ASAP_SOW_30Nov2016.pdf

Page 1 of 50 ENCL 1 Advanced Subscale Aerial Platform SOW 30 November 2016

Statement of Work

For the Acquisition of

Advanced Subscale Aerial Platform and Services

Prepared By

Targets Management Office

Project Manager for Instrumentation, Targets and Threat Simulators

Program Executive Office for Simulation, Training and Instrumentation

Redstone Arsenal, AL, 35898, USA

Page 2 of 50 ENCL 1

Approval Page

This document provides the Statement of Work for an Advanced Subscale Aerial Platform (ASAP) System.

CONCURRENCE BY:

12/1/2016

X Jim Schwierling Jim Schwierling Aerial Targets Lead Project Director Signed by: SCHWIERLING.JAMES.E.1230232756

12/1/2016

X Brian P Nalley for Tony Still Chief, Engineering Division, Targets Management...

Signed by: NALLEY.BRIAN.P.1229834700

12/1/2016

X Steve Moore Steve Moore

Chief, Aerial Target Operations Branch

Signed by: MOORE.STEPHEN.H.1230750587 12/2/2016

X BE Truog Bruce Truog Deputy Director, Targets Management Office Signed by: TRUOG.BRUCE.E.1139511944

12/1/2016

X Alvin V. Brown Alvin V. Brown Director, Targets Management Officeh Signed by: BROWN.ALVIN.VAN.1114473673

Page 3 of 50 ENCL 1

Contents

1 SCOPE

1.1 Project Objectives

1.2 Background

2 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

2.1 Government Documents

2.2 Reference Documents

3 REQUIREMENTS

3.1 Aerial Target – Development and Test

3.1.1 Qualification Tests

3.1.2 Flight Services

3.1.3 Mission Profiles

3.1.4 Flight Qualification Test Planning

3.1.5 Flight Qualification Test Procedure

3.1.6 Flight Qualification Test Report

3.1.7 Payload Equipment

3.2 Methods of Verification

3.3 Re-testing

3.4 Repair and Refurbishment Testing

3.5 Environmental

3.6 System Safety Program

3.6.1 System Safety Program Plan (SSPP)

3.6.2 Hazardous Materials Management Program

3.6.3 Hazard Tracking and Risk Resolution

3.6.4 Safety Risk Management

3.6.5 Safety Risk Acceptance

3.6.6 Residual Hazards

3.6.7 CorrectionsTo Noncompliance Of Safety Provisions

3.6.8 Safety Assessment Report

3.6.9 System Safety Hazard Analysis (SSHA)

3.6.10 Health Hazard Assessment Report

3.6.11 Safety During Mission Support

3.6.12 Accident Prevention Program

Page 4 of 50 ENCL 1

3.6.13 Shipping Explosive Material

3.7 Flight Termination System

3.8 Ground Control Station

3.9 Obsolescence

3.10 Kick-off Meeting

3.11 Warranty

3.12 Technical Data

3.13 Quality/Product Assurance Management

3.13.1 Quality System Plan (QSP)

3.13.2 Parts, Materials, and Processes (PMP) Control Program

3.13.3 Electronics Fabrication Procedures

3.14 Configuration Management (CM)

3.14.1 Technical Baseline

3.14.2 Configuration Management Program

3.14.3 Configuration Administration

3.14.4 Configuration Identification

3.14.5 Functional Baseline

3.14.6 Allocated Baseline

3.14.7 Product Baseline

3.14.8 Interface Control Document

3.14.9 Design/Configuration Modification

3.14.10 Configuration Control

3.14.11 Configuration Status Accounting (CSA)

3.14.12 Configuration Audits

3.15 Meetings and Reviews

3.16 Aerial Target (Option)

3.17 Flight Qualification / Production Acceptance Test (Option)

3.17.1 Target Acceptance/Rejection Criteria

3.17.2 Definition of a Successful Flight

3.17.3 Payload Equipment

3.18 Mission Profiles (Option)

3.19 Flight Qualification Test Planning (Option)

3.20 Flight Qualification Test Procedure (Option)

Page 5 of 50 ENCL 1

3.21 Flight Qualification Test Report (Option)

3.22 Production Acceptance Test Planning (Option)

3.23 Production Acceptance Test Procedures (Option)

3.24 Production Acceptance Test Reports (Option)

3.25 Aerial Target Repair/Maintenance Plan (Option)

3.26 RCC-319 Qualification (Option)

3.27 Technical Support (Option)

3.28 Flight Services (Option)

3.28.1 Definition of a Successful Flight

3.28.2 Payload Equipment

3.28.3 Travel Reimbursement for Personnel

3.28.4 Physical Inventory

3.29 Updated Target Technical Manuals (Option)

3.30 Training (Option)

3.30.1 Training Materials/Documentation

3.30.2 Personnel

3.31 Ground Support Equipment (Option)

3.32 Special Test Equipment (Option)

3.33 Spares (Option)

3.34 Launcher (Option)

3.35 Augmentation/Accessory (Option)

3.36 Full Operational Package-1 (Option)

3.37 Full Operational Package-2 (Option)

3.38 N/A

3.39 Six Degrees of Freedom (6DOF) Simulation (Option)

3.40 Item Unique Identification (IUID) Application (Option)

3.41 Repair (Option)

3.42 Deleted

3.43 Engineering Services (Option)

3.43.1 General

3.43.2 Target/Support Equipment Modifications

3.43.3 Resources

3.43.4 Meetings

Page 6 of 50 ENCL 1

3.43.5 Customer Base

3.43.6 Safety

3.43.7 Commercial Off-The-Shelf

3.43.8 Ground Control Station

3.43.9 Engineering Services Memoranda

4 Period Of Performance

5 Government Ranges, Facilities and equipment Consideration

6 SECURITY

6.1 Employee Clearances

6.2 Government Installation Security

6.3 Government Installation Access

6.4 Payload Classification

6.5 SECURITY MANAGEMENT

6.5.1 Classified Information

6.5.2 For Official Use Only (FOUO) Information

6.5.3 Release of Information Requests

6.5.4 Release of Information To General Public

6.5.5 Antiterrorism (AT) Level I Awareness Training

6.5.6 Access and General Protection/Security Policy and Procedures

6.5.7 AT Awareness Training for Contractor Personnel Traveling Overseas

6.5.8 IWATCH Training

6.5.9 DOD Information Assurance Awareness Training

6.5.10 Operational Security (OPSEC)

6.5.11 OPSEC Training

6.5.12 Information Assurance (IA)/Information Technology (IT) training

6.5.13 Performance or Delivery in a Foreign Country

6.5.14 Handling or Access To Classified Information

7 CONTRACT MANPOWER REPORTING (CMR):

7.1 Reporting Period

7.2 Reporting Data

APPENDIX A: TARGET QUESTIONNAIRE

APPENDIX B: ACRONYMS

Page 7 of 50 ENCL 1

Statement of Work

For The Advanced Subscale Aerial Platform Systems and Services

1 SCOPE

This statement of work (SOW) delineates requirements for the acquisition of the Advanced Subscale Aerial Platform (ASAP) system(s), an unmanned target aircraft with associated ground support equipment. This SOW also provides requirements for qualification testing and preparation of documentation required to gain authorization to operate the targets on Government ranges. In addition, the SOW includes options to procure additional targets, launch equipment, ground support equipment, spare parts, test equipment, special tools and other documentation and technical support required to operate and maintain the target system. The Government reserves the right to make multiple awards under this statement of work if deemed beneficial to the Government;

however, a second award may be delayed up to 12 months from initial award until additional funding is available.

1.1 Project Objectives

The United States Army Program Executive Office for Simulation, Training and Instrumentation (PEO STRI), PM Instrumentation, Targets and Threat Simulators (PM ITTS), Targets Management Office (TMO) has a requirement to provide an affordable aerial target to the Army, other Services, and Foreign Military Sales users, to support Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E) and training missions at Department of Defense (DoD) ranges and other military installations worldwide. This ASAP acquisition will provide additional unmanned aerial target system(s) in the TMO fleet for use in sensor presentations or live fire tracking and engagement for weapon systems testing.

NOTICE: The Government reserves the right to make up to two awards under this statement of work if deemed beneficial to the Government.

NOTICE: The Government reserves the right to stop / discontinue with no guarantee of additional work after CLIN 0001 or CLIN 0002.

1.2 Background

The TMO provides realistic, inexpensive targets to Army, other services, and Allied Nations to support a variety of missions which require both simulated and live-fire engagements. One of the main targets used for these exercises has been the MQM-107 “STREAKER” fixed-wing subscale aerial target. With the depletion of the MQM-107 assets, and due to obsolescence issues with maintaining these targets, the TMO desires to find a replacement target that takes advantage of modern technology while providing improved capabilities and reduced Life Cycle costs.

Page 8 of 50 ENCL 1

30 November 2016

2 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

Applicable top level documents are contained in the Contract Document Summary List (DSL) by number, title, and date. The document versions specified on the DSL take precedence over the generic references (without revision letters) cited in the SOW. In the event of a conflict between the text of this document and the references cited herein, the text of this document takes precedence. Nothing in this document supersedes applicable standards and regulations unless a specific exemption is obtained.

2.1 Government Documents

Performance Specification For The Army’s Advanced Subscale Aerial Platform (ASAP), 28 November 2016.

2.2 Reference Documents

The following documents will be provided by the Government upon request for use as references for this contract. The Government does not guarantee the validity of the information contained in the documents and is not directing the contractor to design to these documents. The Contractor shall assume the responsibility for verifying any information that may be used during the execution of this SOW.

• Technical Data Package for the MQM-107E Target Drone

• DTM MQM107E-10 Flight Controller Manual MQM-107D And MQM-107E

Targets (March 8, 2010)

• DTM 9-1425-423-14-1 Maintenance Manual MQM-107D and MQM-107E

Targets (March 18, 2010)

• DTM 9-1425-423-24P-3 Ground Handling and Support Equipment Repair

Parts and Special Tools List for Model MQM-107D/MQM-107E Variable Speed Training Target (March 2010)

• DTM 9-1425-423-24P-1 Repair Parts and Special Tools List for Model MQM-107D/E Variable Speed Training Target (NSN1550-01-283-9327 and 1410-01-382-4174) Including Ancillary Equipment (NSN 1560-01-336- 9617 and NSN 1401-01-438-0438) (March 2010)

• DTM 9-1425-423-14-3 Test, Ground Handling, and Support Equipment Operations and Maintenance Maual for MQM-107D and MQM-107E guided Missile Targets and Turbojet Engines (J402-CA-702 and TRI 60-5) (March 2010)

• DTM 92-30385 Operations and Maintenance Manual Including Repair Parts and Special Tools List for Launcher Assembly, Tow Target (13376436 and 11558412) (March 2010)

• 107E Channel Assignments for Tech Man Rev 1.xls (September 2009)

Page 9 of 50 ENCL 1

• DTM 9-1425-423-34-1 Intermediate Maintenance Manual MQM-107D and MQM-107E Targets (October 2009)

• ICD12950-3 INTERFACE CONTROL DOCUMENT FOR THE MODEL

291-3 ARMY TRANSPONDER (July 30, 2013)

3 REQUIREMENTS

The Contractor shall provide the following hardware and services under this SOW. All hardware deliveries under this statement of work, unless stated otherwise, shall be delivered to TMO Base Camp, Building 8695, Orogrande, NM.

3.1 Aerial Target – Development and Test

The Contractor shall develop and/or provide a target design for Government acceptance using a Government Furnished target group set. The Contractor shall deliver subscale aerial target(s) that meet or exceed the ASAP Performance Specification. Each target shall be identical in baseline configuration and be capable of demonstrating all of the performance parameters listed in the performance specification. The Contractor shall recommend, for Government approval, the number of test articles, including Ground Support Equipment to be used for development/qualification testing. The Contractor shall provide the information requested in Appendix A, IAW DI-TMSS-80527 when the ASAP(s) are delivered.

3.1.1 Qualification Tests

Demonstration and verification of the requirements of the SOW and the ASAP Performance Specification are essential to meet the ASAP system users’ needs. Prior to acceptance and delivery of the initial proposed targets, the Contractor shall demonstrate the flight characteristics of the target system through test flight(s) of each ASAP and demonstration of other associated system hardware. At the end of all qualification tests, the Contractor shall reset the targets to like-new operational condition as flown in the test or demonstration (including but not limited to antennas, parachutes and augmentation devices etc.) before returning them to the Government. The parameters of interest are cited in the ASAP System Performance Specification. The Government may waive or postpone specific demonstration elements when deemed in the Government’s best interest. The Contractor shall not interpret the waiver of a required demonstration element as removal of that requirement. The Government will determine the compliance of the Contractor’s ASAP system to the ASAP Performance Specification. If the Contractor’s ASAP system is determined to be non-compliant with the ASAP Performance Specification, the Government reserves the right to terminate the contract for cause, allow the Contractor additional time to correct the deficiencies and demonstrate compliance, accept the non-compliant system with its known deficiencies, or accept the system temporarily with its deficiencies pending Contractor correction and re-demonstration. The testing shall occur at a combination of the Contractor’s facility and Government facilities at McGregor Range, Fort Bliss, Texas or other mutually agreed upon location. The Contractor shall deliver acceptance test plans

Page 10 of 50 ENCL 1

(in accordance with (IAW) DI-NDTI-80566), test procedures (IAW DI-NDTI-80603), and test reports (IAW DI-NDTI-80809), as well as any video captured during test, for all tests conducted at the Contractor facility or at the Government range. The Contractor shall propose the minimum number of flights that shall meet all the required threshold performance requirements.

3.1.2 Flight Services

During the test flight phase, the Contractor shall provide flight services operations in accordance with approved flight profiles and time sequences to include air vehicles, flight operations and maintenance personnel. All flights at Government ranges shall be controlled from the Army Ground Aerial Target Control System (AGATCS). The Contractor shall provide all necessary personnel (some may be required to be cleared to the secret level), equipment including, but not limited to launchers, test equipment, recovery equipment and spares, to successfully conduct the required mission(s). The Contractor shall perform all necessary ground and electrical testing and checks prior to launch to ensure a successful flight. A target flight shall be determined to be successful when the following criteria are met:

a. Target launch occurs within three (3) minutes of scheduled launch time.

b. The target performs the scheduled flight profile or in-flight profile changes, and successfully completes all tests as described in the Acceptance Test Plan/Procedures.

c. The target is recovered normally (not fail-safe or automatic recovery) according to the agreed upon test plan and flight profile.

A target which fails to meet one or more of the above criteria for a satisfactory flight will also be rated satisfactory when:

a. The Government has notified the Contractor in advance that the flight will not be subject to one of more of the above criteria and all non-excluded criteria were met.

b. The Government commands flight termination while the target is performing within the prescribed flight profile.

Flight operations shall be conducted in accordance with the regulations established by McGregor Range, Fort Bliss, TX. The Contractor shall insure that its personnel are properly documented and badged for support of the test event.

The Contractor shall be responsible for all target costs, all target repair, reset and/or replacement due to an unsuccessful mission caused by the Contractor or Contractor provided hardware. This excludes failures due to customer or Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) payloads that passed pre-flight checks.

Page 11 of 50 ENCL 1

3.1.3 Mission Profiles

The Contractor shall provide mission profiles to TMO as part of their test plan (IAW DI- NDTI-80566) which shall be used to verify the ASAP operational performance within range and airspace limitations. All targets shall be capable of flying any of the mission profiles. The Government will select the specific target and target profile prior to the mission.

3.1.4 Flight Qualification Test Planning

The Contractor shall develop and submit for Government approval, a test plan for the flight qualification test IAW DI-NDTI-80566 and shall include a risk assessment and a concept of operations plan for range safety personnel. The Contractor shall deliver the draft test plan not later than one hundred eighty (180) days prior to qualification flights for Government review and approval. The Contractor shall deliver the final test plan, including mission profiles, not later than sixty (60) days prior to the test.

3.1.5 Flight Qualification Test Procedure

The Contractor shall develop and submit for Government approval, procedures for the flight qualification test IAW DI-NDTI-80603. The test procedures shall define the test and procedures needed to verify that the target meets the ASAP Performance Specification. The Contractor shall deliver the draft test procedures not later than one hundred fifty (150) days prior to qualification flights for Government review and approval. The Contractor shall deliver the final test procedures, including mission profiles, not later than sixty (60) days prior to the test.

3.1.6 Flight Qualification Test Report

The Contractor shall prepare Flight Qualification Test Reports IAW DI-NDTI-80809 and submit them to the Government detailing the tests conducted and the results of those tests at both the Government’s and Contractor’s facilities. The Contractor shall deliver quick look reports no later than thirty (30) days following the qualification tests and deliver the final test reports no later than sixty (60) days following the qualification tests.

3.1.7 Payload Equipment

The Contractor shall provide technical support to temporarily install, interface and supply power to payload equipment necessary to operate on the range and collect data during the qualification flight(s). The payload equipment that will be integrated into the ASAP may include, but is not limited to, the following: (specific payload part numbers to be tested are listed in the ASAP Performance Specification attached to this SOW).

• Battery-powered Data Loggers provided as GFE

• Tracking beacon(s); Tracking beacons – Identification Friend or Foe (IFF)

• Scoring hardware

• Global Positioning System (GPS) data recorder(s)

Page 12 of 50 ENCL 1

• Cameras

• Flare/Chaff Dispensers

• Towed equipment

• Wing and wingtip pods

The Government will provide the exact hardware requirement no later than ninety (90) days in advance of scheduled mission support.

3.2 Methods of Verification

The methods of verification shall be IAW the ASAP Performance Specification. The Contractor may propose alternate methods of verification for Government approval.

The Government will evaluate any proposed changes to the verification method prior to the execution of the test.

3.3 Re-testing

If equipment delivered under this SOW does not perform in accordance with the requirements of this SOW and the ASAP Performance Specification during operations, the Government reserves the right to call for re-testing at the Contractor’s expense. The Contractor shall correct defects found during testing and/or re-testing before returning the equipment to the Government.

3.4 Repair and Refurbishment Testing

The Contractor shall re-test damaged equipment that has been submitted for repair and refurbishment to verify that the repaired/refurbished item(s) meet the SOW requirements and the ASAP Performance Specification. The Contractor shall tailor the tests to address the specific areas affected by the damage, repair, and/or replacement of components to ensure a fully operational target.

3.5 Environmental

All contractor and subcontractor activities shall be in compliance with applicable federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations.

3.6 System Safety Program

The Contractor shall establish and implement a System Safety Program (SSP). The Contractor shall establish and execute a hazard identification and mitigation effort using Task 101 of MIL-STD-882, Standard Practice for System Safety, as a guide.

Page 13 of 50 ENCL 1

3.6.1 System Safety Program Plan (SSPP)

The Contractor shall provide a SSPP that details the task and activities of system safety management and system safety engineering required to identify, evaluate, and eliminate or control hazards throughout the changes from the baseline configuration.

The SSPP shall fully describe the planned safety tasks and activities required to meet the System Safety Program requirements. The Contractor shall develop and implement a SSPP IAW DI-SAFT-81626. The SSPP shall contain, at a minimum, the following:

a. System Safety Organization.

b. System Safety Program Milestones.

c. System Safety Requirements.

d. Hazard Analysis.

e. Safety Verification.

f. Training.

g. Mishap Reporting and Investigation.

h. System Safety Interfaces.

3.6.2 Hazardous Materials Management Program

The Contractor shall develop and deliver a Hazardous Materials Management Program (HMMP) Plan using NAS 411-1 in accordance with DI-MGMT-81398. In addition, the contractor shall prepare a HMMP Report using NAS 411-1 IAW DI-MISC-81397. The HMMP Reports shall identify via graphic or drawing of the specific location of each hazardous material contained in the final end item(s).

3.6.2.1 Tracked Hazmats

For this contract, “Tracked HAZMATs” in NAS 411 should be defined as Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act (EPCRA) 302/313 listed chemicals. The Contractor shall report the data elements found in MIL-STD-882E, Task 108, section

108.2.4 a, b, and d for Tracked HAZMATs. The contractor shall report coatings (identified by MIL SPEC), functional fluids (e.g. coolant, hydraulic fluid, lubricants, etc), and energetics/solid rocket motor components (including Explosives Class Number) with the same 108.2.4 a, b, and d data elements. The Contractor shall provide Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDSs) or Safety Data Sheets (SDSs) for all reported materials.

3.6.2.2 Ozone Depleting Chemical/Ozone Depleting Substances (ODC/ODS) The contractor shall not use any Class I or Class II Ozone Depleting Chemical/Ozone Depleting Substance (ODC/ODS), identified by the lists at http://www.epa.gov/spdpublc/science/ods/index.html, in the manufacture or support of items required by this SOW unless approved IAW Army ODS policy and/or Title 10 United States Code section 2402. All ODS alternatives must be in compliance with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) program and identified as approved – per the specific application – in the lists at http://www.epa.gov/ozone/snap/lists/. All ODS alternatives must also receive a Toxicity Clearance for the specific application from the US Army Public Health Command.

Page 14 of 50 ENCL 1

3.6.2.3 Hazardous Material

The Contractor shall list any hazardous material, as defined NAS 411-1, to be used for the maintenance, sustainment, and demilitarization of the end item under this contract.

The hazardous material shall be properly identified and include any applicable identification number, such as National Stock Number or Special Item Number. The Contractor hazardous materials list shall be updated during performance of the contract whenever the Contractor determines that any other material to be used in the maintenance, sustainment, and demilitarization of the end item under this contract is hazardous.

3.6.3 Hazard Tracking and Risk Resolution

The Contractor shall implement a means of recording and tracking hazards to ensure that all hazards are identified, assessed, the proper program managers and personnel notified. All hazards shall be included in this hazard log and shall be tracked until final resolution. The hazard log shall be available for government review, and shall contain the following information for each hazard:

a. A description of the hazard.

b. Life cycle phases during which the hazard will be experienced (i.e., transportation, installation or preparation for use, training, operation or use, tear down or packing, maintenance, storage, disposal, etc.).

c. Initial hazard risk assessment code.

d. Status of actions taken to eliminate or control hazard.

e. Final actions on each hazard which reduces the level of risk to an acceptable level. These final actions will be approved by the Aviation and Missile Command (AMCOM) Safety Office and TMO.

f. Final hazard risk assessment code.

3.6.4 Safety Risk Management

The Contractor shall assign a hazard risk assessment code to each identified hazard of this program using the matrix given in MIL-STD-882.

3.6.5 Safety Risk Acceptance

All residual hazards shall be reviewed for risk acceptance by the government. Hazards will not be considered closed until corrective actions are verified by government representatives. The Contractor shall eliminate or reduce all hazards to the lowest risk level practical using methods in the following order of precedence: design, incorporation of safety devices, incorporation of warning devices, procedures and training.

3.6.6 Residual Hazards

Hazards which cannot be eliminated by design shall be considered residual hazards unless the government agrees that the design meets or exceeds all applicable consensus and military design standards (or is verified through testing, where standards do not exist) and that the environment in which it will operate is consistent with that

Page 15 of 50 ENCL 1 envisioned by the design. Hazards found to be non-residual shall be considered closed upon government verification of safe design.

3.6.7 CorrectionsTo Noncompliance Of Safety Provisions

The Contractor shall correct any noncompliance with safety provisions of this SOW upon Government notification. Corrective actions taken shall be made available for review by the Government Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative (COTR).

3.6.8 Safety Assessment Report

The Contractor shall provide a Safety Assessment Report (SAR) IAW DI-SAFT-80102.

The SAR shall provide a system description, an overview of system operation, a comprehensive evaluation of all Software (IAW AMCOM Regulation 385-17) and Hardware safety risks, and shall identify and evaluate all identified design and procedural hazards present. The Contractor shall perform an analysis to identify any non-compliance of safety specification requirements and provide any such justification.

Justification for noncompliance is not to be construed as approval by the government;

noncompliance requires separate written approval by the government. The SAR shall also provide information on required hazard zones to protect personnel from injury due to hazardous levels of noise or non-ionizing radiation. For improvements or modifications that may affect the inherent level of safety, the Contractor shall update the existing safety assessment report evaluation of all software and hardware safety risks and shall identify and evaluate all identified hazards of the modified hardware and software. The SAR shall also contain Other Safety Documentation such as Material Safety Data Sheets for all hazardous materials and a completed System Safety Design Verification Checklist. The Contactor shall participate in the System Safety Working Group (SSWG) meetings by providing information or on-site participation in meetings, as requested by the Government. Contractor support of these meetings will be exercised as options under the Meetings Option of the contract.

3.6.9 System Safety Hazard Analysis (SSHA)

The Contractor shall conduct a system hazard analysis using MIL-STD-882, Task 203, 204, 205, 206, and 208 for guidance. The Contractor shall provide a System Safety Hazard Analysis (SSHA) Report IAW DI-SAFT-80101. The Contractor shall use this report to systematically identify and evaluate hazards, both real and potential, for their elimination or control.

3.6.10 Health Hazard Assessment Report

The Contractor shall provide a Health Hazard Assessment Report (HHAR) IAW DI- SAFT-80106. The Contractor shall identify and evaluate health hazards, evaluate proposed hazardous material, and propose measures to eliminate or control these hazards through engineering design changes or protective measures to reduce the risk to an acceptable level.

Page 16 of 50 ENCL 1

3.6.11 Safety During Mission Support

The Contractor shall comply with all safety procedures and practices set out herein while participating in mission support activities at host installation/ranges. The Contractor shall provide primary and alternate safety designees required by range safety regulations and range user documentation for the host range.

3.6.12 Accident Prevention Program

The Contractor shall maintain an accident prevention program during all Target Systems operations to ensure that Government assets and the public are protected from damage and injury. The Contractor shall prepare reports of accident/incidents IAW DI-SAFT-81563 and shall coordinate with the Government Technical Representative, appropriate Government range safety personnel, TMO, and AMCOM Safety Office as appropriate. The Contractor shall provide Initial reporting of any accident or incident in person, if the Government Technical Representative is on site, or by a telephone call to the Government Technical Representative.

3.6.13 Shipping Explosive Material

The Contractor shall preclude, where possible, the use of explosive, hazardous, or other equipment requiring special handling and added cost for transportation. Any use of such hardware requiring explosive hazard classification will require Government approval. Requests for approval to use explosive materials shall contain a justification for the use of explosive materials. In the event utilization of explosive materials is approved, the Contractor shall furnish any existing approved Department of Transportation (DOT) classifications; analytical data; transportation test data in accordance with DoD Ammunitions and Explosives Hazard Classification Procedures, TB 700-2, as well as any other existing test data; and explosive weights and compositions for each item to be shipped. Data shall be prepared in accordance with DI-SAFT-81299 and TB 700-2. The AMCOM Safety Office will assign interim hazard classifications for the applicable explosive items produced under this contract.

The Contractor shall deliver any explosive material to the Ammunition Supply Point (ASP) at White Sands Missile Range, NM.

3.7 Flight Termination System

The Contractor shall provide a method to terminate the flight of the target in the event of an emergency compliant with the applicable range safety guidelines. Documentation and analysis efforts related to achieving range certification IAW Range Commanders Council (RCC) document RCC-319 are addressed in paragraph 8.3.23.

3.8 Ground Control Station

The ASAP(s) shall operate with the Government. The Contractor shall deliver all software, data files and documentation required to integrate the ASAP into the AGATCS control system target library IAW DI-IPSC-81488. At the Critical Design Review, the

Page 17 of 50 ENCL 1

Contractor shall deliver all necessary interface documentation (Interface Control Document and physical interface for the Government furnished target group set) and software required to integrate the ASAP target to the Government. The AGATCS Contractor will integrate the ASAP software into the ground control station and provide the target group set back to the ASAP contractor for final integration and test. At a minimum, this documentation includes software test descriptions, interface control documents, installation instructions, and operation instructions.

3.9 Obsolescence

The Contractor shall not use any parts/sub-components that are known to be obsolete or not currently in production without prior Government approval. The Contractor shall describe their plan to manage obsolescence in their targets and associated support equipment. The Contractor shall notify the Government of any configuration changes to the previous delivered baseline prior to any additional procurements.

3.10 Kick-off Meeting

The Contractor shall host a kick-off meeting at the Contractor’s facility within the first 45 days after contract award. At a minimum, the Contractor shall present a delivery schedule and discuss the expectations of the flight qualification testing. The Contractor shall also provide the Government an overview of the Contractor’s engineering and manufacturing capabilities. The Contractor shall provide presentation materials used for the meeting IAW DI-ADMN-81373.

3.11 Warranty

The Contractor shall provide a one year defect-free warranty IAW AR 700-139 on all hardware and software delivered under this SOW. The warranty period shall begin on the date of Government acceptance. This does not exclude system reliability, availability and maintainability (RAM) requirements in the ASAP Performance Specification.

3.12 Technical Data

The Contractor shall provide reproduction of any existing technical data applicable to the work performed under this SOW IAW DI-ERDS-80940.

3.13 Quality/Product Assurance Management

The Contractor shall provide Product Assurance (PA) technical expertise to include the utilization of PA management and technical principals, inspection techniques, and other analytical and empirical tools during the development and production of systems/subsystems/components.

The Contractor shall implement and maintain a quality system that meets the requirements of ANSI/ISO/ASQ Q9001, ANSI/ISO/ASQ Q10012, AS9100, or propose an equivalent system. The Contractor's quality procedures, planning and all other

Page 18 of 50 ENCL 1 documentation and data that comprise the quality system (for both hardware and software) shall be made available for Government review throughout the contract.

3.13.1 Quality System Plan (QSP)

The Contractor shall provide its QSP IAW DI-QCIC-81379. The Contractor’s QSP shall describe in detail the approach to implement and maintain a basic quality system that meets the requirements of ANSI/ASQC/Q9001/ISO/Q9001/Q10012-1, AS9100, or equivalent. The QSP shall provide for controls of process and product characteristics and include criteria and methodology that are used to validate conformance to performance specifications and to achieve functional areas in the design, test, production, and management processes. If the Contractor proposes to use a quality system that has not been approved under the Department of Defense Common Process (or Standard Process) Initiatives for DoD contracts, the description shall address at least the following 20 elements: management responsibility; quality system; contract review; design control; document and data control; purchasing; control of customer supplied product; product identification and traceability; process control; inspection and test status; control of inspection, measuring and test equipment; inspection and test status; control of nonconforming product; corrective and preventive action; handling, storage, packaging, preservation, and delivery; control of quality records; internal quality audits; training; servicing; and statistical techniques.

The QSP shall also include a description of the Contractor’s

• Electrostatic Discharge Protection,

• Quality Assurance Provisions,

• Product Acceptance System and validation methodology,

• Environmental Stress Screening, and

• Special Test/Inspection Equipment and validation methodology.

3.13.2 Parts, Materials, and Processes (PMP) Control Program

The Contractor shall submit a PMP Control Program Plan as part of the QSP IAW DI- SDMP-81748. The PMP Control Program Plan shall include a description of the methods of process controls, documentation, and verification of continued process improvement, and the controls and policies for the following subjects as applicable:

• Parts selection and qualification

• Parts survivability

• Parts approval

• Approved parts list

• Parts control

• Supplier selection

• Supplier management

• Parts screening

• Parts documentation

• Parts quality

Page 19 of 50 ENCL 1

• Parts validation

• Plastic encapsulated devices

• Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COT)S selection and qualification

• Obsolete parts/diminishing manufacturing sources and material shortages-test analysis requirements to assure piece parts/materials specification compliance for parts procured non-compliant to Government or DoD-adopted industry standards, including custom parts

• Printed wiring assembly (PWA) design and component mounting processes

• Electrostatic discharge control

• Maintenance and equipment used for electronic manufacturing processes

• Process controls, workmanship methodologies and procedures

• Training/proficiency of the workforce

• Rework and repair of PWAs and cable assemblies

3.13.3 Electronics Fabrication Procedures

Electronics Fabrication Procedures. Processes utilized for the manufacture and repair of electronic hardware will produce assemblies and equipment that meet the system performance requirements. The Contractor’s electronic fabrication plan shall describe the materials, methods, and verification criteria for producing quality electrical interconnections and assemblies and shall utilize process control methodologies for the planning, implementation, and evaluation of the fabrication process. The Contractor shall use IPC/EIA J-STD-001, Class 3 as guidance in developing this plan.

3.14 Configuration Management (CM)

3.14.1 Technical Baseline

The Contractor shall maintain configuration control of development baselines during early SOW work development. However once technical baselines are released via Engineering Change Proposal (ECP)/Engineering Release Record (ERR), no changes to baseline documentation shall be made without Government approval. The Contractor shall notify the Government of any configuration changes to the previous delivered baseline prior to any additional procurements.

3.14.2 Configuration Management Program

The Contractor shall implement a CM program to manage the configurations provided under this contract. The Contractor shall prepare a configuration management plan (CMP) IAW DI-SESS-80858, using MIL-HDBK-61 as a guide. The Contractor’s configuration management process shall include the procedures for identification, preparation, reviewing, auditing, releasing, controlling, changing, and providing the status of all technical data.

3.14.3 Configuration Administration

The Contractor shall designate a single point of contact that shall be the technical authority and have the program responsibility for all functions related to the CM. The

Page 20 of 50 ENCL 1

Contractor CM designate shall document and maintain configuration items to maximize identification, definition and control.

3.14.4 Configuration Identification

The Contractor shall implement a Performance Data Management (PDM) system that shall control the configuration of all components and interfaces.

3.14.5 Functional Baseline

The Contractor shall prepare changes to a functional baseline IAW DI-SDMP-81465.

3.14.6 Allocated Baseline

The Contractor shall prepare changes to the allocated baseline. The Allocated Baseline consists of the System Requirement Specifications (SRS), Interface Design Documents (IDD), and System Design Documents (SDD). Once Government has formally approved the changes, the allocated baseline shall be under formal Contractor configuration control IAW the CMP.

3.14.7 Product Baseline

The Contractor shall develop changes to the product baselines that include the production documentation and engineering drawings, assembly drawings, software source and executable code and integration procedures for each Configuration Item (CI). Changes to the product baselines shall be IAW 3.14.10. The Contractor shall prepare all new or revised Product Drawings and Associated Lists for the detailed assembly, installation, control, interface, electrical and special application drawings as defined in ASME-Y14.24, IAW DI-SESS-81000.

3.14.8 Interface Control Document

The Contractor shall identify all system level interface requirements and prepare an Interface Control Document (ICD) list IAW DI-SESS-81248. The Contractor shall define and control all interface requirements and ensure compatibility and interoperability for hardware and software components IAW requirements described in System Specification.

3.14.9 Design/Configuration Modification

The Contractor shall not modify the design/configuration of the Government-owned ASAP or government-owned Ground Support Equipment (GSE) after demonstration and approval except as approved in writing by the Government. Should modifications be approved, the Contractor shall, if directed, demonstrate performance of the modified item at no cost to the Government to ensure performance requirements are met. The Government will be notified of any configuration changes to the previous baseline prior to any additional procurements.

3.14.10 Configuration Control

The Contractor shall recommend changes to controlled documentation IAW DI-SESS- 80639, DI-SESS-80640, and DI-SESS-80642. Any changes that impact ICDs, or other

Page 21 of 50 ENCL 1 controlled documentation shall not be implemented by the Contractor without prior contractual change. Any proposed contract action that impacts current or future production and /or operational support costs shall contain life cycle cost justification.

Contractor recommended changes to the product baseline shall be submitted following the Physical Configuration Audit (PCA).

3.14.11 Configuration Status Accounting (CSA)

The Contractor shall maintain current and historical records for the baseline technical data, change and nonconformance actions, and new and updated documentation, including identification of all as-designed and as-built configurations. The Contractor shall prepare CSA information IAW DI-SESS-81253 for the “as-built” record.

3.14.12 Configuration Audits

Using MIL-HDBK-61 for guidance and information, the Contractor shall conduct Functional and Physical Configuration Audits (FCA/PCA) for the hardware/software and interfaces IAW the Contractor’s CMP and resolve any reported discrepancies. The Contractor shall support Government participation in selected Audits and prepare a Configuration Audit Summary Report to record and report the result of each audit to include the status and final disposition of identified discrepancies IAW DI-SESS-81022.

The Contractor shall notify the Government not less than sixty (60) days in advance of any configuration audits.

3.15 Meetings and Reviews

The Contractor shall host/conduct planning/progress review meetings during the performance of this contract. Meetings will be scheduled by the Government on an as required basis to maintain oversight and control of the project and will include In Process Reviews (IPR), a Preliminary Design Review (PDR) and a Critical Design Review (CDR). The Contractor shall coordinate participation of its personnel and sub- Contractor personnel for the meetings. The Government would expect these meetings to require support from key program management/leadership personnel only.

Government representatives for the meetings may include Government-contracted technical and management support Contractor personnel. Meeting location and duration will be determined when the option is exercised.

3.16 Aerial Target (Option)

The Contractor shall deliver production quantities of the ASAP target that meet the ASAP performance specification. The Government shall determine the quantity of targets at the time an option is exercised based on target cost and customer requirements. The Contractor shall provide pricing for a single target as well as the economic purchase breakpoints as determined by the Contractor with associated lead times.

Page 22 of 50 ENCL 1

3.17 Flight Qualification / Production Acceptance Test (Option) Prior to acceptance and delivery of the Production targets, the Contractor shall demonstrate the flight characteristics of the target system through test flight(s) of two First Article Test (FAT)(or production lot sample) targets and demonstration of requisite associated system hardware. At the end of all production tests or demonstrations, the Contractor will be responsible for resetting the targets to like-new operational condition (including but not limited to antennas, parachutes and augmentation devices etc.)

before returning them to the Government. The testing shall occur at a combination of the Contractor’s facility and Government facilities at McGregor Range, Fort Bliss, Texas. The Contractor shall propose the minimum number of flights that will meet all the required threshold performance requirements.

3.17.1 Target Acceptance/Rejection Criteria

The Contractor shall successfully demonstrate the proposed ASAP system’s ability to meet the requirements of the ASAP Performance Specification. The Government will accept the target if it meets the threshold requirements as defined in the ASAP Performance Specification and all acceptance test flights are successful. The Government may reject the target if it fails to meet any of the documented threshold requirements. The Government has the discretion to allow the Contractor to correct the deficiencies and retest for additional Government consideration.

3.17.2 Definition of a Successful Flight

A target flight shall be determined to be successful when the following criteria are met:

b. The target performs the scheduled flight profile or in-flight profile changes, within target system capabilities as defined in the ASAP Performance Specification.

to the agreed upon test plan and flight profile without any unplanned damage.

met.

White Sands Missile Range and Fort Bliss, as applicable. The Contractor shall ensure

Page 23 of 50 ENCL 1 that its personnel are properly documented and badged for support of the target mission.

The Contractor shall be responsible for all target costs, all target repair, reset and/or replacement due to an unsuccessful mission caused by the Contractor or Contractor provided hardware. This excludes failures due to customer or GFE payloads that passed pre-flight checks.

3.17.3 Payload Equipment

The Contractor shall provide technical support (may require being cleared up to the secret level) to temporarily install, interface and supply power to equipment necessary to operate on the range and collect data during target operations. The payload equipment that will be temporarily integrated into the ASAP may include, but is not limited to, the following: (specific payload part numbers to be tested are listed in the ASAP Performance Specification attached to this SOW).

• Data Loggers provided as GFE

• Tracking beacon(s) (Tracking beacons – IFF should be a defined payload in the Performance Specification)

• GPS data recorder(s)

• Classified payloads provided as GFE

• Electronic Attack (EA) Threat Simulator provided as GFE

• TOW equipment

• Flares/Chaff Dispensers

The Government will provide the exact hardware requirement no later than thirty (30) days in advance of scheduled mission support. For initial Acceptance Test purposes, the payloads specified in the ASAP Performance Specification shall be tested.

3.18 Mission Profiles (Option)

The Contractor shall provide mission profiles to TMO as part of their test plan (IAW DI- NDTI-80566) which shall be used to verify the ASAP operational performance within range and airspace limitations. All targets shall be capable of flying any of the mission

Page 24 of 50 ENCL 1 profiles. The Government will select the specific target and target profile prior to the

3.19 Flight Qualification Test Planning (Option)

The Contractor shall update and submit for Government approval, Flight Qualification Test Plan for the flight qualification test IAW DI-NDTI-80566 and shall include a risk assessment and a concept of operations plan for range safety personnel. The Contractor shall deliver the draft test plan not later than one hundred eighty (180) days prior to qualification flights for Government review and approval.

3.20 Flight Qualification Test Procedure (Option)

The Contractor shall update and submit for Government approval, the Flight Qualification Test Procedures for the flight qualification test IAW DI-NDTI-80603. The test procedures shall define the test and procedures needed to verify that the target meets the ASAP Performance Specification. The Contractor shall deliver the draft test procedures not later than one hundred fifty (150) days prior to qualification flights for Government review and approval.

3.21 Flight Qualification Test Report (Option)

The Contractor shall prepare Flight Qualification Test Reports IAW DI-NDTI-80809 and submit them to the Government detailing the tests conducted and the results of those tests at both the Government’s and Contractor’s facilities.

3.22 Production Acceptance Test Planning (Option)

A production acceptance process shall be established by the Contractor. An Acceptance Test Plan (ATP) shall be prepared IAW DI-NDTI-80566. The Contractor’s ATP shall address all equipment to be delivered to the Government and shall be submitted to the Government for approval 180 days prior to the conduct of production acceptance tests. The approved ATP will be used for Government acceptance throughout the contract of all deliveries of equipment from the Contractor.

3.23 Production Acceptance Test Procedures (Option)

The Contractor shall provide production Acceptance Test Procedures IAW DI-NDTI- 80603. All items ordered by the Government shall be tested to verify that the systems, subsystems and components being produced continue to meet the performance requirements identified in the initial testing program. The Contractor shall provide a copy of acceptance test procedures prior to testing IAW DI-NDTI-80603. The Contractor shall notify the Government 150 days in advance of any scheduled acceptance tests.

Page 25 of 50 ENCL 1

3.24 Production Acceptance Test Reports (Option)

Tests performed by the Contractor with or without Government witnesses shall be fully documented and made available for Government inspection IAW DI-NDTI-80809.