SPH-M Draft Consolidated CDRL Listing (2 of 2).pdf

PREVIOUS EDITION MAY BE USED.

DD FORM 1423, FEB 2024 Page 1 of 2

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST

A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO. B. EXHIBIT C. CATEGORY:

TDP TM OTHER

D. SYSTEM/ITEM

Self Propelled Howitzer 155mm

E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR

1. DATA ITEM NO.

A017

2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM

Fire Control Report

3. SUBTITLE

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.)

DI-MISC-80508B

5. CONTRACT REFERENCE

C.5.16

6. REQUIRING OFFICE

SFAE-GCS-HR

7. DD 250 REQ

No

8. APP CODE

9. DIST STATEMENT

REQUIRED

10. FREQUENCY

SEE REMARKS

11. AS OF DATE

O

12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION

SEE REMARKS

13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT

SUBMISSION

SEE REMARKS

14. DISTRIBUTION

a. ADDRESSEE

b. COPIES

Draft Final

Reg Repro

16. REMARKS

Format: USG requires contractor response digitally and in the English language. Contractor format is acceptable.

Blocks 10-13: Contractor shall submit a draft CDRL 90 days after contract award. USG will conduct a review within 15 days after receipt. Contractor shall propose a time for a four hour meeting to occur after the 15 day USG review period. The intent of the meeting will be to review any USG comments to the draft proposal. The final submission is due from the contractor 10 days after the review meeting.

The report shall include the following sections:

a. Software Architecture Description. The contractor shall document the detailed description and interactions of the software modules of the system in accordance with section 3.3.3.1 of DI-SESS-82176.

b. Software Requirements. The contractor shall describe the requirements of the fire control system and the interactions between fire control and its interfaces. Fire control requirements shall include information detailed in sections 3.2, 3.3, 3.7, and 3.10 of DI-IPSC-81433A (Software Requirements Specification).

c. Fire Control Integration Report. The contractor shall describe how it could integrate a US provided, GFE fire control system into their platform. The GFE system may include element such as an INU, radios, antennas, computers, displays, user interface devices and/or software. Section 3.2 of DI-SESS-82044 (System/Software Integration Plan) shall be used as a guide for the overview of required work.

d. Software Test Report. The contractor shall document Fire control software testing that was completed most recently and its results. An overview of the test results shall be provided in accordance with section

3.1 of DI-IPSC-81440A.

e. User Manual. The contractor shall describe the software environment needed for the user to install and run the software in accordance with section 3.3 of DI-IPSC-81443A.

SFAE-GCS-HR 1

ACC-Detroit 1

15.TOTAL 2

17. PRICE GROUP

18. ESTIMATED

TOTAL PRICE

G. PREPARED BY H. SIGNATURE I. APPROVED BY J. SIGNATURE

DRAFT

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST

A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO. B. EXHIBIT C. CATEGORY:

TDP TM OTHER

D. SYSTEM/ITEM

Self Propelled Howitzer 155mm

E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR

1. DATA ITEM NO.

A018

2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM

Integrated Health Mgnmt System Description and Data Architecture

3. SUBTITLE

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.)

DI-SESS-82078A

5. CONTRACT REFERENCE

C.5.17

6. REQUIRING OFFICE

SFAE-GCS-HR

7. DD 250 REQ

No

8. APP CODE

9. DIST STATEMENT

REQUIRED

10. FREQUENCY

SEE REMARKS

11. AS OF DATE

O

12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION

SEE REMARKS

13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT

SUBMISSION

SEE REMARKS

14. DISTRIBUTION

a. ADDRESSEE

b. COPIES

Draft Final

Reg Repro

16. REMARKS

Format: USG requires contractor response digitally and in the English language. Contractor format is acceptable.

Blocks 10-13: Contractor shall submit a draft CDRL 120 days after contract award. USG will conduct a review within 15 days after receipt. Contractor shall propose a time for a four hour meeting to occur after the 15 day USG review period. The intent of the meeting will be to review any USG comments to the draft proposal. The final submission is due from the contractor 10 days after the review meeting.

The information should provide knowledge on the system's health management capability. The report shall include at a minimum the below information.

1. Provide a detailed description of the system's overall IHMS or IHMSs to include the fault reporting interfaces (e.g., SAE J1939), how the user/maintainer/operator is notified of faults and other system conditions managed by the IHMS, and details as to the hardware that hosts the IHMS.

2. Provide a quantification of the total number of faults handled by the system's IHMS and a categorical breakdown of how the faults are troubleshot and/or isolated (e.g., automatically, with on-board troubleshooting, with interactive electronic technical manuals, with paper technical manuals, etc.).

3. Describe whether and how the IHMS aids in each of the following tasks: Preventative Maintenance Checks and Services (PMCS), Predictive Maintenance, Hardware/Software Configuration Validation, Data Logging, and Data Visualization.

4. Provide a description of what training and reference materials are available for instructing users on how to operate the IHMS.

Reports to be submitted to the following Points of Contact:

SFAE-GCS-HR: XXXX

ACC-Detroit: xxxxx

SFAE-GCS-HR 1

ACC-Detroit 1

15.TOTAL 2

17. PRICE GROUP

18. ESTIMATED

TOTAL PRICE

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST

A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO. B. EXHIBIT C. CATEGORY:

TDP TM OTHER

D. SYSTEM/ITEM

Self Propelled Howitzer 155mm

E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR

1. DATA ITEM NO.

A019

2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM

Network Integration Report

3. SUBTITLE

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.)

DI-MISC-80508B

5. CONTRACT REFERENCE

C.5.18

6. REQUIRING OFFICE

SFAE-GCS-HR

7. DD 250 REQ

No

8. APP CODE

9. DIST STATEMENT

REQUIRED

10. FREQUENCY

SEE REMARKS

11. AS OF DATE

O

12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION

SEE REMARKS

13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT

SUBMISSION

SEE REMARKS

14. DISTRIBUTION

a. ADDRESSEE

b. COPIES

Draft Final

Reg Repro

16. REMARKS

Format: USG requires contractor response digitally and in the English language. Contractor format is acceptable.

Blocks 10-13: Contractor shall submit a draft CDRL 60 days after contract award. USG will conduct a review within 15 days after receipt. Contractor shall propose a time for a four hour meeting to occur after the 15 day USG review period. The intent of the meeting will be to review any USG comments to the draft proposal. The final submission is due from the contractor 10 days after the review meeting.

The report must include, at a minimum, the information outlined below:

1. Identify internal user accessible locations as well as external mounting points for Antennas and Transceivers.

2. Describe the capacity of Armor Pass-Throughs for internal to external vehicle cabling.

3. If platform currently has Command and Control (C2), PNT and TR equipment integrated, Contractor shall identify the equipment’s current space, power and mounting point claims.

4. Describe the electrical power requirements and outputs for all vehicles offered.

5. Describe the conditions for spare electrical power for both engine-on and engine-off (Battery) conditions.

6. Provide a 3D CAD model of the top of the vehicle to support an Antenna Placement Study and Co-Site analysis.

Reports to be submitted to the following Points of Contact:

SFAE-GCS-HR: XXXX

ACC-Detroit: xxxxx

SFAE-GCS-HR 1

ACC-Detroit 1

15.TOTAL 2

17. PRICE GROUP

18. ESTIMATED

TOTAL PRICE

DD FORM 1423, FEB 2024 Page 1 of 3

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST

A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO. B. EXHIBIT C. CATEGORY:

TDP TM OTHER

D. SYSTEM/ITEM

Self Propelled Howitzer 155mm

E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR

1. DATA ITEM NO.

A020

2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM

Quality Assurance Program Plan

3. SUBTITLE

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.)

DI-MISC-80508B

5. CONTRACT REFERENCE

C.5.19

6. REQUIRING OFFICE

SFAE-GCS-HR

7. DD 250 REQ

No

8. APP CODE

9. DIST STATEMENT

REQUIRED

10. FREQUENCY

SEE REMARKS

11. AS OF DATE

O

12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION

SEE REMARKS

13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT

SUBMISSION

SEE REMARKS

14. DISTRIBUTION

a. ADDRESSEE

b. COPIES

Draft Final

Reg Repro

16. REMARKS

Format: USG requires contractor response digitally and in the English language. Contractor format is acceptable.

Blocks 10-13: The report is to be submitted 90/120 days after contract award. No subsequent submissions required.

The report shall include at a minimum the information outlined below.

1. Reference documents. The applicable issue of the documents cited herein, including their approval dates and dates of any applicable amendments, notices, and revisions, shall be as specified in the contract.

2. Content. The QAPP shall describe how the Quality Program is conducted, the specific techniques and activities to be performed, and their integration and development in conjunction with other specified related plans. The QAPP shall include the following:

2.1 Reference Documents. Provide a complete list of compliance and reference documents (e.g. SAE AS9100; MIL-HDBK-896, Manufacturing Management Program Guide; SAE AS6500, Manufacturing Management Program) that are used to guide the writing and implementation of the QAPP.

2.2 Regulation. Identify and describe all regulatory standards and documentation (e.g. ISO 9001) that the contractor is managed under.

2.3 Leadership.

2.3.1 Quality Policy. Provide the quality policy and explain how it is communicated, understood, and applied within the organization.

2.3.2 Organizational Roles, Responsibilities, and Authorities. Provide the organizational structure and responsibilities that influence the quality of the products. Identify the responsibilities and authorities for relevant roles and provide verification that they are assigned, communicated, and understood.

2.4 Planning.

2.4.1 Quality Objectives. Identify quality objectives at relevant functions, levels, and processes needed for the quality management system. These objectives shall be consistent with the quality policy and measurable to assure customer satisfaction. The objectives shall also be reflected in the quality metrics shared with the Government as identified in 2.7.3. Describe actions to address quality risks.

2.5 Support.

2.5.1 People. Describe the necessary quality manpower, including special skills, and the plans for acquiring competent personnel to meet program technical, schedule, and capacity needs.

2.5.2 Monitoring and Measuring Resources. Identify the equipment needed to verify conformity of the product and services and plans for designing, acquiring, and validating program-unique equipment.

Describe the calibration program and traceability to national or international measurement standards.

SFAE-GCS-HR 1

ACC-Detroit 1

15.TOTAL 2

17. PRICE GROUP

18. ESTIMATED

TOTAL PRICE

DD FORM 1423, FEB 2024 Page 2 of 3

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

16. REMARKS (Continuation)

2.5.3 Control of Quality Records. Describe what quality records are kept, for how long the quality records are required to be kept, where the quality records are kept, who keeps the quality records, and in what form the quality records are kept. Provide a description of how the records are stored, retrieved, dispositioned, and how any confidentiality requirements are maintained.

2.6 Operation.

2.6.1 Operational Planning and Control. Provide details of the method employed to verify process controls are in place and being used during manufacturing and assembly, to include: process documentation; procedures for monitoring and controlling key characteristics; workmanship standards; use of qualified processes, equipment, and personnel; and appropriate tooling and test equipment. List all critical processes used and the method or plan used to control each of them. Describe the statistical techniques used to evaluate and maintain consistent quality control.

2.6.2 Prevention of Counterfeit Parts. Describe the counterfeit parts prevention strategy.

2.6.3 Design and Development Controls. Describe the quality processes in place to monitor the design process, including design changes to correct design errors. Identify and describe the standards, practices, conventions, and metrics that are applied. Also, identify and describe how compliance to these standards is monitored and how conformance to the requirements is verified. Where key characteristics are required, provide a description of the methodologies of identification and management of these characteristics to ensure product quality.

2.6.4 Control of Externally Provided Processes, Products, and Services. Identify all critical parts that will be purchased and how conformance to requirements is ensured for these parts. Depict the method used to evaluate, select, and control suppliers. Describe how quality requirements are flowed down to subcontractors, and how compliance to requirements is verified to assure quality.

2.6.5 Control of Production and Service Provision. Describe how production process verification is performed.

2.6.6 Property Belonging to Customers or External Providers. Describe how the Government’s and external providers’ property is safeguarded.

2.6.8 Control of Nonconforming Outputs. Describe the Material Review Board process, including the responsibilities and authorities for reviewing and dispositioning nonconforming outputs.

2.6.9 Identification and Traceability. Describe how unique identification of outputs is controlled when traceability is a requirement and how documented information is retained to enable traceability.

2.6.10 Configuration Management. Describe how the organization plans, implements, and controls the process to ensure delivery of products with approved configuration and ensures that the documented information (e.g., requirements, design, verification, validation, and acceptance documentation) is consistent with the actual attributes of the products and services.

2.7 Performance Evaluation.

2.7.1 Monitoring, Measurement, Analysis, and Evaluation. Describe the methods for inspection and testing needed to ensure product conformance with design requirements. Include the integration of customer or regulatory established witness points and use of third party verification.

2.7.2 Customer Satisfaction. Describe how the contractor participates in the Government deficiency reporting process.

2.7.3 Analysis and Evaluation (Quality Metrics). Identify what quality metrics are collected and reported. Metrics shall be appropriate for the life cycle phase. The QAPP shall describe how these metrics are collected and how they are used to control production processes and improve quality. The QAPP shall describe how the analysis of quality metrics is documented and how corrective actions are taken as a result of quality metrics. Describe how the quality metrics address all elements of manufacturing (e.g., suppliers, receiving inspection, fabrication, special processes, rework, assembly, inspections, acceptance testing, and customer failures).

2.7.4 Internal Audit. Identify the nature and extent of the quality audits to be performed (e.g., internal, customer, supplier, regulatory, and seller), frequency, methodology for identifying which processes are audited, how the results are used in the corrective and preventive action system, and the extent of the Government’s involvement in internal quality audits.

2.7.5 External Audit. Describe any past working relationship with U.S. Government defense entities and any associated Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) interactions and oversight.

2.8 Improvement.

2.8.1 Problem Reporting and Preventive and Corrective Action. Identify methods used to detect, report, track, and resolve product and process problems and trends, including both shop floor processes and non-shop floor processes. Provide a description of how the U.S. Government will interface with this process.

Outline a program to continuously improve quality based on analysis of quality data.

2.8.2 Nonconformity and Corrective Action. Describe the process for conducting root cause analyses, implementing corrective actions, and measuring corrective action effectiveness.

Reports to be submitted to the following Points of Contact:

SFAE-GCS-HR: XXXX

ACC-Detroit: xxxxx

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST

A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO. B. EXHIBIT C. CATEGORY:

TDP TM OTHER

D. SYSTEM/ITEM

Self Propelled Howitzer 155mm

E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR

1. DATA ITEM NO.

A021

2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM

Technical Report for Nuclear, Biological, Chemical Compliance

3. SUBTITLE

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.)

DI-MISC-80508B

5. CONTRACT REFERENCE

C.5.20

6. REQUIRING OFFICE

SFAE-GCS-HR

7. DD 250 REQ

No

8. APP CODE

9. DIST STATEMENT

REQUIRED

10. FREQUENCY

SEE REMARKS

11. AS OF DATE

O

12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION

SEE REMARKS

13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT

SUBMISSION

SEE REMARKS

14. DISTRIBUTION

a. ADDRESSEE

b. COPIES

Draft Final

Reg Repro

16. REMARKS

Format: USG requires contractor response digitally and in the English language. Contractor format is acceptable.

Blocks 10-13: Contractor shall submit a draft CDRL 60 days after contract award. USG will conduct a review within 15 days after receipt. Contractor shall propose a time for a four hour meeting to occur after the 15 day USG review period. The intent of the meeting will be to review any USG comments to the draft proposal. The final submission is due from the contractor 10 days after the review meeting.

The report shall cover at a minimum the information outlined below.

Provide supporting documentation to include test reports detailing compliance with the following standards.

The SPHS is designated mission critical for CBRN survivability to include chemical, biological, radiological contamination survivability, High Altitude Electromagnetic Pulse (HEMP), and Initial Nuclear Weapons Effects (INWE). The SPHS will be hardened in compliance with Automotive Tank Purchase Description (ATPD) 2404 Section 5.4 and all Army and DoD policies and regulations against the material damaging effects of chemical, biological, radiological, (CBR) contaminants, decontaminants, and decontamination operations. The SPHS shall be able to conduct its mission while contaminated for up to six

(6) hours without failure due to contamination. Additionally, Nuclear Survivability (NS) for the SPHS will be in compliance with all Army and DoD policies and regulations associated with NS, including AR 70-75.

The SPHS will withstand INWE IAW ATPD 2404 section 5.3 and HEMP IAW MIL-STD 2169 and be capable of accomplishing its assigned follow-on mission. Accomplishment of the mission requires, at a minimum, retaining the ability to shoot, move, and communicate internally and one channel voice with no more than one full vehicle reboot. Non-mission essential (per AR 70-75) Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) and MEP equipment are exempt (T=O).

The Contractor shall prepare a report documenting the NBC compliance of all vehicles offered for evaluation for the following standards: ATPD 2404 Sections 5.4 and Sections 5.3 and AR 70-75.

CBRN Protection. The SPHS shall be compatible for use by Soldiers in Mission Oriented Protective Posture (MOPP) IV. The vehicle personnel will be supplied filtered air by an onboard air filtration system that interfaces with individual crew and passengers protective garments and equipment, to allow for continued operations in open or closed hatches. Additionally, the SPHS will host current chemical and radiological detection devices (T). The vehicle will integrate kits and instruments to provide for (1) warning against radiological and chemical hazards, (2) measurement of radiation dose rates inside and outside the vehicle, and (3) chemical identification. The system will provide audio and visual warning to the crew and automatically update the Common Operating Picture (COP) (O).

The Contractor shall prepare a report documenting the NBC compliance of all vehicles offered for evaluation for CBRN Protection.

SFAE-GCS-HR 1

ACC-Detroit 1

15.TOTAL 2

17. PRICE GROUP

18. ESTIMATED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

16. REMARKS (Continuation)

Decontamination / Absorption. Designs and materials that minimize absorption of NBC contaminants and that facilitate rapid decontamination shall be used.

The vehicle unique items shall be hardened to ensure that degradation over a 30 day period of no more than 20% in selected quantifiable essential characteristics is caused by five cumulative exposures to Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical (NBC) contaminants, decontaminants, and decontaminating procedures encountered in the field.

The Contractor shall prepare a report documenting the NBC compliance of all vehicles offered for evaluation for the following NBC decontamination / absorption compliance.

CBRN Decontamination Stowage. Space shall be provided on the vehicle for the storage of MOPP IV clothing (for each crew member), the M256A1 Chemical Detector Kit, M100 (three systems), and M295 Decontamination Equipment.

The Contractor shall prepare a report documenting the NBC compliance of all vehicles offered for evaluation for the following CBRN Decontamination Stowage compliance.

Nuclear Survivability Initial Survivability. The vehicle mission critical subsystems shall survive the Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) environment. This environment is classified and is currently defined in MIL-STD-2169. Vehicle mission critical subsystems shall be operational within 15 minutes after the EMP transient.

The Contractor shall prepare a report documenting the NBC compliance of all vehicles offered for evaluation per MIL-STD-2169.

Chemical Survivability. Vehicle unique items located on the exterior surface of the vehicle shall be able to be decontaminated after exposure to chemical agent concentrations of 10 grams per square meter (g/m^2) (VX, GD, HD) (0.00205 pounds mass per square foot (lbm/sq.ft.)). The size of the chemical agent droplets shall be 2 microliters. The surface shall also resist deterioration caused by the decontamination processes used to remove the chemical agent contamination.

The Contractor shall prepare a report documenting the NBC compliance of all vehicles offered for evaluation for chemical survivability compliance.

Biological Survivability. Vehicle unique items located on the exterior surface of the vehicle shall be able to be decontaminated after exposure to biological agent concentrations of 1x10^5 spores per square meter (9290 spores per square foot). The size of the biological agent shall be 1 to 5 micrometers in size.

The surface shall also resist deteriorization caused by the decontamination processes used to remove biological agent contamination to an acceptable risk level.

The Contractor shall prepare a report documenting the NBC compliance of all vehicles offered for evaluation for biological survivability compliance.

System level air filtration system. NBC Contaminated air. To determine conformance an air filtration system will be tested to prevent the introduction of NBC contaminated air into the crew breathing air system. Air that is introduced into the crew breathing system must pass through an NBC filter. The system shall distribute CBR filtered air to all occupant stations at a flowrate of 3.0 to 4.5 cfm per occupant through an air distribution network to allow for interconnection to occupants' CBR protective masks, using a standard Government-approved capability for quick connect and disconnect and associated flexible air hoses (T=O).

The Contractor shall prepare a report documenting the NBC compliance of all vehicles offered for evaluation for system level air filtration compliance.

Reports to be submitted to the following Points of Contact:

SFAE-GCS-HR: XXXX

ACC-Detroit: xxxxx

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST

A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO. B. EXHIBIT C. CATEGORY:

TDP TM OTHER

D. SYSTEM/ITEM

Self Propelled Howitzer 155mm

E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR

1. DATA ITEM NO.

A022

2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM

Future Growth Opportunities Report

3. SUBTITLE

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.)

DI-MISC-80508B

5. CONTRACT REFERENCE

C.5.22

6. REQUIRING OFFICE

SFAE-GCS-HR

7. DD 250 REQ

No

8. APP CODE

9. DIST STATEMENT

REQUIRED

E

10. FREQUENCY

SEE REMARKS

11. AS OF DATE

O

12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION

SEE REMARKS

13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT

SUBMISSION

SEE REMARKS

14. DISTRIBUTION

a. ADDRESSEE

b. COPIES

Draft Final

Reg Repro

16. REMARKS

Format: USG requires contractor response digitally and in the English language. Contractor format is acceptable.

Blocks 10-13: Contractor shall submit a draft CDRL 120 days after contract award. USG will conduct a review within 15 days after receipt. Contractor shall propose a time for a four hour meeting to occur after the 15 day USG review period. The intent of the meeting will be to review any USG comments to the draft proposal. The final submission is due from the contractor 10 days after the review meeting.

All areas of known future growth potential are of interest, but the items listed below shall be addressed.

a. Opportunity for additional automation, especially with respect to reducing crew size, reducing/aiding maintenance tasks, and reducing cognitive burden.

b. Opportunity for increased cannon range, especially with respect to armament system impulse margin and potential enhanced projectiles.

c. Amount of existing reserve size, weight and power, focused on chassis limits before powertrain, on-board electrical power, and internal integration space limitations.

d. Opportunity to support transition to a digital engineering environment, with focus on existing technical data structure, Systems Engineering methods, existence or possibility of digital twin, or any other pertinent information.

e. Opportunity to incorporate a secondary weapon or protection system, with interest in existing secondary systems integrated and existing interfaces and their associated design limitations. This category is intended to cover both weapons (e.g. crew served machine guns) and other, emerging systems (e.g. counter unmanned aerial systems, active protection systems, etc.).

f. Opportunity to apply the same armament system to other existing US Army Vehicles.

Reports to be submitted to the following Points of Contact:

SFAE-GCS-HR: XXXX

ACC-Detroit: xxxxx

SFAE-GCS-HR 1

ACC-Detroit 1

15.TOTAL 2

17. PRICE GROUP

18. ESTIMATED

TOTAL PRICE

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST

A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO. B. EXHIBIT C. CATEGORY:

TDP TM OTHER

D. SYSTEM/ITEM

Self Propelled Howitzer 155mm

E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR

1. DATA ITEM NO.

A023

2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM

Transportability Report

3. SUBTITLE

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.)

DI-PACK-80880D-TAILORED

5. CONTRACT REFERENCE

C.5.22

6. REQUIRING OFFICE

SFAE-GCS-HR

7. DD 250 REQ

No

8. APP CODE

9. DIST STATEMENT

REQUIRED

D

10. FREQUENCY

SEE REMARKS

11. AS OF DATE

O

12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION

SEE REMARKS

13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT

SUBMISSION

SEE REMARKS

14. DISTRIBUTION

a. ADDRESSEE

b. COPIES

Draft Final

Reg Repro

16. REMARKS

Format: USG requires contractor response digitally and in the English language. Contractor format is acceptable.

Blocks 10-13: Contractor shall submit a draft CDRL 60 days after contract award. USG will conduct a review within 15 days after receipt. Contractor shall propose a time for a four hour meeting to occur after the 15 day USG review period. The intent of the meeting will be to review any USG comments to the draft proposal. The final submission is due from the contractor 10 days after the review meeting.

The report shall provide information to the USG to allow assessment of the system's transportability using existing USG transportation assets and standards. The Transportability Report shall include at minimum the following sections and modifications:

1. Reference documents

2. Format

3.1. Title

3.2. Points of contact

3.3. Date of report

3.9a. Transportation Data; Hazardous Materials 3.9b. Transportation Data; Sectionalization and Reduction 3.9c. Modeling and Simulation. Drawings and CAD models not required. Provide summary of analyses completed against transportation requirements on the existing vehicle system(s) under evaluation.

3.9d. Transportability Tests 3.9i. Dimensional and Weight Data Tables 3.9j. Lift and Tiedown Provisions. The Contractor may present information based on MIL-STD-209 or NATO Standardization Agreement (STANAG) 4478 and 4101.

Additionally, the contractor may provide existing transportation certifications, transportation related analyses, or transportation related demonstration results. The contractor may reference MIL-STD-1366 for transportation details of interest, with emphasis on rail transport and air transport.

Reports to be submitted to the following Points of Contact:

SFAE-GCS-HR: XXXX

ACC-Detroit: xxxxx

SFAE-GCS-HR 1

ACC-Detroit 1

15.TOTAL 2

17. PRICE GROUP

18. ESTIMATED

TOTAL PRICE

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST

A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO. B. EXHIBIT C. CATEGORY:

TDP TM OTHER

D. SYSTEM/ITEM

Self Propelled Howitzer 155mm

E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR

1. DATA ITEM NO.

A024

2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM

Failure Analysis Report (FAR)

3. SUBTITLE

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.)

DI-SESS-80255B

5. CONTRACT REFERENCE

C.5.23

6. REQUIRING OFFICE

SFAE-GCS-HR

7. DD 250 REQ

No

8. APP CODE

9. DIST STATEMENT

REQUIRED

10. FREQUENCY

SEE REMARKS

11. AS OF DATE

O

12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION

SEE REMARKS

13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT

SUBMISSION

SEE REMARKS

14. DISTRIBUTION

a. ADDRESSEE

b. COPIES

Draft Final

Reg Repro

16. REMARKS

Format: USG requires contractor response digitally and in the English language. Contractor format is acceptable.

Blocks 10-13: Each FAR shall be delivered seven calendar days after requested by USG.

The FAR shall include items 3.1 through 3.21 and 3.26 from DI-SESS-80255A.

Reports to be submitted to the following Points of Contact:

SFAE-GCS-HR: XXXX

ACC-Detroit: xxxxx

SFAE-GCS-HR 1

ACC-Detroit 1

15.TOTAL 2

17. PRICE GROUP

18. ESTIMATED

TOTAL PRICE

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST

A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO. B. EXHIBIT C. CATEGORY:

TDP TM OTHER

D. SYSTEM/ITEM

Self Propelled Howitzer 155mm

E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR

1. DATA ITEM NO.

A025

2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM

Ammunition Safety and Reliability Report

3. SUBTITLE

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.)

DI-MISC-80508B

5. CONTRACT REFERENCE

C.5.24

6. REQUIRING OFFICE

SFAE-GCS-HR

7. DD 250 REQ

No

8. APP CODE

9. DIST STATEMENT

REQUIRED

10. FREQUENCY

SEE REMARKS

11. AS OF DATE

O

12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION

SEE REMARKS

13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT

SUBMISSION

SEE REMARKS

14. DISTRIBUTION

a. ADDRESSEE

b. COPIES

Draft Final

Reg Repro

16. REMARKS

Format: USG requires contractor response digitally and in the English language. Contractor format is acceptable.

Blocks 10-13: Contractor shall submit a draft CDRL 90 days after contract award. USG will conduct a review within 15 days after receipt. Contractor shall propose a time for a four hour meeting to occur after the 15 day USG review period. The intent of the meeting will be to review any USG comments to the draft proposal. The final submission is due from the contractor 10 days after the review meeting.

The report must include, at a minimum, the information outlined below.

a. Provide all safety risks for ammunition components. MIL-STD-882E shall be used for risk identification and classification methodology.

b. Provide documentation that the safety design criteria specified in MIL-STD-1316F has been met for all fuzes.

c. Provide past test results for propellant safety test specified in NATO Standardization Agreement (STANAG) 4110 and STANAG 4225 to the cannon design pressure values. Past testing shall have been conducted with two separate lots of propelling charges specified in STANAG 4224, ITOP 4-2-504(1) paragraph 4.6 and TOP 3-2-050.

d. Provide past test results that the ammunition component combination is safe to fire at the System Permissible Maximum Pressure (PMP) and structurally survive PMP+5% or Extreme Maximum Operating Pressure (EMOP). The contractor shall identify the standard and verification method that was used to conduct testing.

e. Provide past test results that the ammunition components are ale to withstand the maximum shock felt during transportation on a ship. The contractor shall identify the standard and verification method that was used to conduct testing.

f. Provide past test results that the package ammunition components is safe up to 20 year service life in controlled storage and 2 years in uncontrolled storage. The contractor shall identify the standard and verification method that was used to conduct testing.

g. Provide past test results that the out-of-package storage of the propelling charge system can withstand 60 days without degraded firing or handling performance that negatively impacts safety muzzle velocity, precision, gun tube wear, rate of fire and chamber residue. The contractor shall identify the standard and verification method that was used to conduct testing.

h. Provide past test results that the ammunition components in the packaged configuration is safe for disposal after exposure to the 12m drop. The contractor shall identify the standard and verification method that was used to conduct testing.

SFAE-GCS-HR 1

ACC-Detroit 1

15.TOTAL 2

17. PRICE GROUP

18. ESTIMATED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

16. REMARKS (Continuation)

i. Provide past test results that the projectile does not fallback during manual and remote ramming. The contractor shall identify the standard and verification method that was used to conduct testing.

j. Provide past test results that the ammunition components are safe to fire and reliable after air drop. TThe contractor shall identify the standard and verification method that was used to conduct testing.

k. Provide past test results of the ammunition component combination reliability independent of the weapon system reliability. The contractor shall identify the standard and verification method that was used to conduct testing.

l. Provide past test results that the ammunition components are safe and reliable in real world environmental conditions that the system will experience during service-related events. The contractor shall identify the standard and verification method that was used to conduct testing.

m. Provide past test results on Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear (CBRN) System Survivability that the ammunition components in packaged configuration shall remain safe and reliable after being decontaminated. The contractor shall identify the standard and verification method that was used to conduct testing.

n. Provide past test results demonstrating the resistance of the ammunition components to insensitive munition (IM) threats per standardized IM protocols.

The contractor shall identify the standard and verification method that was used to conduct testing.

o. Provide past test results demonstrating the performance degradation of the ammunition component combination from a cannon tube with end of life wear.

The contractor shall identify the standard and verification method that was used to conduct testing.

p. Provide past test results demonstrating Sequential Environmental Testing for Safety to assess that the ammunition component combination remains safe to handle, transport and fire after being subjected to rough handling, shock and temperature extremes. The contractor shall identify the standard and verification method that was used to conduct testing.

q. Provide past test results demonstrating Sequential Environmental Testing for Performance to assess performance of the ammunition component combination after being subjected to rough handling, shock and temperature extremes. The contractor shall identify the standard and verification method that was used to conduct testing.

Reports to be submitted to the following Points of Contact:

SFAE-GCS-HR: XXXX

ACC-Detroit: xxxxx

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST

A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO. B. EXHIBIT C. CATEGORY:

TDP TM OTHER

D. SYSTEM/ITEM

Self Propelled Howitzer 155mm

E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR

1. DATA ITEM NO.

A026

2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM

Ammunition Performance Report

3. SUBTITLE

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.)

DI-MISC-80508B

5. CONTRACT REFERENCE

C.5.25

6. REQUIRING OFFICE

SFAE-GCS-HR

7. DD 250 REQ

No

8. APP CODE

9. DIST STATEMENT

REQUIRED

10. FREQUENCY

SEE REMARKS

11. AS OF DATE

O

12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION

SEE REMARKS

13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT

SUBMISSION

SEE REMARKS

14. DISTRIBUTION

a. ADDRESSEE

b. COPIES

Draft Final

Reg Repro

16. REMARKS

Format: USG requires contractor response digitally and in the English language. Contractor format is acceptable.

Blocks 10-13: Contractor shall submit a draft CDRL 90 days after contract award. USG will conduct a review within 15 days after receipt. Contractor shall propose a time for a four hour meeting to occur after the 15 day USG review period. The intent of the meeting will be to review any USG comments to the draft proposal. The final submission is due from the contractor 10 days after the review meeting.

The report must include, at a minimum, the information outlined below.

a. Minimum Range including past test results to support the reported range. The contractor shall identify the standard and verification method that was used to conduct testing.

b. Maximum Range including past test results to support the reported range. The contractor shall identify the standard and verification method that was used to conduct testing.

c. Range Accuracy for unguided or non-course corrected ammunition combinations as range mean point of impact of the target location range, including past test results to support the reported range accuracy. The contractor shall identify the standard and verification method that was used to conduct testing.

d. Deflection Accuracy for unguided or non-course corrected ammunition combinations as deflection mean point of impact of the target location range, including past test results to support the reported deflection accuracy. The contractor shall identify the standard and verification method that was used to conduct testing.

e. Guided Accuracy, for guided or course corrected ammunition combinations as Circular Error Probable (CEP) centered around the target location, including past test results to support the reported guided accuracy. The contractor shall identify the standard and verification method that was used to conduct testing.

f. Range Precision for unguided or non-course corrected ammunition combinations fired at quadrant elevations (QEs) less than 800 mils as range probable error, including past test results to support the reported range precision. The contractor shall identify the standard that was used to conduct testing.

gg. Range Precision for unguided or non-course corrected ammunition combinations fired at quadrant elevations (QEs) greater than 800 mils as range probable error, including past test results to support the reported range precision. The contractor shall identify the standard and verification method that was used to conduct testing.

h. Deflection Precision for unguided or non-course corrected ammunition combinations fired at QEs less than 800 mils as deflection probable error in including past test results to support the reported deflection precision. The contractor shall identify the standard and verification method that was used to conduct testing.

SFAE-GCS-HR 1

ACC-Detroit 1

15.TOTAL 2

17. PRICE GROUP

18. ESTIMATED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

16. REMARKS (Continuation)

i. Deflection Precision for unguided or non-course corrected ammunition combinations fired at QEs greater than 800 mils as deflection probable error in including past test results to support the reported deflection precision. The contractor shall identify the standard and verification method that was used to conduct testing.

j. Muzzle Velocity Precision as standard deviation of muzzle velocity including past test results to support the reported muzzle velocity precision. The contractor shall identify the standard that was used to conduct testing. The contractor shall identify the standard and verification method that was used to conduct testing.

k. Past test results on Terminal Effects identifying zone-specific velocities, masses, shape factor, and spatial distribution of fragments dispersed by the static detonation of the projectile. The contractor shall identify the standard and verification method that was used to conduct testing.

Reports to be submitted to the following Points of Contact:

SFAE-GCS-HR: XXXX

ACC-Detroit: xxxxx

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST

A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO. B. EXHIBIT C. CATEGORY:

TDP TM OTHER

D. SYSTEM/ITEM

Self Propelled Howitzer 155mm

E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR

1. DATA ITEM NO.

A027

2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM

Ammunition Design Maturity & Manufacturing Readiness Level

3. SUBTITLE

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.)

DI-MISC-80508B

5. CONTRACT REFERENCE

C.5.26

6. REQUIRING OFFICE

SFAE-GCS-HR

7. DD 250 REQ

No

8. APP CODE

9. DIST STATEMENT

REQUIRED

10. FREQUENCY

SEE REMARKS

11. AS OF DATE

O

12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION

SEE REMARKS

13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT

SUBMISSION

SEE REMARKS

14. DISTRIBUTION

a. ADDRESSEE

b. COPIES

Draft Final

Reg Repro

16. REMARKS

Format: USG requires contractor response digitally and in the English language. Contractor format is acceptable.

Blocks 10-13: Contractor shall submit a draft CDRL 90 days after contract award. USG will conduct a review within 15 days after receipt. Contractor shall propose a time for a four hour meeting to occur after the 15 day USG review period. The intent of the meeting will be to review any USG comments to the draft proposal. The final submission is due from the contractor 10 days after the review meeting.

The report must include, at a minimum, the information outlined below.

a. Technical Data Package (TDP) for the ammunition component and ammunition component packaging.

b. Prior test results or modeling on energetic launch survivability. The contractor shall identify the standard and verification method that was used to conduct testing.

c. Finite Element Analysis of the ammunition component during gun launch.

d. Interior Ballistic Modeling showing at a minimum P(t) and a(t) curves across temperature, primer to propellant ignition dynamics, negative differential pressure and dP/dt curves. The contractor shall provide data in both metric and English units.

e. Describe fuze characteristics in accordance with the Fuze Data Form. The contractor shall provide prior test data to support values report in the Fuze Data Form for Spin All-Arm/No-Arm, Setback All-Arm/No- Arm, Minimum Arming Distance/Time, Minimum Spin Arming Rate, Maximum Spin Rate, Maximum Velocity, PD Mode reliability, Delay Mode reliability, Time Mode reliability, Proximity Mode reliability, and Overall Fuze reliability. The contractor shall identify the standard and verification method that was used to conduct testing.

f. Ammunition component Maintenance Plan that identifies at a minimum defect classification, defect criteria, inspection methods, specific guidance for inspecting or handling defects, any unique safety precautions, testing and equipment requirements and sampling plan.

e. Demilitarization (DEMIL) plan and DEMIL procedures.

f. All failure or malfunctions reports for ammunition components that failed to function as intended during developmental testing.

g. All failure or malfunctions reports for fielded ammunition components that failed to function as intended.

h. Production Cost Analysis

i. Material Availability/Scarcity Analysis to the sub-tier level.

SFAE-GCS-HR 1

ACC-Detroit 1

15.TOTAL 2

17. PRICE GROUP

18. ESTIMATED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

16. REMARKS (Continuation)

j. An analysis of the origin of all materials and constituents of ammunition components to the sub-tier material level.

k. Annual maximum production capacity through fiscal year 2030 and % of the annual maximum production capacity available for purchase through fiscal year 2030.

l. Workforce analysis that demonstrates the capability to support continuous production at maximum production capacity through fiscal year 2030.

m. Facilities analysis that demonstrates the capability to support continuous production at maximum production capacity through fiscal year 2030.

n. Summary of plans for expansion of facilities and annual maximum production capacity.

o. Quality Management Plan to the sub-component level that at a minimum identifies critical characteristics, inspection methodology, inspection equipment, inspection equipment certification processes, automated inspection equipment (AIE) certification processes and provides a sample Ammunition Data Card

(ADC).

p. Production Work Instructions to the sub-component level.

Reports to be submitted to the following Points of Contact:

SFAE-GCS-HR: XXXX

ACC-Detroit: xxxxx

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST

A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO. B. EXHIBIT C. CATEGORY:

TDP TM OTHER

D. SYSTEM/ITEM

Self Propelled Howitzer 155mm

E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR

1. DATA ITEM NO.

A028

2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM

Antiterrorism Level 1 Training Report

3. SUBTITLE

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.)

DI MISC-81356A

5. CONTRACT REFERENCE

C.7.1

6. REQUIRING OFFICE

SFAE-GCS-HR

7. DD 250 REQ

No

8. APP CODE

N/A

9. DIST STATEMENT

REQUIRED

N/A

10. FREQUENCY

SEE REMARKS

11. AS OF DATE

O

12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION

SEE REMARKS

13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT

SUBMISSION

SEE REMARKS

14. DISTRIBUTION

a. ADDRESSEE

b. COPIES

Draft Final

Reg Repro

16. REMARKS

Format: USG requires contractor response digitally and in the English language. Contractor format is acceptable.

Blocks 10-13: The report is to be submitted 60 days after contract award. Subsequent reports will be submitted within 60 days for new employees commencing performance on this contract.

The Contractor shall use Government provided training for all contractor personnel supporting the contract who are operating on a DoD controlled installation, facility or area. Antiterrorism (AT) Level 1 training shall be accomplished NLT 30 days after the contract award date and within 30 calendar days of new employees commencing performance. The first and supplemental submissions shall be a letter certifying that the contractor has completed AT Level 1 training along with all certificates of completion and have available upon request all certificates of completion for initial and annual reporting requirements.

Reports to be submitted to the following Points of Contact:

SFAE-GCS-HR: XXXX

ACC-Detroit: xxxxx

SFAE-GCS-HR 1

ACC-Detroit 1

15.TOTAL 2

17. PRICE GROUP

18. ESTIMATED

TOTAL PRICE

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST

A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO. B. EXHIBIT C. CATEGORY:

TDP TM OTHER

D. SYSTEM/ITEM

Self Propelled Howitzer 155mm

E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR

1. DATA ITEM NO.

A029

2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM

Operational Security (Level 1) Training Report

3. SUBTITLE

OPSEC Awareness (Lvl 1) Training Report

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.)

DI-MISC-81356A

5. CONTRACT REFERENCE

C.7.6

6. REQUIRING OFFICE

SFAE-GCS-HR

7. DD 250 REQ

No

8. APP CODE

9. DIST STATEMENT

REQUIRED

10. FREQUENCY

SEE REMARKS

11. AS OF DATE

O

12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION

SEE REMARKS

13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT

SUBMISSION

SEE REMARKS

14. DISTRIBUTION

a. ADDRESSEE

b. COPIES

Draft Final

Reg Repro

16. REMARKS

Format: USG requires contractor response digitally and in the English language. Contractor format is acceptable.

Blocks 10-13: The report is to be submitted 40 days after contract award.

This OPSEC Awareness (Level 1) Training shall be accomplished NLT 30 days after the contract award date. All results shall be reported to the COR NLT 40 calendar days after contract award. Contractors shall provide a Certificate of Compliance letter IAW DI-MISC-81356A that all contractor personnel have completed OPSEC Awareness (LEVEL 1) Training and have available upon request all certificates of completion for initial reporting requirements.

Reports to be submitted to the following Points of Contact:

SFAE-GCS-HR: XXXX

ACC-Detroit: xxxxx

SFAE-GCS-HR 1

ACC-Detroit 1

15.TOTAL 2

17. PRICE GROUP

18. ESTIMATED

TOTAL PRICE

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST

A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO. B. EXHIBIT C. CATEGORY:

TDP TM OTHER

D. SYSTEM/ITEM

Self Propelled Howitzer 155mm

E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR

1. DATA ITEM NO.

A030

2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM

iWATCH Training Report

3. SUBTITLE

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.)

DI-MISC-81356A

5. CONTRACT REFERENCE

C.7.5

6. REQUIRING OFFICE

SFAE-GCS-HR

7. DD 250 REQ

No

8. APP CODE

9. DIST STATEMENT

REQUIRED

10. FREQUENCY

SEE REMARKS

11. AS OF DATE

O

12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION

SEE REMARKS

13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT

SUBMISSION

SEE REMARKS

14. DISTRIBUTION

a. ADDRESSEE

b. COPIES

Draft Final

Reg Repro

16. REMARKS

Format: USG requires contractor response digitally and in the English language. Contractor format is acceptable.

Blocks 10-13: The report to be submitted 40 days after contract award.

iWatch Training shall be accomplished NLT 30 days after the contract award date with the results reported to the COR NLT 40 calendar days after contract award. The submissions shall be a letter certifying that the contractor has completed iWatch training and have available upon request all certificates of completion for initial and annual reporting requirements.

Reports to be submitted to the following Points of Contact:

SFAE-GCS-HR: XXXX

ACC-Detroit: xxxxx

SFAE-GCS-HR 1

ACC-Detroit 1

15.TOTAL 2

17. PRICE GROUP

18. ESTIMATED

TOTAL PRICE