W91238-18-R-0034_Amendment_1_2MAR18.pdf

W9123818R0034

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Project: Live Fire Exercise Shoothouse, Camp W.G. Williams, Utah

See continuation page for amendment description

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 22

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 02-Mar-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W9123818R0034

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

12-Feb-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

02-Mar-2018

CODE

USACE SACRAMENTO DISTRICT

ATTN: CONTRACTING DIVISION

1325 J STREET

SACRAMENTO CA 95814-2922

W91238 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE (SF 30)

The following have been added by full text:

SF30 CONTINUATION PAGE

The purpose of this amendment is the following:

Summary of Changes

1. CLIN 0001 – Extended Description – revised

2. Attachment 2 Supplemental Contract Requirements revised to correct liquidated damage amount and to update Wage Determination

3. Attachment 4 – revised to CLIN Breakout Schedule Acknowledgement Statement - revised to provide clarity on content of Base Bid CLIN 0001.

4. Drawing sheet ES001 revised to update General Note #12, list of approved fiber optic cable installers.

5. Appendix 1 label is added to Division 01- General Requirements & Specification

6. Division 01- General Requirements & Specification is revised to delete Section .01 35 26 paragraph 1.6.1.2 Contractor Quality Control (QC) Manager.

7. Division 01- General Requirements & Specification is revised to delete Section 01 50 02

Construction Facilities and Temporary Controls in its entirety.

8. Division 01- General Requirements & Specification is revised to replace Section 01 45 00

Resident Management System Contractor Mode (RMS CM) with Section 01 45 00 Quality Control.

9. Division 01- General Requirements & Specification is revised to add Section 01 45 00.10 Quality Control System (QCS)

10. Site visit sign-in sheet provided

11. Tab 4 of the Price Proposal: Work Breakdown Structure – section 2-13.1 was added to the

Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC)

12. Section 00 21 16 – Instructions to Proposers

a. Tab 2 of the Technical Proposal: Factor 2 - Technical Narrative – corrected typo from four to ten.

b. General Proposal Preparation – Section 2 – Volume II – Price Volume (c) changed to CLIN Breakout Schedule (Attachment 4 – Acknowledgement Statement)

c. Price Volume – Tab 3 – changed to CLIN Breakout Schedule (Attachment 4 – Acknowledgement Statement)

13. Section 00 22 00 – Supplementary Instructions

a. Paragraph B – Order of Review – paragraph f added

14. Section 00 70 00 – Conditions of the Contract

a. Clause 52.217-7 OPTION FOR INCREASED QUANTITY--SEPARATELY

PRICED LINE ITEM (MAR 1989) changed to 120 days after contract award

15. Section 00 73 00 - Local Clauses added

All changes are highlighted in yellow, items deleted have a strikethrough, and additions are bolded in Sections 00 21 16 and 00 22 00

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

SECTION 00 01 10 - TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Table of Contents has changed from:

Exhibit/Attachment Table of Contents

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION PAGES DATE

Attachment 1 Division 01 - General

Requirements

Attachment 2 Supplemental Contract Requirements

1 09-JUN-2017

Attachment 3 ATTACHMENT 3 – Wage Determination

5 12-JAN-2018

Attachment 4 Attachment 1 Statement of Work

7 29-JAN-2018

Attachment 5 Acknowledgement Statement

4 09-JUN-2017

Attachment 6 Attachment 5 Pre-Award Survey

3 25-APR-2017

Attachment 7 Attachment 6 - PPQ Form 4 25-APR-2017 Attachment 8 Camp Williams

Shoothouse RTA Submittal

290 03-JUL-2017

to:

Exhibit/Attachment Table of Contents

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION PAGES DATE

Attachment 1 Apppendix 1 Division 01

General Requirements and Specificati

1017 01-MAR-2018

Attachment 10 ES001 Revised 1 28-FEB-2018 Attachment 2 Attachment 2

Supplemental Contract Requirements

1 27-FEB-2018

Attachment 3 Attachment 3 - Wage Ration Determination

6 09-FEB-2018

Attachment 4 Attachment 1 Statement of Work

7 29-JAN-2018

Attachment 5 Attachment 4 CLIN Breakout Schedule Acknowledge Statement

3 02-MAR-2018

Attachment 6 Attachment 5 Pre-Award Survey

3 25-APR-2017

Attachment 7 Attachment 6 - PPQ Form 4 25-APR-2017 Attachment 8 Camp Williams

Shoothouse RTA Submittal

290 03-JUL-2017

Attachment 9 Site Visit Sign-In Sheet 4 21-FEB-2018

SECTION 00 10 00 - SOLICITATION

CLIN 0001

The CLIN extended description has changed from:

Provide all labor, management, supervision, tools, materials, equipment and transportation for construction of the Live Fire Exercise Shoothouse at Camp Williams UT in strict accordance with all contract documents, RFP drawings and specifications.

To:

Provide all labor, management, supervision, tools, materials, equipment and transportation for CONSTRUCTION of the Live Fire Exercise Shoothouse at Camp Williams UT to include demolition, erosion and sediment control; site improvements of paved roads; range; sniper and observation platform; range operations control building; with all utilities, power, HVAC and communications for buildings. Work shall be in strict accordance with all contract documents, RFP drawings and specifications.

SECTION 00 21 16 - INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS

The following have been modified:

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS & NOTICES TO OFFERORS’ SUBMITTAL INFORMATION FOR

SUPPLIERS (RFQ’s), BIDDERS’ (IFB’s) AND OFFERORS’ (RFP’S)

SUBMITTAL INFORMATION FOR OFFERORS (RFPS):

The following documents must be returned with your offer.

The proposal cover sheet is required by FAR 52.215-1 (c)(2). The format and content for the proposal cover sheet follows:

A. PROPOSAL COVER SHEET

1. Solicitation Number:

2. The name, address, DUNS number, and telephone and facsimile numbers of the offeror.

3. A statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the Solicitation and agreement to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item.

4. Names, titles, email addresses, and telephone and facsimile numbers of persons authorized to negotiate on the offeror’s behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation:

5. Name, title, and signature of person authorized to sign the proposal. Proposals signed by an agent shall be accompanied by evidence of that agent’s authority, unless that evidence has been previously furnished to the issuing office.

B. The completed Standard Form 1442 with continuation pages, duly executed with an original signature by an official authorized to bind the company. Ensure that the firm’s DUNS or DUNS+4 Number is entered in the block with its name and address.

C. Your acknowledgement of any and all Amendments to the solicitation in accordance with the instructions on the Standard Form 30 Amendment.

Note: If the SF 1442 and/or the pricing schedule was changed by amendment, be sure to use the amended pages when submitting your quote, bid, or offer.

D. The completed CLIN Schedule with your proposed contract line item prices inserted in the appropriate spaces. Prices must be proposed for all contract line items. Unit prices are to be extended to the actual “dollar and cents” amounts (i.e., to two decimal places). Do not round off extended prices to the nearest dollar. Check your pricing submission very carefully for mathematical and clerical errors prior to submission.

E. Your completed Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of Bidders/Offerors

F. Your Offer Guarantee (e.g., Standard Form 24, “Bid Bond”)

General Instructions to Offerors:

INQUIRIES:

Prospective offerors should submit inquiries related to this solicitation in accordance with the following (collect calls will not be accepted):

For information related to amendments, and the dates set for receipt of proposals, please check http://www.fedbizopps.gov

1. Contractual and Technical inquiries and questions relating to proposal procedures are to be submitted via Bidder Inquiry in ProjNet at https://www.projnet.org/projnet. The steps for Bidder Inquiry are as follows:

a. To submit and review bid inquiry items, offerors will need to be a current registered user or self-register into the system. To self-register go to the aforementioned web page and click on the QUICK ADD link.

Select agency as USACE, and enter the Bidder Inquiry Key for this solicitation listed below, your e-mail address, and then click continue. Fill in all required information and click Add User.

b. From this page you may view all bidder inquiries or add an inquiry.

c. Bidders will receive an acknowledgement of their question via e-mail, followed by an answer to their question after it has been processed.

d. The Solicitation Number is: W91238-18-R-0034

e. The Bidder Inquiry Key is: J7TCSY-Y2V9XR

f. Offers will NOT be publicly opened. Information concerning the status of the evaluation and/or award will

NOT be available after receipt of proposals.

g. The point of contact for this solicitation is:

Lequita Byrd-Craig, Contract Specialist Telephone: (916) 557-6932

Email: Lequita.Y.Byrd-Craig@usace.army.mil

2. The Bidder Inquiry System will be unavailable for new inquiries 13 days prior to proposal submission in order to ensure adequate time is allotted to form an appropriate response and amend the solicitation, if necessary.

3. Please include the solicitation number, the project title, the location of the project, the full name of your company and your telephone and FAX numbers in your correspondence. Written inquiries should be received by this office not later than 13 calendar days prior to the date set for receipt of offers.

4. Oral explanations or instructions are not binding. Changes to the solicitation can only be made by an amendment to the solicitation.

FACSIMILE BIDS/OFFERS:

Facsimile bids/offers, modifications thereto, or cancellations of bids/offers will not be accepted.

ACCEPTANCE OF OFFERS:

A written award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party.

AVAILABILITY OF CORPS OF ENGINEERS PUBLICATIONS DESCRIPTIONS:

a. The internet URL for Corps of Engineers publications is:

http://www.publications.usace.army.mil/

b. Construction Criteria Base (CCB). The Construction Criteria Base (CCB) system available through the National Institute of Building Sciences includes copies of Corps of Engineers methods and specifications.

Information about the CCB can be obtained from:

http://www.wbdg.org/ccb/ccb.php

FACSIMILE BIDS/OFFERS:

Facsimile bids/offers, modifications thereto, or cancellations of bids/offers will not be accepted.

PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS:

The bidder/offeror whose bid/offer is accepted will, within the time established in the contract, furnish performance and payment bonds in accordance with FAR 52.228-15.

INDIVIDUAL SURETIES IN SUPPORT OF BID BONDS:

Bidders/offerors utilizing individual sureties in support of a bid bond shall include a Standard Form (SF) 28 (Affidavit of Individual Surety), accompanied by a pledge of acceptable assets from each person acting as an individual surety, and include these with the SF 24 (Bid Bond), and the bid itself (see clause titled "Pledges of Assets," FAR 52.228-11).

Pledges of acceptable assets shall be in the form of (1) evidence of an escrow account and/or (2) a recorded lien on real estate.

ACCEPTANCE OF OFFERS:

A written award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party.

System for Award Management (SAM) Registration:

It is a requirement that any and all contractors that intend to do business with the government must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) database. No contract may be awarded by the government to any contractor who is not registered in SAM. If your company is not registered in SAM, you must register in order to be eligible for any government award.

The following link provides access to the SAM website:

https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/

If you have difficulties with or questions regarding the SAM registration, the following link has been set up by the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) to assist contractors registering for CAGE codes for enrollment and navigation within SAM:

https://www.logisticsinformationservice.dla.mil/CAGETier3/

CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITY, PREAWARD SURVEY:

In order to determine a contractor's responsibility for purposes of contract award in accordance with FAR Part 9, the contractor is required to provide a statement regarding previous experience and past performance in performing comparable work, information related to the business organization, financial resources, and/or plant to be used in performing the work (Attachments, Preaward Survey). All offerors will complete and return the Preaward Survey as part of the Price/Cost proposal. (W91238-18-R-0034).

Failure to submit the Preaward Survey in conjunction with the price proposal will not of itself render the offer unacceptable.

In order to be determined to be responsible a prospective contractor must:

1. Have adequate financial resources to perform the contract or the ability to obtain them.

2. Be able to comply with the required or proposed delivery or performance schedule, taking into consideration all existing commercial and governmental business commitments.

3. Have a satisfactory performance record. In making the determination of responsibility, the Government Contracting Officer shall consider relevant past performance information. A prospective contractor shall not be determined responsible or non-responsible solely on the basis of a lack of relevant performance history except when there are special standards set forth in the solicitation which applies to all bidders that must be met in order to receive the award. These special standards may be necessary when unusual expertise or specialized facilities are necessary in the performance of the contract; therefore, in order to be determined to be responsible for that particular contract, the offeror must be able to meet those special standards. A prospective contractor that is or recently has been seriously deficient in contract performance shall be presumed to be non-responsible unless the Contracting Officer determines that the circumstances were beyond the contractor's control or that the contractor has taken appropriate corrective action. Other responsibility considerations by the Contracting Officer will include past efforts by the contractor to apply sufficient tenacity and perseverance to perform acceptably, to meet quality requirements of contracts, and the contractor's past compliance with subcontracting plans (if required) under recent contracts.

4. Have a satisfactory record of integrity and business ethics.

5. Have the necessary organization, experience, accounting and operational controls, and technical skills, or the ability to obtain them (including, as appropriate, such elements as production control procedures, property control systems, quality assurance measures, and safety programs applicable to materials to be produced or services to be performed by the prospective contractor and subcontractors).

6. Have the necessary production, construction, and technical equipment and facilities, or the ability to obtain them.

7. Be otherwise qualified and eligible to receive an award under applicable laws and regulations.

Determination of Contractor Responsibility will be completed in accordance with FAR 9.104-1.

If the contractor or subcontractor does not already have sufficient resources demonstrated in the completed Pre-award Survey, acceptable evidence of "the ability to obtain" the required, adequate resources (all of the resources discussed in FAR 9.104-1) normally consists of a commitment or explicit arrangement that will be in existence at the time of contract award to rent, purchase or otherwise acquire the needed facilities, equipment, other resources, or personnel.

The Pre-award Survey as a tool used by the Government in determining responsibility of the offeror is submitted as part of the Price/Cost proposal and is separate from the technical proposal's response to the technical evaluation criteria found later in this section. Some of the information required from the offeror for completion of the Pre-award Survey and the technical proposal may be duplicative but it is necessary that the information be provided in full in both places and that the Price/Cost proposal and the Technical proposal be separate documents. DO NOT state, for example, in the technical proposal, "See Price/Cost proposal for past performance information".

GENERAL PROPOSAL PREPARATION.

The proposal shall be submitted as summarized below and as required by the specifications.

(1) Volume I – Technical Volume

(a) Factor 1: Technical Experience

(b) Factor 2: Technical Narrative

(c) Factor 3: Network Analysis Schedule

(d) Factor 4: Past Performance

(2) Volume II – Price Volume

(a) Proposal Cover Sheet

(b) Standard Form 1442, Acknowledgement of Amendments, Joint Venture Agreement

(c) CLIN Breakout Schedule (Attachment 4 – Acknowledgement Statement)

(d) Work Breakdown Structure

(e) Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors

(f) Bid Guarantee

(g) Pre-Award Survey Information

Each Offeror must submit a proposal consisting of both a “price” volume and a “technical” volume. The price volume includes the signed offer and the Offeror’s proposed line-item prices and overall price. The technical volume includes all required information relating to the “non-price” evaluation factors. The two volumes must be submitted as separate, physically distinct volumes. Both volumes must be received at the location shown in Block 8 of Standard Form 1442, not later than the date and time specified in Block 13 of Standard Form 1442. The information in the two volumes is evaluated separately and independently. Therefore, all information intended by the Offeror to be evaluated as part of the price volume must be contained within the price volume. All information intended by the Offeror to be evaluated as part of the technical volume must be submitted as part of the technical volume. Do not merely cross-reference similar material between the technical and price volumes.

Marking of Proposal Volumes.

Mark each volume as either the “Price Volume” or the “Technical Volume”. In addition, mark the outside front cover of each volume with the project title and location, solicitation number, name and address of the Offeror, and volume copy number. (Markings which identify the Offeror are not required on either the back cover or on the spine/binding.)

Tabbing of Proposal Volumes.

Offers are to be formatted and tabbed in accordance with the instructions that follow for each proposal volume.

Table of Contents.

Include a table of contents for each proposal volume.

TECHNICAL VOLUME

NUMBER OF SETS OF THE TECHNICAL VOLUME.

The Technical Proposal is to be submitted in one hard “original” and three (3) copies. In addition, submit one complete PDF copy of the technical proposal on Compact Disk (CD).

ORIGINAL AND ALL COPIES ALONG WITH CD SHALL BE SENT TO:

USACE, SACRAMENTO DISTRICT

ATTN: Lequita Y. Byrd-Craig, CESPK-CT-A 1325 J ST – Suite 878

SACRAMENTO, CA 95814

FORMAT, CONTENTS, AND LIST OF TABS FOR THE TECHNICAL VOLUME.

Use 8-1/2” x 11” pages for the narrative portions of the proposal. There is not a page limit for the overall technical proposal; however, there may be limits imposed at the tab level. Organize your technical proposal as indicated below. The tabs directly correlate to the technical evaluation factors. Although the Government may use information contained anywhere within the technical proposal in its evaluation of any technical evaluation criteria, the Government is not obligated to search for or to consider information that is not located in the specified location.

Number the pages. Do not include information pertaining to your proposed pricing for this project in the technical proposal. Limit your submittals to the information specified; excess information will not be evaluated. For purposes of the CD electronic version of the proposal, “tabs” means searchable PDF bookmarks.

TECHNICAL VOLUME

TAB CONTENTS

1. FACTOR 1 – Technical Experience

2. FACTOR 2 – Technical Narrative

3. FACTOR 3 – Network Analysis Schedule

4. FACTOR 4 – Past Performance

Tab 1 of the Technical Volume: Factor 1 – Technical Experience.

Instructions

Offerors shall submit at least two recent (within the last five (5) years) projects for each of the areas identified below in subparagraph (a) through (c). The projects shall be relevant to the vertical construction of multi-story building. For purposes of evaluation, relevant means installation or construction of projects of multi-story buildings to include the areas identified below in subparagraphs (a) through (c). Each project submitted to demonstrate the offeror's experience need not include ALL of the areas listed below in subparagraphs (a) through (c), but the offeror must provide a minimum of two from the areas listed below. In total, the offeror may submit up to eight (8) separate projects for the prime and subcontractor(s) combined.

a. Constructing multi-story buildings of value between $5-10 million similar to this project.

b. Constructing two or more separate buildings in a single project.

c. Construction of civil grading and fill work of one acre or greater in a project.

Please number your project submissions and include a matrix similar to the one below for purposes of matching your submissions to their applicable experience areas:

Evaluation Areas Experience 1 Experience 2

a. Constructing multi-story buildings of value between $5-10 million similar to this project

b. Constructing two or more separate buildings in a single project

c. Construction of civil grading and fill work of one acre or greater in a project

Formatting and Other Restrictions.

The Technical Experience is limited to twelve (12) 8-1/2” x 11” pages

Tab 2 of the Technical Proposal: Factor 2 –Technical Narrative.

Offerors shall provide a technical narrative approach that clearly demonstrates the offeror’s understanding of the technical requirements to construct the live fire shoothouse and other facilities in accordance with the requirements of the RFP. Narrative shall address working on civil site work and construction of multiple facilities. Narrative shall describe the Contractor’s technical approach to each item. Contractor shall also address how they will efficiently and effectively manage the schedule in order to accomplish all tasks within the period of performance.

Formatting and Other Restrictions. The narrative is limited to ten (10) 8-1/2” x 11” pages

Tab 3 of the Technical Proposal: Factor 3 –Network Analysis Schedule.

The Offeror shall provide a Network Analysis Schedule that shows its proposed phasing of work with construction activities that integrates all elements of the Scope of Work to include the base and option items in a logical sequence that demonstrates the contractors understanding of the project requirements and exhibits an achievable timeline within the period of performance.

Formatting and Other Restrictions. The schedule is limited to six (6) 11” x 17” pages.

Tab 4 of the Technical Proposal: Factor 4 – Past Performance.

General.

The information provided under this tab will be used to evaluate the past performance record of the offeror and proposed key subcontractors. Information other than that supplied by the offeror under this tab may be utilized by the Government in its evaluation of past performance.

Prime Contractor/Key Subcontractor Example Projects Past Performance.

Offerors shall provide past performance evaluation information for the projects submitted. Projects shall be within the past five years that are of similar scope, magnitude, and complexity compared to the Live Fire Exercise Shoothouse project (e.g. Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Construction Contractor Appraisal Support System (CCASS), questionnaire, similar performance evaluation, or other performance evaluations completed previously).

The contractor shall also describe any performance issues, quality control on past contracts, and timeliness of performance, customer satisfaction and cost control. Furthermore, the contractor must describe the project and how it is similar in terms of scope, magnitude and complexity to the Live Fire Exercise Shoothouse project.

The Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project described above in 4.3.4.2.a. Ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQ should be submitted with your proposal.

If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project (s) before proposal closing date, the offeror shall complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Lequita Y. Byrd-Craig using email at Lequita.Y.Byrd-Craig@usace.army.mil prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate, by reference, into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), including Construction Contractor Appraisal Support System (CCASS), using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the offeror.

While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

Formatting and Other Restrictions

(1) Start the information for each example project on a new page. There is not a page limitation for this submission.

(2) Sample Past Performance Questionnaire (Attachment):

PRICE VOLUME

NUMBER OF SETS OF THE PRICE PROPOSAL.

Submit the price proposal volume in an electronic format, using a searchable bookmarked “pdf” file format which will become part of the contract (this price volume may be on the same CD as the technical proposal, but both volumes must be in separate files. DO NOT submit hard copies of the price volume, except for the bid guarantee, if applicable.

FORMAT, CONTENTS, AND LIST OF TABS FOR THE PRICE PROPOSAL.

Use only 8-1/2” x 11” pages. There are no page limits for the price proposal; however, limit responses to required information. Excess information will not be evaluated. Organize your price proposal as indicated below. For the price volume only, “tab” means a bookmark on a searchable PDF document. If a tab is not applicable to your proposal, omit that tab but do not renumber the subsequent tabs.

PRICE PROPOSAL VOLUME

TAB CONTENTS OF THE PRICE PROPOSAL

1 Proposal Cover Sheet 2 SF 1442; Acknowledgement of Amendments; Joint Venture Agreement 3 CLIN Breakout Schedule (Attachment 4 – Acknowledgement Statement) 4 Work Breakdown Structure 5 Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors 6 Bid Guarantee 7 Pre-Award Survey Information

DETAILED SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PRICE PROPOSAL.

Tab 1 of the Price Proposal: Proposal Cover Sheet.

The proposal cover sheet is required by FAR 52.215-1 (c)(2). This provision, titled “Instructions to Offerors – Competitive Acquisition” is incorporated by reference in Section 00 21 00. The format and content for the proposal cover sheet follows:

PROPOSAL COVER SHEET

1. Solicitation Number:

2. The name, address, DUNS Number, and telephone and facsimile numbers of the Offeror.

3. A statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the Solicitation and agreement to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item.

4. Names, titles, e-mail address, and telephone and facsimile numbers of persons authorized to negotiate on the Offeror’s behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation:

5. Name, title, and signature of person authorized to sign the proposal. Proposals signed by an agent shall be accompanied by evidence of that agent’s authority, unless that evidence has been previously furnished to the issuing office.

(End of Proposal Cover Sheet)

Tab 2 of the Price Proposal: SF 1442; Acknowledgement of Amendments; Joint Venture Agreement.

The Standard Form (SF) 1442 must be completed by the Offeror and duly executed with an original signature by the official(s) identified in the proposal cover sheet as authorized to bind the Offeror in accordance with FAR 4.102, which includes specific instructions pertaining to individuals, partnerships, corporations, Joint Venture participants, and agents. Include the Offeror’s DUNS number in block 14 of the SF 1442, along with the Offeror’s address. All amendments must be acknowledged in accordance with the instructions on the Standard Form 30, Amendment. If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), include a copy of the JV agreement and indicate its status.

Tab 3 of the Price Proposal: Pricing Schedule.

Submit the completed Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) Schedule (Section 00 10 00) with the Offeror’s proposed contract prices inserted in the appropriate spaces. Prices must be proposed for all contract line items (except for those CLINs deleted from the solicitation). Unit prices must be extended to the actual “dollar and cents” amounts (e.g., to two decimal places). Do not round off the extended prices to the nearest dollar. Check your pricing submission very carefully for mathematical and clerical errors prior to submission. Any qualification of pricing may render the proposal unacceptable and therefore not eligible for award. However, Offerors are encouraged to use callouts, footnotes, etc. to explain their lines of thinking where it would aid in the Government finding the price(s) fair and reasonable.

Tab 4 of the Price Proposal: Work Breakdown Structure.

Submit a Work Breakdown Structure of the Offeror’s proposed contract prices, for each line item in the CLIN Schedule, using the format below, in accordance with Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) 3-740-05 2-13.1. Again, Offerors are encouraged to use callouts, footnotes, etc. to explain their lines of thinking where it would aid in the Government finding the price(s) to be balanced.

01 CONSTRUCTION OF LIVE FIRE SHOOTHOUSE

02 NOT APPLICABLE

1001 CONSTRUCT LATRINE

1002 CONSTRUCT AFTER ACTION REVIEW

1003 CONSTRUCT AMMO BREAKDOWN

1004 CONSTRUCT BLEACHER

1005 CONSTRUCT COVERED MESS

Tab 5 of the Price Proposal: Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors.

The Offeror must have electronically completed the annual representations and certifications on the “System for Award Management” (SAM) website in accordance with FAR 52.204-8. The Offeror is responsible for ensuring that these on-line Representations and Certifications are updated as necessary to reflect changes, but at least annually to ensure that they are kept current, accurate and complete. In addition, the Offeror must also complete and return the “Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors” included in Section 00 45 00 of the solicitation.

If the Offeror is a Joint Venture, all participants must separately complete both the Online Representations and Certifications Application (ORCA) and Section 00 45 00.

Tab 6 of the Price Proposal: Bid Guarantee.

All Offerors must submit a bid guarantee, (e.g., Standard Form 24, Bid Bond) which complies with the requirements of FAR 28.101 Bid Guarantees, and any Defense and Army supplements thereto.

Tab 7 of the Price Proposal: Pre-Award Survey Information.

The contracting officer is required to make an affirmative pre-award determination of the prospective contractor’s responsibility in accordance with the mandatory requirements of Part 9 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and its supplements. The contracting officer must have sufficient information available to determine that a prospective contractor meets these minimum standards. Therefore, the Offeror is requested to provide the pre-award survey information described below with its price proposal:

(1) The completed Construction Contractor Data Form with Supplemental Schedules A-C (see format which follows). If the Offeror is a large multi-segmented business concerns, the data provided on the supplemental schedules may be limited to information that directly pertains to the specific segment of the business concern (i.e., the division, group, unit, etc.) proposed to perform work under the prospective contract with its own work force. If the offer is being submitted by a Joint Venture, submit a separate form for each Joint Venture participant. The Offeror may submit pre-award survey information in another format, provided that the information furnished is substantially the same as that which would be furnished on the Construction Contractor Data Form and its supplemental schedules.

(2) Current financial statements. If the Offeror’s financial statement is more than 60 days old, submit a certificate stating that the firm's financial condition is substantially the same, or, if not the same, state the changes that have taken place. If a Joint Venture, provide this information for each participant in the Joint Venture.

(3) Banking information. Provide letters from banks or other financial institutions with which the Offeror conducts business. The letters should contain information about your firm's accounts, loans, lines of credit, etc. The Government is interested in financial stability, timely payments, the length and nature of the relationship between the firm and the financial institution, and the firm's financial ability to perform the contract. The letters should also provide the name and telephone number of the bank representative the Government may contact. If a Joint Venture, provide this information for each Joint Venture participant.

The Government will treat the pre-award survey information submitted by the Offeror as proprietary.

SECTION 00 22 00 - SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS

PROPOSAL EVALUATION

SOLICITATION SECTIONS PERTAINING TO OFFEROR’S SUBMISSION AND EVALUATION

PROPOSAL BASIS OF AWARD

GENERAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND

INSTRUCTIONS, EVALUATIONS, AND

CONTRACT AWARD

A. Basis for Award

AWARD SELECTION CRITERIA:

1. Proposals must meet the criteria stated in the RFP in order to be eligible for award, to include responsiveness, responsibility, technical acceptability, and fair and reasonable pricing.

2. The Source Selection Authority, independently exercising prudent business judgment, will determine which Offeror, if any, will receive the contract award. Award will be made to that Offeror whose proposal is technically acceptable and has the lowest price that is determined fair and reasonable.

3. The Government reserves the right to reject any and all offers.

4. Offerors are reminded to include their best technical and price terms in their initial offer and not to assume that they will have an opportunity to participate in discussions or be asked to submit a revised offer.

B. Order of Review

Lowest Priced Technically Acceptable (LPTA) Evaluation Process

1. Evaluation of technical proposals: The Source Selection Authority will give all proposals to the Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB). Although each offeror's price proposal will not be revealed to members of the SSEB, the Board will review technical proposals in ascending order of the value of each offerors' price proposal. Accordingly, the Board will first consider the technical proposal of the lowest-priced offeror. If the proposal is found acceptable as to all evaluation factors, no further technical offers will be reviewed and the lowest-priced offeror’s price proposal will next be evaluated. If, on the other hand, the lowest-priced offeror's technical proposal is not found acceptable for any factor, the Board will set aside that technical proposal and will review the next lowest-priced offeror's technical proposal. This process will continue until the Government finds a technical proposal that is fully acceptable for each evaluation factor.

2. Evaluation of price proposal: Next, the price proposal of the first offeror whose technical proposal is found to be acceptable for each evaluation factor (as explained in Step 1, above) will be analyzed for price reasonableness, for balanced pricing, and for evidence that its offeror possesses a clear understanding of project requirements. If the evaluators find the price proposal to be reasonable, balanced, and reflective of an adequate understanding of project requirements, then its offeror will be recommended as the prospective contract awardee.

3. While the Government’s intent is to award without discussions, any debriefing of an offeror whose proposal was reviewed but not selected for contract award will be limited to an explanation of the deficiencies that prevented the Government from finding the proposal acceptable as to all factors contained in this solicitation.

4. No debriefing can be provided to offerors whose proposals were not evaluated by the Government.

STANDARDS OF REVIEW

1. Technical proposals will be evaluated consistent with the uniform evaluation procedures set forth in this section of the solicitation. The SSEB will conduct an in-depth review of each proposal against the factors established in the solicitation as follows:

a. All proposals received will be subject to an initial screening by the Contracting Officer to determine compliance with the instructions set forth herein and responsiveness to their terms and conditions.

b. Each member of the SSEB will independently evaluate all information provided in a proposal against the prescribed non-price factors. Once these individual evaluations are completed, the SSEB will assign a consensus rating for each evaluation factor. The SSEB will not consider any documents incorporated by reference, except as expressly allowed by this solicitation.

c. Each board member’s rating for each offeror’s submission in response to each evaluation factor, as well as the board’s overall rating of each offer as either ACCEPTABLE or UNACCEPTABLE, and any supporting documentation, shall be provided to the Source Selection Authority.

d. Offerors are reminded that unsupported promises to comply with contractual requirements will not be sufficient. Proposals must not merely parrot the contractual requirements, but rather provide substantive, understandable and realistic evidence to support promised performance.

e. NOTE: For purposes of evaluating Experience and Past Performance, the Offeror is defined as the firm identified in Block 14 of the Standard Form 1442. If more than one firm is listed in Block 14, then a signed Joint Venture/partnership agreement must be submitted with the proposal and the Joint Venture/partnership shall be registered as such in the System for Award Management (SAM) database. However, each party of the Joint Venture/partnership must submit its own DUNS number with the JV/partnership proposal. Submitted projects performed by entities than the Offeror, such as teaming joint-venture or partners or subcontractors, will not be evaluated for Offeror experience or Offeror past performance, unless those other entities are part of a Joint Venture/partnership, as demonstrated by a signed JV/partnership agreement. Also, cited project examples must identify the Offeror’s role in the project if the Offeror was not the prime contractor – i.e., if it was acting as a subcontractor at any tier.

f. For purposes of this RFP, an “Offeror” may include a group of two or more entities that have formed a “contractor team arrangement,” as that term is defined in the Federal Acquisition Regulation, Section 9.601. In the case of entities that have formed a contractor team arrangement, the experience and performance history of any member of the team, whether or not gained while working with the other member(s) of the currently-proposed contractor teamarrangement, may be considered as a part of the evaluation of the Offeror’s proposal.

g. An Offeror that relies upon the performance history of a member or members of a proposed contractor team arrangement will be expected to maintain that arrangement during performance of any contract awarded to that Offeror under this RFP. As a part of their proposal, the Offeror must provide a contractor team agreement signed by all parties, identifying the legal name(s) of all entities and describing the nature of each entity’s relationship (teaming/partnering, joint venture, etc.) and its role on this project. Past Performance information of other than the Offeror will not be considered without the teaming arrangements. In the case of joint ventures, at least one project will be submitted from each member to demonstrate past experience. This documentation shall be provided in Binder 1 of the Offeror's proposal.

C. Non-Price (Technical) Evaluation Criteria

TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE / UNACCEPTABLE RATINGS:

1. Proposals selected for technical review will be evaluated against the minimum requirements for each non-price evaluation factor.

2. In order to receive an overall ACCEPTABLE rating, a proposal must receive an ACCEPTABLE rating on all non-price factors and any sub-factors. A proposal receiving an UNACCEPTABLE rating on one or more non-price factor or sub-factor will receive an overall UNACCEPTABLE rating and be ineligible for award.

3. The final overall rating, along with ratings on individual factors, will be provided to the SSA and used in making the determination of which Offeror(s) is/are eligible for award.

TECHNICAL VOLUME REQUIREMENTS

TAB CONTENTS

1. FACTOR 1 – Technical Experience

2. FACTOR 2 – Technical Narrative

3. FACTOR 3 – Network Analysis Schedule

4. FACTOR 4 – Past Performance

Tab 1 of the Technical Volume: Factor 1 – Technical Experience.

a. Instructions

i. Offerors shall submit at least two recent (within the last five (5) years) projects for each of the areas identified below in subparagraph (a) through (c). The projects shall be relevant to the vertical construction of multi-story building. For purposes of evaluation, relevant means installation or construction of projects of multi-story buildings to include the areas identified below in subparagraphs (a) through (c). Each project submitted to demonstrate the offeror's experience need not include ALL of the areas listed below in subparagraphs (a) through (c), but the offeror must provide a minimum of two from the areas listed below. In total, the offeror may submit up to eight (8) separate projects for the prime and subcontractor(s) combined.

a) Constructing multi-story buildings of value between $5-10 million similar to this project.

b) Constructing two or more facilities in a single project.

c) Construction of civil grading and fill work of one acre or greater in a project.

Formatting and Other Restrictions. The Technical Experience is limited to twelve (12) 8-1/2” x 11” pages

b. Evaluation Criteria

Past or current references shall clearly demonstrate experience in all areas listed above in order to receive an acceptable rating for this factor.

Failure to demonstrate the minimally accetability criteria under this factor will result in an unacceptable rating and possible elimination from further consideration for contract award.

Tab 2 of the Technical Proposal: Factor 2 –Technical Narrative.

i. Offerors shall provide a narrative that describes the technical approach in order to demonstrate the offeror’s understanding of the technical requirements to construct the live fire shoothouse and other facilities in accordance with the requirements of the RFP. Narrative shall address working on civil site work and construction of multiple facilities. Narrative shall describe the Contractor’s technical approach to each item.

Contractor shall also address how they will efficiently and effectively manage the schedule in order to accomplish all tasks within the period of performance.

ii. Formatting and Other Restrictions. The narrative is limited to four ten (10) 8-1/2” x 11” pages.

Technical Narrative: The Government will review the narrative provided in response to this factor. Offerors must demonstrate a clear understanding of the requirements of the RFP to receive an “ACCEPTABLE” for this factor.

Failure to demonstrate the minimally acceptability criteria under this factor will result in an “UNACCEPTABLE” rating and possible elimination from further consideration for contract award.

Tab 3 of the Technical Proposal: Factor 3 –Network Analysis Schedule.

i. The Offeror shall provide a Network Analysis Schedule that shows its proposed phasing of work with construction activities that integrates all elements of the Scope of Work to include the base and option items in a logical sequence that demonstrates the contractors understanding of the project requirements and exhibits a timeline that is within the period of performance.

ii. Formatting and Other Restrictions. The schedule is limited to six (6) 11” x 17” pages.

The Offeror’s Network Analysis Schedule may receive an “Acceptable” rating if it presents a logical and reasonable construction sequencing of project activities indicating an accurate understanding of the phasing, interrelationship and organization of tasks necessary to satisfactorily complete the full scope of the project within the allotted period of performance. For purposes of evaluation, offerors should assume a Notice to Proceed (NTP) date of April 30, 2018. This date is being given for evaluation purposes only and likely does not reflect the actual expected NTP date for this effort.

Tab 4 of the Technical Proposal: Factor 4 – Past Performance.

General.

a. The information provided under this tab will be used to evaluate the past performance record of the offeror and proposed key subcontractors. Information other than that supplied by the offeror under this tab may be utilized by the Government in its evaluation of past performance.

(1) The Government will evaluate past performance information to establish its level of confidence in the likelihood the Offeror will satisfactorily complete the requirements of this solicitation. The recency and relevance of the information (as determined by the Government), the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in the contractor’s performance may be considered.

(2) This confidence assessment of past…