Standard_Training_Evaluation.docx
DOCX document 14 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Stationary Engineer Training Program State and local contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 2026-RFP-00128
- Issued by
- San Mateo County, California
About this file
This is a Standard Training Evaluation form document associated with the County of San Mateo's Stationary Engineer Training Program solicitation. The evaluation form is designed to assess participant satisfaction and learning outcomes through four key questions. The first question requests an overall rating of the training session on a scale of 1 to 10, with defined benchmarks ranging from 1 (Poor) to 10 (Excellent). The second and third questions use yes/no responses to determine whether participants acquired applicable knowledge and would recommend the session to colleagues. The fourth question provides space for open-ended feedback and comments.
This evaluation instrument will be administered to participants in the comprehensive Stationary Engineer Training Program, which covers ten course components including industrial maintenance, safety, workplace readiness, electrical fundamentals, air conditioning and refrigeration, tools and measurements, environmental regulations, plumbing, welding, and fire alarm/fire pump systems. The selected contractor will be responsible for evaluating individual participant performance throughout the training program and collecting this feedback to measure program effectiveness and participant engagement. The evaluation form serves as a standardized metric for assessing training quality and applicability across all course components, whether delivered in-person or through a hybrid live and Zoom format.
View the file
Other files for this state and local contract opportunity
Show all 19
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Standard Training Evaluation
Question 1.
Overall, how would you rate this session? (Range of 1 to 10, with 10 being Excellent, 8 Very Good, 7 Good, 5 Average and 1 Poor.)
Question 2.
Did you learn something you can apply back at your job? (Yes/No)
Question 3.
Would you recommend this session to a colleague? (Yes/No)
Question 4.
Do you have any comments?
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .