Projnet Inquiries.pdf

UNCLASSIFIED\\FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Bid Inquiry Contractor Report All Inquiries

Project: (DESC1902) DLA - Hydrant Fueling System Alterations at LRAFB Review: RFI Review (00001) (sorted by CommentID ) Displaying 38 inquiries.

Id Discipline Sheet Detail Spec

8765092 Contracting Instructions to Bidders

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Instructions to Bidders states that proposals will need to be mailed to the Contracting Division in hard copy format.

Due to continuously changing travel and mail durations and revisions to policies, we would like to request the ability to submit proposals via DOD-SAFE file exchange.

On: Aug 12 2020.

Government Response. . Please adhere to the proposal submission requirements in the solicitation. DOD SAFE will not be used for this solicitation. On: Aug 25 2020

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8766845 Contracting Instrictions to Bidders, Proposal

Requirements

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Proposal Tab 1, Sub Factor 1.1, Relevant Construction Experience

Submission Requirements. Requesting Government's review and consideration in extending the contractors project qualifications for submitted projects from six (6) to ten (10) years. Increasing the allowable window to ten years will increase the number of responsive proposals to be submitted and we believe maintains the intent of recent relevant experience criteria.

On: Aug 13 2020.

Government Response. . The government concurs with changing the time limit on experience from six

(6) years to ten (10) years as follows:

The submitted projects shall either be 100% construction progress complete or substantially complete within ten (10) years from the date of issuance of this solicitation. On: Aug 19 2020

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8766980 Contracting Solicitation, f.(4),(i)

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Proposal Tab 1, Sub Factor 1.1, Relevant Construction Experience

Submission Requirements.

All other project examples shall include at a minimum two (2) elements of the following four (4)phases of airfield fueling, but may include multiple or all phases: [1] offload, [2] transfer(systems of pumps, filters and pipes), [3] aviation fuel storage, or [4] fuel delivery to equipment that incorporates refueler truck fillstands or otherwise complies with the direct aircraft fueling systems criteria for Type III, IV, or V hydrant fueling systems as specified in the Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) 3-460-01. The construction contract for these project examples shall be a minimum of $7 million in magnitude.

Would USACE allow a minimum of $5 million in magnitude? Typical contract value for 2 of the 4 items is a $1M-$5M SRM project. This would allow more competitive pricing.

On: Aug 13 2020.

Government Response. . For this factor, the government concurs with the change from $10 million in magnitude to $5 million.

Page 1 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

9/4/2020https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicPublicReportAll...

The construction contract for this project example shall be a minimum of $5 million in magnitude. On: Aug 19 2020

Government Response. . The text below appends or clarifies ALL previous replies.

Correction: The Government concurs with the change from $7 million in magnitude to $5 million. The construction contract for this project example shall be a minimum of $5 million in magnitude. On: Sep 04

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8767610 Contracting M-001 01 00 50

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

What are the wage rates on this project

On: Aug 13 2020.

Government Response. . The wage rates are included in the solicitation starting on page 55. On: Aug 25

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8772846 Mechanical 33 52 43.13

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

It is impossible to determine the length of the existing 10" hydrant loop that is required to be pigged per spec paragraph 3.10. Please provide an approximate length of the existing 10" hydrant loop is required to be pigged.

On: Aug 17 2020.

Government Response. . The total length of the piggable section of hydrant loop piping is approximately 24,000 LF. On: Aug 20 2020

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8772856 Contracting CLIN

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

What exactly is considered "Fuel Fill Piping" for CLIN 0005?

On: Aug 17 2020.

Government Response. . The fuel fill piping is all work required to connect the existing 2 fillstand positions at the bulk facility to the hydrant loop piping. On: Sep 01 2020

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8772900 Mechanical M-502 3 33 52 43.13

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

The drawings and specs require stainless steel piping for piping 2" and smaller. The specs require carbon steel relief valves. Are we to assume the (3) isolation valves on the CS relief valves to be carbon steel or stainless steel?

On: Aug 17 2020.

Government Response. . The Contractor shall assume the isolation valves are stainless steel. On: Aug 20 2020

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8773039 General Solicitation page 10 of 60 COVID-19

Protocols

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Regarding site visit access, the solicitation reads that if a person's ID indicates they reside in a COVID-19 "hotspot", the person may be denied access to the AFB.

Page 2 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

Please provide specific location criteria that will be used to determine who will be denied access to the AFB because of where they live. This does not account for those that have been very careful and have been self-quarantining.

On: Aug 17 2020.

Government Response. . The government does not anticipate that any potential offeror will be denied access to the base for a pre-proposal site visit; however, base security controls access to the base. A representative from Base CE will be at the visitors center/check-in to assist in the process. On: Aug 20

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8775451 Mechanical M-113, M-202, M-301

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Sheet M-202 shows a 6" ball valve upstream of the BPCV. Sheet M-301 doesn't show one. Is it required?

On: Aug 18 2020.

Government Response. . Provide a 6" ball valve prior to the BPCV to facilitate maintenance on the BPCV. On: Aug 20 2020

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8775455 Mechanical M-113, M-202

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

M-202 shows a 2" DBB plug valve with motor actuator for the leak detection system. M-113 shows a 2" ball valve with motor actuator. What type of valve is required for the leak detection system?

On: Aug 18 2020.

Government Response. . Provide a 2" DBB plug valve with motor actuator for the leak detection system.

On: Aug 20 2020

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8775462 Mechanical M-113, M-202

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

M-202 shows an 8" ball valve on the F/S discharge header that bypasses the loop and connects to the return. It is not shown on M-113. Is the 8" bypass valve required?

On: Aug 18 2020.

Government Response. . The 8" bypass valve is not required for this project. On: Aug 20 2020

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8775474 Mechanical M-202

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

The drawings and specs require piping 2" and smaller to be SS. Shouldn't the 2" line for the PCV be CS, since it is welded to a CS line?

On: Aug 18 2020.

Government Response. . The 2" line for the PCV shall be carbon steel. On: Aug 20 2020

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8775476 Mechanical M-113, M-202

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

M-202 shows a 2" DBB plug valve on the PRT return line connection to the return line. M-113 does not show this valve. Is the 2" DBB plug valve on the PRT return line required?

On: Aug 18 2020.

Page 3 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

Government Response. . The 2" DBB plug valve is required for the PRT return line. As an alternate, the contractor may provide a 2" ball valve in accordance with the new AW 078-24-28 standard released March 2020. On: Aug 20 2020

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8775682 Mechanical 33 52 43.11

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Paragraph 2.8.1.16 requires an automatic level alarm system utilizing the digital tank gauge system to interface with the PCP. Typically, the float switch assembly as specified in paragraph 2.8.1.7 is utilized for the level alarm system with interface to the PCP and also to start and stop FTP-1. Should the automatic level alarm system set-points be added to the float switch assembly requirements?

On: Aug 18 2020.

Government Response. . The drawings and specifications correctly represent the PRT level alarm/pump control scope of work thus no additional level alarm setpoints should be added to the float switch assembly requirements. The PRT float switch assembly, as specified and as indicated on the drawings, consists of two point level set points which will start/stop FTP-1. The PRT automatic level alarm system shall be as specified in 33.52.43.11 paragraph 2.8.1.16 – the ATG and Leak Detection Monitor/Veeder-Root TLS shall provide, as part of the Automatic Level Alarm System, alarm setpoints for PRT HLA and HHLA. These alarms shall interface directly with the Pump Control Panel, as indicated on the drawings. On: Aug 20 2020

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8775688 Mechanical 33 52 43.11

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

The spec requirements for the operating tank level indicators include new servo gauges, new temperature probes, and a new RTU. The electrical drawings only require a new RTU and will utilize the existing servo gauges and temperature probes. What is required for the ATG for the existing storage tanks?

On: Aug 18 2020.

Government Response. . Please see Sheet EI605A for the scope of work for the existing AGST's ATG system: each of the three existing tanks 1,2,3 Servo ATG, temperature/water probe and tank side indicator will be reused. A new RTU will be provided in the new pumphouse along with a new local level display (CP/2500 or equal). ATG signal cabling from the existing servo gauges to the RTU will be new. 120 Vac power to the 3 existing servo level gauges will be new. Existing interconnecting cabling between the existing servo level gauges and the respective temperature/water probe as well as the interconnecting cabling between the servo level gauges and the respective tank side indicator will be reused (existing to remain in place). On: Aug 20 2020

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8775691 Mechanical 33 52 43.11

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Paragraphs 2.11. and 2.12 require two different types of level switches. One is a float type and one is electronic type. Which type is required?

On: Aug 18 2020.

Government Response. . The mechanical float sensors in Section 2.11 are not desired and can be removed from the specification. Please provide the electronic sensors in section 2.12 for the LLLA and LLA.

The existing HHLA and HLA will be reused. Therefore, it is required to provide four new scully modules in the PCP per tank. On: Aug 20 2020

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8775696 Mechanical 33 52 43.11

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Paragraph 2.12 requires new high-high, high, low, and low-low level switches and probe holders. The electrical drawings only require new low and low-low level switches. Which switches are required?

Page 4 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

On: Aug 18 2020.

Government Response. . Only new low and low-low switches are required. On: Aug 20 2020

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8775752 Mechanical M-113, M-202, M-301

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

M-301 shows an 8" DBB plug valve with MOV for the cross connect valve between the supply and return. Sheet M-202 shows an 8" ball valve (I27) with MOV. What type of valve is required?

On: Aug 18 2020.

Government Response. . Provide a 8" ball valve with MOV for the cross connect valve (I27). On: Aug 20

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8780590 Mechanical 33 52 43.11

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Paragraph 2.8.1.11 requires internally/externally coated carbon steel product return basin. Is a stainless steel product return basin acceptable?

On: Aug 19 2020.

Government Response. . Yes, a stainless steel product return basin is acceptable. On: Aug 20 2020

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8783248 Mechanical 33 52 43.13

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Based on the response to comment number 8772900, that requires SS isolation valves for all relief valves (CS & SS), should all relief valves be stainless steel, since the relief piping is all SS?

On: Aug 20 2020.

Government Response. . After further discussion on this matter, carbon steel isolation valves, carbon steel thermal reliefs valves, and carbon steel pipe are acceptable since the header pipes are carbon steel.

On: Aug 21 2020

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8783804 Mechanical 01 11 00 para.

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

The scope of work in Section 01 11 00: "The HVAC system will connect to the base-wide EMCS system."

There is no requirement in Division 23 to connect the new pump house HVAC system to a base-wide EMCS. Please modify specifications to add this if it is the government's intent to have base-wide EMCS control of the pump house HVAC or remove the requirement from the scope of work in 01 11 00.

On: Aug 20 2020.

Government Response. . The Division 23 spec is correct. There is no requirement connect the new pumphouse HVAC system to a base-wide EMCS. On: Sep 01 2020

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8789959 Mechanical 33 52 23.15 3.2.2 a. NDT Testing

Frequency

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Specification says "Provide 100 percent radiographic testing for all underground piping and hydrant pump discharge piping."

Page 5 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

For purposes of this statement, which pumps are considered hydrant pumps and how far downstream does 100% RT apply?

On: Aug 24 2020.

Government Response. . The FP-1, FP-2, and FP-3 pumps are the Hydrant Pumps. The intent is to 100% radiographic test the new and modified sections of the primary hydrant loop. On: Sep 01 2020

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8796387 Contracting Advertisement for bid

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

The current bid date is September 16, 2020. Based on the site visit just being held and the complexity of the project, we request the government push the bid date back (min 2 weeks) to September 30, 2020 to ensure the most competitive pricing can be gained?

On: Aug 27 2020.

Government Response. . The bid date of September 16, 2020 remains unchanged. An extension will not be granted On: Sep 01 2020

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8796408 Contracting Advertisement for bid

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

The Projnet Home page for this project lists RFIs will be taken from (Aug 20 2020 - Sep 22 2020). September 22 is of course after the scheduled bid date. However, page 10 of the solicitation states last day for RFIs is August 20.

Please confirm the last day for RFIs and if the Bid date will change.

On: Aug 27 2020.

Government Response. . Per page one of the solicitation, the ProjNet review closes on August 31, 2020.

A Request for Information (RFI) Review has been set up f or this RFP in ProjNet https://w w w .projnet.org/projnet/. The Bidder Inquiry Key is:

N248XP-RV55SS. All questions and inquiries w ill be accepted only via the ProjNet w ebsite. The review is open from 10 AUG 20 to 31 AUG 20 12:00 pm CT On: Sep 01 2020

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8796417 Environmental Engineering

Pre-Proposal Site Visit

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Can you provide the sign in sheet for the August 25, 2020 site visit?

On: Aug 27 2020.

Government Response. . The site visit attendance sheet will be posted in an amendment which is forthcoming. On: Sep 01 2020

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8796432 Contracting SAMS site Advertisement for bid

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

The SAMs project advertisement list an award date of December 22, 2020 with a completion of June 30, 2022. For planning purposes as a small business, is the award date correct? Or is there any chance the project would be awarded much sooner? If possibly awarded sooner, approximately when?

On: Aug 27 2020.

Page 6 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

Government Response. . The is a potential to award the contract earlier; however, it should be noted that there are numerous factors involved in awarding a federal contract. The project could potentially be awarded in early to mid-November but the government cannot guarantee an early award at this time. On:

Sep 01 2020

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8796550 Specifications CZ212 Note 8

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

What is the volume of the vehicles and/or aircraft movements that will require flaggers? Who makes that decision?

Thank you!

On: Aug 27 2020.

Government Response. . Flaggers are required for any volume of traffic when crossing an active taxiway. Any relief to this requirement would have to come from Air Ops/Airfield Manager. Contractor to coordinate with the base for further guidance after contract award. On: Sep 03 2020

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8796809 General SF1442 and 002200

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

The Supplementary Instructions (Page 15) states to submit two hard copies and 2 CD Rom of the Price Proposal.

The SF1442 states to submit an original and two copies. Please advise how many hard copies of the Price Proposal are required.

On: Aug 27 2020.

Government Response. . 2 Hard copies and 2 CD ROMs of the price proposal are required. On: Sep 01

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8796814 General 00 22 00

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Can the Government provide workable/fillable documents (word or excel) for the Pre-Award Survey (Page 17-18), Schedule A Existing Commitments, Schedule B Experience Data, Table 3 Factor A Relevant Experience Matrix Example and Relevant Construction Experience of Offeror forms?

On: Aug 27 2020.

Government Response. . Workable/fillable documents will not be provided. On: Sep 01 2020

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8796818 General 00 22 00

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Page 28, Tab 2, 2nd paragraph states the government will queary the CPARS to validate past performance ratings.

Should the Offeror provide the CPARS for projects submitted in Subfactor 1.1 in this section if we have them? Or are we to provide single page of the PPQ form?

On: Aug 27 2020.

Government Response. . You may provide the CPARS for projects submitted in Sub Factor 1.1 if you have them in lieu of the PPQ Form. On: Sep 01 2020

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8796975 Contracting Advertisement for bid

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Page 7 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

We previously posted inquiry 8796408, but incorrectly listed the last day for questions as August 20. The question should have read that the last day was August 31, not August 20.

We apologize for the confusion.

On: Aug 27 2020.

Government Response. . August 31st is the correct date. On: Sep 01 2020

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8798559 Mechanical M-113

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Is all of the small bore drain piping and relief piping going to be changed to carbon steel?

On: Aug 28 2020.

Government Response. . Correct. The small bore drain piping and relief piping is changed to carbon steel. On: Sep 01 2020

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8803019 Mechanical GD135 1/GD135 02 65 00

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

What is the material the existing underground tanks are made of that are to be removed? Fiberglass or steel?

On: Aug 31 2020.

Government Response. . The existing underground tank that will be removed are steel tanks. On: Sep 03 2020

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8803035 Mechanical GD135 1/GD135 02 65 00

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Once access to the airfield is approved, will there be any restrictions on the heavy equipment(cranes, excavators, etc.) unique to this area?

On: Aug 31 2020.

Government Response. . All equipment shall be marked with a 3'x3' flag with checkered pattern of international orange and white 1'x1' squares. Equipment to remain on the airfield after dark or during inclement weather must have a battery-operated, low intensity, omni-directional red flashing light.

Regarding equipment height the preference is for normal day-to-day operations to remain no higher than 15 feet. However, it is understood that due to the nature of the work equipment will need to exceed 15 feet.

With the use of an approved Airfield Waiver, coordination with and approval of Air Operations, and active communication with the tower this threshold can be exceeded. Equipment parked on the airfield overnight will need to be stowed in a position that does not exceed 15 feet.

Please also note Section 32 of EM 385-1-1 (30 Nov 2014)." for additional guidance On: Sep 03 2020

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8803245 Civil Section 32 13 14.13 Airfield Paving

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

The specification section was written for large-scale paving projects using only a single-pass, "slipform" paver-finisher using a very low slump concrete. Since the airfield paving is replacing single, small blocks and road paving is small irregular areas with multiple slopes to area drains, we request the following exceptions be allowed: use of vibratory truss screed and hand-held finishing equipment in lieu of paver-finisher; use of a non-chloride, plasticizer to get the slump to a workable 4".

On: Aug 31 2020.

Page 8 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

Government Response. . The government will allow the use of the vibrating screed and hand tools provided that all other metrics are met. The upper limit on the slump will be 4 inches to include tolerances (ie 3 +/- 1, not 4 +/- 1).

Consistent with paragraph 10.4 of ACI 309R-05, the vibrating screed will be for strikeoff operations only and internal vibration is still required. On: Sep 03 2020

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8803284 Civil section 32 12 16 Asphalt Materials

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Local aggregate suppliers for AR DoT mix designs cannot meet the specification on the -200 gradation, and the gradation bands are too tight. They also cannot meet specification on the Voids in the Mineral Aggregate (VMA) percentages.

The asphalt cement that is specified is PG64-16, which is not available. That cement is used in the southernmost states that have warmer climates. We use PG64-22 in this region of the United States.

We request that locally available materials, AR DoT mix designs, aggregates and asphalt cement be acceptable as approved in previous USACE projects on LR AFB.

On: Aug 31 2020.

Government Response. . The government will allow the use of Arkansas DOT mix designs, aggregates, and asphalt cement. On: Sep 03 2020

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8803308 Environmental Drawing GD111 Note 4 &

GD112 Note 3

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

The referenced notes require soil sampling every 100' along the pipe. Since the majority of pipe to be abandoned is under airfield apron concrete paving, please confirm whether or not the contractor is to core-drill the concrete airfield paving to sample every 100' or does the 100'/ sample note only apply to grassed areas.

On: Aug 31 2020.

Government Response. . For bidding purposes, the contractor shall assume 100'. However, after award the Contractor may work with the State of Arkansas Department of Environment Quality in attempt to modify the sampling distance to reduce the core drills through the airfield pavements. On: Sep 03 2020

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8803332 Civil GD123 & CP221

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Drawing GD123 shows fillstand 1 pavement and jet fuel line under the pavement (85 LF) being removed from Fillstand 1 toward pump house 1. Drawing CP221 does not show the pavement at the jet fuel line being replaced.

Please clarify if we can abandon the pipe in place or must we remove the pavement and the fuel pipe.

If we are to remove the concrete pavement, can we remove only pavement necessary to remove the pipe or must we remove the concrete pavement back to the nearest pavement joint.

On: Aug 31 2020.

Government Response. . The jet fuel line under the pavement from Fillstand 1 toward pump house 1 is to be abandoned in place, not removed. On: Sep 03 2020

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

Report Complete

Page 9 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

UNCLASSIFIED\\FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Patent 11/892,984 ProjNet property of ERDC since 2004.

Page 10 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User