W912P9-16-R-0002-0004.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to delete PPQ cover page, include Davis Bacon Act, associated wage rate, construction clauses, extend RFP due date to 30 Nov 2015 at 2:00 PM Central, and update PWS. Changes are in blue.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

U 1 20

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 09-Nov-2015

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W912P9-16-R-0002

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

15-Oct-2015

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

09-Nov-2015

CODE

CONTRACTING DIVISION

US ARMY ENGR DIST ST LOUIS

1222 SPRUCE STREET, RM 4.207

ST LOUIS MO 63103-2833

W912P9 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912P9-16-R-0002

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 23-Nov-2015 02:00 PM to 30-Nov-2015 02:00 PM.

SECTION C - DESCRIPTIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS

The following have been modified:

FUSRAP STATEMENT OF WORK

STATEMENT OF WORK

ST. LOUIS FUSRAP REMEDIAL ACTION

November 9, 2015

PART 1- GENERAL

SECTION C

1.1 CONTRACT AWARD

The Government intends to award a Single Award Task Order Contract (SATOC), remedial action indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contract under Solicitation W912P9-16-R-0002. The contract will be awarded to a Small Business-Set Aside firm utilizing the best value tradeoff process. Task Orders issued under this contract will be cost reimbursable Cost Plus Fixed-Fee (CPFF).

1.2 DESCRIPTION OF WORK

This contract will provide for Hazardous, Toxic and Radioactive Waste (HTRW) remediation activities managed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers St. Louis District. This contract for the environmental response actions, associated investigation, design and removal activities will include service and construction activities mandated by Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). The work at the FUSRAP St. Louis Sites falls under the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation, Liability Act (CERCLA). The St. Louis FUSRAP sites contain low-level radiological and chemically contaminated material. The St. Louis sites are located in the metropolitan St. Louis area in two primary vicinities, the St. Louis Downtown Site (SLDS) and the St. Louis North County sites (NORCO). The NORCO sites includes the St. Louis Airport Site (SLAPS), SLAPS Vicinity Properties (SLAPS VPs), and the Hiss/Latty Avenue Properties (HISS/Latty). Work may be concurrent at multiple locations within these sites. Sites range from heavily industrialized areas to open fields. Contaminated accessible soil remaining for excavation and offsite disposal currently is estimated at 182,700 cubic yards.

1.3 SCOPE OF WORK

The SATOC to be awarded will require personnel, plant and equipment to respond to the St. Louis District FUSRAP support. The remedial action work encompasses any and all remediation work for remedial/removal actions including general conditions, field engineering, environmental services, environmental actions, remedial actions and management services. The work anticipated under this contract is primarily for, but not limited to, low level radioactive contaminated material removal.

Radiological contaminates are primarily thorium, radium and uranium, with co-located chemical contamination such as selenium, cadmium, and arsenic. The Record of Decision for SLDS and the Record of Decision for the St. Louis North County Sites (including SLAPS VPs and HISS/Latty) are viewable on-line at the St. Louis FUSRAP web site:

http://www.mvs.usace.army.mil/Missions/CenterofExpertise/FormerlyUtilizedSitesRemedialActi onProgram/aspx.

1.4 CONTRACTOR CAPABILITY, TECHNICAL EXPERTISE

The Contractor selected for this work shall have and demonstrate the capability to perform environmental compliance and remediation services relating to FUSRAP and HTRW or similar work with radioactive contamination in the areas of field engineering, remediation work and management services, including , but not limited to:

1.4.1 Field Engineering

1.4.1.1 The contractor shall present capability to perform environmental investigations, remedial design of work plans and documents relating to FUSRAP and HTRW or similar work.

1.4.1.2 The Contractor shall be responsible for the utilization of existing Remedial Action Work Descriptions in the remediation efforts. Contractor may be required to update work plans or generate additional construction work plans detailing how the work will be executed. Applicable portions of the construction work plans must be certified by respective registered professionals (i.e., P.E., Site Safety Officer, Radiological Safety Officer, Quality Control Officer, Geologist, Professional Land Surveyor, Certified Health Physicist, etc).

1.4.1.3 Contractor may be required to fill data gaps as needed to prepare the construction work plans.

Subsurface boring capabilities would be required for obtaining such data. Installation and/or decommissioning of ground water monitoring wells may be required.

1.4.1.4 The contractor will be required to develop and implement appropriate Health and Safety Programs and Plans for HTRW site operations as mandated by OSHA and EM 385-1-1.

1.4.1.5 The contractor shall provide HTRW Construction Quality Management, including submittals and other requirements EP 415-1-266.

1.4.1.6 Conducting final status surveys in accordance with the Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Site Manual ( MARSSIM )experience and gamma walkover/guided excavation will be required.

1.4.2 Remediation Work

The Contractor shall present capability to perform construction remedial action operations (i.e.

excavation, backfilling, site restoration, decontamination and demolition) relating to FUSRAP and HTRW or similar work

1.4.2.1 Contractor shall provide excavation of contaminated soils and materials located at SLDS, SLAPS VPs, and the HISS/Latty. Excavation depths range from surface soil removal to depths exceeding 25 feet, located in a variety of conditions (e.g., open field, near/under structures, above and below ground water, near utilities). Contractor shall be responsible for planning and executing all excavation activities. The Contractor (or its subcontractor) shall be responsible for detailing and installing deep excavation support/bracing, as required for remediation and to include support/bracing modification as necessitated by field conditions. Post-excavation evaluation by a geologist for preferential pathways will be required.

1.4.2.2 Contractor may be required to decontaminate buildings. Structural support, demolition and disposal of structures may be required.

1.4.2.3 Documentation of current, final excavation and restoration as-built conditions via land survey, GIS and CADD drawing will be required. Safety support, quality control, and site-wide management are also requirements.

1.4.2.4 Contractor shall be responsible for the collection and control of surface and/or ground water.

This may include on-site physical water treatment via batch treatment facility, with subsequent discharge to either publicly-owned treatment works or surface waters according to applicable discharge requirements.

1.4.2.5 As part of the excavation process, permanent and/or temporary relocation of utilities may be required.

1.4.2.6 Contractor shall provide for the backfill and restoration of disturbed areas.

1.4.2.7 In conjunction with construction activities discussed above (excavation, utility relocation, water management, etc.), the Contractor shall work with regulators, local entities, railroad entities and stakeholders, to include, but not limited to, EPA Region VII, Missouri Department of Natural Resources, St. Louis Airport Authority, Federal Aviation Administration, Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District, and Mallinckrodt LLC.

1.4.2.8 Contractor shall manage stockpiles and coordinate transportation of excavated materials to appropriate off-site disposal facilities via an existing transshipment rail facility or with other transportation contractor. Primary radiological disposal shall be accomplished with existing USACE contracts; however, the Contractor may be required to secure disposal facilities subcontracts during the execution of this work. Knowledge of and experience with classification of materials, Department of Transportation Regulations, and HTRW manifesting are required.

1.4.3 Management Services

1.4.3.1 Management organization and staffing, including a list of key personnel and their related qualification (experience and education) and authorities, plus subcontractors

1.4.3.2 Cost Reimbursable Contract Management Procedures and accounting system.

1.4.3.3 Scheduling, cost control and performance status reporting

1.4.3.4 Procurement and Subcontracting policies.

1. 5 BACKGROUND INFORMATION

The Contractor will be furnished a Scope of Work for each proposed task order. The Scope of Work will typically include a narrative remedial action work description and accompanying plans and specifications.

Other applicable back up data such as records of decisions, engineering evaluations/cost analysis, pre-design investigation reports and design considerations will be furnished or made available to the Contractor. Joint USACE – Contractor site inspections are anticipated prior to negotiation of each task order.

1.6 DESCRIPTION OF TASK ORDERS

A Task Order is an official contracting instrument under this contract. The function is to direct the Contractor to perform scoped work and/or approved items of work. The Contracting Officer, or his/her authorized representative, will furnish the Contractor with a Scope of Work for the activity or services required. The Service Contract Act or the Davis Bacon Act wages will be incorporated, as applicable, depending on the type of work being performed in each Task Order. The Contractor shall provide the Government with a cost proposal within 14 to 30 calendar days of the request for proposal, depending on the work/Task Order, or unless specified otherwise. The Contractor’s proposal shall be supported by appropriate documentation (production rates, use of overtime, crew sizes and make-up, types of equipment, materials and supplies). The Government will review the proposal for reasonableness and completeness, and then negotiate with the Contractor all items and period(s) of performance. The Contracting Officer will then issue the task order. Only the Contracting Officer (or designee) may formally execute or modify Task Orders. The Contractor will not be reimbursed for the preparation of the cost proposal.

1.7 COST REIMBURSEMENT TASK ORDERS

Cost reimbursement task orders provide payment to the Contractor for allowable, allocable, and reasonable costs incurred in the performance of the work. This section outlines Government policies, procedures, practices, and requirements as it relates to cost reimbursement contracting mechanisms. If Government Furnish Property/ Government Furnished Equipment (GFP/GFE) is provided, it will be stated in the individual Task Order and will be accounted for in accordance with the approved property control plan (PCP) and any site specific addendum to the PCP. If property is acquired by the Contractor under Cost Reimbursable task order in performance of the work, the Contractor acquired property (CAP) will also be accounted for in the same manner.

1.7.1 Objective

The objective of a cost reimbursement task order is for USACE and the Contractor to jointly accomplish the work in conformance with the specified requirements, to complete the work on schedule and at the most economical cost.

1.7.2 Management Organization, Responsibilities and Authorities

The Contractor shall provide a management staff and organization that is capable of effectively and efficiently managing its own resources, as well as any subcontracts. Managers are to have relevant experience and past responsibilities to control costs and insure timely execution of the work. Likewise, key technical personnel are to have relevant education and experience to perform the scope of services.

The primary Government authority under this contract is the Contracting Officer (CO). Designated representatives will be identified, in writing, as authorized Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR), or Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO) and also serve as personnel of authority. Only the CO or ACO may cause an increase in the contract obligation amount. Technical direction under a cost reimbursement task order may also be made by the COR as long as it does not impact cost or schedule.

1.7.3 Cost Control

Since much of the risk associated with cost reimbursable contracting is borne by the Government, the Contractor must show evidence of sufficient cost control policies and procedures. Cost control is also important because of the multiple funding sources possible under this contract. It is imperative that the contractor be capable of estimating, budgeting, accounting and reporting costs by individual funding sources as well as work item. In accordance with FAR 16. 104(h), the contractor must be capable to track costs on cost –reimbursable actions. To the extent practicable, the Government will attempt to segregate task orders and other work authorizations by sole funding source, for administrative purposes. The Contractor shall make available, upon request, supporting documents and provide for physical inspection or demonstration at the appropriate office, of its accounting system capabilities to support cost reimbursement contract accounting needs.

1.7.4 Mobilization

Mobilization is a non-recurring cost unique to individual work sites for a given task order. Costs for mobilization will be reimbursed, if incurred, after formal execution of the relevant cost reimbursement task order. Mobilization costs prior to formal task orders are not reimbursable. Contractors are encourage to segregate non-recurring costs such as mobilization when submitting task order proposals.

1.7.5 Contract Management Procedures

The Contractor is expected to have in place standard operating procedures that cover in detail the methods that the Contractor will employ relating to cost reimbursement contracted work with the Government, especially the capability to estimate, budget, account and report costs.

1.7.6 Management Information System (MIS)

The principles of defining and maintaining a performance measurement baseline for comparison against the current estimate at completion and schedule are expected to be incorporated in some fashion in the contractor's MIS. Detailed analysis capability of cost variances for labor, material, equipment, overhead, etc., between the performance measurement baseline and the current estimate at completion is expected.

The MIS must be capable of integrating cost and recording progress payments for fixed-price and/or cost reimbursement type subcontracts. The MIS shall include accurate updates of schedule logic, actual dates, and actual budgeting data on the schedule. The MIS shall be capable of simultaneously managing on multiple task orders, the current approved budget and schedule, actual cost and progress incurred, earned value, and projected future budget and schedule data. Key personnel successful experience in using the MIS tools should be demonstrated.

1.7.7 Work Allocation Document (WAD)

1.7.7.1 The Work Allocation Document system may be used to allocate previously obligated contract funds by the Government to the contractor and to further control the obligation or expenditures of funds for identified work. It is a series of numbered documents directly related to the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) prepared by the contractor, and approved by the CO or COR.

1.7.7.2 After task order issuance, the Government may request the contractor to submit WAD budgets in the government-specified WAD system format. This format will include: a) an approved WBS; b) an estimate keyed to the WBS; c) a schedule for the task; and d) a narrative description of the scope of work.

The Government will review the submitted WAD/WADs and approve/disapprove as necessary. The budget estimates of costs for the work orders submitted for each WAD shall not exceed the total budget for that order.

1.8 Sub-Contracting and Procurement

The Contracting Officer shall review and consent to solicitations over $25,000. The Contractor must give notice to the Contracting Officer and obtain specific approval for any cost reimbursement type subcontract. The Contractor will have detailed closeout procedures in place for subcontractors.

1..8.1 Just as the Government clearly defines its procurement policy, the contractor's procurement policy shall be clearly delineated. The contractor shall utilize procurement and subcontracting procedures consistent with good faith principles and fair dealing. Further, where required, the contractor will employ the principles and requirements of the Federal Acquisition Regulation.

1..8.2 The objective of the Government is to select contractors that will raise the standards of subcontract administration while incorporating integrity and peer respect. Adequate staffing to perform subcontract management is required. Detailed contractor procurement procedures and subcontract program plans are critical to the successful implementation of this contract. In accordance with FAR 44.203(a), the Contracting Officer’s consent to a subcontract or approval of the contractor’s purchasing system does not constitute a determination of the acceptability of the subcontract terms or price, or of the allowability of costs, unless the consent or approval specifies otherwise.

1.8.3 Technical Changes and Claims

Contract clauses for changes and disputes are included for cost reimbursement task orders. The contractor shall minimize subcontract disputes and effectively and efficiently control and process subcontract changes. Pre-pricing of subcontract changes is preferred, as is a formal system of issuing subcontract changes where obligations are recorded in advance of issuance of drawing changes or task orders issued to the contractor.

1.8.4 Closeout Procedures

All cost reimbursement task orders will require a final audit by the cognizant audit office of the Federal Government. The contractor is expected to demonstrate procedures and processes that facilitate quick subcontract and supplier closeout and resolution of disputes.

1.8.5 Fee Determination

For Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee Task Orders, the fee rate will be determined during initial negotiations for each separate task order.

1.9 SITE-SPECIFIC SUBMITTALS. Site work shall not commence on a project until the Government, (the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) or other management personnel has approved all of the site-specific submittals required for each specific Task Order.

1.9.1 Work Plan

A comprehensive Work Plan shall be prepared, as required, to fully describe all aspects of the work to be completed. The Work Plan shall contain but not be limited to the following:

1.9.1.1 Work to be accomplished.

1.9.1.2 Discussion of implementation of the project including the method of operation, type of equipment, personnel required, and other special considerations.

1.9.1.3 Schedule that presents the requirements to complete the required field work and key milestones.

1.9.1.4 Permits, licenses, and certificates, identification number, and locations of the disposal facility, if necessary.

1.9.1.5 Key personnel to be used on the project and their responsibilities.

1.9.1.6 Logs, reports, and record keeping to be utilized

1.9.1.7 Plans as listed below, as required.

1.9.2 Health and Safety

Site-specific health and safety submittals including safety practices, procedures, and equipment are required. The Contractor shall develop, implement, and enforce an Accident Prevention Plan (APP). The plan shall incorporate the requirements of 29 CFR 1910, Corps of Engineers EM 385-1-1 (Safety and Health Requirements) and ER385-1 (Safety and Occupational Health Requirements for Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste (HTRW) Activities). The Health and Safety Manager shall sign and date the APP prior to submittal for approval.

1.9.3 Sampling and Analysis

A Contractor prepared sampling and analysis plan in accordance with the requirements of USACE’s EM 200-1-3 shall be developed in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted for each project and shall include information described in the paragraph “Project Staff Organization and Responsibilities" in this section.

1.9.4 Contractor Quality Control

A Contractor Quality Control Plan including quality control organization, qualifications of personnel, authority, areas of responsibility, subcontractor quality control, tracking procedures and other necessary information based upon the work in the task order shall be submitted.

1.9.5 Daily Quality Control

Daily quality control reports shall be prepared in accordance with the task order and contract requirements and submitted to government personnel during the construction remediation process.

1.9.6 Technical

Technical submittals are those required and further described in the Statement of Work specifications of each individual Task Order.

PART 2 – PRODUCTS (Not Applicable)

PART 3 – EXECUTION

3.1 ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS

All remedial actions shall be in full compliance with applicable Federal, State and local environmental laws and regulations including but not limited to: Pertinent Occupational Safety and Health Administration requirements, Department of Transportation requirements, National Environmental Policy Act, Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), Resource Conservation Act (RCRA),and Underground Storage Tank (UST) regulations. The Contractor shall assure that all activities performed by his personnel, subcontractors and suppliers are executed as required by these laws and regulations.

3.2 PERMITS AND LICENSES

The Contractor shall meet the substantive and/or administrative requirements of all Environmental Permits, Licenses and/or Certificates required by each task order. All required clearances, such as digging permits, shall be obtained prior to initiation of excavating or drilling operations.

3.3 TRANSPORTATION, STORAGE, TREATMENT AND/OR DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS

WASTES

Transportation, storage, treatment and/or disposal of hazardous wastes requirements will be detailed in the site specific Scope of Work, or accompanying plans and specifications, of each individual task order.

The Contractor shall ensure that the transportation, storage, treatment and/or disposal of hazardous wastes comply with applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. The Contractor shall also ensure that his personnel and staff, and all subcontractors handle, transport, store, treat, and/or dispose of all hazardous wastes as required by applicable laws and regulations. The Contractor is responsible for the storage, loading, and certification of all manifests. Details on completing the Complete Manifest Package will be issued in the individual task orders if necessary.

3. 4 SITE SAFETY AND HEALTH

Site safety and health requirements will be detailed in the site-specific Scope of Work, or accompanying plans and specifications, of each individual task order. The Contractor shall have an ongoing Safety and Health Program that meets the requirements of the OSHA standard 29 CFR 1910.120 / 29 CFR 1926.65 and other requirements of EM 385-1-1 and ER 385-1-92.

3.5 CHEMICAL DATA QUALITY MANAGEMENT (CDQM)

CDQM, if required, will be detailed in the site-specific Scope of Work, or accompanying plans and specifications, of each individual task order. The Contractor shall be able to provide services that conform to requirements presented in ER 1110-1-263 and guidance contained in the following:

EM 200-1-1 on laboratory validation EM 200-1-2 on technical project planning EM 200-1-3 on preparation of sampling and analysis EM 200-1-6 on chemical quality assurance

3.6 SECURITY

The Contractor shall provide site security (e.g., fencing and/or guard service) as required by each individual Task Order. However, at a minimum the Contractor shall maintain the site and all other Contractor controlled areas in such a manner as to minimize the risk of injury or accident to site personnel or others who may be in the area. Work on or near roadways shall be carefully marked with lights and barricades meeting State and local regulations or, where such regulations are not applicable, deemed adequate to minimize the risk of an accident. Open excavations that pose a danger to site personnel or others shall be fenced to prevent accidental entry. Side slopes of excavations shall be shored or left at a safe angle of repose as defined by OSHA 1926.650-652 and EM 385-1-1, Section 25. All equipment, when not in operation, shall be left in a safe manner (e.g., wheels blocked and buckets on the ground).

Near residential areas where there may be children, special consideration shall be given to site security/safety needs.

3.7 ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS

The engineering requirements related to the remedial action will be described in detail in each individual Task Order. The Contractor shall perform all necessary field work and analyses to address the appropriate engineering requirements. Engineering work performed should be under the authority of a properly licensed engineer. Furthermore, engineering support to be performed incidental to construction /remediation will depend on the requirements of the individual Task Order. If required, the Contractor shall outline a complete Quality Control Plan in order to implement quality control testing for construction of project's engineering features. The Contractor shall specify and perform any and all necessary engineering quality control testing, at required frequencies, deemed necessary in order to adequately control and monitor construction/remediation

3.8 MANAGEMENT AND TECHNICAL STAFF ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES

The Contractor shall clearly describe his organization including subcontractors and identify personnel (management, administrative and technical) and their responsibilities. The project organization shall address the Contractor-subcontractor interactions. Subcontractors shall not be replaced without prior approval of the Contracting Officer.

3.8.1 List of Key Personnel shall include their general qualifications (experience/education) and their HTRW specific qualifications.

3.8.2 The Contractor’s management and quality control (QC) chains-of-command shall be mutually exclusive. The Contractor's CQCC shall report to a responsible company senior officer. The Contractor's project production management and quality control chain-of-command shall be mutually exclusive.

3.8.3 Subcontractors shall not be replaced without prior approval of the Contracting Officer.

3.9 CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL AND QUALIFICATIONS

The following list of qualifications is indicative of HTRW-type personnel. Requirements of on-site personnel may be further detailed in the site-specific Scope of Work of individual task orders. The Contractor shall not replace key personnel without prior approval of the Contracting Officer.

3.9.1 Program Manager The Program Manager is responsible for overall management of the contract including cost control, schedule and technical quality. The Program Manager shall be the primary Contractor contact before issuance of a Task Order. The Program Manager’s qualifications, experience and performance must be satisfactory to the Contracting Officer and based on the following:

3.9.1.1. Degree from an accredited college or university in engineering, construction or engineering management, geology, chemistry or other relevant fields;

3.9.1.2. Professional registration in respective field;

3.9.1.3. Experience in environmental restoration or comparable work;

3.9.1.4. Experience with federal government cost reimbursable contracting.

3.9.1.5. Working knowledge of applicable federal, state and local environmental related laws, regulations.

3.9.2 Project Manager

The Contractor shall designate a Project Manager for each individual task order. The Program Manager may be designated as the Project Manager if execution is sufficiently limited and with prior approval of the Contracting Officer. The Project Manager shall be the primary Contractor contact for the designated Task Order. The Project Manager is responsible for the management and execution of the Task Order and assures compliance with the Scope of Work, accompanying plans and specifications, all work plans, and applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations. The Project Manager shall be the primary Contractor contact once the Task Order is issued and in progress. The Project Manager’s qualifications, experience and performance must be satisfactory to the Contracting Officer and based on the following:

3.9.2.1. Degree from an accredited college or university in engineering, construction or engineering management, geology, chemistry or other relevant field;

3.9.2.2. Professional registration in respective field;

3.9.2.3. Project Management-level experience in environmental restoration or HTRW work;

3.9.2.4. Experience with federal government cost reimbursable contracting.

3.9.2.5. Working knowledge of applicable federal, state and local environmental related laws, regulations.

3.9.3 Safety and Health Officer

The Contractor shall utilize a trained, experienced Safety and Health Officer to enforce all aspects of the Safety and Health Program at each site. The Safety and Health Officer shall have the authority to stop work if unacceptable health or safety conditions exist. The Safety and Health Officer’s qualifications, experience and performance must be satisfactory to the Contracting Officer and based on the following:

3.9.3.1 Work experience at HTRW sites or comparable environmental restoration field activities where

Level C and Level B personal protective equipment was required

3.9.3.2 Relevant specialized training, safety program implementation such as the proper use of air monitoring instruments, air sampling methods and the interpretation of results.

3.9.3.3 Certification of completion in First Aid and CPR training by a recognized organization such as the

American Red Cross.

3.9.3.4 Working knowledge of applicable federal, and state occupational and health regulations.

3.9.4 Radiation Safety Officer (RSO)

For sites where radiation is a hazard of concern, the Contractor shall utilize a RSO to implement radiation protection programs. The RSO’s qualifications, experience and performance must be satisfactory to the Contracting Officer and based on the following:

3.9.4.1 Degree from an accredited institution in health physics or related field. Equivalent education, training and experience can be submitted for USACE concurrence in lieu of a degree for personnel that are otherwise qualified.

3.9.4.2 Experience in implementing radiation protection programs at HTRW sites or other comparable work.

3.9.4.3 Working knowledge of applicable federal, state and USACE radiation protection regulations and requirements.

3.9.5 Project Engineer

The Project Engineer shall be responsible for field engineering activities to ensure technical compliance with the task order’s Scope of Work and accompanying plans and specifications. The Project Engineer’s qualifications, experience and performance must be satisfactory to the Contracting Officer and based on the following:

3.9.5.1 Degree from an accredited college or university in civil, environmental, geotechnical engineering, or other relevant field;

3.9.5.2 Experience in remedial/removal activities at HTRW sites, or comparable environmental restoration work.

3.9.6 Contractor Quality Control (CQC) Manager

For each task order and/or site, the Contractor shall designate an individual within the organization who shall have overall management responsibility for CQC with authority to act in all matters of CQC for the Contractor. The CQC manager shall be on-site during construction and remedial/removal activities. The CQC manager shall have no other duties. The CQC Manager’s qualifications, experience and performance must be satisfactory to the Contracting Officer and shall be based on the number of years of comparable experience at an HTRW site or other environmental restoration work activity.

3.9.7 Site Superintendent

For each task order issued, or distinct site location, the Contractor shall have a designated Site Superintendent with responsibility and authority to direct the work to be performed and to verify compliance. The Site Superintendent shall have evidence of the following qualifications:

3.9.7.1 Experience as a site superintendent, or equivalent position.

3.9.7.2 Experience in equivalent positions at HTRW sites, or comparable environmental restoration work.

3.9.7.3 Experience with cost-reimbursable contracts and/or task orders.

3.9.8 Field Staff

All field personnel, shall meet the training, medical surveillance, safety and health program requirements of OSHA that are pertinent to each individual task order.

3.9.9 Other Key Technical or Management Personnel

Each individual task order may require additional professional-level staff for the remedial/removal action work or services. Additional disciplines and areas of expertise may include, but are not limited to, environmental engineering, geology, hydrogeology, chemistry, occupational physician, health physicist, industrial hygienist, health physics technicians, and regulatory specialist.

3.10 MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM (MIS)

A MIS capability is required as an on-site management tool to facilitate the tracking of costs scheduled and incurred, overruns and underruns, and subcontractor costs, for cost-reimbursement task orders.

3.10.1 This MIS should integrate cost and schedule information to provide at a minimum: daily tracking of costs incurred, daily tracking of costs scheduled, projection of cost and schedules, earned value, and time phased budget and spending curves. Automated information should be remotely accessible at the work site and other locations to allow for daily cost tracking of actual labor (both on-site and home office), equipment, purchases, subcontracts, other commitments, obligations, and expenditures. This system should be able to be used as a project management tool to capture committed or obligated costs as they occur, not when reconciled at invoice. Anticipated capabilities of a MIS include, but may not be limited, to the following:

3.10.2 As a minimum the system must have the following capabilities. All of these capabilities may not be required on every Task Order and will be required for each specifically based upon the need.

3.10.2.1 The cost tracking system shall be maintained on-site and shall provide real time ability to capture costs.

3.10.2.2 The cost tracking system shall have the ability to forecast costs.

3.10.2.3 The cost tracking system shall provide a daily report for review and approval by the Government.

3.10.2.4 The cost tracking system shall allow for active management and budgeting of task order costs, including but not limited to home office costs, direct field costs, indirect costs, subcontractor costs, equipment costs, and other project costs.

3.10.2.4 The cost tracking system shall have the ability to provide a weekly cost comparison/cost variance report. This report shall capture all committed/expended costs and shall allow the comparison of the forecasted total task order cost with the budgeted cost. It shall also show the overruns/underruns on the individual task order tasks.

3.10.2.5 Work Breakdown Structure.

The Contractor shall provide MIS procedures anticipated for tracking all phases of cost, from daily subcontracting, material, labor and overheads, through the phase required to invoice for cost. The daily cost tracking shall be performed in a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) format, with various defined levels of control. The upper levels of the WBS shall be where the Contractor’s costs roll-up to levels where the COR will manage costs and funding. For example, Level 1 would be the total project and Level 2 will be Engineering, Construction and Fee. The lower level of the WBS shall be where the Contractor controls costs per his own accounting system. The MIS and/or accounting system must be capable of recording and tracking costs by separate project funds in addition to work schedule items. Earned Value reporting is expanded at the upper levels of the WBS.

3.10.2.6 Planning and Scheduling

The planning and scheduling system shall be based on a network theory embodied in the critical path method (CPM) that shows the time needed for each step of the project and also the steps that must be taken in a logical sequence. This should include a standard network analysis system that can be resource loaded for cost and manpower projections and earned value analysis.

3.10.2.7 Technical and Regulatory Reports.

The Contractor shall track technical and regulatory reports using the MIS for each project, as required in the Task Order. These systems reports shall contain the following information, at a minimum: Contract number, Contractor name, project name, reporting period, scheduled completion date, actual completion date.

3.11 CONTRACTOR QUALITY CONTROL (CQC)

The Contractor is responsible for quality control and shall establish and maintain an effective quality control system in compliance with the Contract Clause entitled “Inspection of Construction.” The quality control system shall consist of plans, procedures, and organizations necessary to produce an end product which complies with the contract requirements. The system shall cover all construction operations, both on-site and off-site and specific requirements shall be included in individual Task Orders.

PART 4 – SECURITY

4.1 SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY REPORTING TRAINING (E.G. IWATCH, CORPSWATCH, OR

SEE SOMETHING, SAY SOMETHING)

The contractor and all associated sub-contractors shall receive a brief/training (provided by the Requirinig Activity (RA)) on the local suspicious activity reporting program. This locally developed training will be used to inform employees of the types of behavior to watch for and instruct employees to report suspicious activity to the project manager, security representative or law enforcement entity. This training shall be completed within 30 calendar days of contract award and within 30 calendar days of new employees commencing performance with the results reported to the COR NLT 5 calendar days after the completion of the training.

4.2 PRE-SCREEN CANDIDATES USING E-VERIFY PROGRAM

The Contractor must pre-screen Candidates using the E-verify Program (http://www.uscis.gov/e-verify) website to meet the established employment eligibility requirements. The Vendor must ensure that the Candidate has two valid forms of Government issued identification prior to enrollment to ensure the correct information is entered into the E-verify system. An initial list of verified/eligible Candidates must be provided to the COR no later than 3 business days after the initial contract award." *When contracts are with individuals, the individuals will be required to complete a Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification, with the designated Government representative. This Form will be provided to the Contracting Officer and shall become part of the official contract file.

SECTION I - CONTRACT CLAUSES

The following have been added by reference:

52.222-5 Construction Wage Rate Requirements--Secondary Site of the

Work

MAY 2014

52.222-6 Construction Wage Rate Requirements MAY 2014 52.222-7 Withholding of Funds MAY 2014 52.222-8 Payrolls and Basic Records MAY 2014 52.222-9 Apprentices and Trainees JUL 2005 52.222-10 Compliance with Copeland Act Requirements FEB 1988 52.222-11 Subcontracts (Labor Standards) MAY 2014 52.222-11 Subcontracts (Labor Standards) MAY 2014 52.222-12 Contract Termination-Debarment MAY 2014 52.222-13 Compliance With Construction Wage Rate Requirements and

Related Regulations

MAY 2014

52.222-14 Disputes Concerning Labor Standards FEB 1988 52.222-15 Certification of Eligibility MAY 2014 52.222-16 Approval of Wage Rates MAY 2014 52.222-30 Construction Wage Rate Requirements--Price Adjustment

(None or Separately Specified Method)

MAY 2014

52.228-7 Insurance--Liability To Third Persons MAR 1996 52.236-5 Material and Workmanship APR 1984 52.236-7 Permits and Responsibilities NOV 1991 52.236-18 Work Oversight in Cost-Reimbursement Construction

Contracts

APR 1984

52.236-19 Organization and Direction of the Work APR 1984

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

Attachments: Name Pages Date

1 Fully Burden Labor rates pricing schedule 3 25 Aug 2015 2 Sample Effort 17 30 Oct 2015 3 Wage Determination (SCL) 10 14 Jul 2015 4 Wage Determination (DBA) 32 5 Nov 2015

5 Past Performance Questionnaire 4 4 Nov 2015

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

The following have been added by full text:

52.222-5 CONSTRUCTION WAGE RATE REQUIREMENTS--SECONDARY SITE OF THE WORK (MAY

2014)

(a)(1) The offeror shall notify the Government if the offeror intends to perform work at any secondary site of the work, as defined in paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of the FAR clause at 52.222-6, Construction Wage Rate Requirements,of this solicitation.

(2) If the offeror is unsure if a planned work site satisfies the criteria for a secondary site of the work, the offeror shall request a determination from the Contracting Officer.

(b)(1) If the wage determination provided by the Government for work at the primary site of the work is not applicable to the secondary site of the work, the offeror shall request a wage determination from the Contracting Officer.

(2) The due date for receipt of offers will not be extended as a result of an offeror's request for a wage determination for a secondary site of the work.

(End of provision)

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

EVALUATION CRITERIA

The award will be made based on the best overall (i.e., best value trade-off) proposal that is determined to be the most beneficial to the Government, with appropriate consideration given to the four (4) evaluation factors: 1.

Technical Capabilities (2 sub factors), 2. Technical Staff Experience, 3. Past Performance, and 4. Cost/ Price. The Technical Capabilities and Technical Staff Experience factors are of equal importance; Technical Capabilities and Technical Staff Experience are significantly more important than Past Performance. When combined, the Technical Capabilities, Technical Staff Experience, and Past Performance are more important than Cost Price. To receive consideration for award, a rating of no less than “Acceptable” must be achieved for all non-cost factors (to include all subfactors). Offerors will be cautioned that the award may not necessarily be made to the lowest cost offered.

NOTE: ALL NON-PRICED FACTORS COMBINED ARE MORE IMPORTANT THAN COST.

Award will be made based on Best Value, using the tradeoff process for proposals in accordance with FAR Part 15.101-1 and Far Part 15.3. This may result in an award being made to a higher rated, higher priced Offeror where the decision is consistent with the evaluation factors, and it is reasonably determined that the technical superiority, and/or overall business approach, and/or superior past performance of the higher priced Offeror outweighs the cost difference.

Offerors are informed that the Government does not intend to conduct discussions as a part of the evaluation and selection process. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if it is determined by the Government’s Source Selection Authority to be in the best interests of the Government to do so. Therefore, offerors are cautioned to provide all the information required and requested by the solicitation at the time of its initial proposal submission.

1. EVALUATION FACTORS

The following evaluation factors and subfactors will be used to evaluate each proposal. Award will be made to the offeror whose proposal is most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment of the evaluation factors and subfactor:

a. Factor 1: Technical Capabilities. (2 subfactors) The Offeror shall present technical approach to the components identified in the Statement of Work. The

Offeror must demonstrate the capability to perform environmental compliance and remediation services relating to FUSRAP and HTRW or similar work with radioactive contamination. The Technical Capabilities factor is further divided into the following subfactors:

Subfactor 1 – Remedial Work. The Offeror shall present capability to perform construction remedial action operations (i.e. excavation, backfilling, site restoration, decontamination and demolition) relating to FUSRAP and HTRW or similar work

Subfactor 2 – Field Engineering. The Offeror shall present capability to perform environmental investigations, remedial design of work plans, subsurface boring capabilities, and documents relating to FUSRAP and HTRW or similar work.

Subfactor 1 Remedial Work is more important to Subfactor 2 Field Engineering.

Evaluation of the offeror’s proposal shall address each subfactor as it applies to the Statement of Work (SOW). During evaluations of each proposal, the Government will assign each subfactor an adjectival rating and write a narrative evaluation reflecting the identified findings. If a subfactor is unacceptable the whole factor is unacceptable.

b. Factor 2: Technical Staff Experience.

The Offeror shall discuss the availability, competence and professional qualifications of construction, engineering and other technical abilities of key personnel with at least five years of experience for related to environmental response actions associated with investigation, design, removal, and construction activities involving sites contaminated with radiological waste. Emphasis should be placed on personnel experience related to this type of remedial work. In addition, the Offeror shall provide resumes of key management personnel and their organizational structure for this contract. The resumes should clearly display job title, education, special qualifications and experience record showing title, specific duties, responsibilities and assignments.

The offeror shall provide information on his management organization (including subcontractors) and staff.

Offerors shall provide a narrative of how the effort required by the RFP will be assigned for performance within the offeror’s corporate entity and among the proposed subcontractors. The information provided for the prime offeror and each proposed major subcontractor must include the entire company name, company address, CAGE Code, DUNS Number and type of work to be performed by citing the applicable Government SOW subparagraph number.

The proposal should provide a diagrammed organizational chart showing staff and subcontractor’s relationships and lines of authority. The offeror shall provide information on Cost Reimbursable Contract Management, scheduling, and cost control.

The Technical Factor Ratings, excerpted below focus on the strengths, deficiencies, weaknesses, risks and uncertainties of the offeror's proposal. The color rating depicts how well the offeror’s proposal meets the Technical subfactor requirements.

TABLE 1 – COMBINED TECHNICAL/RISK RATINGS

Color Ratings Description Blue…