W911YN18B0001_QA.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 20 KB Posted

Attached to
Replace Fire Crash/Rescue Station, Jacksonville, FL Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W911YN18B0001
Issued by
Department of the Army National Guard National Capital Region Integrated Air Defense System

About this file

From the source

Questions and Answers as of 7-5-18

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Replace Fire Crash/Rescue Station, Jacksonville, FL, newest first.
File Type Posted
ABSTRACT_OF1419_W911YN18B0001.pdf PDF
Bid__Opening_Attendance_8-10-18.pdf PDF
W911YN18B00010006.pdf PDF
W911YN18B0001_QA_8-3-18_.pdf PDF
Attachment_4_Addendum_3_LSGA019179_02Augl2018.pdf PDF
W911YN18B0001_QA_8-1-18_.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
W911YN18B00010005.pdf PDF
Geotech_Report_LSGA019179.pdf PDF
W911YN18B0001_QA_7-27-18.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
W911YN18B00010004.pdf PDF
W911YN18B00010002.pdf PDF
W911YN18B0001_QA_7-24-18.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
W911YN18B0001_QA_7-16-18.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_2_Addendum_1_LSGA019179_12Jul2018.pdf PDF
W911YN18B00010001.pdf PDF
PreBidSlides_W911YN18B0001-final.ppt PPT presentation
W911YN18B0001_Pre-bid_Site_visit_Contractor_Attendance.pdf PDF
Pre-Bid_Site_Visit_Minutes.pdf PDF
W911YN18B0001.pdf PDF
Show all 19

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

INFORMATION

W911YN18B0001
This File contains two tabs. The first tab contains questions and answers pertaining to the solicitation document and procedures. The second tab contains technical questions pertaining to the project drawings and specifications.

W911YN18B0001

PROJECT: LSGA019179 REPLACE FIRE CRASH/RESCUE STATION

Solicitation Questions Question #

Technical Questions

Question #
1The concrete finish on the bond beams is called out in the Concrete Specification section 3.9.B to knock off the fins and plug the tie holes. Is this sufficient or will rub and dress be required?
Answer
2The detail for the top of the bond beams in Detail 7 on drawing S-503 indicates a bond beam ( which is constructed prior to setting steel) which has a steel support welded directly to it with no tolerance for the height of the steel plate in the bond beam. Is it acceptable to use shims and seal between the weld plate in the bond beam and the steel tube showing in the detail. There is a similar question on the bond beams, and plates on the other details on sheet S-503.
Answer
3On sheet A-602 in the General Notes, it states that the aluminum window and door framing is to comply with AF/TP UFC 4-010-01. Specification Section 08 41 13 GLAZING, in paragraph 1.3 SUMMARY, A.1. states that “All exterior window and door glazing shall comply with UFC Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection Design Guidelines.” Drawing CS 102, the AT/FP sheet indicates an AF/TP setback distance of 33 feet. Specification section 08 41 13 ALUMINUM-FRAMED ENTRANCES AND STOREFRONTS in paragraph 1.3.G Florida Product Approval calls identifies the storefront to be used as “1. Design Basis: Kawneer, Florida Product Approval #15404.3” This product is the Kawneer IR 501T product which satisfies the State of Florida impact rating and test requirement related to wind driven objects. Drawing CS-102 indicates a 33 foot AFTP Setback blast distance. The Kawneer IR 501T product is not tested to meet the blast loadings required by UFC 4.010.01 at a 33 AFTP setback.

a. What is a storefront product that meets the design requirements for 33 foot AFTP Setback design and test?

b. What is the anchorage and/or steel reinforcing required for the window framing and door opening framing? The storefront details on sheet A-604 do not show any anchorage. W

c. Which are the exterior doors that open into spaces classified as occupied spaces which are required to meet the 33 foot Setback blast design.

Answer
4Are hollow metal exterior doors # 101C, 107, 110, 127F and 134 required to comply with the blast design for the 33 foot ADTP Setback? Is the glass in these doors required to meet the design loading required by the 33 foot AFTP Setback? As noted in Section 08 41 13 GLAZING?
Answer
5Will a complete dynamic design analysis be required should it be confirmed that the Kawneer IR 501T system fails to satisfy the blast resistant requirements of the 33 foot AFTP Setback design loading?
Answer
6What is the Charge Weight for the design of the storefront with the 33 foot AFTP Setback requirement on sheet CS-102?
Answer
7On sheet A-602 GLAZED OPENING GENERAL NOTE 4. Reads“Refer to the window design load analysis…” Please identify the source of the window design load analysis in Note 4.
Answer
8On sheet A-602 GENERAL NOTES, Note 2 requires all hollow metal doors and frames to be painted. Note 4 requires exterior hollow metal doors and frames to be galvanized. Are the exterior hollow metal doors to be painted galvanized?
Answer
9Is door mark 100A required to be blast rated?
Answer
10On door marks 100, 101C and 102A, is the rim exit device and the other door hardware sufficient to satisfy the blast design requirement?
Answer
11What is the primary voltage for the transformer?
Answer
12Is this a Wye or a Delta system?
Answer
13Sheets S-503 & S-504 call for Steel Joist, whereas sheets A-502 & A-503 call for Steel Truss. Please clarify which is correct.
Answer
14The specifications call for 1” mini blinds. However, also listed are motorized operators. These types of blinds are usually not motorized. Can you please confirm that the 1” blinds are to have motorized operators?
Answer
15Are all windows including the training room, day room have these mini blinds? The plans show no indications for these window treatments.
Answer
16Can the QC Manager and the Supervisor be the same person?
AnswerThis answer assumes the "Supervisor" is Superintendent. No. See Specification 01 00 00 paragraph 36. "An individual Key Team Member may not hold more than one key role."
17Can the Site Safety Health Officer be the same as the Supervisor?
AnswerThis answer assumes the "Supervisor" is Superintendent. No. See Specification 01 00 00 paragraph 36. "An individual Key Team Member may not hold more than one key role."
18In regards to the Quality Control Manger, Specification Section 01 40 00 does not indicate that a QC Manager is required on the project but other specifications sections refer to the QC Manager. Please Clarify if a full time QC Manager is required on site during work.
AnswerThe QC Manager is not required to be on site at all times.
19Please confirm that a Competent Person is required whenever high risk activities are being performed: Confined Space, Cranes and rigging, Excavation/trenching, fall protection, and electrical work. Please clarify if the Competent Person(s) can be the same as the SSHO, Supervisor or QC Manager.
Answer
20Please confirm that a LEED AP Coordinator is required on this project.
Answer
21Please clarify if the Commissioning Authority is to be contracted by the GC or by the owner.
Answer
22Please confirm that the government intends the General Contractor to provide a Supervisor, Quality Control Manager, LEED AP Waste Manager, Site Safety Health Officer, Commissioning Authority and a Competent Person on site full time for the duration of the project. The requirement of having these people on site will escalate contractors bids.
AnswerA Superintendent and SSHO are required to be on site at all times when work is performed. Competent Person(s) are required to be on site at all times the particular high risk activities are taking place. The SSHO may be a Competent Person if meeting the requirements and does not conflict with other duties and ongoing activities.

Williams, Brian J MSG MIL USA: Williams, Brian J MSG MIL USA:

Need A/E input for "LEED AP Wast Manager, Commissioning Authority" requirements.

23Please confirm that the contractor should include in their bid the costs to hire an engineering firm for delegated design requirements for the following spec sections: 03 45 00, 05 50 00, 07 41 13, 08 11 13, 08 41 13, 08 80 00, 08 91 19, 09 51 13, 21 13 13, 22 05 29, 22 15 19, 23 21 13, 23 31 13, 23 36 00, 26 05 29, 26 05 53, 25 56 13, 26 56 19, 27 05 36, 27 05 36, 27 51 16 AND 32 31 13.
Answer
24There is a contradition between the specifications and plans. Specification 10 26 00, paragraph 2.2 and Drawing A-601, CG-1. Please confirm what is correct.
Answer
25Wall insulation: It calls for spray polyurethane foam insulation at the exterior walls. Was this meant to be injected insulation into the walls? (Core Fill)
Answer
26Window blinds: I see that window blinds have been requested in the Spec Sheet, but I do not see any locations that have been selected on the prints. I am in need of the locations for the window blinds.
Answer
27102113.19 Toilet Partitions - The specification states the material is to be Solid Plastic (2.2), but the plans Finish Schedule states to be Solid Phenolic (TP-1-). Which will it be Solid Plastic or Phenolic?
Answer
28102600 Wall Protection - The specification states to use a Vinyl Corner Guard, but the Finish Schedule states to use Stainless Steel. Which will it be? Also the IPC Model 180 is not a good model number.
Answer
29104413 Fire Protection Specialties - Will the Extinguishers in the Truck Bay be wall hung or in semi-recessed cabinets?
Answer
30105113 Metal Lockers - The specification does not provide a factory for the Wardrobe Lockers and the Gear Lockers. Please provide factories that meet the specification. Also, how many of each will be required to be ADA?
Answer
31Fire Alarm: Is a Monaco System required?
Answer
32Elevations for site work: Please provide existing elevations in order to do dirt take off.
Answer
33Is there a landscape or irrigation plan?
Answer
34Johnson Controls, Inc. contact: Brad Tepper identified in the specifications is no longer the contact.
AnswerPlease contact Scott Wrigley, scott.wrigley@jci.com, 904-426-8633.

File details come from the government source that posted it.