RMW_SPE60015R0711_Amend_3.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

See Block 14

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE SPE600 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code)

CODE FACILITY CODE

SPE60015R0711

X

2015 APR 09

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of OffersX is extended, is not extended.

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO.

IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc. ) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning

DLA ENERGY

8725 JOHN J KINGMAN RD STE 4950

FT BELVOIR VA 22060-6222

USA

15C. DATE SIGNED 16C. DATE SIGNED

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

See Attached Continuation Sheet(s).

(X)

CHECK ONE

PAGE OF PAGES

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

13. THIS APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE

BLOCK 14 (cont’d)

Please see the attachement.

PAGE 2 OF 3 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:

SPE60015R0711-0003

SECTION J - LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

List of Attachments

Description File Name ATTACH. Amendment 3

SPE60015R0711.pdf

PAGE 3 OF 3 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:

SPE60015R0711-0003

RMW SPE600-15-R-0711

Amendment 3

1. 52.232-38 SUBMISSION OF ELECTRIC FUNDS TRANSFER INFORMATION WITH

OFFER (JUL 2013) is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with 52.232-33 PAYMENT BY

ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFER- SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT (JUL 2013).

52.232-33 -- Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer-- System for Award Management.

Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer-- System for Award Management (Jul. 2013)

(a) Method of payment.

(1) All payments by the Government under this contract, shall be made by electronic funds transfer (EFT), except as provided in paragraph (a)(2) of this clause. As used in this clause, the term “EFT” refers to the funds transfer and may also include the payment information transfer.

(2) In the event the Government is unable to release one or more payments by EFT, the Contractor agrees to either--

(i) Accept payment by check or some other mutually agreeable method of payment; or

(ii) Request the Government to extend the payment due date until such time as the Government can make payment by EFT (but see paragraph (d) of this clause).

(b) Contractor's EFT information. The Government shall make payment to the Contractor using the EFT information contained in the System for Award Management (SAM) database. In the event that the EFT information changes, the Contractor shall be responsible for providing the updated information to the SAM database.

(c) Mechanisms for EFT payment. The Government may make payment by EFT through either the Automated Clearing House (ACH) network, subject to the rules of the National Automated Clearing House Association, or the Fedwire Transfer System. The rules governing Federal payments through the ACH are contained in 31 CFR part 210.

(d) Suspension of payment. If the Contractor's EFT information in the SAM database is incorrect, then the Government need not make payment to the Contractor under this contract until correct EFT information is entered into the SAM database; and any invoice or contract financing request shall be deemed not to be a proper invoice for the purpose of prompt payment under this contract. The prompt payment terms of the contract regarding notice of an improper invoice and delays in accrual of interest penalties apply.

(e) Liability for uncompleted or erroneous transfers.

(1) If an uncompleted or erroneous transfer occurs because the Government used the Contractor's EFT information incorrectly, the Government remains responsible for--

(i) Making a correct payment;

(ii) Paying any prompt payment penalty due; and

(iii) Recovering any erroneously directed funds.

(2) If an uncompleted or erroneous transfer occurs because the Contractor's EFT information was incorrect, or was revised within 30 days of Government release of the EFT payment transaction instruction to the Federal Reserve System, and--

(i) If the funds are no longer under the control of the payment office, the Government is deemed to have made payment and the Contractor is responsible for recovery of any erroneously directed funds; or

(ii) If the funds remain under the control of the payment office, the Government shall not make payment, and the provisions of paragraph (d) of this clause shall apply.

(f) EFT and prompt payment. A payment shall be deemed to have been made in a timely manner in accordance with the prompt payment terms of this contract if, in the EFT payment transaction instruction released to the Federal Reserve System, the date specified for settlement of the payment is on or before the prompt payment due date, provided the specified payment date is a valid date under the rules of the Federal Reserve System.

(g) EFT and assignment of claims. If the Contractor assigns the proceeds of this contract as provided for in the assignment of claims terms of this contract, the Contractor shall require as a condition of any such assignment, that the assignee shall register separately in the SAM database and shall be paid by EFT in accordance with the terms of this clause. Notwithstanding any other requirement of this contract, payment to an ultimate recipient other than the Contractor, or a financial institution properly recognized under an assignment of claims pursuant to Subpart 32.8, is not permitted. In all respects, the requirements of this clause shall apply to the assignee as if it were the Contractor. EFT information that shows the ultimate recipient of the transfer to be other than the Contractor, in the absence of a proper assignment of claims acceptable to the Government, is incorrect EFT information within the meaning of paragraph (d) of this clause.

(h) Liability for change of EFT information by financial agent. The Government is not liable for errors resulting from changes to EFT information made by the Contractor's financial agent.

(i) Payment information

2. K-0001 K5 USE OF ELECTRONIC DATA INTERCHANGE (DLA ENERGY MAR 2009)

(SEE OFFER SUBMISSION PACKAGE FOR FULL TEXT) is hereby deleted in its entirety.

3. K-0006 K45-.01 FACSIMILE OR ELECTRONIC INVOICING (DLA ENERGY APR 2007)

(SEE OFFER SUBMISSION PACKAGE FOR FULL TEXT) is hereby deleted in its entirety.

4. G-0005 G150.05 SUBMISSION OF INVOICES FOR PAYMENT-COMMERCIAL ITEMS

(BULK) (DLA ENERGY JAN 2011) is hereby deleted in its entirety.

5. C-0005 C16.08-1 TURBINE FUEL, AVIATION (JET A/JET A-1) (BULK) (DLA ENERGY

MAR 2014) is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with ENERGY QAP C16.08-1 TURBINE FUEL, AVIATION (JET A) (DLA ENERGY AUG 2014) and C16.09 TURBINE

FUEL, AVIATION (JET A1) (DLA ENERGY APR 2015).

C16.08-1 TURBINE FUEL, AVIATION (JET A) (DLA ENERGY AUG 2014)

Jet A shall conform to the requirements of ASTM D 1655, Standard Specification for Aviation Turbine Fuels, except as modified below, at the custody transfer point

NATIONAL STOCK NUMBER PRODUCT NOMENCLATURE DLA ENERGY PRODUCT CODE

9130-00-359-2026 Turbine Fuel, Aviation, Jet A JAA

(a) ADDITIVES.

(1) Additives shall not be premixed with other additives before injection into the fuel.

(2) FUEL SYSTEM ICING INHIBITOR (FSII). When required by contract line item-

(i) FSII shall be added to the fuel and shall be Diethylene Glycol Monomethyl Ether (DIEGME) conforming to ASTM D4171, Standard Specification for FSIIs, Type III or MIL-DTL-85470B, dated June 15, 1999, Inhibitor, Icing, Fuel System, High Flash, NATO Code Number S-1745.

(ii) FSII shall be added to the fuel so that the resulting concentration in the final blend is between 0.07% and 0.10% by volume.

(iii) When using the 20-ounce aerosol can to introduce FSII during over the wing refueling, determine the fuel quantity and calculate the amount of required additive. This additive shall be added gradually during filling to permit proper blending in the fuel. One can of aerosol additive will inhibit 180 gallons of fuel to 0.087 percent by volume. The use of aerosol FSII is not permitted for U.S. Navy aircraft refueling.

(3) CORROSION INHIBITOR/LUBRICITY IMPROVER (CI/LI). When required by contract line item-

(i) The additive must conform to MIL-PRF-25017H with Amendment 1, dated August 4, 2011 Inhibitor, Corrosion/Lubricity

Improver, Fuel Soluble (NATO S-1747), found in ASSIST and shall be listed in the electronic Qualified Products List (QPL)-25017, located in the Qualified Products Database (QPD) found at http://assistdocs.com.

(ii) The concentration of CI/LI added to the fuel must be between the minimum effective concentration and the maximum allowable concentration as listed for the CI/LI in QPL-25017.

(4) STATIC DISSIPATER ADDITIVE (SDA). When required by contract line item-

(i) SDA shall be added to the fuel and the conductivity limits of 50 to 600 picosiemens per meter (pS/m) at ambient temperature or 29.4oC (85oF), whichever is lower, unless otherwise directed by the procuring activity.

(5) METAL DEACTIVATOR (MDA). MDA shall not be used unless the supplier has obtained PRIOR written consent from the procuring activity.

(6) Product shall be homogeneously mixed. Until all aviation turbine fuel tanks are coated, it is acceptable to perform stratification tests in lieu of circulating tanks to achieve homogeneity.

(b) SPECIFICATION MODIFICATIONS

(1) Microseparometer (MSEP).

(i) The following MSEP ratings apply in the presence of the additives listed below. Values apply at point of manufacture:

Jet-A Additive MSEP Rating, min.

Fuel System Icing Inhibitor (FSII) 85 Corrosion Inhibitor/Lubricity Improver (CI/LI) 80

Fuel System Icing Inhibitor (FSII) and Corrosion Inhibitor/Lubricity Improver (CI/LI)

REPORTS. Refer to the MATERIAL INSPECTION AND RECEIVING REPORT contract provision for reporting requirements.

http://assistdocs.com/

C16.09 TURBINE FUEL, AVIATION (JET A1) (DLA ENERGY APR 2015)

Aviation turbine fuel shall conform to the requirements of the most recent version of ASTM D1655: Standard Specification for Aviation Turbine Fuels with the following modifications:

NATIONAL STOCK NUMBER PRODUCT NOMENCLATURE DLA ENERGY PRODUCT CODE

9130-00-753-5026 Turbine Fuel, Aviation, Jet A-1 JA1

(a) EUROPEAN LOCATIONS ONLY. Aviation turbine fuel shall conform to the Defence Standard 91-91 Issue 7, Amendment 3, dated 02 February 2015.

(b) CANADA ONLY. Aviation turbine fuel shall conform to CAN/CGSB-3.23.

(c) ADDITIVES.

(ii) Additives shall not be premixed with other additives before injection into the fuel.

(1) CONDUCTIVITY. If fuel contains electrical conductivity additive, the conductivity limits of 50 to 600 picosiemens per meter (pS/m) at ambient temperature or 85 degrees Fahrenheit (29.4ºC), whichever is lower shall apply at the custody transfer point, unless otherwise directed by the procuring activity.

(2) FUEL SYSTEM ICING INHIBITOR (FSII). When FSII is required by contract line item—

(i) The fuel shall contain 0.07 to 0.10 percent by volume FSII.

(ii) The FSII shall conform to the requirements outlined in either specification MIL-DTL-85470B, Inhibitor, Icing, Fuel System, High Flash, NATO Code Number S-1745; or the latest revision of ASTM D4171, Standard Specification for FSIIs, Type III.

(iii) When using the 20-ounce aerosol can to introduce FSII during over the wing refueling, determine the fuel quantity and calculate the amount of required additive. This additive shall be added gradually during filling to permit proper blending in the fuel.

One can of aerosol additive will inhibit 180 gallons of fuel to 0.087 percent by volume. The use of aerosol FSII is not permitted for U.S.

Navy aircraft refueling.

(3) CORROSION INHIBITOR/LUBRICITY IMPROVER (CI/LI). When CI/LI is required by contract line item the additive shall conform to the latest revision of MIL-PRF-25017H with amendment 1 dated August 4, 2011, and be listed in Qualified Products List (QPL)-25017. In order to obtain dosage data for QPL-25017 additives, log into ASSIST Online, access the Qualified Products Database (QPD), do a search for QPL number 25017, and click the MIL-PRF-25017 Category 1 link. The dosage information is located in the "source notes" for each qualified additive as minimum effective and maximum allowable concentrations in grams per cubic meter (g/m3).

(4) METAL DEACTIVATOR ADDITIVE (MDA). MDA shall not be used unless the supplier has obtained written consent from the procuring activity and user.

(d) Product shall be homogeneously mixed. Until all aviation turbine fuel tanks are coated, it is acceptable to perform stratification tests in lieu of circulating tanks to achieve homogeneity.

(5) Microseparometer (MSEP).

(iii) The following MSEP ratings apply in the presence of the additives listed below. Values apply at point of manufacture:

Jet A-1 Additive MSEP Rating, min.

Fuel System Icing Inhibitor (FSII) 85 Corrosion Inhibitor/Lubricity Improver (CI/LI) 80

Fuel System Icing Inhibitor (FSII) and Corrosion Inhibitor/Lubricity Improver (CI/LI)

6. The requirement for line item 0076, for the delivery of JP8 at Edwards AFB, CA is hereby reduced by 700,000 USG from 1,000,000 USG to 300,000 USG.

7. Solicitation note 29 is hereby added to the solicitation to read the following:

For Hawaii JA1 locations the following applies:

1) Antioxidants. Immediately after processing and before the fuel is exposed to the atmosphere (such as during rundown into feed/batch tankage), add an approved antioxidant formulation (2) or combination of approved antioxidant formulations in order to prevent the formation of gums and peroxides after manufacture. The concentration of antioxidant to be added shall be:

a. Not less than 17.2 milligrams (mg) nor more than 24.0 mg of active ingredient per liter (L) of fuel (6.0 to 8.4 lb/1000 barrels) to all JA1 fuel that contains blending stocks that have been hydrogen treated or Synthesized Paraffinic Kerosene (SPK) derived from hydrotreated, hydrocracked, or hydroisomerized products of a Fischer-Tropsch or HEFA process.

b. At the option of the supplier, not more than 24.0 mg of active ingredient per liter of fuel (8.4 lb/1000 barrels) may be added to JA1 fuels that do not contain hydrogen treated blending stocks or SPK derived from hydro-treated, hydrocracked, or hydro-isomerized products of a Fischer- Tropsch or HEFA process.

2) Antioxidant formulations. The following antioxidant formulations are approved:

a. 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol

b. 6-tert-butyl-2,4-dimethylphenol

c. 2,6-di-tert-butylphenol

d. 75 percent min-2,6-di-tert-butylphenol 25 percent max tert-butylphenols and tri-tert-butylphenols

e. 72 percent min 6-tert-butyl-2,4-dimethylphenol 28 percent max tert-butyl-methylphenols and tert-butyl-dimethylphenols

f. 55 percent min 2,4-dimethyl-6-tert-butylphenol and 15 percent min 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol and 30 percent max mixed methyl and dimethyl tert-butylphenols

8. The requirement for line item 0084, for the delivery of JA1 to DFSP Anchorage, AK is hereby deleted in its entirety.

9. For line item 0071, for the delivery of JA1 to Joint Base Elmendorf Richardson (JBER) a throughput SPLC is hereby added as 810100270, DFSP Anchorage, AK.

10. For line item 0068, for the delivery of JA1 to Fort Wainwright, AK, the requirement SPLC is hereby changed to 81900250 from 819230240 and a throughput SPLC is hereby added as 819230240, Eielson AFB, AK.

11. For line item 0067, for the delivery of JA1 to Eielson AFB, AK the throughput SPLC 810102240 and the mode Railcar is hereby removed. Truck deliveries are restricted to FOB Destination only.

12. For line item T008, for the throughput requirement at DFSP Vancouver, the mode is hereby changed to BULK: TANKER from BULK: TRUCK. The mode BULK: BARGE is hereby added to T008, but restricted to FOB Destination only.

13. 52.212-2 EVALUATION-COMMERCIAL INTEMS (JAN 1999) is hereby revised with 52.212- 2 EVALUATION-COMMERCIAL INTEMS (OCT 2014) to read the following:

Evaluation -- Commercial Items (Oct 2014)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

FACTOR 1: TECHNICAL ACCEPTABILITY

The following subfactors will be used in determining technical acceptability:

SUBFACTOR

1. Supplies or services and prices/cost, Section B

2. Description/specifications/statement of work, Section C

3. Inspection and acceptance, Section E

4. Deliveries or performance, Section F

5. Section 526 Compliance for Biofuels

Subfactors 1 – 5 will be rated either “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable.” These ratings are defined as follows:

ACCEPTABLE: The offeror’s proposal conforms to the Government’s supply and schedule requirements in Section B, product specifications in Section C, product quality assurance in Section E, and delivery/transportation requirements in Section F.

UNACCEPTABLE: The offeror’s proposal does not conform to any one or more of the following requirements:

the Government’s supply and schedule requirements in Section B, product specifications in Section C, product quality assurance in Section E, or delivery/transportation requirements in Section F.

Proposals may be comprised of individual, independent offers, differentiated by product grade, shipping mode and/or FOB point. An individual offer within a proposal may be rated “Unacceptable”, while remaining offers within the same proposal may be rated “Acceptable.” A rating will be made for each individual offer within each proposal.

Each individual offer within a proposal must receive an “Acceptable” rating for every subfactor in order to be rated technically acceptable. If an individual offer within a proposal receives a rating of “Unacceptable” for one subfactor it will be rated technically unacceptable. Therefore, some individual offers within a proposal may be considered technically acceptable while other individual offers within the same proposal may be considered technically unacceptable.

An offeror that proposes an exception to any of the requirements of the solicitation, as related to the aforementioned subfactors, will be reviewed to determine whether the fuel will meet the Government’s specification and delivery requirements, can physically be accepted, and not compromise fuel quality. If so, an offer containing the exception will also be technically acceptable. Programmatic exceptions are addressed to all offerors via amendment. Likewise, a rating may be made “Acceptable” if an offeror corrects, or the Government accepts by reason of exception, any subfactors previously rated “Unacceptable” by the SSEB.

Offerors must provide additional written details to address all areas rated “Unacceptable” prior to the receipt of Final Proposal Revisions, which the Government will review for acceptance.

FACTOR 2: PRICE

Fixed Price with Economic Price Adjustment (EPA) contracts will result from this solicitation. The Contract Team will evaluate proposals for pricing purposes in accordance with FAR 52.212-2 – EVALUATION – COMMERCIAL ITEMS. Offerors are advised that DLA Energy intends to execute the extension provision of any subsequent contract only if there are remaining quantities left on the contract; no quantities will be added. The extension provision will only extend the ordering and delivery period of the contract. In addition, the extension provisions contained in contract provision I-0010 I209.09 EXTENSION PROVISIONS (DLA ENERGY JAN 2012) will be evaluated in conjunction with the evaluation of initial offers received.

The lowest price is defined as the lowest laid-down price, to include transportation costs as determined by the Bid Evaluation Model (BEM), which will provide the basis to make awards. The BEM is a computer evaluation model which analyzes numerous variables. These variables include the offeror’s proposed prices, fuel types, minimum and maximum award quantities, shipping locations, shipment mode capabilities, minimum and maximum cargo sizes, customer receipt locations, and receipt mode capabilities.

Transportation rates will be included for tanker, barge, pipeline, and tank truck transportation modes in accordance with M-0008 M41.04 EVALUATION OF OFFERS INVOLVING OTHER THAN F.O.B.

TANKER (BULK)(DLA ENERGY JUL 2010) and M-0005 M24.02 EVALUATION OF OFFERS

INVOLVING F.O.B. TANKER LOADING FOR THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN/WEST COAST/

OFFSHORE PURCHASE PROGRAM (DLA ENERGY SEP 2010). Government additive costs will be used to evaluate, where applicable, proposals of product not fully additized at the loading facility, but instead are additized/injected en route to a facility or customer location. The BEM will calculate the overall pattern of delivery of fuel from contractor facilities to specific customer locations that represents the lowest total combination of price for product and transportation.

DLA Energy will request offeror submission of Interim Proposal Revisions (IPRs) before the conclusion of negotiations. IPRs will be entered into the BEM and evaluated. Each offeror will be provided with two documents generated from the BEM: the Minimum Cost Bid Evaluation

Worksheet (MCBEW) and the Laid Down Cost Report (LCR), as follows:

- The MCBEW will provide detailed information on how an offer is evaluated to each demand location.

Details including product price, method of delivery for each leg of the route, transportation and additive costs, and any applicable evaluation factors are included, and the ‘final laid in price’ is identified for each location. This information will be generated separately for each offeror, and each offeror will receive only the information applicable to their offer.

- The LCR will provide information on the award price at each demand location. The report is limited to providing the solicitation line item, location, quantity awarded, and ‘laid in price’ for quantity awarded. In this instance, the laid in price is the aggregate price including product, additive, transportation and any evaluation factor costs. No information concerning apparently successful offer, shipping point, or product routing is included.

- Offerors will be given time to review the MCBEW and LCR, after which DLA Energy will close negotiations and call for Final Proposal Revisions (FPRs). FPRs will be entered into the BEM and evaluated. Offerors will be provided with updated copies of the MCBEW and LCR.

Offerors will then be given an opportunity to provide a further discount using the Reverse Auction (RA) Procurex tool. All offerors will be entered in the RA. No further action is required for offerors that choose not to offer a price discount during the RA. Any offeror that does participate will enter a discount price in the RA. The discount price will be offered by product and region, rather than specific line item. For example, a discount may be offered for all JP8 in the West Coast region.

This discount will be offered from a notional price (e.g., $1.00), and not from an actual offer price.

The Contracting Officer will establish an RA bid line for each product and region. Each bid line will have a notional price established. This notional price is the price against which vendors will offer their discounts.

The minimum decrement for bids will be $0.00001. At the conclusion of the RA,the lowest discount price offered by each vendor will be recorded. This discount will be applied to the price offered at time of FPRs, and the BEM will be run to determine the award pattern with any discounts offered during the RA. A mock RA will be held to allow all offerors to become familiar with the process before the actual RA is conducted.

14. For Line item T0001, the delivery of JA1 to Joint Base Elmendorf Richardson (JBER), AK is hereby deleted in its entirety.

15. For Line item 0072, for the delivery of JA1 to DFSP Pearl Harbor, HI, a throughput SPLC is hereby added as 89051000, DFSP Pearl Harbor, HI.

16. For Line item 0026, for the delivery of JAA to Davis Monthan AFB, AZ, a throughput SPLC is hereby added as 799000240, Davis Monthan AFB, AZ.

17. For Line item 0001, for the delivery of JP5 to Kodiak, AK the mode BULK: PIPELENE is hereby removed.

18. For Line item 0087, for the delivery of JP5 to DFSP Pearl Harbor, HI, a throughput SPLC is hereby added as 890510000 DFSP Pearl Harbor, HI and a requirement SPLC is hereby added as 89051000, DFSP Pearl Harbor, HI.

19. For Line item 0003, for the delivery of JP5 to DFSP Selby, CA, a throughput SPLC is hereby added as 876142270, DFSP Selby, CA.

20. For Line item 0010, for the delivery of JP5 to DFSP Pt. Loma, CA a throughput SPLC is hereby added as 88900296, DFSP Pt. Loma, CA.

21. For Line item T0016, the mode BULK: TANKER and BULK: PIPE is hereby deleted. The mode BULK: TRUCK is hereby changed to FOB restriction O/D.

22. For Line item 0066, for the delivery of JP8 to Beale AFB, the mode BULK: PIPE is hereby deleted. The mode BULK:TRUCK is hereby changed to FOB restriction O/D.

23. K-0008 K150 WIDE AREA WORKFLOW (WAWF) SUPPLEMENTAL INVOICE

SUBMISSION (DLA ENERGY MAY 2014) is hereby added to the OSP package.

K-0008 K150 WIDE AREA WORKFLOW (WAWF) SUPPLEMENTAL INVOICE SUBMISSION (DLA

ENERGY MAY 2014)

(a) When a vendor becomes aware that an invoice was submitted for a price or quantity that is lower than the correct amount, the following needs to be done:

1. The vendor will go to WAWF and try to recall the invoice and do changes in price or quantity. If the vendor is unable to recall the invoice:

2. The vendor will submit via fax (Fuels EDM FAX Line: 614-701-2638 or DSN 791-2638/ Toll Free 855- 234-5592) a manual invoice to the payment office, SL4701, which identifies the invoice as an adjustment with an invoice number that is a derivation of the original invoice number that was submitted and paid. (For example, if the original invoice number was 12345, then adjustment invoice number shall be 12345ADJ).

3. The adjustment invoice should have the original price or quantity cited as well as the corrected price or quantity and the net adjustment,

4. All other proper invoice criteria, in accordance with the Prompt Payment Act, remain required for adjustment invoices.

5. The vendor can print the WAWF invoice and use it to make the adjustments as described above.

If a vendor has payment status questions, they may contact either DFAS-Customer Service at DFAS- CO_LC@DFAS.MIL or dial 1-800-756-4571 option 2, or contact their DLA Energy Contracting Officer, to obtain contract information from their contract.

Note: The aforementioned email address contains an underscore “_” between the “CO” and “LC”.

24. Except as provided herein, all other terms and conditions remain unchanged and in full force and effect mailto:DFAS-CO_LC@DFAS.MIL mailto:DFAS-CO_LC@DFAS.MIL