W911YN18B0001_QA_8-1-18_.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 36 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Replace Fire Crash/Rescue Station, Jacksonville, FL Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W911YN18B0001
About this file
Solicitation Questions and Answers as of 01 August 2018
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| ABSTRACT_OF1419_W911YN18B0001.pdf | ||
| Bid__Opening_Attendance_8-10-18.pdf | ||
| W911YN18B00010006.pdf | ||
| W911YN18B0001_QA_8-3-18_.pdf | ||
| Attachment_4_Addendum_3_LSGA019179_02Augl2018.pdf | ||
| W911YN18B00010005.pdf | ||
| Geotech_Report_LSGA019179.pdf | ||
| W911YN18B0001_QA_7-27-18.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| W911YN18B00010004.pdf | ||
| W911YN18B00010002.pdf | ||
| W911YN18B0001_QA_7-24-18.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| W911YN18B0001_QA_7-16-18.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_2_Addendum_1_LSGA019179_12Jul2018.pdf | ||
| W911YN18B00010001.pdf | ||
| PreBidSlides_W911YN18B0001-final.ppt | PPT presentation | |
| W911YN18B0001_Pre-bid_Site_visit_Contractor_Attendance.pdf | ||
| Pre-Bid_Site_Visit_Minutes.pdf | ||
| W911YN18B0001_QA.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| W911YN18B0001.pdf |
Show all 19
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Chart1
Comment Number 1 #REF! 1 Date #REF! 1 Discipline 0 Spec/ Report Sheet Comment 0 Response 0 Response By 0 On Date 43291 Comment Fire Crash Rescue Station - Bidding Questions/Response 7/30/18
| Comment Number | Date | Discipline | Spec/ Report | Sheet | Comment | Response | Response By | On Date |
| 1 | Structural | The concrete finish on the bond beams is called out in the Concrete Specification section 3.9.B to knock off the fins and plug the tie holes. Is this sufficient or will rub and dress be required? | Exposed surfaces will require rub and dress. | Brett Rowan, PE | 7/10/18 | |||
| 2 | Structural | S-503 | The detail for the top of the bond beams in Detail 7 on drawing S-503 indicates a bond beam ( which is constructed prior to setting steel) which has a steel support welded directly to it with no tolerance for the height of the steel plate in the bond beam. Is it acceptable to use shims and seal between the weld plate in the bond beam and the steel tube showing in the detail. There is a similar question on the bond beams, and plates on the other details on sheet S-503. | The steel plate is an embed plate at the top of the cast in place concrete beam. ACI tolerances would not require a shim plate. If construction is in excess of tolerances, submit an RFI. | Brett Rowan, PE | 7/10/18 | ||
| 3 | AT/FP | A-602 | On sheet A-602 in the General Notes, it states that the aluminum window and door framing is to comply with AF/TP UFC 4-010-01. Specification Section 08 41 13 GLAZING, in paragraph 1.3 SUMMARY, A.1. states that “All exterior window and door glazing shall comply with UFC Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection Design Guidelines.” Drawing CS 102, the AT/FP sheet indicates an AF/TP setback distance of 33 feet. Specification section 08 41 13 ALUMINUM-FRAMED ENTRANCES AND STOREFRONTS in paragraph 1.3.G Florida Product Approval calls identifies the storefront to be used as “1. Design Basis: Kawneer, Florida Product Approval #15404.3” This product is the Kawneer IR 501T product which satisfies the State of Florida impact rating and test requirement related to wind driven objects. Drawing CS-102 indicates a 33 foot AFTP Setback blast distance. The Kawneer IR 501T product is not tested to meet the blast loadings required by UFC 4.010.01 at a 33 AFTP setback. |
a. What is a storefront product that meets the design requirements for 33 foot AFTP Setback design and test?
b. What is the anchorage and/or steel reinforcing required for the window framing and door opening framing? The storefront details on sheet A-604 do not show any anchorage. W
c. Which are the exterior doors that open into spaces classified as occupied spaces which are required to meet the 33 foot Setback blast design.
| 33 ft Standoff distance is not the correct DBT distance. Please refer to Addendum #1 dated July 12, 2018, incorporated by solicitation amendment 0001, Window System Design Load Compliance & Analysis with Revision date of 6/15/17 located in the Glazing specification. The Window Design Load Analysis provides all of the requirements, guidance & direction to meet UFC 4-010-01 Standard 10. The summary of fully reflected & incident loads with the applicable standoff distance is listed in the analysis tables on page 4. Please follow all requirements, guidances and directions as noted in the Window Design Load Compliance & Analysis. | William J. Moore, PSP AT/FP (SME) | 7/10/18 | ||||||
| 4 | AT/FP | 08 41 13 | Are hollow metal exterior doors # 101C, 107, 110, 127F and 134 required to comply with the blast design for the 33 foot ADTP Setback? Is the glass in these doors required to meet the design loading required by the 33 foot AFTP Setback? As noted in Section 08 41 13 GLAZING? | Please see note #3 above and references. | William J. Moore, PSP AT/FP (SME) | 7/10/18 | ||
| 5 | AT/FP | Will a complete dynamic design analysis be required should it be confirmed that the Kawneer IR 501T system fails to satisfy the blast resistant requirements of the 33 foot AFTP Setback design loading? | Please see note #3 above and references. | William J. Moore, PSP AT/FP (SME) | 7/10/18 | |||
| 6 | AT/FP | CS102 | What is the Charge Weight for the design of the storefront with the 33 foot AFTP Setback requirement on sheet CS-102? | The 33 foot distances is not the DBT standoff distances for this project. Please refer to the Window Design Load Compliance Analysis located in the Glazing Spec. for all information | William J. Moore, PSP AT/FP (SME) | 7/10/18 | ||
| 7 | AT/FP | A-602 | On sheet A-602 GLAZED OPENING GENERAL NOTE 4. Reads“Refer to the window design load analysis…” Please identify the source of the window design load analysis in Note 4. | Please refer to the Glazing Spec for the Window Design Load Compliance Analysis. | William J. Moore, PSP AT/FP (SME) | 7/10/18 | ||
| 8 | A-602 | On sheet A-602 GENERAL NOTES, Note 2 requires all hollow metal doors and frames to be painted. Note 4 requires exterior hollow metal doors and frames to be galvanized. Are the exterior hollow metal doors to be painted galvanized? | Yes. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/10/18 | |||
| 9 | Is door mark 100A required to be blast rated? | No. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/10/18 | ||||
| 10 | On door marks 100, 101C and 102A, is the rim exit device and the other door hardware sufficient to satisfy the blast design requirement? | Yes- However please follow UFC 4-010-01 Standard 12 requirements & B-3.3.3 based on the DBT blast loading as shown in the Window Design Load Analysis tables located in the addendum for the specified conventional construction standoff distance. | William J. Moore, PSP AT/FP (SME) | 7/10/18 | ||||
| 11 | What is the primary voltage for the transformer? | 25.5 kV nominal. Refer to single line on sheet E-601 and specification 261219. | Mike Cahill, PE | 7/10/18 | ||||
| 12 | Is this a Wye or a Delta system? | The transformer shall be delta primary at 25.5 kV and wye secondary at 208V/120Y. | Mike Cahill, PE | 7/10/18 | ||||
| 13 | S-503 & 504 | Sheets S-503 & S-504 call for Steel Joist, whereas sheets A-502 & A-503 call for Steel Truss. Please clarify which is correct. | Proper terminology is double sloped steel joist, terms are often used interchangably. | Brett Rowan, PE | 7/10/18 | |||
| 14 | The specifications call for 1” mini blinds. However, also listed are motorized operators. These types of blinds are usually not motorized. Can you please confirm that the 1” blinds are to have motorized operators? | Blinds are not to be motorized. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/10/18 | ||||
| 15 | Are all windows including the training room, day room have these mini blinds? The plans show no indications for these window treatments. | Per Sheet A-601 Geneal Notes, Provide blinds at all windows and storefront. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/10/18 | ||||
| 16 | Can the QC Manager and the Supervisor be the same person? | This answer assumes the "Supervisor" is Superintendent. No. See Specification 01 00 00 paragraph 36. "An individual Key Team Member may not hold more than one key role." | FLANG | 7/10/18 | ||||
| 17 | Can the Site Safety Health Officer be the same as the Supervisor? | This answer assumes the "Supervisor" is Superintendent. No. See Specification 01 00 00 paragraph 36. "An individual Key Team Member may not hold more than one key role." | FLANG | 7/10/18 | ||||
| 18 | 01 40 00 | In regards to the Quality Control Manger, Specification Section 01 40 00 does not indicate that a QC Manager is required on the project but other specifications sections refer to the QC Manager. Please Clarify if a full time QC Manager is required on site during work. | The QC Manager is not required to be on site at all times. | FLANG | 7/10/18 | |||
| 19 | Please confirm that a Competent Person is required whenever high risk activities are being performed: Confined Space, Cranes and rigging, Excavation/trenching, fall protection, and electrical work. Please clarify if the Competent Person(s) can be the same as the SSHO, Supervisor or QC Manager. | Competent person is requred whenever high risk activities are being performed. This person can the same as the SSHO or Supervisor. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/10/18 | ||||
| 20 | Please confirm that a LEED AP Coordinator is required on this project. | Yes, the project will require confirmation that the construction is according to LEED Silver criteria | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/10/18 | ||||
| 21 | Please clarify if the Commissioning Authority is to be contracted by the GC or by the owner. | Commissioning Authority is to be contracted by the GC. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/10/18 | ||||
| 22 | Please confirm that the government intends the General Contractor to provide a Supervisor, Quality Control Manager, LEED AP Waste Manager, Site Safety Health Officer, Commissioning Authority and a Competent Person on site full time for the duration of the project. The requirement of having these people on site will escalate contractors bids. | A Superintendent and SSHO are required to be on site at all times when work is performed. Competent Person(s) are required to be on site at all times the particular high risk activities are taking place. The SSHO may be a Competent Person if meeting the requirements and does not conflict with other duties and ongoing activities. LEED AP Waste Manager and Commissioning Authority need to be on site as needed to adequately perform their activities. |
Williams, Brian J MSG MIL USA: Williams, Brian J MSG MIL USA:
Need A/E input for "LEED AP Wast Manager, Commissioning Authority" requirements.
| Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/10/18 | |||||||
| 23 | Please confirm that the contractor should include in their bid the costs to hire an engineering firm for delegated design requirements for the following spec sections: 03 45 00, 05 50 00, 07 41 13, 08 11 13, 08 41 13, 08 80 00, 08 91 19, 09 51 13, 21 13 13, 22 05 29, 22 15 19, 23 21 13, 23 31 13, 23 36 00, 26 05 29, 26 05 53, 25 56 13, 26 56 19, 27 05 36, 27 05 36, 27 51 16 AND 32 31 13. | Contractor is responsible for the design of the products in the sections listed. Contractor has the option to request that the design be performed by the subontractor or manufacturer of the product. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/10/18 | ||||
| 24 | 10 26 00 | A-601 | There is a contradition between the specifications and plans. Specification 10 26 00, paragraph 2.2 and Drawing A-601, CG-1. Please confirm what is correct. | Drawing A-601 is correct. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/10/18 | ||
| 25 | Wall insulation: It calls for spray polyurethane foam insulation at the exterior walls. Was this meant to be injected insulation into the walls? (Core Fill) | Yes. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/10/18 | ||||
| 26 | Window blinds: I see that window blinds have been requested in the Spec Sheet, but I do not see any locations that have been selected on the prints. I am in need of the locations for the window blinds. | See response to Question #15. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/10/18 | ||||
| 27 | 10 21 13 | 102113.19 Toilet Partitions - The specification states the material is to be Solid Plastic (2.2), but the plans Finish Schedule states to be Solid Phenolic (TP-1-). Which will it be Solid Plastic or Phenolic? | Partitions are to be Phenolic per Finish Schedule sheet A-601. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/10/18 | |||
| 28 | 10 26 00 | 102600 Wall Protection - The specification states to use a Vinyl Corner Guard, but the Finish Schedule states to use Stainless Steel. Which will it be? Also the IPC Model 180 is not a good model number. | See response to Question #24. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/10/18 | |||
| 29 | 10 44 13 | 104413 Fire Protection Specialties - Will the Extinguishers in the Truck Bay be wall hung or in semi-recessed cabinets? | Wall hung | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/10/18 | |||
| 30 | 10 51 13 | 105113 Metal Lockers - The specification does not provide a factory for the Wardrobe Lockers and the Gear Lockers. Please provide factories that meet the specification. Also, how many of each will be required to be ADA? | Specifications describe the product; it is contractor's responsibility to purchase from manufacturer. If referring to LEED point MR 5; contractor only receives the point if chosen manufacturer is within 500 miles. Wardrobe lockers are ADA as designed. Gear lockers are not required to be ADA. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/10/18 | |||
| 31 | Fire Protection | Fire Alarm: Is a Monaco System required? | PENDING ANSWER, DOCUMENTATION | Jeff McLaughlin, PE | 7/10/18 | |||
| 32 | V-100 | Elevations for site work: Please provide existing elevations in order to do dirt take off. | Refer to sheet V-100 | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/10/18 | |||
| 33 | Is there a landscape or irrigation plan? | No landscaping or irrigation in contract. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/10/18 | ||||
| 34 | Johnson Controls, Inc. contact: Brad Tepper identified in the specifications is no longer the contact. | Please contact Scott Wrigley, scott.wrigley@jci.com, 904-426-8633. Matt Weiss, matthew.t.weiss@jci.com, 404-867-2261 | FLANG | 7/10/18 | ||||
| 35 | 7/11/18 | 08 36 13 | Specification section 08 36 13 SECTIONAL DOORS in paragraph 1.2. E identifies the acceptable product as “Entrematic Amarr 2002, Florida Produce Approval # 20673.5.” The sectional door approval indicates approval under this code to the IBC-2410-195-24-I Thru 10’-2” wide. The door openings exceed the 10’-2” width. Is the product identified acceptable even though the design width exceeds the IBC indication? Are “or equal” products by other manufacturers acceptable? | Sectional door manufacturer must provide calculations showing that door meets IBC wind load requirements for door size indicated in construction documents. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/12/18 | ||
| 36 | 7/11/18 | Signs: A. Will a sign schedule be provided? B. Are standard Room Identification and Restroom Identification signs the only ADA signs required? C. Please identify sizes for the signs? D. Will an address or other building signs be required? If so please provide a sped. E. May more economical plastic acrylic laser manufacured signs be acceptable in place of photopolymer? | A signage schedule will not be provided. Per specification Section 10 14 23, provide room identification signs for all rooms that are ADA Section 703 compliant, including dimensional requirements.. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/12/18 | |||
| 37 | 7/11/18 | 08 36 13 | For Spec Section 08 36 13 Sectional Doors: with regard to the sectional doors,16'-2" is generally the widest sectional door you can get with a true Dade NOA. Rolling steel doors can achieve this. The feedback we are getting is that there is no sectional door of this construction type that will meet the wind loads, regardless of manufacturer, due to the size. Please advise. | Sectional door manufacturer must provide calculations showing that door meets IBC wind load requirements for door size indicated in construction documents. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/12/18 | ||
| 38 | 7/11/18 | A-601 | Some of the rooms listed on the finish schedule (A-601) do not correlate with the rooms listed on the floor plan (A-101). For example, Dorm Room (117) appears on the finish schedule and floor plan; however, the finish schedule also lists another room (Telecom – 117) with entirely different finishes. There also is not a Men’s restroom (123) & Women’s restroom (125) shown on the floor plan. Please clarify. | On Sheet A-601 ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE delete 117 Telecom,123 MEN, and 125 WOMEN. | Ashley Good, RID | 7/13/18 | ||
| 39 | 7/11/18 | A-601 | Remark #7 on A-601 indicates to provide floor tile PFT-1 at the sink/shower in room 134. Should this be revised so that the sink/shower receives PFT-2 (smaller format tile) instead, in order to achieve a proper slope to the drain? | Note #7 should read "Provide Floor Tile PFT-2 and porcelain tile base PTB-1 at floor sink/shower in Room 134." | Ashley Good, RID | 7/13/18 | ||
| 40 | 7/11/18 | Are the showers to be recessed? The specifications call for a thick-set installation; however, the foundation plan does not illustrate any recesses in the slab. Please clarify. | Showers are to be recessed with a thick set installation. Provide a 2" deep 3' x 3' recess at each of the showers in MEN'S RESTROOM 114 and WOMEN'S RESTROOM 115 and a 2" deep 4' x 4' recess in EQUIP WASH DISINFECT INFECTIOUS CONTROL. Perimeter of shower floor shall be even with room finish floor. Slope shower floor 1" to shower drain. Shower pan shall extend 18" into the room under tile floor. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/12/18 | |||
| 41 | 7/11/18 | A-402 | Is “PT-1” on sheet A-402 supposed to be wall tile “WT-1”? | Yes. | Ashley Good, RID | 7/12/18 | ||
| 42 | 7/11/18 | 09 30 13 | A-601 | The tile specifications (093013) and the tile represented on the finish legend (A-601) do not correlate. The specifications indicate that the walls are to receive a “PF-2” which is a 12x12 tile, while the drawings illustrate that all wall tile is to be “WT-1” (a 3x6 tile). Please clarify. | All wall tile is WT-1. | Ashley Good, RID | 7/13/18 | |
| 43 | 7/11/18 | A-601 | Please provide remarks #2, 4, 9, 10, & 11 that are referenced after the basis of designs for the tile on sheet A-601. | Remarks #2 and 4 are shown in the Remarks column. #9,10, and 11 are not used. #13 is "See floor plan for location of accent wall paint." | Ashley Good, RID | 7/13/18 | ||
| 44 | 7/11/18 | FX-001 | On drawing FX001, Note 12 states to provide a MIC mitigation chemical injection system for the fire sprinkler system. The fire sprinkler contractor asking the question has performed multiple projects at FANG and has no knowledge of a concern for MIC in the water supply. Will this be a requirement as the cost for this is substantial? It has been suggested that it would be a more affective design to be installed at the fire pump house suppling the entire underground loop rather than at one building. | Note 12 is incorrect and should be deleted from the drawing. A MIC mitigation chemical injection system is not required. | Jeff McLaughlin, PE | 7/12/18 | ||
| 45 | 7/11/18 | 21 13 13 | Spec. Section 21 13 13 Wet-Pipe Sprinkler System, paragraph 1.4 a Requires the use of high pressure piping system components listed for 250-psi minimum working pressure. Are pressures maintained above 175 psi as this has not been a requirement with previous projects? | Water flow testing conducted by Jacobs on 11/13/2015 revealed the static pressure to be 190 psi. Due to this pressure reading, the piping is requried to be listed to 250 psi minimum. If information can be provided to demonstrate the static pressures are maintained below 175 psi, then standard components may be used. However, this deviation must be approved by FLANG. | Jeff McLaughlin, PE | 7/12/18 | ||
| 46 | 7/11/18 | 10 51 13 | A-102; A-402 | Wardrobe lockers: Spec's and elevation drwg A402 states single tier BUT equipment drwg A102 states 2- Tier. Please advise what is correct. | Wardrobe lockers are single tier per A-402 and specifications. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/12/18 | |
| 47 | 7/16/18 | G-001 | Reference drawing G-001 The index of drawings list a V-101 drawing, which we did not find in the drawing file. Please provide | Refer to Sheets V-100 and V-101. Sheet V-101 is the survey for the area of the retention pond. Reference Addendum #2 | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/18/18 | ||
| 48 | 7/16/18 | C-002, CL101 | Reference drawing C-002 Phasing plan note #2 and drawing CL-101. Please clarify. It appears the new building is right on the existing fence line which will have to be removed to construct the new building. There is no temporary fence indicated on any plans which would leave open access to the taxiway during construction of the building. Do we need to provide a temporary security fence, where can it be located and to what standard does it need to be constructed ? | Building is intentionally located on the existing fence line. Contractor is to remove only the portion of the existing fence requried to construct the building and reinstall fencing to within 6" of building when building construction is complete. At contractor's option, remove additional fence and install temporary fencing of same security level during construction and reinstall existing permanent fencing to within 6" of the building upon completion of construction. The existing fencing is the secure perimeter of the the Airport and must remain in some manner during the entire construction process. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/18/18 | ||
| 49 | 7/16/18 | Is a City of Jacksonville building permit required? | No | FLANG | 7/18/18 | |||
| 50 | 7/16/18 | At the prebid it was indicated that JEA (Jacksonville Electric Authority) owns the utilities. If it is JEA the following questions apply. Have the plans been submitted to JEA for review and have they provided an availability number? Who is responsible for water and sewer growth, impact and meter fees? Utility details do not appear to JEA standards, please advise. | Plans have not been submitted to JEA. Contractor shall include all fees associated with construction as a part of their bid. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/18/18 | |||
| 51 | 7/16/18 | TY101 | Reference drawing TY-101 note #2. Please clarify note. Is the security/access control system being provided by others? | Security/Access infrastructure (conduits, boxes, etc.) is to be by contractor. Electronic security equipment/devices are provide by owner. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/18/18 | ||
| 52 | 7/16/18 | 08 41 13 | With reference to specification section 08 41 13 ALUMINUM-FRAMED ENTRANCES AND STOREFRONTS paragraph 1.7 WARRANTY, item B.1. Which requires a 20 year warranty on finishes. The finish is clear anodized. We are advised that a 20 year warranty is not available for clear anodized finish on storefront framing or door materials. Please clarify warranty requirement. | Provide manufacturer's 10 year warranty. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/18/18 | ||
| 53 | 7/17/18 | V-100 | On Drawing V-100 the Surveyors Report in the lower left of the page is not readable. Can this note be reissued? | See Addendum 2 | FLANG | 7/18/18 | ||
| 54 | 7/18/18 | CS101; CS103; CG101; CU101 | The following drawings have squares intermixed with the text/numbers in callouts throughout. Please review and provide clear copies. CS101 - Detail Callouts Throughout; CS103 - Detail Callouts Throughout; CG101 - Detail Callouts Throughout; CU101 - Detail Callouts Throughout | |||||
| See Addendum 2 | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/24/18 | ||||||
| 55 | 7/23/18 | A-601 | On the Room Finish Legend, A-601, there seems to be multiple descriptions of the same rooms. For example, regarding Room 111 , I can locate the dispatch station however I can't locate the DOV room. Please clarify. | The first room listed for duplicate numbers is correct. Disregard the second room name associated with the number. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/24/18 | ||
| 56 | 7/23/18 | A-402 | The Restroom Elevations, A-402, it designates the wall-tile but is calling out for PT-1? I am assuming that it is supposed to beWT-1 instead. Pleae clarify. | Correct all wall finishes shown as tile are to be WT-1/ PT-1 is incorrrect. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/24/18 | ||
| 57 | 7/23/18 | A-401 | On A-401 it appears there is more WT-1 in the kitchen and dispatch station wash area but it is not called for on the drawings. Please clarify. | A-401 interior elevations indicating WT-1 at backsplash of Kitchen and Dispatch is correct. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/24/18 | ||
| 58 | 7/23/18 | Wood blocking matching the height of the insulation, (approx. 3.5” wide and 3.8” high) will be required at all roof perimeters. It is not shown on the Structural or Architectural drawings. I believe the wood blocking and its attachment should be a structural component. Please clarify. | At contractors optionprovide 14 ga. bent metal plate or treated wood framing as described at the perimeter of the roof for gutter and trim anchorage. Submit detail as a part of shop drawings for approval. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/24/18 | |||
| 59 | 7/23/18 | Neither the Structural or Architectural drawings show sub soffit framing which I believe would be required to support the finished soffit materials. Please clarify. | Soffit panels are to follow the slope of the underside of the roof structure. Contractor shall provide soffit material(s) listed in Specification Section 07 41 13; installed as a complete system. Provide manufacturer's standard "F" or "J" trim for panel support. If additional structure is required to support manufacturer's trim, between roof structural members the contractor shall include that as a part of the overall system bid. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/24/18 | |||
| 60 | 7/23/18 | Please confirm that the following materials will be an acceptable alternative to The Centria SRS 3 panel system. |
a. Petersen Pac-Clad Tite-Loc Plus 22 gauge painted with a double bend 180 degree 2” standing seam metal roof panels fastened to meet manufacturer’s specifications. Color to be selected from manufacturer’s standard colors in a two-coat finish.
b. Petersen .032 aluminum 1’ wide non-vented metal soffit panels and J-trim with a painted finish. Color to be selected from manufacturer’s standard colors in a two-coat finish.
c. Manufacturer’s 30-year material finish warranty
| d. Manufacturers 20-year water tightness warranty | The Government will not pre-approve material submittals. The cited product, Centria, is identified as a "basis-of-design" product (see specification 01 60 00), and therefore is not a required product. Any product meeting the basic specification will be acceptable. The contractor will be required to provide material submittals and shop drawings that may be required by the specifications prior to incorporating the material into the work. | FLANG | 7/23/18 | ||
| 61 | 7/24/18 | S-601 | Drawings / Sheet S-601 / Foundation Schedule - The following footing |
marks are not located on the drawings F30, F40, F60, F80, & F90. Are these footers used for this project? If yes, please provide locations.
| The Foundation Schedule is a standard schedule and not all foundations are utilized. Construct foundations according to the Foundation Plan S-101. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/25/18 | ||
| 62 | 7/24/18 | S-101; S-601 | Drawings / Sheet S-101 & S-601 / Foundation Schedule - The following |
footer mark WF40 is listed on sheet S-101 but not listed in the schedule on sheet S-601.
| Reinforce footing as shown in detail 8/S-501 | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/25/18 | |
| 63 | 7/24/18 | Will a temporary fence need to be install at the flight line during |
the construction? Can you provide a plan showing the extent?
| See resposne to question #48 | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/25/18 | ||
| 64 | 7/24/18 | C-508 | C-508 has temporary low-profile barricade and vehicle flag details. |
Is there a plan that shows where we are to place these?
| Barriers detail 1/C-508 are to be placed across the existing concrete taxiway to prevent aircraft from entering area when construction vehicles are on or near the taxiway performing construction activities, refer to sheet CG101. Vehicle flags shall be on all vehicles while working on the flight line side of the existing high security fence, refer to sheet CG101. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/25/18 | ||
| 65 | 7/24/18 | A-402 | Sheet A-402 Restroom Elevations are showing tile on some walls but |
are called out as painted walls. Please clarify which is correct.
| See response to question #56 | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/25/18 | ||
| 66 | 7/24/18 | A-601 | Sheet A-601 Room Finish Schedule looks to have another project |
listed in the schedule along with the current one. It has each room called out twice with different room names and finishes and some of these room names do not match the floor plan. Can you please clarify what the rooms and materials are for this project? Example:
Room 110 - Mechanical / Floor Finish - SC-1 Room 110 - DOK / Floor Finish - CPT-1 Room 111 - Dispatch Station / Floor Finish CPT-1 Room 111 - DOV / Floor Finish - CPT-1 Room 112 - Shift Supervisor / Floor Finish - CPT-1 Room 112 - OPS 1 / Floor Finish - RF-1
| The following are the rooms that repeat with different names and/or materials. 101 - 125 & 127 - 130 | See response to question #55. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/25/18 | ||
| 67 | 7/24/18 | A-701 | Sheet A-701, Partition Type 1, calls out for 2 layers of GWB on one |
side and 1 layer of GWB on the other side, however, the detail shows 2 layers on each side. Please clarify which is correct.
| Detail for Partition Type 1 is drawn correctly noted incorrectly. Partition Type 1 is to have two layers of 5/8" gypsum board on each side of the studs. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/25/18 | ||||||
| 68 | 7/24/18 | Is there a Geotechnical Report for this project? | Yes, see attached | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/25/18 | |||
| 69 | 7/24/18 | 31 23 19 | Reference Specification 31-23-19, Part 1, 1.5,B Contractor shall install observation wells at locations as directed by the Contractor's Geotechnical Engineer and as approved by the engineer adjacent to the structures under construction for the purpose of measuring water levels during excavations. Is this correct? | Yes, it is correct. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/25/18 | ||
| 70 | 7/24/18 | Is the intent for the General Contractor to employ an independent Geotechnical Engineer | Yes. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/25/18 | |||
| 71 | 7/27/18 | 11 30 13 | A-102 | Spec Section 11 30 13 and Sheet A-102 conflict each other. |
On Drawing A-102, please clarify which equipment is furnished and installed by the contractor, and furnished and installed by the owner.
| The following equipment in Specification Section 11 30 13 will be provided and installed by Owner: freestanding electric range, refrigerator/freezers, undercounter refrigerator, clothes washers, and clothes dryers. On Equipment Floor Plan A-102, equipment items A-3, A-4, and the curtain rod in A-6 are furnished and installed by the Contractor. The curtain in A-6 is provided and installed by the Owner. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/30/18 | ||
| 72 | 7/27/18 | A-301; A-503; A-701; A-702 | All the metal stud framed wall types on sheets, A-701 and A-702, Fire rated and Non Rated, show the walls going up to the sloped roof deck structure 20'-6" aff, (framed up between the steel trusses) but the building section drawings, sheets A-301, and A-503 show the walls terminating at the horizontal bottom chord member of the steel trusses, 12' aff. |
What framing height option will be required or considered for this Bid?
| All partitions shall be built as shown on A-701 and A-702. Sheets A-301 and A-503 are shown for structural clarity. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/30/18 | |||
| 73 | 7/27/18 | A-501 | Notes 18 and 19 on sheet A-501 calls for 16 gage metal studs and 10 gage expanded metal welded to the studs. We cannot find these notes on any architectural or structural plans. | ||
| Please identify the location of these notes | Notes 18 and 19 are not applicable. Refer to General Note 13 on G-002. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/30/18 | ||
| 74 | 7/27/18 | Some wall and building sections show Batt insulation above the drywall and acoustical ceilings, but others do not. |
Should we assume all ceilings need Sound Batts above? And if not, can the rooms be identified that do need insulation?
| Sound attenuation blankets (batts) per Specification Section 09 29 00 2.6 C. shall be provided above the ceilings in all dorm rooms. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/30/18 | ||||
| 75 | 7/30/18 | Can you confirm which of these exterior flush doors with no glass are blast resistant? 101C, 107, 110, 127F, 127L, 128, 132, & 134. | All exterior doors listed shall be blast resistant. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/30/18 |
Sheet2
Sheet3
File details come from the government source that posted it.