W911YN18B0001_QA_7-16-18.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 26 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Replace Fire Crash/Rescue Station, Jacksonville, FL Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W911YN18B0001
About this file
Solicitation Questions and Answers as of 16 July 2018
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| ABSTRACT_OF1419_W911YN18B0001.pdf | ||
| Bid__Opening_Attendance_8-10-18.pdf | ||
| W911YN18B00010006.pdf | ||
| W911YN18B0001_QA_8-3-18_.pdf | ||
| Attachment_4_Addendum_3_LSGA019179_02Augl2018.pdf | ||
| W911YN18B0001_QA_8-1-18_.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| W911YN18B00010005.pdf | ||
| Geotech_Report_LSGA019179.pdf | ||
| W911YN18B00010004.pdf | ||
| W911YN18B0001_QA_7-27-18.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| W911YN18B00010002.pdf | ||
| W911YN18B0001_QA_7-24-18.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| W911YN18B00010001.pdf | ||
| Attachment_2_Addendum_1_LSGA019179_12Jul2018.pdf | ||
| W911YN18B0001_Pre-bid_Site_visit_Contractor_Attendance.pdf | ||
| PreBidSlides_W911YN18B0001-final.ppt | PPT presentation | |
| Pre-Bid_Site_Visit_Minutes.pdf | ||
| W911YN18B0001_QA.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| W911YN18B0001.pdf |
Show all 19
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Chart1
Comment Number 1 #REF! 1 Date #REF! 1 Discipline 0 Spec/ Report Sheet Comment 0 Response 0 Response By 0 On Date 43291 Comment Fire Crash Rescue Station - Bidding Questions/Response 7/10/18
| Comment Number | Date | Discipline | Spec/ Report | Sheet | Comment | Response | Response By | On Date |
| 1 | Structural | The concrete finish on the bond beams is called out in the Concrete Specification section 3.9.B to knock off the fins and plug the tie holes. Is this sufficient or will rub and dress be required? | Exposed surfaces will require rub and dress. | Brett Rowan, PE | 7/10/18 | |||
| 2 | Structural | S-503 | The detail for the top of the bond beams in Detail 7 on drawing S-503 indicates a bond beam ( which is constructed prior to setting steel) which has a steel support welded directly to it with no tolerance for the height of the steel plate in the bond beam. Is it acceptable to use shims and seal between the weld plate in the bond beam and the steel tube showing in the detail. There is a similar question on the bond beams, and plates on the other details on sheet S-503. | The steel plate is an embed plate at the top of the cast in place concrete beam. ACI tolerances would not require a shim plate. If construction is in excess of tolerances, submit an RFI. | Brett Rowan, PE | 7/10/18 | ||
| 3 | AT/FP | A-602 | On sheet A-602 in the General Notes, it states that the aluminum window and door framing is to comply with AF/TP UFC 4-010-01. Specification Section 08 41 13 GLAZING, in paragraph 1.3 SUMMARY, A.1. states that “All exterior window and door glazing shall comply with UFC Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection Design Guidelines.” Drawing CS 102, the AT/FP sheet indicates an AF/TP setback distance of 33 feet. Specification section 08 41 13 ALUMINUM-FRAMED ENTRANCES AND STOREFRONTS in paragraph 1.3.G Florida Product Approval calls identifies the storefront to be used as “1. Design Basis: Kawneer, Florida Product Approval #15404.3” This product is the Kawneer IR 501T product which satisfies the State of Florida impact rating and test requirement related to wind driven objects. Drawing CS-102 indicates a 33 foot AFTP Setback blast distance. The Kawneer IR 501T product is not tested to meet the blast loadings required by UFC 4.010.01 at a 33 AFTP setback. |
a. What is a storefront product that meets the design requirements for 33 foot AFTP Setback design and test?
b. What is the anchorage and/or steel reinforcing required for the window framing and door opening framing? The storefront details on sheet A-604 do not show any anchorage. W
c. Which are the exterior doors that open into spaces classified as occupied spaces which are required to meet the 33 foot Setback blast design.
| 33 ft Standoff distance is not the correct DBT distance. Please refer to Addendum #1 dated July 12, 2018, incorporated by solicitation amendment 0001, Window System Design Load Compliance & Analysis with Revision date of 6/15/17 located in the Glazing specification. The Window Design Load Analysis provides all of the requirements, guidance & direction to meet UFC 4-010-01 Standard 10. The summary of fully reflected & incident loads with the applicable standoff distance is listed in the analysis tables on page 4. Please follow all requirements, guidances and directions as noted in the Window Design Load Compliance & Analysis. | William J. Moore, PSP AT/FP (SME) | 7/10/18 | ||||||
| 4 | AT/FP | 08 41 13 | Are hollow metal exterior doors # 101C, 107, 110, 127F and 134 required to comply with the blast design for the 33 foot ADTP Setback? Is the glass in these doors required to meet the design loading required by the 33 foot AFTP Setback? As noted in Section 08 41 13 GLAZING? | Please see note above and references. | William J. Moore, PSP AT/FP (SME) | 7/10/18 | ||
| 5 | AT/FP | Will a complete dynamic design analysis be required should it be confirmed that the Kawneer IR 501T system fails to satisfy the blast resistant requirements of the 33 foot AFTP Setback design loading? | William J. Moore, PSP AT/FP (SME) | 7/10/18 | ||||
| 6 | AT/FP | CS102 | What is the Charge Weight for the design of the storefront with the 33 foot AFTP Setback requirement on sheet CS-102? | The 33 foot distances is not the DBT standoff distances for this project. Please refer to the Window Design Load Compliance Analysis located in the Glazing Spec. for all information | William J. Moore, PSP AT/FP (SME) | 7/10/18 | ||
| 7 | AT/FP | A-602 | On sheet A-602 GLAZED OPENING GENERAL NOTE 4. Reads“Refer to the window design load analysis…” Please identify the source of the window design load analysis in Note 4. | Please refer to the Glazing Spec for the Window Design Load Compliance Analysis. | William J. Moore, PSP AT/FP (SME) | 7/10/18 | ||
| 8 | A-602 | On sheet A-602 GENERAL NOTES, Note 2 requires all hollow metal doors and frames to be painted. Note 4 requires exterior hollow metal doors and frames to be galvanized. Are the exterior hollow metal doors to be painted galvanized? | Yes. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/10/18 | |||
| 9 | Is door mark 100A required to be blast rated? | No. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/10/18 | ||||
| 10 | On door marks 100, 101C and 102A, is the rim exit device and the other door hardware sufficient to satisfy the blast design requirement? | 7/10/18 | ||||||
| 11 | What is the primary voltage for the transformer? | 25.5 kV nominal. Refer to single line on sheet E-601 and specification 261219. | Mike Cahill, PE | 7/10/18 | ||||
| 12 | Is this a Wye or a Delta system? | The transformer shall be delta primary at 25.5 kV and wye secondary at 208V/120Y. | Mike Cahill, PE | 7/10/18 | ||||
| 13 | S-503 & 504 | Sheets S-503 & S-504 call for Steel Joist, whereas sheets A-502 & A-503 call for Steel Truss. Please clarify which is correct. | Proper terminology is double sloped steel joist, terms are often used interchangably. | Brett Rowan, PE | 7/10/18 | |||
| 14 | The specifications call for 1” mini blinds. However, also listed are motorized operators. These types of blinds are usually not motorized. Can you please confirm that the 1” blinds are to have motorized operators? | Blinds are not to be motorized. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/10/18 | ||||
| 15 | Are all windows including the training room, day room have these mini blinds? The plans show no indications for these window treatments. | Per Sheet A-601 Geneal Notes, Provide blinds at all windows and storefront. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/10/18 | ||||
| 16 | Can the QC Manager and the Supervisor be the same person? | This answer assumes the "Supervisor" is Superintendent. No. See Specification 01 00 00 paragraph 36. "An individual Key Team Member may not hold more than one key role." | FLANG | 7/10/18 | ||||
| 17 | Can the Site Safety Health Officer be the same as the Supervisor? | This answer assumes the "Supervisor" is Superintendent. No. See Specification 01 00 00 paragraph 36. "An individual Key Team Member may not hold more than one key role." | FLANG | 7/10/18 | ||||
| 18 | 01 40 00 | In regards to the Quality Control Manger, Specification Section 01 40 00 does not indicate that a QC Manager is required on the project but other specifications sections refer to the QC Manager. Please Clarify if a full time QC Manager is required on site during work. | The QC Manager is not required to be on site at all times. | FLANG | 7/10/18 | |||
| 19 | Please confirm that a Competent Person is required whenever high risk activities are being performed: Confined Space, Cranes and rigging, Excavation/trenching, fall protection, and electrical work. Please clarify if the Competent Person(s) can be the same as the SSHO, Supervisor or QC Manager. | Competent person is requred whenever high risk activities are being performed. This person can the same as the SSHO or Supervisor. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/10/18 | ||||
| 20 | Please confirm that a LEED AP Coordinator is required on this project. | Yes, the project will require confirmation that the construction is according to LEED Silver criteria | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/10/18 | ||||
| 21 | Please clarify if the Commissioning Authority is to be contracted by the GC or by the owner. | Commissioning Authority is to be contracted by the GC. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/10/18 | ||||
| 22 | Please confirm that the government intends the General Contractor to provide a Supervisor, Quality Control Manager, LEED AP Waste Manager, Site Safety Health Officer, Commissioning Authority and a Competent Person on site full time for the duration of the project. The requirement of having these people on site will escalate contractors bids. | A Superintendent and SSHO are required to be on site at all times when work is performed. Competent Person(s) are required to be on site at all times the particular high risk activities are taking place. The SSHO may be a Competent Person if meeting the requirements and does not conflict with other duties and ongoing activities. LEED AP Waste Manager and Commissioning Authority need to be on site as needed to adequately perform their activities. |
Williams, Brian J MSG MIL USA: Williams, Brian J MSG MIL USA:
Need A/E input for "LEED AP Wast Manager, Commissioning Authority" requirements.
| Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/10/18 | |||||||
| 23 | Please confirm that the contractor should include in their bid the costs to hire an engineering firm for delegated design requirements for the following spec sections: 03 45 00, 05 50 00, 07 41 13, 08 11 13, 08 41 13, 08 80 00, 08 91 19, 09 51 13, 21 13 13, 22 05 29, 22 15 19, 23 21 13, 23 31 13, 23 36 00, 26 05 29, 26 05 53, 25 56 13, 26 56 19, 27 05 36, 27 05 36, 27 51 16 AND 32 31 13. | Contractor is responsible for the design of the products in the sections listed. Contractor has the option to request that the design be performed by the subontractor or manufacturer of the product. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/10/18 | ||||
| 24 | 10 26 00 | A-601 | There is a contradition between the specifications and plans. Specification 10 26 00, paragraph 2.2 and Drawing A-601, CG-1. Please confirm what is correct. | Drawing A-601 is correct. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/10/18 | ||
| 25 | Wall insulation: It calls for spray polyurethane foam insulation at the exterior walls. Was this meant to be injected insulation into the walls? (Core Fill) | Yes. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/10/18 | ||||
| 26 | Window blinds: I see that window blinds have been requested in the Spec Sheet, but I do not see any locations that have been selected on the prints. I am in need of the locations for the window blinds. | See response to question #15. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/10/18 | ||||
| 27 | 10 21 13 | 102113.19 Toilet Partitions - The specification states the material is to be Solid Plastic (2.2), but the plans Finish Schedule states to be Solid Phenolic (TP-1-). Which will it be Solid Plastic or Phenolic? | Partitions are to be Phenolic per Finish Schedule sheet A-601. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/10/18 | |||
| 28 | 10 26 00 | 102600 Wall Protection - The specification states to use a Vinyl Corner Guard, but the Finish Schedule states to use Stainless Steel. Which will it be? Also the IPC Model 180 is not a good model number. | See response to Question #24. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/10/18 | |||
| 29 | 10 44 13 | 104413 Fire Protection Specialties - Will the Extinguishers in the Truck Bay be wall hung or in semi-recessed cabinets? | Wall hung | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/10/18 | |||
| 30 | 10 51 13 | 105113 Metal Lockers - The specification does not provide a factory for the Wardrobe Lockers and the Gear Lockers. Please provide factories that meet the specification. Also, how many of each will be required to be ADA? | Specifications describe the product; it is contractor's responsibility to purchase from manufacturer. If referring to LEED point MR 5; contractor only receives the point if chosen manufacturer is within 500 miles. Wardrobe lockers are ADA as designed. Gear lockers are not required to be ADA. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/10/18 | |||
| 31 | Fire Protection | Fire Alarm: Is a Monaco System required? | PENDING ANSWER, DOCUMENTATION | Jeff McLaughlin, PE | 7/10/18 | |||
| 32 | V-100 | Elevations for site work: Please provide existing elevations in order to do dirt take off. | Refer to sheet V-100 | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/10/18 | |||
| 33 | Is there a landscape or irrigation plan? | No landscaping or irrigation in contract. | Scott Herlitzka, AIA | 7/10/18 | ||||
| 34 | Johnson Controls, Inc. contact: Brad Tepper identified in the specifications is no longer the contact. | Please contact Scott Wrigley, scott.wrigley@jci.com, 904-426-8633. | FLANG | 7/10/18 | ||||
| 35 | 7/11/18 | 08 36 13 | Specification section 08 36 13 SECTIONAL DOORS in paragraph 1.2. E identifies the acceptable product as “Entrematic Amarr 2002, Florida Produce Approval # 20673.5.” The sectional door approval indicates approval under this code to the IBC-2410-195-24-I Thru 10’-2” wide. The door openings exceed the 10’-2” width. Is the product identified acceptable even though the design width exceeds the IBC indication? Are “or equal” products by other manufacturers acceptable? | |||||
| 36 | 7/11/18 | Signs: A. Will a sign schedule be provided? B. Are standard Room Identification and Restroom Identification signs the only ADA signs required? C. Please identify sizes for the signs? D. Will an address or other building signs be required? If so please provide a sped. E. May more economical plastic acrylic laser manufacured signs be acceptable in place of photopolymer? | ||||||
| 37 | 7/11/18 | 08 36 13 | For Spec Section 08 36 13 Sectional Doors: with regard to the sectional doors,16'-2" is generally the widest sectional door you can get with a true Dade NOA. Rolling steel doors can achieve this. The feedback we are getting is that there is no sectional door of this construction type that will meet the wind loads, regardless of manufacturer, due to the size. Please advise. | |||||
| 38 | 7/11/18 | A-601 | Some of the rooms listed on the finish schedule (A-601) do not correlate with the rooms listed on the floor plan (A-101). For example, Dorm Room (117) appears on the finish schedule and floor plan; however, the finish schedule also lists another room (Telecom – 117) with entirely different finishes. There also is not a Men’s restroom (123) & Women’s restroom (125) shown on the floor plan. Please clarify. | |||||
| 39 | 7/11/18 | A-601 | Remark #7 on A-601 indicates to provide floor tile PFT-1 at the sink/shower in room 134. Should this be revised so that the sink/shower receives PFT-2 (smaller format tile) instead, in order to achieve a proper slope to the drain? | |||||
| 40 | 7/11/18 | Are the showers to be recessed? The specifications call for a thick-set installation; however, the foundation plan does not illustrate any recesses in the slab. Please clarify. | ||||||
| 41 | 7/11/18 | A-402 | Is “PT-1” on sheet A-402 supposed to be wall tile “WT-1”? | |||||
| 42 | 7/11/18 | 09 30 13 | A-601 | The tile specifications (093013) and the tile represented on the finish legend (A-601) do not correlate. The specifications indicate that the walls are to receive a “PF-2” which is a 12x12 tile, while the drawings illustrate that all wall tile is to be “WT-1” (a 3x6 tile). Please clarify. | ||||
| 43 | 7/11/18 | A-601 | Please provide remarks #2, 4, 9, 10, & 11 that are referenced after the basis of designs for the tile on sheet A-601. | |||||
| 44 | 7/11/18 | FX-001 | On drawing FX001, Note 12 states to provide a MIC mitigation chemical injection system for the fire sprinkler system. The fire sprinkler contractor asking the question has performed multiple projects at FANG and has no knowledge of a concern for MIC in the water supply. Will this be a requirement as the cost for this is substantial? It has been suggested that it would be a more affective design to be installed at the fire pump house suppling the entire underground loop rather than at one building. | |||||
| 45 | 7/11/18 | 21 13 13 | Spec. Section 21 13 13 Wet-Pipe Sprinkler System, paragraph 1.4 a Requires the use of high pressure piping system components listed for 250-psi minimum working pressure. Are pressures maintained above 175 psi as this has not been a requirement with previous projects? | |||||
| 46 | 7/11/18 | 10 51 13 | A-102; A-402 | Wardrobe lockers: Spec's and elevation drwg A402 states single tier BUT equipment drwg A102 states 2- Tier. Please advise what is correct. | ||||
| 47 | 7/12/18 | G-001 | Reference drawing G-001 The index of drawings list a V-101 drawing, which we did not find in the drawing file. Please provide | |||||
| 48 | 7/12/18 | C-002; CL-101 | Reference drawing C-002 Phasing plan note #2 and drawing CL-101. Please clarify. It appears the new building is right on the existing fence line which will have to be removed to construct the new building. There is no temporary fence indicated on any plans which would leave open access to the taxiway during construction of the building. Do we need to provide a temporary security fence, where can it be located and to what standard does it need to be constructed ? | |||||
| 49 | 7/12/18 | Is a City of Jacksonville building permit required? | ||||||
| 50 | 7/12/18 | At the prebid it was indicated that JEA (Jacksonville Electric Authority) owns the utilities. If it is JEA the following questions apply. Have the plans been submitted to JEA for review and have they provided an availability number? Who is responsible for water and sewer growth, impact and meter fees? Utility details do not appear to JEA standards, please advise. | ||||||
| 51 | 7/12/18 | TY-101 | Reference drawing TY-101 note #2. Please clarify note. Is the security/access control system being provided by others? | |||||
| 52 | 7/16/18 | 08 41 13 | With reference to specification section 08 41 13 ALUMINUM-FRAMED ENTRANCES AND STOREFRONTS paragraph 1.7 WARRANTY, item B.1. Which requires a 20 year warranty on finishes. The finish is clear anodized. We are advised that a 20 year warranty is not available for clear anodized finish on storefront framing or door materials. Please clarify warranty requirement. |
Sheet2
Sheet3
File details come from the government source that posted it.