W911QY-16-R-0004_BK_Solicitation_Amendment_0001.pdf

PDF 140 KB Posted

Attached to
PMFSS Battlefield Kitchen Solicitation
Solicitation number
W911QY-16-R-0004
Issued by

About this file

W911QY-16-R-0004 BK Solicitation Amendment 0001

View the file

Other files

Show all 14

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to:

1. Update Section C.1.3 Contract Outline and Sequence of Events.

2. Update Section C.3.2 First Article Test Units (CLIN 1002).

3. Update Section M.3.5.2 Subfactor 2 - Technical Data.

4. Update Section M.3.9.6.3.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 22

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 06-Jun-2016

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W911QY-16-R-0004

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

06-May-2016

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

06-Jun-2016

CODE

W6QK ACC-APG NATICK

CONTRACTING DIVISION

BLDG 1 GENERAL GREENE AVENUE

NATICK MA 01760-5011

W911QY 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W911QY-16-R-0004

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION C - DESCRIPTIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS

The following have been modified:

STATEMENT OF WORK

C. DESCRIPTIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS for BATTLEFIELD KITCHEN

C.1. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

C.1.1. Scope: This Statement of Work (SOW) describes the work to be performed by the Contractor in conjunction with the design, fabrication, test, and delivery of the Battlefield Kitchen (BK).

C.1.2. Technical: The BK is being developed as a replacement to the Mobile Kitchen Trailer. It will be a mobile kitchen towed by the Light Medium Tactical Vehicle (LMTV) and larger vehicles with cross country travel capability. It will have the capability to prepare meals for and feed 300 people, three meals per day. The kitchen will be height reducible to 8 feet for transportation on military aircraft. The system must also have provisions for transportation by helicopter sling load, rail, and ship. All cooking appliances on the BK will be fuel fired (JP-8) with minimal electric power to operate controls, blowers, pumps, etc., and as such, all of the BK electrical power needs will be supplied by a military standard 3kW Generator that is transported within the BK envelope. A key feature of the BK will be that the appliances are dismountable for operation in ground based shelters/buildings. All of the cooking equipment on the BK platform must be man-portable in accordance with MIL-STD-1472. To facilitate operation in closed shelters, the BK ventilation system must be reconfigurable to function when the BK appliances are dismounted and operated in a ground based shelter.

C.1.3. Contract Outline and Sequence of Events: The Contractor will be provided with data and hardware resulting from the developmental work accomplished to date by the Government. This will include solid models, drawings, test reports, prototype burners, appliances, M1061A1 Trailer and generator. See Section H for specifics of GFE and GFI. This provides the contractor with the preliminary system designs, but ultimately, the Contractor shall be responsible for designing and fabricating BK systems that meet all of the requirements of this contract and the component Performance Purchase Descriptions (PPDs). It is the intention of the government to use the technical data obtained under this contract to procure identical or nearly identical Battlefield Kitchens on subsequent (follow

on) full and open competitive contracts.

C.1.3.1. For the purposes of this contract, the BK System will be defined as all the parts and pieces that make up a fully functional BK with all Components of the End Item (COEI) and Basic Issue Items (BII). The BK System will include three subsystems: The BK platform, Modular Appliances, and the Modular Burners. The BK platform will therefore be the BK without appliances or burners. It is the intention of the Government to be able to procure separately the three subsystems from the TDP deliverable under this effort in future actions.

C.1.3.2. This overall developmental effort will consist of two phases. The first phase will be the completion of the design of the three sub-systems and all three subsystems will be interchangeable even if provided by different manufacturers: 1) Modular Burner, 2) Modular Appliances, and 3) The BK platform. After successful completion of the Critical Design Review (C.4.4.2.) the Contractor will be given approval to proceed with fabrication of the prototypes. Once Government approval is granted, the Contractor shall proceed to fabricate and test the quantity of Developmental Prototype BK Systems as specified in the Delivery Order.

C.1.3.3. The Contractor shall design and fabricate a minimum of three developmental prototypes (CLIN 0012);

additional developmental prototypes, if ordered, will be ordered under CLIN 0013, at quantities and prices specified in the delivery order. The contractor shall complete the BK developmental prototype systems and deliver them to the Government for evaluation in the Production Prove-Out Test. The Production Prove-Out Test (PPT) will be a Government run test at a Government facility to determine the conformance of the BK and subsystems to the requirements of the applicable PPD's and this Contract. After Government testing, the test prototypes shall be returned to the Contractor. Deficiencies identified during the PPT shall be corrected by the Contractor. After refurbishment of the test prototypes, the Contractor shall deliver the three BK systems to the Government. The prototypes will then be evaluated in Government administered Limited User Test. Feedback from the PPT, and LUT will be used to finalize the design of the BK System and complete the developmental portion of this contract.

C.1.3.4. Initial production approval will be based on the successful completion of the developmental testing and incorporation of necessary design changes to correct remaining deficiencies. The next step will be the fabrication of First Article Test (FAT) Units. These units will be subjected to Contractor performed FAT and Government performed Initial Operational Test (IOT) in that order. The successful completion of these two tests will support the decision for Full Rate Production.

C.1.3.5. During each Government performed test, the Contractor shall provide support in the form of spare and repair parts as well as on-site technical support as required.

C.1.4. Contractor Responsibilities: The Contractor shall furnish all personnel, labor, engineering, services, materials, supplies, and facilities necessary to design, develop, manufacture, and test the BK system and provide all support hardware and software as indicated in this Statement of Work (SOW). The work and services to be performed by the Contractor are detailed in this SOW and will be authorized by issuance of delivery orders. The Contractor shall not initiate any work that is not authorized by a delivery order or modification without written direction by the Contracting Officer.

C.1.5. Program Management: The Contractor shall designate an individual as the Contractor’s Program Manager (PM). The PM shall serve as the primary Point of Contact (POC) between the Government and Contractor, and shall be responsible for the coordination of all Contractor activities related to the contract. The PM shall have the authority to commit the Contractor to specific courses of action and accept direction from the Contracting Officer.

The PM shall be responsible for coordinating all meetings between the Government and the Contractor. The PM shall be responsible for bringing to the Contracting Officer’s attention any conflicts in the Contractor’s interpretation of the contract requirements (first by telephone and followed in writing) or problems that could adversely affect the Contractor’s ability to meet the stated quality, cost, or production/delivery schedule.

C.1.6. Master Program Schedule: The Contractor shall develop and maintain a detailed Master Program Schedule in Microsoft Project (using the Gantt chart format) that outlines all of the tasks required to execute the program. A baseline schedule shall be established during the contract preparation phase and tracked from contract award. The schedule shall show in detail the path the contractor will follow to meet the required delivery dates of all items awarded on the contract. The schedule shall provide a comprehensive list of all program related events (i.e. design reviews, engineering, design, integration, fabrication, First Article Testing, Production, CDRL deliverables, etc.).

The schedule shall track all tasks, baseline and actual schedule progress, and include percentages complete. The Contractor is expected to keep the Master Program Schedule up to date and track program progress using the schedule. Updates to the schedule shall be supplied to the Government as changes occur or as requested. The contractor shall submit the up to date Master Program Schedule along with weekly teleconference meeting minutes (Section 0).

C.1.7. Configuration Management: The Contractor shall implement and maintain an internal configuration management program for the BK throughout the life of the contract. EIA649, ‘National Consensus Standard for Configuration Management’, may be used as a guide for the Contractor’s configuration management program.

Copies of this document may be purchased at http://www.sae.org/.

C.1.8. Physical Configuration Baseline (PCBL): The Contractor shall create and control the PCBL using the change control and engineering release processes. The PCBL, which shall be in the Contractor’s own format, is the product performance requirement for replacement assemblies and spare/repair parts, engineering drawings, parts lists, process specifications and computer software configuration items. The PCBL shall support interchangeability and interoperability to a replaceable part level.

C.1.9. Configuration Control: The Contractor shall use configuration control to manage all proposed changes after the Physical Configuration is baselined (See C.1.8 and C.2.19). Configuration control shall be used to document the impact of proposed changes and to update configuration documentation. Following acceptance of the system, the Contractor shall not alter the design in form, fit, or function without prior approval from the Contracting Officer.

C.1.10. Engineering Change Proposal (ECP): An ECP shall be prepared for proposed changes. At a minimum, the ECP shall include the following:

C.1.10.1. Date Prepared C.1.10.2. ECP Number C.1.10.3. Justification and Priority Code C.1.10.4. System Designation (i.e. Cage Code, nomenclature, model, P/N) C.1.10.5. Name of Part (or Lowest Assembly ) Affected C.1.10.6. Baselines Affected C.1.10.7. Title of Change C.1.10.8. Description of Change C.1.10.9. Need for Change C.1.10.10. Effect on Interfaces (i.e. Integrated Logistics Support (ILS), Interchangeability and Interoperability) C.1.10.11. Total Costs/Savings C.1.10.12. Retrofit Information (if applicable) C.1.10.13. Technical data describing the change to include any changes or additions to the drawings and EDFP.

C.1.10.14. Applicable testing performed and evaluation of the test results.

C.1.10.15. Applicable updates to TM and training

C.1.11. Warranty Performance: The Contractor shall provide a warranty covering workmanship, materials, design, and compliance with the Physical Configuration Baseline and this SOW.

C.1.12. Contractor Test Authorization: The contractor is authorized to receive DoD test rates at a Major Range Test Facility Base (MRTFB).

C.1.13. Pre-Planned Product Improvement (P3I): The Government anticipates that technological advancements will be made during the contract performance period. Therefore, the Contractor shall incorporate these improvements when directed by the Contracting Officer as technology matures. Improvements may include, but are not limited to, burner improvements, ventilation, manufacturing, weight reduction, material improvements to extend useful life of system, application of alternative fuel or alternative power technologies, refrigeration technologies or refrigerants, appliance heat exchanger technologies or materials and use of waste heat for various kitchen functions.

C.2. DEVELOPMENTAL PHASE TASKS

C.2.1. Reliability: The Battlefield Kitchen (BK) shall demonstrate a minimum reliability of at least 430 hours Mean Time Between Hardware Essential Function Failure (MTBHEFF) and a Mean Time Between Hardware System Abort (MTBHSA) of at least 730 hours. The contractor shall furnish information (e.g. test data, modeling and simulation data, accelerated life test data, reliability enhancement test data, RAM model based predictions etc.) to demonstrate the BK will meet or exceed the reliability requirement prior to commencement of Government testing.

For the purposes of demonstration of these requirements, testing will be conducted (as applicable) consistent with Attachment A-1 Operational Mode Summary and Mission Profile (OMSMP). Also, demonstration of these requirements in testing shall include all components of the system with the exception of the Government furnished generator. A hardware essential function failure is defined as any contractor furnished (or modified) equipment failure that results in the loss of a mission essential function as defined in Attachment A-2 Failure Definition and Scoring Criteria (FDSC). Examples of essential function failures (EFF) include, but are not limited to, events which causes the inability of the BK to perform a cooking method, or provide ventilation, lighting, power generation or mobility functions. A hardware system abort is any hardware EFF or combination of hardware EFFs that prevent the BK from producing a scheduled hot meal. Detailed descriptions and explanations of failure categorization are found in the attached FDSC.

C.2.1.1. The Contractor shall develop, implement, and maintain a comprehensive Reliability, Availability and Maintainability (RAM) Management Program. The RAM management program shall establish a process to achieve the RAM requirements in the BK Purchase Description. The Contractor shall develop a RAM model using appropriate design tools and processes such as: Reliability Block Diagram, Fault Tree Analysis (FTA), Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA), Design Verification Plan & Report (DVP&Rs), Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) concepts, and Accelerated Life Cycle Testing (ALT). Throughout the period of contract performance, the Contractor shall update the RAM model whenever new failure modes are identified or when RAM predictions are impacted by design or manufacturing changes. The RAM model shall reflect the lowest identifiable elements and how elements relate to each other. The RAM model shall be used to identify critical items in the system design and identify additional design or testing activities required to achieve the RAM requirements. The RAM model shall be presented at design reviews with supporting reliability data (test data, modeling and simulation data, accelerated life test data, reliability enhancement test data etc.) to demonstrate that the BK will meet or exceed the reliability requirement prior to commencement of Government testing. The Contractor shall ensure products obtained from vendors meet RAM requirements. The Contractor shall monitor system design to identify, assess, and implement failure analysis and corrective actions and to ensure compliance with RAM requirements.

C.2.2. Safety Assessment Report (SAR) & Health Hazard Analysis Report (HHAR) (CLIN 0001):

C.2.2.1. Safety Assessment Report (SAR): The contractor shall conduct a Safety Assessment of the Battlefield Kitchen in accordance with CDRL B001. The SAR is a comprehensive evaluation of the safety risks to the operator, user, and maintainer and equipment prior to test or operation of the system. The Safety Assessment shall identify, analyze and document all safety features of the system design and potential hazards that may be present and specific procedural controls that should be followed to prevent or minimize hazard exposure.

C.2.2.2. Health Hazard Analysis Report (HHAR): A Health Hazard Assessment Report (HHAR) shall be delivered as an appendix or attachment to the SAR IAW CDRL B001. The HHAR shal demonstrate that the prototype is safe to use, maintain and test/evaluate.

C.2.3. Hazardous Material Management Plan (HMMP) (CLIN 0002): The Contractor shall prepare and deliver a HMMP in accordance with CDRL B002.

C.2.4. Design Modular Burner (CLIN 0003): The Contractor shall design the modular burner to meet the requirements of the Attachment B-2, Performance Purchase Description for Modular Burner, PPD FSE-001.

C.2.5. Fabrication of Modular Burners (CLIN 0004): The contractor shall not proceed with this task without approval of the contracting officer. Approval shall be based on the acceptance of the design presented in the Critical Design Review (C.4.2.2). The contractor shall fabricate Modular Burners in accordance with the approved design in quantities sufficient to meet the delivery requirements of the developmental Battlefield Kitchen Systems, C.2.13 CLIN 0012 only. The Modular Burners required for C.2.13.1, CLIN 0013 shall be fabricated and priced as part of

CLIN 0013.

C.2.6. Contractor Developmental Test Plan and Test Performance for Modular Burner (CLIN 0005): The Contractor shall develop and provide a Contractors Developmental Test Plan for the modular burner in accordance with CDRL B003 and Attachment B-2, PPD FSE-001 Modular Burner. The Contractor shall be responsible for coordinating, scheduling, and performing Contractor Developmental Testing utilizing the appropriate facilities, equipment, and procedures.

C.2.7. Contractor Developmental Test Report for Modular Burner (CLIN 0006): The Contractor shall prepare and submit a Contractors Developmental Test Report for the Modular Burner in accordance with CDRL B004.

C.2.8. Design Modular Appliance Suite (CLIN 0007): The Contractor shall design the components of the modular appliance suite to meet the requirements of Attachment B-1 Performance Purchase Description, FSE-002. Only those components required for the BK shall be addressed.

C.2.9. Fabricate Modular Appliance suite (CLIN 0008): The contractor shall not proceed with this task without approval of the contracting officer. Approval shall be based on the acceptance of the design presented in the Critical Design Review (C.4.2.2). The contractor shall fabricate modular appliances suites in accordance with the approved design in quantities sufficient to meet the requirements of Delivery of the developmental Battlefield Kitchen Systems, C.2.13, CLIN 0012 only. The Modular Appliance Suite required for C.2.13.1, CLIN 0013, shall be fabricated and priced as part of CLIN 0013.

C.2.10. Contractor Developmental Test Plan and Test Performance for Modular Appliance Suite (CLIN 0009): The Contractor shall develop and provide a Contractors Developmental Test Plan for the Modular Appliances in accordance with CDRL B003 and Attachment B-1, PPD FSE-002 Modular Appliances. The Contractor shall be responsible for coordinating, scheduling, and performing Contractor Developmental Testing utilizing the appropriate facilities, equipment, and procedures.

C.2.11. Contractor Developmental Test Report for Modular Appliance Suite (CLIN 0010): The Contractor shall prepare and submit a Contractors Developmental Test Report for the Modular Appliances in accordance with

CDRL B004.

C.2.12. Design Battlefield Kitchen Platform (CLIN 0011): The Contractor shall design the Battlefield Kitchen developmental platform to meet the requirements of the Attachment B-3, PPD FSE-003 BK System.

C.2.13. Fabricate and Deliver Battlefield Kitchen Systems (CLIN 0012 and 0013): The Contractor shall fabricate and deliver complete Developmental Battlefield Kitchen Systems to the Government (CLIN 0012). The Contractor shall fabricate and deliver additional Complete Developmental BK Systems (CLIN 0013) to the Government in accordance with quantities specified in the delivery order. The Developmental Prototype BK System shall contain all COEI and BII required to provide the BK System with complete functionality. The BK System as delivered shall be fully functional and meet all requirements of the contract. All Contractor testing shall be successfully completed in accordance with the approved Contractor Test Plan. These Systems will be subjected to Government Testing. Each BK System shall integrate the Modular Burners and Modular Appliances designed and fabricated under C.2.5 and C.2.9.

C.2.13.1. Fabricate and Deliver Battlefield Kitchen Systems (CLIN 0013) The Contractor shall fabricate and deliver additional Complete Developmental BK Systems (CLIN 0013) in the quantity specified in the delivery order. It is anticipated that this order (if executed) will result in a maximum of 2 additional prototypes. These additional prototypes shall be replications of the prototypes delivered under CLIN 0012. Any changes, to include improvements, shall only be made with the prior approval of the Government. The Modular Burners and Appliances necessary to meet this requirement shall be separate from CLIN 0004 and CLIN 0008 and shall be included in the price of CLIN 0013.

C.2.13.2. Generator: The Generator for the developmental prototype shall be the 3kW TQG or the 3 kW STEP Generator if available and will be provided to the Contractor as GFE.

C.2.13.3. Trailer: The trailer used for the developmental prototype shall be the M1061A1 Trailer, NSN 2330-01- 207-3533. A sample of this trailer will be provided as GFE. This sample can be used for design purposes only (to include modification if necessary); however, new trailers shall be utilized by the Contractor for the Developmental Prototypes. The Contractor shall be responsible for the purchase of all trailers used for fabrication of prototypes and production units. Previous manufacturers of this trailer have been:

D&S Manufacturing : 301 E Main St Black River Falls, WI 54616, (715) 284-5376 Schutt Industries: 185 Industrial Ave, Clintonville, WI 54929, (715) 823-8025 Utility Tool and Body: P.O. Box 360 Clintonville, WI 54929, (715)-823-3167

C.2.14. Contractor Developmental Test Plan and Test Performance for Battlefield Kitchen System (CLIN 0014): The Contractor shall develop and provide a Contractors Developmental Test Plan for the Battlefield Kitchen System in accordance with CDRL B003 and Attachment B-3, PPD FSE-003. The Contractor shall be responsible for coordinating, scheduling, and performing Contractor Developmental Testing utilizing the appropriate facilities, equipment, and procedures.

C.2.15. Contractor Developmental Test Report for Battlefield Kitchen System (CLIN 0015): The Contractor shall prepare and submit a Contractors Developmental Test Report for the Battlefield Kitchen System in accordance with CDRL B004.

C.2.16. System Support Package Hardware (CLIN 0016): The Contractor shall deliver a complete set of the hardware items contained on the System Support Package List (CDRL B005). Hardware components from the kit shall be used during the Production Prove-out Test, Logistics Demonstration, Limited User Test, and IOT as required replacements for failed components. The kit shall be refurbished after each test to replace used components.

Changes to component design will also warrant a replacement of that component in the system support package.

Adjustments to the System Support Package List shall also warrant the equivalent adjustment to the System Support Package. Upon completion of the developmental phase of this contract, the Contractor shall replace any shortages in the System Support Package and the Government shall retain the System Support Package Hardware.

C.2.17. Contractor Test Support for Government Developmental Testing (CLIN 0017): The Contractor shall provide support during Government tests, specifically, the Production Prove-out Test (PPT), Limited User Test (LUT), and Logistics Demo (LD).

C.2.17.1. PPT Support: PPT Support shall include initial preparation of equipment for test, providing training to test personnel, on call support for maintenance and repairs, as well as addressing other technical issues as needed for the duration of government testing.

C.2.17.2. LUT Support: The Contractor shall provide LUT support on a daily basis for up to 10 days to include but not limited to training operators and maintainers, tools, and the appropriate engineering, technical, and logistics support personnel. During the conduct of the LUT, the Contractor shall provide all required on-site technical, engineering, and logistics support, to include on-site mark up of any BK CDRL deliverable as changes occur. The Contractor shall repair any BK failures or system technical problems that occur during the conduct of the event.

C.2.17.3. Log Demo (LD) Support: The Contractor shall provide Log Demo support on a daily basis for up to 10 days to include but not limited to training operators and maintainers, tools, and the appropriate engineering, technical, and logistics support personnel. During the conduct of the Log Demo, the Contractor shall provide all required on-site technical, engineering, and logistics support, to include on-site mark up of any BK CDRL deliverable as changes occur. The Contractor shall repair any BK failures or system technical problems that occur during the conduct of the event.

C.2.18. Post Test Actions: Post Test Actions: During the development phase, the Contractor shall correct any and all design deficiencies identified during Government testing of BK systems and refurbish hardware if required for retest or subsequently scheduled test. Developmental testing will include Production Prove-out Test, Limited User Test, and Logistics Demonstration. For Government administered testing, the Contractor shall be responsible for shipping the item(s) to the test site. After testing, the Government shall be responsible for shipping the items to the Contractors facility if refurbishment of hardware is required. If refurbishment is not required and Government testing is complete, the Government shall take possession of the BK prototypes. If mutually agreed upon, One BK prototype may be returned to the Contractors facility at Government expense after completion of all developmental testing and remain at the Contractors facility until the completion of C.3.2. Fabrication of First Article Test units (CLIN 1002). After completion of C.3.2, the Contractor shall be responsible for shipping all developmental prototype items to the Government.

C.2.18.1. Non Design Related Repairs (CLIN 0018): Damage to the BK prototypes that may affect the BKs performance but not considered a design deficiency or incurred through no fault of the Contractor (e.g. accidents or misuse) may require repair by the Contractor prior to delivery to the Government for subsequent testing. These repairs will be optional and priced at the time of requirement.

C.2.19. LRIP Approval: The Contractor shall not proceed to production without written approval from the Government. Upon successful completion of developmental tasks and acceptable resolution of all outstanding design issues, and a successful Production Readiness Review the Government will approve the Contractor to proceed with LRIP. This will mark the end of the Developmental phase of the BK and the beginning of Production.

At this point the Physical Configuration Baseline will be frozen and any subsequent changes shall require an ECP submitted to and approved by the Government (C.1.10.).

C.3. PRODUCTION PHASE

C.3.1. First Article Test Plan (CLIN 1001): The Contractor shall develop and provide a First Article Test Plan in accordance with CDRL B008. The First Article Test Plan shall outline the testing required to demonstrate that the production units meet the stated performance requirements. The Contractor shall be responsible for coordinating and scheduling all First Article Testing utilizing the appropriate facilities, equipment, and procedures. The First Article Test Plan shall include a comprehensive First Article Test schedule that outlines the location, dates, duration, and identifies all testing resources required.

C.3.2. First Article Test Units (CLIN 1002): The Contractor shall fabricate First Article Test Units in accordance with the finalized frozen configuration. These units shall be evaluated in the First Article Test in accordance with the First Article Test Plan developed under C.2.19. (CLIN 1001). The First Article units shall be completely representative of production units including, but not limited to, design, manufacturing processes, sources of supply, and quality assurance processes. Production of First Article units shall include all the non-recurring tasks associated with design and initiation of production. Non-recurring tasks to initiate BK production shall include developing manufacturing processes and instructions; developing quality assurance processes and documents; establishing viable suppliers; set up of equipment, tools, and fixtures; qualification of welders; personnel training; and all other tasks required to establish a production line that delivers compliant systems. Prior to delivery of the First Article Units to the Government, the Contractor shall be required, at no extra cost to the Government, to replace or repair to original condition any units or subcomponents that sustained any damage or were otherwise noncompliant during First Article Test. Normal wear and tear resulting from the testing shall be acceptable, however, damage resulting from material deficiencies or inadequate design must be corrected on the First Article Test unit by the Contractor at his/her own expense. Changes to the FAT units resulting from material deficiencies or inadequate design shall be incorporated into the design through the ECP process to include updating the FAT units. The First Article units will be accepted by the Government after First Article Test and IOT (See Section 3.2.2 results) demonstrate that the First Article Test systems comply with the requirements and after the Government has accepted the First Article Test Report.

C.3.3. First Article Test: The Contractor shall be responsible for all actions necessary to complete the First Article Test including transportation of equipment and test items to and from test sites. The Contractor shall administer and perform a First Article Test in accordance with the Attachments B-1, B-2, B-3, and the Government approved test plan (CLIN 1001). First Article Test is designed to verify the conformance of BK Production Units to this Statement of Work and the requirements and verifications of the PPDs contained in Attachment B. The Contractor shall conduct all of the verifications specified in Section 4 of the PPDs for the BK System, Appliances, and Burner.

The Contractor shall provide all technical support to the First Article Test, to include repairing any damage or problems that occur during testing and having personnel and parts available to service systems as required. Failed components shall be replaced by the Contractor at no additional charge to the Government. The Contractor shall perform all maintenance and repairs during testing at no additional cost to the Government. Maintenance shall be conducted in accordance with the procedures outlined in the Contractor supplied technical publications and technical manuals. During First Article Test, the Contractor’s personnel shall perform all unit and direct support level maintenance as required.

C.3.3.1. The Contractor may utilize all FAT units as needed to complete all verifications within the required schedule. The Contractor shall be responsible for coordinating and scheduling all First Article Testing and for the utilization of the appropriate facilities, equipment, personnel, and procedures. The Contractor may use Government test facilities, on a non-interference basis, for performance of some or all of the required First Article Test. If utilized, the Contractor shall provide reimbursement directly to the Government testing activity (e.g., Aberdeen Test Center) for all direct and indirect costs incurred related to the test conduct. Throughout First Article Test conduct, the Government requires immediate and electronic access (e.g., VISION Digital Library at Aberdeen Test Center or other means) to test related information, including the test plans, test schedule, test results, and each Test Incident Report (TIR). The Government has the right to attend any portion or all of the First Article Test. The Contractor, at no additional cost to the Government, shall correct all issues to include non-conformances to requirements or specifications that are identified as a result of the conduct of the First Article Test. If adequately demonstrated in prior testing, the Government reserves the right to waive portions of the First Article Test. Any testing waived by the Government shall result in a direct reduction in the First Article Test cost. The Contractor shall report on the First Article Test results, analyze any failures, repair any damage, provide corrective action for failures, submit ECPs as part of the configuration control as required, and retain one First Article unit as manufacturing samples during execution of BK production. The Contractor shall restore the First Article unit to original condition plus correct nonconformances identified in testing, and deliver these units last on the contract, unless otherwise directed by the Government. Prior to final delivery of the FAT units, the contractor shall incorporate any and all approved Engineering Changes to the units. The remainder of the First Article Units shall be delivered to the Government to participate in the IOT (See C.3.2.1).

C.3.3.2. Initial Operational Test. The Initial Operational Test (IOT) is a Government administered test performed after completion of the Contractor administered FAT. The IOT for the BK shall be performed using the FAT units that have been delivered to the Government under C.3.2 (CLIN 1002). After completion of the First Article Test and refurbishment of the FAT unit in accordance with C.3.2, two of the FAT units shall be shipped to the Government for the performance of the Government administered Initial Operational Test (IOT).

C.3.4. First Article Test Report (CLIN 1003): The Contractor is required to develop and submit a comprehensive First Article Test Report for all of the tests that were conducted during the First Article Test in accordance with

CDRL B009.

C.3.5. Contractor Test Support for Initial Operational Testing (IOT) (CLIN 1004): The Contractor is responsible to provide IOT support on a daily basis for up to 10 days to include but not limited to training operators and maintainers, tools, and the appropriate engineering, technical, and logistics support personnel. During the conduct of the IOT, the Contractor shall provide all required on-site technical, engineering, and logistics support.

The Contractor shall be responsible for repair of any BK failures or system technical problems that occur during the conduct of the event.

C.3.6. BK Production Units (CLINs 1005, 2001, 3001, 4001, and 5001): The Contractor shall fabricate BK production units conforming to all the requirements of this contract and to the latest configuration of the BK and the BK subsystems. Contractor developed technical manuals are a required component of the BK and no delivery of BK production shall be accepted without the required, acceptable technical manuals.

C.3.7. BK Authorized Stockage List Kits (CLINs 1006, 2002, 3002, 4002, and 5002): The Contractor shall provide a complete BK ASL kit with each BK fielded. The ASL kit will be comprised of the items on the Authorized Stockage List (ASL). The ASL will consist of select items from the Provisioning Parts List. The purpose of the ASL kit will be to supplement the BK System with spare parts most likely to require replacement during the first year of deployment. The ASL will be determined within 30 days after the completion of the Production Prove-out Test. The ASL will be generated by the Government with Contractor Input.

C.3.8. Shipping (CLINs 0087, 1007, 2003, 3003, 4003, and 5003): The contractor shall ship BK components as required for the developmental and production phases of this effort. Shipping shall include: Shipping of complete systems and support system and components to test sites, shipping complete systems and ASL to fielding sites, and other shipping as required. CLIN 0087 shall be used to cover all shipping charges during the developmental phase.

CLINS 1007, 2003, 3003, 4003, and 5003 shall be used to cover shipping charges during option years 1 through 5 respectively.

C.3.9. Contractor Support of Fielding (CLINs 1008, 2004, 3004, 4004, and 5004): The contactor shall provide support to correct issues due to manufacturing or shortages with the Battlefield Kitchens or ASL at the time of fielding. Support will be in the form of providing replacement components, and at the Governments discretion, installing those components, for items found defective or missing during government deprocessing.

C.3.10. Long Term Storage of BK Systems (CLINs 1009, 2005, 3005, 4005, and 5005): These CLINs will be ordered if storage duration of BK goes beyond the 90 calendar days furnished under CLINs 1005, 2001, 3001, 4001 or 5001. The Contractor shall provide storage capacity for up to 200 Government accepted BK at an indoor and secure storage location. Long Term Storage shall include storage plus all other activities associated with storage including, but not limited to, materiel handling, recordkeeping, security, cleaning, and refurbishing. The contractor shall be fully liable for any damage to, degradation of, or loss of BK during storage and storage activities. BK are required to be stored in an inside location, with the unauthorized access to systems prohibited. BK shall enter and exit Contractor storage on a First In - First Out basis, with a minimal amount of material handling activities occurring during the storage period. The Government will notify the Contractor that BK are required at a fielding location, which shall initiate the process of removing the required number of systems from storage. All BKs shall be inspected and cleaned and refurbished as needed to obtain like-new condition prior to being shipped to the Government. The Contractor shall maintain a system log by serial number that includes, but is not limited to, date accepted by Government, date of entry into storage, date of removal from storage, fielding destination, and details of all activities completed on the system during the Contractor storage period. Any nonconformance of a production unit removed from long term storage shall be corrected by the contractor at no additional cost to the Government utilizing Contractor personnel and Contractor supplies equipment and materials. The unit of measure for long-term storage is “Each” where “Each” is defined as the total price to store one BK for one month. If ordered, payment for long-term storage will be based on the total inventory in storage at the end of each month. *FOR EXAMPLE ONLY*, if the CLIN price is $100 and the contractor maintains twenty-five (25) systems in long-term storage on the last day of the month, the total price for the CLIN (for that month) would be $2,500. If, in the next month, ten systems are shipped, while five more are added to long-term storage, the end-of-month inventory would be twenty

(20) systems, and the contractor would be entitled to an additional $2,000 under the long-term storage CLIN.

C.3.11. Per Unit Production Cost Breakdown Report (CLINs 1010, 2006, 3006, 4006, and 5006): At the end of each production year the Contractor shall submit documentation detailing the actual production costs of the BK in accordance with CDRL C002.

C.3.12. Modular Appliances and Accessories (CLINs 1011, 2007, 3007, 4007, and 5007): The contractor shall fabricate and deliver modular appliances and accessories as per delivery order in accordance with CLIN 1011, 2007, 3007, 4007, and 5007.

Modular Burner Modular Oven with Burner Modular Griddle with Burner Modular Cook top with Burner Modular Steamer with Burner Modular Tilt Skillet with Burner Modular Refrigerator Modular Hand Wash Sink Components for dismounted operation

C.3.13. Initial Spares per Proposed Spare Parts List (CLIN 1012): The Contractor shall deliver to the Government a kit of initial spares for all items on the Proposed Spare Parts List (See C.6.1). The quantity of each required spare part shall be sufficient to maintain 100 BKs for two years.

C.4. MEETINGS and REVIEWS:

C.4.1. Post Award Conference: The Contractor shall coordinate, schedule, and conduct a Post Award Conference with the Government within 21 calendar days of Contract award. The purpose of the Conference shall be discussion of project orientation, transfer of background information, to provide a mutual understanding of the technical requirements/contractual requirements and the Quality Assurance provisions of the Contract. The Government can address any questions or issues with regards to technical matters. The Contractor shall describe to the Government the management of all aspects of the program. The Contractor shall ensure that all personnel and subcontractors that are required for an adequate discussion of the contract effort are in attendance. Scheduling of the Post Award Conference shall not change the delivery schedule of the contract. The Contractor shall be prepared to:

C.4.1.1. Conduct a review of the system requirements to ensure that they have been completely and properly identified and that there is a mutual understanding of the system requirements between the Government and the Contractor.

C.4.1.2. Make available to Government representatives the documentation for production planning, manufacturing methods and controls, material and manpower resource allocation, production engineering, quality control and assurance program, production management organization, and management of major subcontractors.

C.4.1.3. Review the overall plan, tasks, and schedule required to execute the BK program within the schedule constraints set forth by the Contract/Government.

C.4.1.4. Document the Post Award Conference meeting minutes and distribute the minutes via e-mail to all Post Award Conference attendees no later than 1 week from the end of the Post Award Conference.

C.4.1.5. Conduct a tour of all facilities associated with the BK effort.

C.4.2. Design Review Meetings and Information Packages (CLIN 0019): The contractor shall conduct a minimum of two design reviews (Preliminary and Critical) on each component of the BK System (appliances, burner, and BK platform) with the Government. Additional reviews shall be scheduled as needed. The design review schedule shall be proposed by the contractor and mutually agreed upon by Government. The contractor shall propose design review dates that support its Program Master Schedule (See C.1.6.) for meeting delivery dates of the contract. A minimum of 14 calendar days after each review shall be given to the Government for providing comments and concerns regarding the design. Government concerns and comments shall be resolved as part of the Contractor’s Design Review Information Packages (CLIN 0019) and shall be submitted to the Government in accordance with CDRL B006.

C.4.2.1. Preliminary Design Review (PDR): The purpose of the Preliminary Design Review is to ensure that the design and basic system architecture are sufficiently complete to demonstrate a technical confidence that the performance requirements will be satisfied within cost and schedule goals. At the time of the Preliminary Design Review, the contractor shall have identified at least the system functions and major component functions needed to meet the requirements of the PPDs and have applied performance requirements to each function. The contractor shall also present details of its findings thus far on the effectiveness of component and subcomponent hardware and software items in meeting the functional and performance requirements. The presentation format and content will be of the Contractors choosing, but must be sufficient to support the purpose of the PDR. The intent is for separate PDRs for the Burner, Appliances, and BK platform; however, the Contractor or Government may recommend combining the PDRs. A combination PDR will be a mutual decision.

C.4.2.2. Critical Design Review (CDR): The purpose of the Critical Design Review is to confirm that the system design is stable and is expected to meet system performance requirements, confirms the system is on track to achieve cost goals as evidenced by the detailed design documentation, and establishes the system’s initial product baseline. A successful Critical Design Review will provide the Contractor authority to proceed with developmental component and/or system fabrication. The presentation format and content will be of the Contractors choosing, but must be sufficient to support the purpose of the CDR. The intent is for separate CDRs for the Burner, Appliances, and BK platform; however, the Contractor or Government may recommend combining the CDRs. A combination CDR will be a mutual decision.

C.4.3. Production Readiness Reviews (PRR): Two production readiness reviews shall be conducted. The first shall be conducted 30 days prior to initiation of fabrication of the First Article Test Units. The purpose of this review will be to verify that all lessons learned to date have been incorporated into the design of the BK and that the

Contractor is ready to begin fabrication of the First Article Units. The second Production Readiness Review shall be conducted after all changes made to correct deficiencies uncovered during FAT and IOT have been incorporated and after Government acceptance of FAT Report. The Contractor shall coordinate the scheduling of the PRR with the Government. The Contractor shall provide a minimum of 21 days advance notice for scheduling. The purpose of this review shall be to verify that the lessons learned from First Article Test have been incorporated into the design and technical data, update quality assurance processes, and to demonstrate the Contractor’s readiness to produce the BK. The review will focus on First Article Test results, resolution of any required changes, readiness of the logistics deliverables, Quality Assurance processes, and any additional equipment procurement that is required. The exact date, location, and administrative arrangements for this meeting shall be made through communication between the Contractor and the Government. The presentation format and content will be of the Contractors choosing, but must be sufficient to support the purpose of the PRR.

C.4.4. In-Process Reviews: In-Process Reviews (IPR) shall be conducted as a part of program status monitoring and control. Technical Publication, Provisioning, Training, technical/engineering, quality assurance, and other necessary IPRs shall be conducted to clarify requirements, assure conformance to contract requirements, provide guidance, review deliverable status, and to help ensure deliverables are prepared in a manner that will satisfy contractual requirements. The Contractor may request an IPR when Government assistance or clarification is desired.

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .