SPRBL119R0042-0003.pdf
PDF 50 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Interconnection Equipment Contract Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- SPRBL1-19-R-0042
About this file
This document provides details for the Interconnection Equipment Contract solicitation. The solicitation will seek to establish multiple Indefinite-Delivery Indefinite-Quantity contracts to supply interconnection equipment, wiring harnesses, cables, connectors, accessories, and installation kits across the Federal Government. The Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime will issue the Request for Proposal on August 7, 2019. The contracts will have a base period of one five-year term and five one-year option periods, with a maximum value of $808 million and minimum of $10,000 per awardee. The estimated award date is October 31, 2019. The solicitation will be full and open competition with small business set-asides, requiring awardees to commit to providing at least 40% of the total contract value to small businesses. The Government also reserves the right to set aside orders under $250,000 solely for small business awardees.
Amendment 0003
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 31
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. Contract ID Code Page Of
2. Amendment/Modification No.
3. Effective Date
4. Requisition/Purchase Req No.
5. Project No. (If applicable)
6. Issued By Code 7. Administered By (If other than Item 6) Code
8. Name And Address Of Contractor (No., Street, City, County, State and Zip Code)
9A. Amendment Of Solicitation No.
9B. Dated (See Item 11)
10A. Modification Of Contract/Order No.
10B. Dated (See Item 13) Code Facility Code
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.
Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:
(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning ____________ copies of the amendments: (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
12. Accounting And Appropriation Data (If required)
13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS
It Modifies The Contract/Order No. As Described In Item 14.
A. This Change Order is Issued Pursuant To: The Changes Set Forth In Item 14 Are Made In
The Contract/Order No. In Item 10A.
B. The Above Numbered Contract/Order Is Modified To Reflect The Administrative Changes (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) Set
Forth In Item 14, Pursuant To The Authority of FAR 43.103(b).
C. This Supplemental Agreement Is Entered Into Pursuant To Authority Of:
D. Other (Specify type of modification and authority)
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return _______________ copies to the Issuing Office.
14. Description Of Amendment/Modification (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
15A. Name And Title Of Signer (Type or print)
16A. Name And Title Of Contracting Officer (Type or print)
15B. Contractor/Offeror 15C. Date Signed 16B. United States Of America 16C. Date Signed
By (Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)
NSN 7540-01-152-8070
PREVIOUS EDITIONS UNUSABLE
30-105-02 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)
Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
SEE SCHEDULE
X
Firm Fixed Price
0003 2019AUG29
SPRBL1
DLA LAND AT ABERDEEN
6565 SURVEILLANCE LOOP, ROOM C1301
APG, MD 21005-1846
LINDSEY D. SCHUMAN
EMAIL: LINDSEY.SCHUMAN@DLA.MIL
SPRBL1-19-R-0042
2019AUG16
X
X
/SIGNED/
2 signed
SEE SECOND PAGE FOR DESCRIPTION
1 18
CONTINUATION SHEET
Reference No. of Document Being Continued Page of
Name of Offeror or Contractor:
PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD
SECTION A - SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
Buyer Name: LINDSEY D. SCHUMAN
Buyer Office Symbol/Telephone Number: DLA-ZLAB/(443)861-4526
Type of Contract 1: Firm Fixed Price
Type of Contract 2: Cost Plus Fixed Fee
Kind of Contract: Supply Contracts and Priced Orders
*** End of Narrative A0000 ***
The purpose of Amendment 0003 for Solicitation SPRBL1-19-R-0042 is as follows:
1. Narrative A0001: The below paragraphs in Narrative A001 have been changed to read as follows: ________________
MULTIPLE AWARDS:...The solicitation is being released under Full and Open Competition in accordance with (IAW) FAR 6.102(b). IAW _______________
FAR 19.502-4(a), the solicitation also includes reservation(s) for small business contract awards, and will require prime awardees to provide a Small Business Commitment Document that targets a minimum of 40% of the total awarded order dollar value throughout the life of the contract to small businesses. In addition, the solicitation will also provide the Government the right to set-aside orders under
$250,000 solely for small business awardees based on the guidance in FAR 19.502-2.
PRICING OVERVIEW: The Price Evaluation List contains a total of 127 supply items as provided in Attachment 0001 labeled Attachment ________________
0001 Price Evaluation List SPRBL1-19-R-0042.xlsx. The offeror shall provide ceiling prices on a minimum of 95% of the supply items (or
121 items) on the Price Evaluation List, for either the exact item specified or an acceptable alternate. Offerors cannot provide two prices for an item. You must either propose to the actual item or the alternate. Alternate items to those found on the Price Evaluation
List can be offered at the time of Price Proposal. However, the offeror must provide a complete technical data package for the Alternate item being offered as well as the item on the Price Evaluation List. If an item is deemed equal in form, fit, and function to the item on the Price Evaluation List, it may be added to the IEC contract award. Alternate items determined not acceptable will not count towards the 95% minimum Price Evaluation List requirement, and will not be evaluated. It is anticipated that the IEC contract awardees will pursue aggressive pricing, maximize the alternate offers, and find technical solutions/efficiencies, as needed.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS:...Prospective offerors should insert prices, complete all requirements within the RFP, shall sign box 17 of ____________________ the solicitation and sign box 15 of the amendments, and upload all pages of the solicitation and amendments, (prior to the closing date) in https://fbo.gov .
2. Sections L&M: Sections L&M have been updated as reflected within this amendment. The following paragraphs were updated: ____________
L.2.
L.4.
L.5.
L.6.
M.2.
M.3.
3. Section I: To clarify the following clauses: _________
FAR 52.216-19, Order Limitations: Changed " within seven N/A days..." in paragraph (d) to "N/A."
FAR 52.246-17, Warranty of Supplies of a Noncomplex Nature: Added the full-text narrative.
4. Section I: To add the following mandated provision/clause: _________
FAR 52.204-24, Representation Regarding Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment.
FAR 52.204-25, Prohbition on Contracting for Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services and Equipment.
4. Section J: To update the following Attachments: _________
Exhibit B: Exhibit B, ILSC-1A Supplemental Statement of Work for IEC, to update the CDRLs contract reference paragaphs (Block 5). __________
Attachment 0001: Attachment 0001, Price Evaluation List has been updated as of 28 August 2019 to Yearly Best Estimated Quantity as _______________ opposed to the previous version of "Best Estimated Quantity".
Attachment 0005: Attachment 0005, PEL Supplemental Requirements, CDRL descriptions have been updated to remain consistent with the ________________
ILSC-1A, Supplemental Statement of Work, document.
2 18
SPRBL1-19-R-0042
Name of Offeror or Contractor:
PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD
Attachment 0006: Attachment 0006, Questions and Answers, has been updated as of 28 August 2019. _______________
*** END OF NARRATIVE A0004 ***
3 18
Name of Offeror or Contractor:
PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD
SECTION I - CONTRACT CLAUSES
Status Regulatory Cite Title Date Status Regulatory Cite Title Date _______ _______________ ______________________________________________________________________ ____________ _______ _______________ ______________________________________________________________________ ____________
I-1 ADDED 52.204-25 PROHIBITION ON CONTRACTING FOR CERTAIN TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND VIDEO AUG/2019
SURVEILLANCE SERVICES OR EQUIPMENT
I-2 CHANGED 52.216-19 ORDER LIMITATIONS OCT/1995
(a) Minimum order. When the Government requires supplies or services covered by this contract in an amount of less than No Minimum, the __________
Government is not obligated to purchase, nor is the Contractor obligated to furnish, those supplies or services under the contract.
(b) Maximum order. The Contractor is not obligated to honor --
(1) Any order for a single item in excess of No Maximum; __________
(2) Any order for a combination of items in excess of N/A; or ___
(3) A series of orders from the same ordering office within N/A days that together call for quantities exceeding the limitation in ____ subparagraph (b)(1) or (2) of this section.
(c) If this is a requirements contract (i.e., includes the Requirements clause at subsection 52.216-21 of the Federal Acquisition
Regulation (FAR)), the Government is not required to order a part of any one requirement from the Contractor if that requirement exceeds the maximum-order limitations in paragraph (b) of this section.
(d) Notwithstanding paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, the Contractor shall honor any order exceeding the maximum order limitations in paragraph (b), unless that order (or orders) is returned to the ordering office within N/A days after issuance, with written notice ____ stating the Contractors intent not to ship the item (or items) called for and the reasons. Upon receiving this notice, the Government may acquire the supplies or services from another source.
(End of Clause)
CONTINUATION OF NONCOMMERCIAL ORDER CLAUSES___________________________________________
FAR 52.246-17 Warranty of Supplies of a Noncomplex Nature (June 2003)
(a) Definitions. As used in this clause--
Acceptance means the act of an authorized representative of the Government by which the Government assumes for itself, or as an agent of another, ownership of existing supplies, or approves specific services as partial or complete performance of the contract.
Supplies means the end items furnished by the Contractor and related services required under the contract. The word does not include data.
(b) Contractors obligations.
(1) Notwithstanding inspection and acceptance by the Government of supplies furnished under this contract, or any condition of this contract concerning the conclusiveness thereof, the Contractor warrants that for A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) YEAR UNLESS OTHERWISE
INDICATED ON A DELIVERY ORDER RFP--
(i) All supplies furnished under this contract will be free from defects in material or workmanship and will conform with all requirements of this contract; and
(ii) The preservation, packaging, packing, and marking, and the preparation for, and method of, shipment of such supplies will conform with the requirements of this contract.
(2) When return, correction, or replacement is required, transportation charges and responsibility for the supplies while in transit shall be borne by the Contractor. However, the Contractors liability for the transportation charges shall not exceed an amount equal to the cost of transportation by the usual commercial method of shipment between the place of delivery specified in this contract and the Contractors plant, and return.
(3) Any supplies or parts thereof, corrected or furnished in replacement under this clause, shall also be subject to the terms of this clause to the same extent as supplies initially delivered. The warranty, with respect to supplies or parts thereof, shall be equal in duration to that in paragraph (b)(1) of this clause and shall run from the date of delivery of the corrected or replaced supplies.
(4) All implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose are excluded from any obligation contained in this contract.
(c) Remedies available to the Government.
(1) The Contracting Officer shall give written notice to the Contractor of any breach of warranties in paragraph (b)(1) of this clause within FORTY-FIVE (45) DAYS.
(2) Within a reasonable time after the notice, the Contracting Officer may either --
(i) Require, by written notice, the prompt correction or replacement of any supplies or parts thereof (including preservation, packaging, packing, and marking) that do not conform with the requirements of this contract within the meaning of paragraph (b)(1) of this clause; or
(ii) Retain such supplies and reduce the contract price by an amount equitable under the circumstances.
4 18
Name of Offeror or Contractor:
PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD
(3)
(i) If the contract provides for inspection of supplies by sampling procedures, conformance of supplies or components subject to warranty action shall be determined by the applicable sampling procedures in the contract. The Contracting
Officer --
(A) May, for sampling purposes, group any supplies delivered under this contract;
(B) Shall require the size of the sample to be that required by sampling procedures specified in the contract for the quantity of supplies on which warranty action is proposed;
(C) May project warranty sampling results over supplies in the same shipment or other supplies contained in other shipments even though all of such supplies are not present at the point of reinspection; provided, that the supplies remaining are reasonably representative of the quantity on which warranty action is proposed; and
(D) Need not use the same lot size as on original inspection or reconstitute the original inspection lots.
(ii) Within a reasonable time after notice of any breach of the warranties specified in paragraph (b)(1) of this clause, the Contracting Officer may exercise one or more of the following options:
(A) Require an equitable adjustment in the contract price for any group of supplies.
(B) Screen the supplies grouped for warranty action under this clause at the Contractors expense and return all nonconforming supplies to the Contractor for correction or replacement.
(C) Require the Contractor to screen the supplies at locations designated by the Government within the contiguous
United States and to correct or replace all nonconforming supplies.
(D) Return the supplies grouped for warranty action under this clause to the Contractor (irrespective of the f.o.b. point or the point of acceptance) for screening and correction or replacement.
(4)
(i) The Contracting Officer may, by contract or otherwise, correct or replace the nonconforming supplies with similar supplies from another source and charge to the Contractor the cost occasioned to the Government thereby if the Contractor --
(A) Fails to make redelivery of the corrected or replaced supplies within the time established for their return;
or
(B) Fails either to accept return of the nonconforming supplies or fails to make progress after their return to correct or replace them so as to endanger performance of the delivery schedule, and in either of these circumstances does not cure such failure within a period of 10 days (or such longer period as the Contracting
Officer may authorize in writing) after receipt of notice from the Contracting Officer specifying such failure.
(ii) Instead of correction or replacement by the Government, the Contracting Officer may require an equitable adjustment of the contract price. In addition, if the Contractor fails to furnish timely disposition instructions, the
Contracting Officer may dispose of the nonconforming supplies for the Contractors account in a reasonable manner. The
Government is entitled to reimbursement from the Contractor, or from the proceeds of such disposal, for the reasonable expenses of the care and disposition of the nonconforming supplies, as well as for excess costs incurred or to be incurred.
(5) The rights and remedies of the Government provided in this clause are in addition to and do not limit any rights afforded to the Government by any other clause of this contract.
(End of Clause)
*** END OF NARRATIVE I0002 ***
5 18
Name of Offeror or Contractor:
PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD
SECTION J - LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
List of Number List of Number
Addenda Title Date of Pages Transmitted By Addenda Title Date of Pages Transmitted By________________ ____________________________________________________________ _______________ ____________ _______________________________ ____________________________________________________________ _______________ ____________ _______________
Exhibit B ILSC-1B SUPPLEMENTAL SOW FOR OMNIBUS CONTRACT FOR 28-AUG-2019 036
INTERCONNECTION EQUIPMENT
Attachment 0001 PRICE EVALUATION LIST 28-AUG-2019
Attachment 0005 PEL SUPPLEMENTAL REQUIREMENTS 28-AUG-2019
Attachment 0006 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS 28-AUG-2019 020
6 18
Name of Offeror or Contractor:
PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD
SECTION K - REPRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATIONS, AND OTHER STATEMENTS OF OFFERORS
Status Regulatory Cite Title Date Status Regulatory Cite Title Date _______ _______________ ______________________________________________________________________ ____________ _______ _______________ ______________________________________________________________________ ____________
K-1 ADDED 52.204-24 REPRESENTATION REGARDING CERTAIN TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND VIDEO AUG/2019
SURVEILLANCE SERVICES OR EQUIPMENT
(a) Definitions. As used in this provision--
"Covered telecommunications equipment or services", "Critical Technology", and "Substantial or essential component" have the meanings provided in clause 52.204-25, Prohibition on Contracting for Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment.
(b) Prohibition. Section 889(a)(1)(A) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Pub. L. 115-232) prohibits the head of an executive agency on or after August 13, 2019, from procuring or obtaining, or extending or renewing a contract to procure or obtain, any equipment, system, or service that uses covered telecommunications equipment or services as a substantial or essential component of any system, or as critical technology as part of any system. Contractors are not prohibited from providing--
(1) A service that connects to the facilities of a third-party, such as backhaul, roaming, or interconnection arrangements; or
(2) Telecommunications equipment that cannot route or redirect user data traffic or permit visibility into any user data or packets that such equipment transmits or otherwise handles.
(c) Representation. The Offeror represents that--
It [ ] will, [ ] will not provide covered telecommunications equipment or services to the Government in the performance of any contract, subcontract or other contractual instrument resulting from this solicitation.
(d) Disclosures. If the Offeror has responded affirmatively to the representation in paragraph (c) of this provision, the Offeror shall provide the following information as part of the offer--
(1) All covered telecommunications equipment and services offered (include brand; model number, such as original equipment manufacturer (OEM) number, manufacturer part number, or wholesaler number; and item description, as applicable);
(2) Explanation of the proposed use of covered telecommunications equipment and services and any factors relevant to determining if such use would be permissible under the prohibition in paragraph (b) of this provision;
(3) For services, the entity providing the covered telecommunications services (include entity name, unique entity identifier, and
Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code, if known); and
(4) For equipment, the entity that produced the covered telecommunications equipment (include entity name, unique entity identifier, CAGE code, and whether the entity was the OEM or a distributor, if known).
(End of provision)
7 18
Name of Offeror or Contractor:
PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD
SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS
DLAD PROC NOTES IMPLEMENTED BY REFERENCE
DLAD Proc Lot L04 Offers for Part Numbered Items (SEP 2016).
DLAD Proc Note L06 Agency Protests (DEC 2016).
DLAD Proc Note L08 Use of Past Performance Information Retrieval System Statistical Reporting in Past Performance Evaluations (JUN
2018).
DLAD Proc Note L09 Reverse Auction (OCT 2016)
DLAD Proc Note L11 Small Business Program Representation (AUG 2017).
DLAD Proc Note L22 Restriction of Alternate Offers for Source Controlled Items (SEP 2017).
INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS - PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS
L.1. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION:_________________________
L.1.1. Introduction: This section contains general proposal submission instructions as well as specific proposal requirements for the
IEC. The Government intends to award multiple contracts from this solicitation.
L.1.2. General: The proposal shall be presented in sufficient detail to allow Government evaluation of response to the requirements of the Request for Proposal (RFP). The Government will not assume the offeror possesses any capability, understanding, or commitment not specified in the proposal.
L.2. PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS:__________________________
L.2.1. General
L.2.1.1. The offeror shall provide information by addressing each Factor/Sub-Factor/Sub-Sub Factor in the format and sequence identified below. The offeror shall provide information in sufficient detail to allow the Government to make a best value assessment of the offerors capability to support the evaluation criteria. The offeror is responsible for providing adequate documentation to enable a thorough evaluation of the proposal. The offeror should thoroughly read and understand the terms and conditions contained in the solicitation. The offeror shall submit a proposal that clearly and concisely describes and defines the offerors response to the objectives/requirements contained in the RFP. In order to receive full consideration, the offeror is encouraged to ensure that the information provided within its proposal is factual, accurate and complete.
L.2.1.2. The offeror shall assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of its facilities and experience, and that the Government will base its evaluation exclusively on the merits and content of the information presented in the offerors proposal. The proposal shall not simply restate or rephrase the Governments requirements, but rather provide a convincing rationale explaining how the offeror intends to meet these requirements.
L.2.1.3. Each large business offeror shall provide a Small Business Subcontracting Plan that contains all the elements required by FAR
52.219-9. This plan shall be incorporated into any resultant contract in reference to the RFP.
L.2.1.4. If the offeror does not understand the instructions contained herein, written notification should be provided to the
Contracting Officer for clarification ten (10) days prior to the deadline for the receipt of proposals to get an answer in time to meet the deadline. The Government will publish the questions asked and the answers given, and distribute them to all prospective offerors.
L.2.1.5. If the offeror takes exception to any of the solicitation terms, the offeror shall include a list setting out the exceptions.
Exceptions to any terms and conditions of the RFP may make the proposal unacceptable.
L.2.1.6. In order to be considered for an award, proposals must be submitted in four (4) volumes in accordance with the instructions of the solicitation. Volume 1 shall consist of the Technical Proposal, which must be devoid of all reference to cost or price. Volume 2 shall consist of the Past Performance Proposal. Volume 3 shall consist of the Small Business Participation Proposal, and shall consist of the Sub-Contracting Plan (for Other-than-small-businesses only). Volume 4 shall consist of the Price Proposal.
L.2.1.7. The offeror shall include a completed and signed copy of the RFP, and all amendments. The offeror shall also include a cover letter on company letterhead as part of the proposal submission. The cover letter must contain a statement committing the offerors firm to the proposal, stating its validity for a period of at least one hundred eighty (180) days, and providing any exceptions to the RFP that are addressed throughout the proposal. The letter should also include the name, title, phone number, and e-mail address for the person(s) authorized to negotiate with the Government in connection with the proposal. The letter must be signed by a responsible officer or partner/principal of the firm that is authorized to bind the organization contractually. The letter must also contain a statement that the proposal meets the specifications of each section and sub-section of the RFP.
8 18
Name of Offeror or Contractor:
PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD
L.2.1.8. All proposal volumes, with the exception of Volume 4, shall be in delivered in PDF files. Volume 4 shall be delivered through the provided excel file. PDF pages should not exceed 8-1/2 inches in width by 11 inches in length with at least one inch margins on all sides, using a font with a 12 point size type or larger for all body text. Text used in the proposal is at the discretion of the offeror but should maintain a legible font and size. Graphics must be able to be printed and copied in pure black and white (no color). Pages shall be consecutively numbered. Each page of the proposal should be affixed with the following legend: Source Selection Information
(See FAR 2.101 and 3.104). The offeror shall not submit information in its proposals that is considered Classified. Proprietary markings are permitted.
L.2.1.9. Offers submitted must be valid for one hundred eighty (180) days after the final closing date of the solicitation. The
Government intends to make more than one contract award. The Government will process late submissions of proposals in accordance with
FAR 15.208.
L.2.1.10. The offeror shall submit its proposal electronically through the link on FedBizOpps associated with the solicitation number.
The offeror shall email a confirmation upload to Lindsey.Schuman@dla.mil and Michelle.Bontempo@dla.mil. The offeror may e-mail
Lindsey.Schuman@dla.mil and Michelle.Bontempo@dla.mil if it is experiencing technical difficulties with the FedBizOpps website. Email submissions through a secured site may be accepted as an alternative if approved in advance by the Contracting Officer.
L.3. TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (VOLUME 1)___________________________________
L.3.1. The technical proposal shall not exceed fifty (50) pages. The page count will be made by counting the pages from left to right, consecutively. Pages that exceed the page limitation will not be evaluated. Each paragraph shall be separated by at least one blank line. Any and all annexes, documentation and attachments that are submitted by the offeror will count against the page limitations. The following will not count against page limitations: table of contents pages, cross-referencing pages, acronym lists, and page dividers.
L.3.2. The Technical Proposal shall consist of separate sub-sections outlining each technical sub-factor and sub-sub factor.
Information provided by the offeror should enable the Government to determine whether the offeror can meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation. The offeror is responsible for including sufficient details to permit a complete and accurate evaluation strictly from a technical standpoint. The proposal shall be detailed and clearly stated to allow an assessment by the Government without the need for additional clarification.
L.3.3. Factor: Technical
L.3.3.1. Sub-Factor: Management Approach: The offerors shall provide a management approach that demonstrates its ability to effectively and efficiently manage the scope of the acquisition and that the organization has the current or planned capabilities for assuring performance of the requirements. The offeror shall provide insight into its organizational and administrative structure. The offeror shall clearly define how this structure will enable effective performance under the contract. The proposal should detail the processes the offeror has in place to ensure that applicable clauses, including terms and conditions required by the prime contract, flow down to subcontractors.
L.3.3.1.1. Program Management Plan: The offeror shall provide a detailed plan on how it will manage the program to include the oversight of the supply chain. The offeror shall align its plan in accordance with the required program management support within the SOW. The plan should detail the key personnel, internal management reviews, training, and policy implementation that will ensure integrity throughout the program. The plan shall also include the offerors ability to support surge and sustainment in contingency operations.
L.3.3.2. Sub-Factor: Technical Evaluation Approach: To meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation, the offeror must clearly show within its submitted proposal how it plans to meet the Governments product requirements as identified in the SOW in Section J (Exhibit
A) of this solicitation. The offeror shall demonstrate its technical capability by discussing in its technical proposal the plans, methods, and procedures for fulfilling the technical requirements described in the specification and the SOW. The offeror shall provide evidence demonstrating a clear understanding of the requirements, to include the scope and complexity of the work. The proposed approach shall be well-defined and logical, and include the methodologies and processes that can successfully meet the objectives. As required in the SOW, a Small Business or an Other-than-small-business offeror is required to quote on a minimum percentage of RFQ/RFPs. This percentage will be referred to as the quote metric. A Small Business offeror shall describe its plan to propose to the seventy percent
(70%) quote metric, and an Other-than-small-business offeror shall describe its plan to propose to the eighty-five percent (85%) quote metric.
L.3.3.2.1. Sub-Sub-Factor: Supply Chain Management: The offeror shall provide its established methods and processes in terms of supply chain management. The offeror shall provide detail into its supply chain management structure, and describe how that structure will meet the requirement of the SOW. The offeror shall list the current business alliances and contractual relationships with manufacturers, vendors, distribution centers, consolidation centers, warehousing resources, etc., that will enable the offeror to provide, consolidate, and distribute supplies covered under the IEC. The offeror shall also describe how these business alliances and contractual relationships will enable it to provide, consolidate, and distribute the types of supplies covered under the IEC. The offeror shall explain the processes in place to ensure that applicable quality requirements are flowed to subcontractors. The offeror shall also provide a detailed plan on how it will maintain the on-time delivery metric stated within the SOW, including its established processes
9 18
Name of Offeror or Contractor:
PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD
for tracking deliveries through the supply chain.
L.3.3.2.2. Sub-Sub-Factor: Production Management: The offeror shall provide detail on its production management processes, and demonstrate how the methods and processes meet the solicitation requirements. The plan should demonstrate the offerors understanding of the technically complex challenges that may arise under the acquisition.
L.3.3.2.2.1. Production Quality Verification: The offeror shall describe in detail its quality management processes, and the methodology by which the high level of quality will be maintained through their supply chain and throughout deliverables.
L.3.3.2.2.2 FAT Process: The offeror shall describe in detail its ability to supply items that require FAT. The offeror shall provide processes utilized for FAT execution, including the process flow through its supply chain.
L.3.3.2.2.3. Technical Data Package Verification: The offeror shall describe in detail the processes utilized to review, analyze and verify the TDPs prior to proposal submission.
L.3.3.2.2.4. Configuration Management: The offeror shall describe in detail their configuration management processes to include their process for Engineering Change Proposals and Request for Variance.
L.3.3.2.2.5. Obsolescence Reporting: The offeror shall describe the processes in place for tracking diminishing sources/part obsolescence as identified in the forecasted quarterly requirement within the SOW.
L.4. PAST PERFORMANCE (VOLUME 2)_________________________________
L.4.1. To assist the Government in evaluating past performance, the offeror shall provide a list of relevant completed contracts/orders, commercial or government, performed within the past three (3) years. Up to three (3) total, government OR commercial contracts for the same or similar items shall be submitted. Companies proposing as a joint venture can provide up to three (3) examples from either the companies that make up the joint venture or the joint venture. The Government will not consider any contracts that were completed or performed by subcontractors for the requirements listed in the past performance volume. For the purposes of this evaluation, similar items will be defined as products in the same federal supply class (FSC). Relevancy includes contracts/orders for similar items that are similar in complexity, dollar value, contract type, and/or degree of subcontracting.
L.4.2. For each contract/order requested, the offeror shall provide the following information:
- Name and address of the contracting government activity or the name and address of the commercial customer;
- For government contracts, the name, email address, and phone number of the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO), and for commercial customers, the name and phone number of the commercial customer purchasing official;
- The contract/order number or other means of document identification if no contract/order number was assigned along with period of performance;
- The contract type (i.e. fixed price, fixed price with EPA, etc.) or commercial agreement type;
- Total dollar value of the contract;
- A description of the item(s) provided under the contract and the item or service, if applicable;
- For Government contracts, the name, email address, and phone number of the Administering Contracting Officer (ACO), and for commercial supply contracts, the name and phone number of the officer, official agent or employee administering the contract; and
- A listing of any problems or discrepancies (includes shortages, overages, damages, defects, or misshipments, etc.) experienced with the contracts or customers, including a brief description of how these problems were addressed and remedied.
- The Government reserves the right to limit the number of references it decides to contact.
Sources of Past Performance Information for Evaluation are as follows:
- Past performance information shall be provided by the offeror, as solicited;
- Past performance information shall be obtained from questionnaires tailored to the circumstances of the acquisition, if applicable; or
- Past performance information may be obtained from any other sources available to the Government, to include, but not limited to, the
Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract
Reporting System (eSRS), Dunn & Bradstreet (D&B), or other databases; interviews with Program Managers, Contracting Officers, and Fee
10 18
Name of Offeror or Contractor:
PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD
Determining Officials; and the Defense Contract Management Agency.
L.5. SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION (VOLUME 3)_____________________________________________
An offeror (either Other-than-small-businesses and small businesses) shall provide a Small Business Participation Commitment Document
(SBPCD) substantiating how it will meet the small business participation requirements. The extent of participation of small businesses and other socio-economically disadvantaged small businesses or entities will be measured as a percentage of the total anticipated effort regardless of whether the small business or socio-economically disadvantaged small business is a prime contractor, subcontractor, or joint venture partner.
To receive consideration for award, the offeror shall provide a SBPCD that explains its plan to maintain a minimum of forty percent
(40%) of the total awarded order dollar value throughout the life of the contract to small business. Small business participation is the collective small business participation from any type of small business or subcategory small business. Work self-performed by a small business prime will be credited towards the required forty percent (40%) small business participation.
The plans shall include the name of the company and type of services or supplies they will provide, their small business and socio-economic size standard, the current commitment the organization have with the offeror, and the percentage of work that will be performed when using the small businesses to ensure the required forty percent (40%) small business participation will be met. The plan shall include the organizations commitment to ensuring that the forty percent (40%) is maintained through bi-annual size standards checks with its vendors.
Other-than-small-business offerors shall provide substantiating documentation on your organizations performance in regards to meeting previous small business participation goals. The documentation should incorporate any small business performance within the last three
(3) years from date of solicitation. An Other-than-small-business offerors shall advise the Government within their proposal if they did not have any small business participation goals on any contract within the last three (3) years.
Other-than-small-business offerors shall provide a Small Business Subcontracting Plan that contains all the elements required by FAR
52.219-9. This plan shall be incorporated into any resultant contract. The following are non-mandatory goals for socio-economic contracting programs that should be considered in the offerors plan:
Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB) - five percent (5%) of total contract dollars
Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) - three percent (3%) of total control dollars
Historically Underutilized Business Zone (HUBZone) - three (3%) of total control dollars
Veteran Owned Small Business - two percent (2%) of total control dollars
L.6. PRICE (VOLUME 4)_____________________
L.6.1. The offeror shall propose on a minimum of ninety-five (95%) of the Price Evaluation List (PEL) for the base period and each option period. Alternative items determined not to be acceptable will not count towards the ninety-five (95%) minimum of the PEL items required to be priced. (If the offeror proposes on an item or an alternative item for the base period, it must also propose on the same item or the alternative for all option periods.) The offeror that does not meet the ninety-five (95%) minimum of acceptable quoted PEL items will have its proposal rejected.
L.6.2. The offeror shall fill out Tab 1 of the provided spreadsheet: Attachment 0001 Price Evaluation Spreadsheet. The offeror shall refer to the instructions within the spreadsheet to ensure a complete understanding as to what requirements apply per NIIN.
L.6.2.1. TAB 1 The offerors shall submit firm-fixed ceiling prices for a minimum of ninety-five (95%) of the items on the PEL for the base period and all option periods. Pricing shall be for a new/unused product. Prices offered must be unit prices, which are clearly stated and which require no further interpretation by the Government in order to determine the actual offered price. Unit prices offered must include costs of compliance with all solicitation requirements. Prices are to be F.O.B destination and shall include all applicable costs, including commercial packaging. The ceiling prices on the PEL must include shipping to customers worldwide and as stated in SOW paragraph 3.4.4. Failure to submit proposed prices in accordance with these instructions may result in rejection of the offer.
L.6.2.1.1. The PEL is a representative sample of the types of items purchased by DLA Land Aberdeens customers. The prices for the PEL and acceptable alternatives will be ceiling prices after contract award. It is the maximum unit price the Government will pay during the base period and applicable option periods. During the post-award competition of orders, the contractor may not submit a quote for a PEL item or acceptable alternative with a price that exceeds the applicable contractual ceiling price. DLA Land Aberdeen will verify that the prices do not exceed the ceiling prices.
L.6.2.1.2. The offeror should take into consideration that there will be no minimum order quantity on the PEL items.
11 18
Name of Offeror or Contractor:
PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD
L.6.2.1.3. If an item on the PEL is superseded during the contract term, the contractor shall advise the Contracting Officer as soon as practical. If there is not a change to the form, fit, and function, configuration, application, or physical nature and is therefore an exact item of replacement, PEL pricing shall remain applicable. If there is a change such that it is not an exact item replacement, the contractor shall include complete information from the manufacturer concerning the replacement item as it relates to form, fit, and function, configuration, application, or physical nature of the superseded item. If the determination by the Contracting Officer is that the superseded item is not an exact replacement then PEL Pricing will not be applicable.
L.6.2.1.4. If an item on the PEL has been classified as end of life by the manufacturer, then the contractor shall provide supporting documentation to the Contracting Officer. PEL pricing will not be applicable after the last production date.
L.6.2.1.5. The Government is providing the estimated demand represented by the most current data available. The offeror should note these numbers are based on historical data and should account for any business risk associated with these numbers.
L.6.2.1.6. Items on the PEL have been identified by NSN, part number and material descriptions. If any of the following occur, the
Contracting Officer shall be contacted in writing: the part number does not match, equal or represent the item description; the part number has been discontinued; or the part number / product is no longer available.
L.6.2.1.7. The offeror may offer alternates for items on the PEL. (If the offeror proposed an alternative item for the base period, it must also propose on the same item for all option periods.) To be considered for evaluation, the alternate item must be equal to the item on the PEL, have the same form, fit, and function, and be compliant with applicable sourcing restrictions. The offeror shall provide the alternate items manufacturer, part number, and material description. In addition, the offeror shall fill in the unit price.
The offeror shall furnish with its offer legible copies of all drawings, specifications, or other data necessary to clearly describe the characteristics and features of the alternate product being offered, as well as a link to the manufacturers website (if applicable) to locate and identify the item being requested. Data submitted shall cover design, materials, performance, function, interchangeability, inspection, and/or testing criteria, and other characteristics of the offered product. In addition the offeror shall furnish drawings and other data covering the design, material and other information of the exact product cited in the PEL sufficient to enable the
Government to determine whether the offerors product is equal to the product cited in the PEL. The substantiation is to be part of the price proposal copy and must clearly identify the PEL item for which an alternate is being offered. The Contracting Officer will evaluate equal products on the basis of information furnished by the offeror or identified in the offer, and reasonably available to the
Contracting Officer. The Contracting Officer is not responsible for locating or obtaining any information not identified in the offer.
The offeror may only offer one alternate item per line item in the PEL. The offeror must identify the alternate offer in the price proposal spreadsheet in the space provided. All substantiating documentation must be annotated to clearly show the line item of the PEL for which an alternate is being offered. Alternate items determined not to be acceptable will not count towards the ninety-five (95%) minimum of the PEL items required to be priced. It is the Government that determines if the documentation or other evidence furnished by an offeror is adequate to satisfy the requirements in this provision. The Contracting Officer may at any time request evidence of the technical acceptability of the supplies offered in response to this solicitation. The Contracting Officer determines the acceptability and sufficiency of other documentation or other evidence at his or her sole discretion. If the Contracting Officer requests evidence from the offeror and the Contracting Officer subsequently finds the evidence to be unacceptable, or if the offeror fails to provide the requested evidence, the alternate item will not be accepted. As ordering requirements arise for the PEL items, the Government reserves the right to re-evaluate the acceptability of alternatives for any particular customer requirement. Acceptable alternate items will be added to the contractors awarded PEL as firm-fixed-price ceiling prices for the applicable base and all option periods. Failure to adhere to this paragraphs requirements will result in the proposal being considered unacceptable.
L.6.2.1.8. The offeror's ceiling prices should not include FAT. The ceiling prices shall include all other requirements in the solicitation and SOW to include testing and shipping.
L.6.3. Any clarifications or questions regarding an item on the PEL must be addressed to the Contracting Officer in writing during the solicitation period. The questions must be in order by the PEL line item numbering and forwarded to the Contracting Officer in a
Microsoft Word Document format.
L.6.4. Prices offered shall be clearly stated and require no further interpretation by the Government to determine the actual offered price. Prices shall not be stated as part of a pricing formula or as charges per lot. Unit prices offered shall include costs of compliance with all solicitation requirements. Failure to submit proposed prices in accordance with these instructions may result in rejection of the offer.
L.6.5. The offerors pricing on the PEL shall be carried out to a maximum of two decimal places.
L.6.6. The pre-formatted spreadsheet is the only acceptable method of returning the price proposal. Submitted files shall be renamed to include the volume number, the offerors name and the solicitation number, for example Volume 4_XYZ Company_SPRBL119R0042. The offeror shall not change the format in the spreadsheet, as any change to the spreadsheet may adversely impact the evaluation of the price proposal.
L.6.7. The offeror may be required to submit other than certified cost or pricing data in accordance with FAR 15.403-3.
12 18
Name of Offeror or Contractor:
PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD
*** END OF NARRATIVE L0001 ***
13 18
Name of Offeror or Contractor:
PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD
SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD
DLAD PROCT NOTES IMPLEMENTED BY REFERENCE:
DLAD Proc Note M06 Evaluation of Offers for Part Numbered Items (SEP 2016).
PROPOSAL EVALUTION__________________
M.1. Proposals will be evaluated using Best Value Tradeoff source selection procedures, with the Government giving appropriate consideration to the four (4) evaluation factors: Technical, Past Performance, Small Business Participation, and Price. The Government will weigh the relative benefits of each proposal and awards will be made based on an assessment of the results of the evaluation. In making this assessment, the Government shall give due consideration to all of the factors, sub-factors, and sub-sub factors and their relative order of importance. The Government intends to make multiple awards.
All evaluation factors other than price, when combined, are significantly more important than price. The Government will evaluate Small
Business Offerors and Other-than-Small-Business Offerors separately and alike, as defined throughout the evaluation criteria. The
Government reserves the right to make an award to other than the lowest priced offerors, or to other than the offerors with the highest technical rating if the Government determines that do so would result in the best value to the Government. Offerors that receive a final rating of Red/Unacceptable on any factor/sub factor/sub-sub Factor level are ineligible for award. Non-cost evaluation factors for tradeoff are listed below in descending order of importance. The evaluation sub-factors /sub-subfactors listed below are equal in importance.
Non-Cost Evaluation Factors, Sub-Factors, and Sub-Sub Factors:
1. Technical
a. Management Approach
b. Technical Evaluation Approach
i. Supply Chain Management
ii. Production Management
2. Past Performance
3. Small Business Participation
Cost Evaluation Factor:
1. Price
M.2. TECHNICAL:______________
M.2.1. Management Approach: The offerors management approach will be evaluated to determine the extent to which the offeror has developed a strategy for the effective and efficient management of contract activities needed to successfully fulfill the SOW requirements, and demonstrated that the organization has the current or planned capabilities for assuring performance of the requirements. The offeror shall provide insight into its organizational and administrative structure that ensures efficient and effective procurement of requirement supply.
M.2.1.1. Program Management Plan: The offerors program management plan will be evaluated to determine if the offeror has clearly demonstrated its ability to effectively manage the overall program requirements, including its supply chain network.
M.2.2. Technical Evaluation Approach: The offerors technical approach will be evaluated to determine the extent to…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .