W912BV21R0004_AM0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

This Amenment is to provide edits to Sections 00 21 00 and 00 22 11. This Amendment also adds Site Visit information, please see 52.236-27 for details.

The POC for this Amendment is Tyler Godw in: 918-669-7281, tyler.l.godw in@usace.army.mil

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 34

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 31-Mar-2022

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X W912BV21R0004

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

24-Mar-2022

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

31-Mar-2022

CODE

CONTRACTING DIV

US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, TULSA DISTRICT

2488 E. 81ST STREET

TULSA OK 74137-4290

W912BV 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912BV21R0004

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION 00 10 00 - SOLICITATION

The following have been added by full text:

BID SCHEDULE

SECTION 00 11 00

PRICING (CLIN)

SCHEDULE

CLIN Description of Item Quantity Unit Unit

Price Amount

BASE BID ITEMS

0001 DFAC Construction 1 JOB - $

0002 Existing Facility Demolition 1 JOB - $

0003 Site Improvements 1 JOB - $

0004 As-Built Drawings 1 JOB - $ 30,000

0005 O&M Manuals 1 JOB - $ 30,000

0006 Mechanical Integrator 1 JOB - $

TOTAL AMOUNT BASE BID (CLINS 0001 – 0006, inclusive) $

OPTION BID ITEMS

0007 OPTION 1 - Extension of Underground Electrical Utility Line

1 JOB - $

TOTAL BID (BASE + OPTIONS) (CLINS 0001 – 0007, inclusive) $

Contract Duration Base Bid (See Note 6 & 8): ____________ Contract Duration Base Bid plus Option 1 (See Note 6 & 8): _____________

Notes:

1. The offeror agrees to perform the work required at the prices specified above in strict accordance with the terms of this scope of work, if this offer is accepted by the Government in writing within 90 calendar days after the date offers are due.

2. The Offeror shall submit pricing data on the latest Pricing Schedule as published in the solicitation or the latest amendment thereto. In lieu of indicating additions/deductions to line items, all Offerors should state their revised prices for each item.

3. Offerors must insert a price on all numbered items of the Pricing Schedule. Failure to do so will disqualify the Offer.

4. All quantities are estimated except where the unit is given as JOB. If a modification to a proposal is submitted and provides for a lump-sum adjustment to the total estimated cost, the application of the lump- sum adjustment to each unit price and/or lump-sum price, in the Pricing Schedule must be stated or, if it is not stated, the Offeror agrees that the lump-sum adjustment shall be applied on the prorated basis to every CLIN item in the Bidding Schedule.

5. All the extensions of the unit prices shown (if applicable) will be subject to verification by the Government. In case of variation between the unit price and the extension, the unit price will be considered to be the offer.

6. The Offeror shall propose total contract duration in number of calendar days after the notice to Proceed (NTP) is issued by the Government, whether via electronic means or hard copy, whichever is the earliest method of delivery. The total number of proposed calendar days for construction through completion, ready for turnover shall not exceed the days shown at, 52.211-10 COMMENCEMENT, PROSECUTION AND COMPLETION OF WORK. The proposed duration shall become the required contract duration. The Government may issue the NTP via e-mail or by other means. Day number 1 is the day after the date of issuance of the NTP.

7. CLIN DESCRIPTION AND INCLUSIONS

a. Costs for CLIN 0001 –DFAC Construction: shall include all the items associated with administration, supervision, labor and construction of the DFAC primary Facility as required by the plans and specifications. Features include, but are not limited to building fabrication, architecture, fire protection, life safety, electrical, lighting, fire alarm, mechanical, plumbing, communications, physical security and cybersecurity.

b. Costs for CLIN 0002 – Existing Facility Demolition: includes all excavation, earthwork and site demolition.

c. Costs for CLIN 0003 –Site Improvements: shall include all Site Work for underground utilities; storm drainage, electrical, communications, water main, fire water line, sanitary sewer, gas, fencing, paving, sidewalks, ramps, stairs, retaining walls and sodding.

d. Costs for CLIN 0004 – As-built Drawings: shall include maintaining redlines for building and preparing a separate set of as-builts for building. The Government will provide Auto Desk Revit files for the vertical structure and MicroStation files for the civil and landscaping design to contractor for as-built preparation.

e. Costs for CLIN 0005 – O&M Manuals: shall include data and instructions for major systems installed.

f. CLIN 0006 – Mechanical Integrator: Includes performing building systems integration by ensuring individual mechanical components and controls systems integrate seamlessly to satisfy all requirements of the mechanical design, during all ambient conditions within the design parameters.

8. CLIN OPTION DESCRIPTIONS

a. Costs for CLIN 0007 - OPTION 1 Extension of Underground Electrical Utility Line: shall include electrical utility pathway as required by the plans and specifications.

9. CLIN Options: The Government reserves the right to exercise any or all options at any time from contract award and up to 240 days after Notice to Proceed.

10. Only one contract for entire pricing schedule will be awarded under this solicitation.

--END SECTION 00 11 00--

SECTION 00 21 00 - INSTRUCTIONS

The following have been modified:

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

1.1. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK

This is a competitive best value solicitation using trade off procedures for a construction contract for the Advanced Individual Trainee Barracks (AIT) 1300 persons Dining Facility project located at Fort Sill, Oklahoma. The Government will evaluate proposals in accordance with the criteria, described herein and award a firm fixed-price contract to the responsible firm whose proposal conforms to all the terms and conditions of the solicitation and is determined the overall best value to the Government.

1.2. GOVERNMENT SECURITY REQUIREMENTS

The offeror must ensure that ALL mail sent to the Tulsa District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, either pre-contract or post-contract award, has a return mailing address on the outside of the envelope, package, box, etc. ANY MAIL addressed to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, including but not limited to bids, modifications to bids, proposals, revised proposals, bonds, correspondence, etc., will be REJECTED by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers mail room facility located at 2488 E. 81st Street, Tulsa, OK 74137-4290, if it does not contain a return mailing address.

There will be no exceptions.

USACE Tulsa District C/O: Tyler Godwin Phone: 918-669-7281 Email: tyler.l.godwin@usace.army.mil

1.3. COPIES OF SOLICITATION DOCUMENTS AND AMENDMENTS

Copies of the solicitation and any amendments will be posted electronically on SAM.gov, Contract Opportunities via the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE) suite at https://piee.eb.mil/.

Solicitation Number: W912BV21R0004

It shall be the Offeror’s responsibility to check the websites for any amendments. The Offeror shall submit in the proposal all requested information specified in this solicitation. There will be no public opening of the proposals received as a result of this solicitation.

Any information given to an Offeror which impacts the solicitation and/or offer will be given in the form of a written amendment to the solicitation.

1.4. OFFEROR'S QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS AND BIDDER INQUIRY USED FOR REQUESTS FOR

INFORMATION (RFI)

Questions and/or comments relative to the Solicitation shall be submitted via Bidders Inquiry (reference instructions below). Any information given to an offeror which impacts the solicitation and/or offer will be given in the form of a publicized question and answer on ProjNet’s Bidder Inquiry and/or written amendment to the solicitation.

Contractual and Technical inquiries and questions relating to proposal procedures are to be submitted via Bidder Inquiry in ProjNet at:

https://www.projnet.org/projnet

To submit and review bid inquiry items, offerors will need to be a current registered user or self-register into the system. To self-register, go to the web page and click on the BID tab. Select Bidder Inquiry, select agency USACE, and enter the Bidder Inquiry Key for this solicitation listed below, your e-mail address, and then click login. Fill in all required information and click create user. Verify the information on the next screen is correct and click continue. From this page you may view all bidder inquiries or add an inquiry. Bidders will receive an acknowledgement of their question via e-mail, followed by an answer to their question after it has been processed.

The solicitation number is: W912BV21R0004 The Bidder Inquiry Key is: IT4UVC-QGH3AN

The bidder inquiry system will close for new inquiries six (6) days prior to proposal due date to ensure adequate time to form an appropriate response and amend the solicitation, if necessary. Offerors are requested to review the specification in its entirety, and review the Bidder Inquiry System for answers to questions prior to submission of a new inquiry. The bidder inquiry technical help call center operates weekdays from 8AM to 5PM Central Time Zone (Chicago). The telephone number for the Call Center is (800)428-HELP. Offers will NOT be publicly opened.

Information concerning the status of the evaluation and/or award will NOT be available after receipt of proposals.

The points of contacts for this solicitation are:

Contract Specialist: Tyler Godwin Telephone: (918)669-7281 E-mail: tyler.l.godwin@usace.army.mil

Contracting Officer: Julie S. Hill Telephone: 918-669-7699 E-mail: julie.s.hill@usace.army.mil

1.5. SMALL BUSINESS SIZE STANDARD/NAICS CODE

The NAICS Code selected for this project is 236220 and the size standard is $39,500,000.00. Also see FAR 52.204- 8, Annual Representations and Certifications.

1.6. PROPOSAL EXPENSES AND PRE-CONTRACT COSTS

This request for proposal (RFP) does not commit the Government to pay, as a direct charge, any costs incurred in the preparation and submission of a proposal

1.7. SITE VISIT

The vendor is highly encouraged to attend a site visit.

See FAR 52.236-27 ALT I for site visit information.

1.8. ACCURACY IN PROPOSALS

Proposals must set forth full, accurate, and complete information as required by this RFP, including attachments. The penalty for making false statements is prescribed in 18 U.S.C. 1001.

1.9. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL

1.9.1. The submittal method for proposals is electronic via the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment website or email ONLY (no mailed proposals).

Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment website: https://piee.eb.mil

The following email addresses must be entered for notification of proposal receipt and download availability:

Tyler.L.Godwin@usace.army.mil Julie.S.Hill@usace.army.mil

1.9.2. Proposals will be received until the date and time and specified in this request for proposal. Mail all bonds to:

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Tulsa District ATTN: CESWT-CT-E (Tyler Godwin) 2488 E. 81st Street Tulsa, OK 74137-4290

1.9.3. The packaging shall be marked Solicitation Number: W912BV-21-R-0004

1.10. PROPOSALS

Offer Closing Date: May, 9th 2022 Offer Closing Time: 2:00 pm Central Standard Time (CST)

1.11. DEVIATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS

Deviations and exceptions to the terms and conditions of the solicitation are neither encouraged nor desired. Should the offer include any standard company terms and conditions that conflict with the terms and conditions of the solicitation, the offer may be determined “unacceptable” and thus ineligible for the award. Should the offeror have any questions related to specific terms and conditions, these must be resolved prior to submission of the offer.

Notwithstanding the above, if deviations and exceptions are included with the offer, the offeror shall list and describe in detail the deviations and/or exceptions. All deviations and exceptions shall be fully supported with the Offeror’s rationale and shall fully explain the impact, if any, on the performance and/or specific requirement of the RFP.

SECTION 00 22 00 - SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS

The following have been modified:

EVALUATION CRITERIA

SECTION 00 22 11

EVALUATION CRITERIA, BASIS OF AWARD

1. OVERVIEW

This is a competitive best value solicitation using trade off procedures for a construction contract for the Advanced Individual Trainee Barracks (AIT) 1300 persons Dining Facility (DFAC) project located at Fort Sill, Oklahoma. The

Government will evaluate proposals in accordance with the criteria, described herein and award a firm fixed-price contract to the responsible firm whose proposal conforms to all the terms and conditions of the solicitation and is determined the overall best value to the Government.

General Description of Work: Construct the Advanced Individual Trainee Barracks Complex, Phase 2 Dining Facility located at Fort Sill, Oklahoma in accordance with the plans and specifications.

1.1 WHO CAN SUBMIT

a. Firms formally organized as small business construction contractors; firms associated specifically for this project as a small business. Associations may be as joint ventures, partnerships, or as key team subcontractors, or any other interested small business parties may submit proposals. Associations may be as joint ventures as a partnership in accordance with FAR 9.601, or as key team subcontractors. To qualify the requirements of paragraphs 5.1.2.a(3) and 7.1.1 (below) must be met.

b. Organization Conflicts of Interest (OCI) Disclosure: The Offeror shall provide a disclosure statement with its proposal which concisely describes all the relevant facts concerning past or present organizational conflicts of interest relating to work on this project. In the same statement, and if applicable, the Offeror shall provide information to assure the Government that the conflicts of interest have been mitigated and/or neutralized to the maximum extent possible. If a conflict of interest is discovered after award of this contract, the Contracting Officer will make a decision whether to terminate the contract.

2.0 BASIS OF AWARD

The Contracting Officer intends to award a firm fixed-price contract to the responsible Offeror whose proposal the Source Selection Authority determines conforms to the solicitation, is fair and reasonable, and offers the best overall value to the Government, considering all non-price factors described herein, and price. All evaluation factors, other than price, when combined, are considered significantly more important than price. The intent of this solicitation is to obtain the best proposal for the required work. The Government reserves the right to accept other than the lowest priced offer or to reject all offers. The Government will not award a contract if the proposal contains a deficiency, as defined in FAR 15.001. The Government reserves the right to reject any offer if the offer is not in the best interest of the Government.

If awarded the contract, the Offeror shall construct the project in accordance with the plans and specifications.

3.0 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS

3.1 REQUIREMENT FOR SEPARATE PRICE AND TECHNICAL PROPOSALS

3.1.1 Each Offeror shall submit a Price Proposal and Technical Proposal. The Price Proposal and Technical Proposal must be submitted as separate files. Ensure that each file is clearly marked to indicate its contents, and the identity of the Offeror.

3.1.2 The Price Proposal and Technical Proposal must be received by the closing date and time set for receipt of proposals.

3.1.3 No dollar amounts from the Price Proposal are to be included in the Technical Proposal.

3.1.4 All information intended to be evaluated as part of the Technical Proposal must be submitted as part of the Technical Proposal (Volume 1). Do not merely cross-reference similar material in the Price Proposal, or vice versa.

Also, do not include links to websites in lieu of incorporating information into your proposal.

3.1.5 TAB A: Deviations, Exception and Assumptions

Deviations and exceptions to the terms and conditions of the solicitation in either the technical or price proposal are neither encouraged nor desired. Should the offer include any standard company terms and conditions that conflict with the terms and conditions of the solicitation, the offer may be determined “unacceptable” and, thus, ineligible for award. Should the Offeror have any questions related to specific terms and conditions, these must be resolved prior to submission of the offer. Notwithstanding the above, if deviations and exceptions are included with the offer, the Offeror shall list and describe in detail the deviations and/or exceptions under Tab A. All deviations and exceptions shall be fully supported with the Offeror’s rationale and shall fully explain the impact, if any, on the performance and/or specific requirement of the RFP. Deviations from the minimum standard of quality required by the RFP shall not be accepted unless identified by the offeror’s proposal and specifically approved by the Contracting Officer in writing. If unapproved, the Contractor must provide the RFP requirements without additional cost to the Government. If approved, the accepted deviation will take precedence as a provision of the solicitation.

The Offeror shall also clearly describe on the Tab B submitted with the Price Proposal any exception to the contractual and/or technical terms and include the monetary impact on the solicitation with the price proposal. If the offeror has no deviations, exceptions, or assumptions to the terms and conditions of the solicitation, they must submit a statement indicating this. This information will not be evaluated separately but may impact the evaluation of other factors.

Offerors are urged to read paragraph 2.0 and the definitions contained in paragraph 10.3 carefully.

3.2 DISCUSSIONS

The Government does not intend to enter into discussions with offerors prior to making an award. Offerors are encouraged to present their best technical proposal and price proposal in their initial proposal submission. However, in accordance with FAR Part 15.306, should discussions become necessary, the Government reserves the right to hold them. If this occurs, a competitive range will be determined, and offerors notified. The competitive range may be limited for purposes of efficiency in accordance with (IAW) FAR Part 15.306(c)(2).

3.3 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

3.3.1 Submit only the electronic files specifically authorized and/or required elsewhere in this section. Do not submit excess information, to include audio-visual materials, electronic media, etc. All pages should be numbered and include working bookmarks.

3.3.2 Electronic copies of each volume shall be submitted through the Solicitation Module of the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE) suite at https://piee.eb.mil/ using the applicable solicitation number.

Proposals submitted by mail or hand-carried will not be evaluated. Proposals sent through proprietary or third-party File Transfer Protocol (FTP) sites or DoD SAFE will not be retrieved. It is the responsibility of the Offeror to confirm receipt of proposals. All proposals received after the exact time specified for receipt shall be treated as late submissions and will not be considered except under facts and circumstances allowed by the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR). For instructions on how to post an offer, please refer to the Posting Offer demo: https://pieetraining.eb.mil/wbt/sol/Posting_Offer.pdf.

It is the Offeror’s responsibility to obtain written confirmation of receipt of all electronic files of the full proposal by the DTRA Contracting office. In the event that the Solicitation Module is down, the alternate method for proposal submission is via email to: dtra.belvoir.al.mbx.fbo-notices@mail.mil ONLY. The Offeror must obtain prior approval from the Contracting Officer to use the alternate submission method. Offerors are responsible for ensuring electronic copies are virus-free and shall run an anti-virus scan before submission.

Electronic copies of each volume shall be compatible with the following software products: Adobe Acrobat Reader 11 and Microsoft Office Suite 2016. Narrative portions of the proposal shall be in Adobe Acrobat portable document file (pdf) searchable text format. Offerors shall not embed sound or video (e.g., MPEG) files into the proposal files.

Electronic files shall be clearly identified for each volume, section, and item. Proposals shall be tabbed and labeled in a manner to afford easy identification from a Table of Contents. Each page shall be identified with the appropriate page number centered at the bottom of the page.

3.3.3 Sheet size of the proposal contents shall be 8-1/2 inches x 11 inches where sheets are prepared specifically for this proposal, unless another paper size is specifically authorized elsewhere in this section for a particular submission. Do not use alternative paper sizes (e.g., 11” x 14” or 11” x 17” sheets) unless specifically authorized in this section for a particular submission. Do not use a font size smaller than 10, an unusual font style such as script, or condensed print for any submission. All page margins must be at least 1 inch wide but may include headers and footers. Proposals shall not exceed page limitations as defined in the individual Factor limitations noted in the paragraphs below, excluding the cover sheet and Table of Contents. A page is defined as text or information on one side of the paper. The Government will not evaluate any information beyond the total page limitations noted in the individual Factor limitations noted in the paragraphs below. The Government will not review any information submitted in an appendix or attachment to the proposal. The Offeror shall not submit verbatim sections of this solicitation as part of their proposal. Offers that do not meet these requirements may be subject to rejection.

3.3.4 “Confidential” projects cannot be submitted to demonstrate capability unless all of the information required for evaluation as specified herein can be provided to the Government as part of the Offeror’s technical proposal.

Proposals containing information that is not to be disclosed to the public for any purpose, or used by the Government except for evaluation purposes, must be clearly marked in accordance with the instructions at FAR 52.215-1, “Instructions to Offerors— Competitive Acquisition,” paragraph (e), “Restriction on disclosure and use of data.”

3.3.5 For submissions with page limitations: Where authorized, fold-out pages (11" x 14" or 11" x 17") will count as one page. Tables of content, proposal cover letters, and tabs between proposal information do not count toward any page limitations in the proposal.

3.3.6 Proposal revisions shall be submitted as page replacements with revised text readily identifiable, e.g., bold face print or underlining. The source of the revision, e.g., Error, Omission, Clarification, or amendment shall be included and be annotated for each revision. Proposal replacement pages shall: be numbered; be clearly marked “REVISED;” show the date of revision.

A revised copy of the entire proposal in .pdf format shall be provided via the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE) suite at https://piee.eb.mil/or via email to tyler.l.godwin@usace.army.mil and copy julie.s.hill@usace.army.mil.

3.4 SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (VOLUME 1)

3.4.1 Technical Proposal. Proposals shall contain the entire proposal in .pdf format using Adobe Acrobat software to print to a .pdf file; do NOT scan the document(s) into a .pdf file. The text portion of the complete proposal shall be contained as a single .pdf file. Sections of the proposal shall be bookmarked (linked to the index) in logical order.

3.4.2 Format and Contents of the Technical Proposal and List of Tabs. The technical proposal will be appropriately organized using the tabs specified in the chart below. The proposals shall contain a detailed table of contents. A cover sheet identifying the Offeror (name, address, point of contact), project description, and solicitation number shall be provided. The second sheet shall be a Table of Contents. Offers that violate these rules unnecessarily delay the evaluation process and may be rejected by the Government after the initial evaluation without receiving any further consideration. The Government will not evaluate any information beyond the page limitation noted.

3.4.3 Page Limitations. The following page limitations are established for each factor and subfactor:

Factor 1 – Past Performance – No overall page limitation.

Each project submitted shall be limited to two (2) pages per project.

Factor 2 - Management Approach:

Sub-factor 1, Technical Approach – Limited to 12 pages Sub-factor 2, Organization– Limited to 5 pages Sub-factor 3, Key Personnel – Limited to 2 pages for each resume provided

Factor 3 - Performance Capability

Sub-factor 1, Proposed Contract Duration and Summary Schedule – No page limit may be (11" x 14" or 11" x 17"). Schedule narrative is limited to 5 pages.

Sub-factor 2, Specialized Experience Key Subcontractors – No page limitation. Each project submitted shall be limited to one (1) page per project

3.5 SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE PRICE PROPOSAL (VOLUME 2)

3.5.1 Price Proposal. Submit the Price Proposal in read only PDF files.

3.5.2 Size Restrictions and Page Limits. The following are established for Factor 4 – Section 00 11 00 Pricing Schedule: no page limit.

Proposal materials shall be submitted in PDF file. Do not use a font size smaller than 10, an unusual font style such as script, or condensed print for any submission. Each page shall be identified with the appropriate page number centered at the bottom of the page. Sheet size of the proposal contents shall be 8-1/2 inches x 11 inches. There are no page limits set for the Price Proposal. However, limit your response to information required by this solicitation.

Excess information will not be considered in the Government’s evaluation.

3.5.3 Format and Contents of the Price Proposal and List of Tabs.

The Price Proposal shall be tabbed and labeled in a manner to afford easy identification from a Table of Contents, as indicated in the following chart. Note: If the Offeror is not required to submit any information under a listed Tab (such as a JV Agreement) in accordance with the instructions below, that tab can be omitted. However, do not renumber the subsequent tabs.

4.0 PROPOSAL CONTENTS AND RELATED EVALUATION FACTORS

VOLUME 1 – TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

Factor/ Subfactor/ Element

LOCATION DESCRIPTION RELATIVE IMPORTANCE

N/A Vol 1 TAB A DEVIATIONS, EXCEPTIONS, AND ASSUMPTIONS

Not rated but may impact the evaluation of factors

FACTOR 1 Vol 1 TAB B PAST PERFORMANCE Most Important Factor

FACTOR 2 MANAGEMENT APPROACH 2nd Most Important Factor

Subfactor 1

Vol 1 TAB C Technical Approach Most Important Sub-factor

Subfactor 2 Vol 1 TAB D Organization 2nd Most Important Subfactor

Subfactor 3 Vol 1 Tab E Key Personnel 3rd Most Important Subfactor

FACTOR 3 PERFORMANCE

CAPABILITY

3rd Most Important Factor

Subfactor 1 Vol 1 Tab F Proposed Contract Duration And Summary Schedule

Most Important Subfactor

Subfactor 2 Vol 1 Tab G Specialized Experience Key Subcontractors

2nd Most Important Subfactor

VOLUME 2 – PRICE PROPOSAL

Factor/ Subfactor/ Element

LOCATION

DESCRIPTION

RELATIVE IMPORTANCE

N/A Vol 2 Tab A Proposal Cover Sheet Not Rated

N/A Vol 2 Tab B Signed Letter Responding to RFP, SF1442 and Acknowledgement of Amendments

Not Rated

FACTOR 4 Vol 2 Tab C SECTION 00 11 00, PRICING

SCHEDULE

5th Most Important Factor All technical factors, when combined, are significantly more important than price N/A Vol 2 Tab D Bid Guarantee (Bid Bond) Not Rated

N/A Vol 2 Tab E Representations & Certifications Not Rated

N/A Vol 2 Tab F JV Agreement (if applicable) Not Rated

5.0 VOLUME 1 TAB B – FACTOR 1 PAST PERFORMANCE

There are two aspects to the performance confidence evaluation: relevancy and quality of past performance. In accordance with FAR 15.305(a)(2), the currency and relevance of the information, source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in contractor's performance shall be considered. Relevance and quality of performance will be combined to establish one performance confidence assessment rating for each Offeror.

5.1 RELEVANCY OF PAST EXPERIENCE

5.1.1 These projects must be of relevant scope and complexity to the solicited project. The Offeror shall submit information on up to five (5), but no more than five (5), completed projects demonstrating the Offeror's recent and relevant experience using the Company – Specialized Experience form – (Attachment 1) at the end of the section. If any of the information required is not included in these forms, the Offeror will be considered non-responsive and evaluated as unacceptable. Each project submitted shall be limited to two (2) page per project. Projects must be one hundred percent (100%) complete or meet the Beneficial Occupancy Date (BOD) requirement.

All projects must have a construction completion date or BOD no earlier than seven (7) years preceding the original date of issuance of this solicitation. BOD is the point at which the customer determines the facility or area can be occupied from both a regulatory and work function standpoint.

5.1.2 To determine relevance, the agency will evaluate the following. This list is not all-inclusive. The offeror may submit other types of projects but must explain the relevancy of those projects to the project that is being solicited in this RFP. However, the more items that are included in a project the more relevant the experience and the more credit will be given:

i. A project with a value of $15M.

ii. A project that involved the construction of a dining facility or the construction of a large restaurant or cafeteria with an industrial kitchen.

iii. A Design-Bid-Build project.

iv. A project constructed on Military installation or other restricted access sites.

v. Projects that demonstrate experience with High Performance and Sustainable Building (HPSB) Guiding Principles certification per UFC 1‐200‐02, LEED certification or, other third-party sustainability certifications.

5.1.3 The Offeror shall submit the requested information to demonstrate a record of recent, related experience, for the facility types. Offerors may identify state and local government and private contracts that are similar to the Government’s requirements as outlined in the Summary of Work Section 01 11 00.

5.1.4 If the Offeror is a joint venture or teaming arrangement, each firm shall provide information, demonstrating experience relevant to their role on this project. Offeror shall provide a copy of the joint venture agreement or letters of commitment for all teaming contractors, agreements and letters of commitment will not count towards the page limitations, failure to provide the joint venture agreement or letters of commitment will result in the proposal being evaluated as unacceptable. If any firm has multiple functions or divisions, limit the project examples to those performed by the division or unit submitting the offer or by the team member. Joint Venture partners or teaming partners should each demonstrate experience commensurate with their role on this project. If any of the information required is not included in the forms (Attachment 1), then the Contractor will be considered non-responsive and evaluated as unacceptable.

5.1.5 To receive credit for extent (amount) of experience, the Offeror shall demonstrate a history of recent, relevant experience. A firm will not receive credit under this factor for the relevant experience of key personnel proposed for this project. If Offeror represents the combining of two or more companies for the purpose of this RFP, the proposal shall clearly identify the contractual responsibilities of each firm and the work to be performed by each;

describe the nature of the association; indicate whether the firms have experience working together in construction ventures, including how long and how many projects. In addition, each company, including joint ventures, shall list their Government contract experience. Provide a copy of the commitment letter of the firms (see Attachment 5) or the Joint Venture Agreement. A copy of the teaming or joint venture agreement(s) must be appended to the plan under Factor 2 Sub-factor 1 (not included in the page limitation). If the letter of commitment is not included for a teaming subcontractor, the contractor will not receive credit for teaming subcontractor’s experience under this factor and the submitted projects will not be reviewed. Each member of the team must provide one (1) to two (2) "recent", "relevant" projects performed by the team member that reflect the team member's experience commensurate with their role on this project or how their experience qualifies them for their role on this project. In such instances the combined experience projects, submitted by each member of the team, shall not exceed the maximum number of projects stated in paragraph 5.1.1.

5.1.6 The Government will consider extent of recent experience, degree of relationship of such experience to this project, demonstrated familiarity with applicable codes and local conditions. Some examples of relevancy to this project may include, but not be limited to:

i. Number, size, type work, complexity, location

ii. Dates completed no more than seven (7) years preceding date of Solicitation

iii. Firm's role and extent of work self-performed (brokering out all work and simply “placing the sidewalks” on a cited project are examples of less relevant experience)

5.1.7 The Government may consider previous recent teaming experience among the team members, JV partners or key teaming subcontractors, as value added, even if on different type design and/or construction projects than this project. The more relevant the experience, the more credit will be given.

5.2 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT

5.2.1 For each of the projects submitted, provide a copy of the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) report. If CPARS does not exist, please provide a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) (Attachment 2) to a representative of the owner. The Past Performance Questionnaire included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 1, Past Performance. Ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed Past Performance Questionnaires should be submitted with your proposal. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ (Attachment 2), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact, Tyler Godwin via email Tyler.L.Godwin@usace.army.mil prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs.

However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. Form PPQ-0 at Attachment 2 shall be utilized and offerors shall submit the PPQ with their proposal submission to the Contracting Office designated proposal submission location. The contract specialist or Contracting Officer will not require the PPQ to be sent directly from the client. If you have questions regarding the attached questionnaire, or require assistance, please contact the Contract Specialist at (918) 669-7281.

5.2.2 The Government reserves the right to verify the experience record of cited projects or other recent projects by reviewing Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), other databases; or interviews with Program Managers, Contracting Officers, and Fee Determining Officials; and the Defense Contract Management Agency or to interview owners or references. The Government may check any or all cited references to verify supplied information. The information obtained from these sources will be evaluated supplementary to the past performance questionnaires. In reference to the contracts pulled from these sources, the relevancy of the projects, completion dates, ratings and comments in the individual categories and overall ratings will be considered in making the overall confidence assessment.

5.2.3 While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the offeror. The offeror is responsible for ensuring that the completed questionnaires are submitted by the closing date.

5.2.4 No additional information may be submitted under this factor, unless the Offeror is submitting proposals as a Joint Venture in which case the offeror shall provide the brief narrative as described in paragraph 5.2.9.d below. Inclusion of additional information will result in the contractor being found unacceptable and may result in the contractor being removed from further consideration.

5.2.5 The Government will evaluate the responses from the customers from which Past Performance Questionnaires have been received. The Government may contact and interview points of contact on the Past Performance Questionnaires. The Government reserves the right to interview other individuals acting for the listed references if the listed reference is not available. In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance.

5.2.6 To improve accuracy of database searches, the offeror will also provide the CAGE Codes for the prime contractor and all teaming partners, i.e., design firms, key subcontractors, Joint Venture Partners, whose experience is being relied on.

5.2.7 The Government may contact references, for information regarding the Offeror’s past performance on the project and for the purposes of assessing and verifying Section 00 22 11 the scope of the work performed. Offerors should provide accurate, current, and complete contact information for references provided in the project descriptions.

5.3 JOINT VENTURE SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

a. Offerors submitting proposals as a Joint Venture (JV) shall obtain a DUNS number and be registered in the CCR as the offering Joint Venture. The Offeror must provide three (3) to five (5) "recent", "relevant" projects performed by the JV that reflect the JV's ability to perform the work required in this.

b. If the Offeror cannot provide a sufficient number of projects as the JV to meet the minimum requirement, the Offeror must provide those "recent", "relevant" projects that it has performed as the JV, and then supplement the record with additional "recent", "relevant" projects performed by each JV member in their individual capacities. In such instance, each JV member must satisfy a minimum requirement of two (2) projects, to include any performed as the JV.

c. If the JV has no "recent", "relevant" projects performed by the JV, then each member of the JV must provide two (2) to three (3) "recent", "relevant" projects performed by the JV member that reflect the JV member's experience commensurate with their role on this project or how their experience qualifies them for their role on this project as required. In such instances the combined experience projects, submitted by each member of the JV, shall not exceed the maximum number of projects stated in paragraph 5.1.1

d. In addition to the examples of "Company Specialized Experience" and "Past Performance Surveys", the Joint Venture shall provide a brief narrative not to exceed five (5) pages stating the roles that each partner of the Joint Venture will perform on this project and how the presented projects demonstrate the JV member's experience commensurate with their role on this project or how their experience qualifies them for their role on this project.

The attached “Specialized Experience" and "Past Performance Survey" forms shall be used by the Joint Venture or the JV partners. Explain how the JV is structured.

e. Verification: The Government reserves the right to verify the experience record of cited projects or other recent projects not submitted by reviewing the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), or other Government appraisal systems or to interview owner or references. The Government may check any or all cited references to verify supplied information. An Offeror will be afforded the opportunity to reply to or explain adverse performance information to which the Offeror has not previously had an opportunity to address.

5.4 RATING METHODS

5.4.1 Each submitted project will be assigned one of the levels of relevancy shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Past Performance Relevancy Rating Method

Adjectival Rating Definition Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

5.4.2 In reviewing each past performance effort by the Offeror, the Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) will then evaluate the overall quality of the Offeror's past performance (see FAR 15 .304(c)(2)) to determine the performance confidence assessment rating. The past performance evaluation conducted in support of a current source selection does not establish, create, or change the existing record and history of the Offeror's past performance on past contracts; rather, the past performance evaluation process gathers information from customers on how well the Offeror performed those past contracts.

5.4.3 The Government will consider the currency and relevance of the information, source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in contractor performance. With respect to relevancy, past performance on projects with more relevance will typically be a stronger predictor of future success and have more influence on the past performance confidence assessment rating than past performance on projects of lesser relevance.

Owners/references may be asked to comment on items such as quality of design or construction, timeliness, management of the work, subcontractor management, including timely payment to subs or suppliers, safety, relations between owner and designer or contractor, level of support for such things as as-built documentation, O&M manuals, training, correcting design or construction errors, warranty work, etc. The Government will target areas covered in the requirements of this proposal including records of confirming quality, schedule, cost control, customer satisfaction, level of support for such things as as-built documentation, O&M Manuals, training, problem resolution for design or construction errors, warranty work, and safety. The Government will not release the Interview Forms to the Offeror at any time, in order for the Government to solicit candid, unbiased interview comments. The Government also places a higher value on projects which document successful outcomes and are supported by outside source confirmation, for example, but not limited to telephone databases, Offeror-furnished references, or personal knowledge. The Government also places a higher value on projects, which provided particularly difficult or unique challenges and the innovative methods the contractor used to resolve problems successfully. (see Table 2 below).

5.4.4 The past performance confidence assessment rating is based on the Offeror's overall record of recency, relevancy, and quality of performance. At the conclusion of the assessment, the Offeror shall be assigned one of the ratings in Table 2.

Table 2. Performance Confidence Assessment Adjectival Rating Definition Substantial Confidence Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Limited Confidence Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Unknown Confidence (Neutral)

No recent/relevant performance record is available, or the Offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

5.4.5 Each entity (firm) will be rated on its own performance or that of its predecessor, as defined in FAR 52.204-20, if relevant. An entity may not establish past performance based on the past performance of its proposed key personnel, apart from that of the entity. If the Government does not obtain past performance information for the projects identified by the Offeror and cannot establish a past performance record for the Offeror through other sources, past performance will be rated neither favorably nor unfavorably. The performance confidence assessment will be considered “Unknown Confidence”.

6.0 VOLUME 1 - FACTOR 2 - MANAGEMENT APPROACH

6.1 VOLUME 1, TAB C: SUBFACTOR 1 - TECHNICAL APPROACH

6.1.1 Submission Requirements:

6.1.1.1 Provide information that describes the offeror’s intended technical approach to executing the construction contract per the detailed requirements herein. Limit the information to 12 pages or less concisely describe the technical approach to project management and execution.

6.1.1.2 Offeror’s Understanding: Describe challenges, risk, and constraints associated with the project and how the offeror intends to address each with means and methods, resources, or internal organizational processes.

6.1.1.3 Technical Approach for Construction: Describe the technical approach to construction for the facility.

Describe any proposed phasing plan for construction of the Advanced Individual Trainee Barracks (AIT) Complex, Phase II Dining Facility (DFAC). Describe interactions within the team and with the Corps of Engineers during construction.

6.1.14 Subcontractor Approach and…