectives.
Contractor delays are jeopardizing performance of contract objectives.
Response to inquiries, technical, service, and administrative issues is not effective.
Rate the Following Score (1 – 5)
COMMENTS
Quality of Product or Service
_____ x 8 = _____
Timeliness of Performance
_____ x 8 = _____
Contract Management _____ x 4 = _____
Overall Rating _____/100 pts
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .