SP8000-16-R-0010_Attachment_2_(QASP)_for_Turbine_Engine_Component_Recycling.pdf

PDF 20 KB Posted

Attached to
Turbine Engine Component Recycling Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
SP8000-16-R-0010
Issued by
Defense Logistics Agency Strategic Materials

About this file

Attachment 2 (QASP) to the PWS for Turbine Engine Component Recycling (SP8000-16-R-0010)

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT #2 to PWS:

QUALITY ASSURANCE & SURVEILLANCE PLAN (QASP)

Turbine Engine Components Recycling

SP8000-16-R-0010

Contract Requirement: Execute a strategic and precious metals recovering focusing on excess Government owned turbine engine components, as delineated in the Performance Work Statement (PWS) and ATTACHMENT #1: Performance Requirements Summary Table (PRST).

Work Requirements: Quality and Timeliness

Performance Standards:

Perform the following specific requirements/tasks, in accordance to the following paragraphs of the PWS and ATTACHMENT #1-PRST:

1) Paragraph B.1.1 and B.1.2.1 of the PWS—Receive batches of condemned turbine engine components

2) Paragraph B.2.1 and B.2.2.1 of the PWS—Unpack and sort Government Furnished Material (GFM).

3) Paragraph B.4.2.3, B.5.2.3 and B.6.2.2 of the PWS—Prepare and produce Demilitarization Certificates for each DD Form 1348.

4) Paragraph B.4.2.4, B.5.2.4 and B.6.2.3—Perform Demilitarization for all parts in a batch within 30 days of material arriving at the Contractor facility.

5) Paragraph B.4.2.2 & B.5.2.2—Provide documentation showing material in batch meet Aerospace requirements.

6) Paragraph B.3.1.3—Provide precious metals offtake assay and Toxic Characteristic Leachate Procedure (TCLP) documentation to the COR and the Precious Metals Program Point of Contact (POC).

Acceptable Quality Level (AQL): The AQL’s for the requirements/tasks listed in the “Performance Standards” above are listed in paragraphs B.1.3, B.2.3, B.3.3, B.4.3, B.5.3, B.6.3 and B.7.3 of the PWS and in ATTACHMENT #1: PRST.

Methods of Surveillance: The methods of surveillance can be either scheduled or unannounced inspections on all scheduled requirements/tasks. The COR will determine if the performance of each requirement/task receives a “pass” or “fail.” The inspections may include a visual inspection performed by the COR during or upon completion of the requirements/tasks completed by the Contractor; or a review of Contractor provided documentation of scheduled requirements/tasks.

Frequency of Surveillance: The COR will perform inspections IAW Section C.6 of the PWS and can observe the selected requirements/tasks at any time he/she determines a need to inspect a requirements/tasks or notices a deficiency. Based on observed deficiencies in contractor performance, subsequent inspections may either be reduced or increased.

ATTACHMENT #2: QASP

Turbine Engine Component Recycling

SP8000-16-R-0010

The COR will, at a minimum:

1) Execute scheduled or unannounced inspections of the Contractor’s performance to ensure that the Contractor is achieving the required level of. Performance.

2) Prepare a “COR Inspection Report” upon completion of the scheduled or unannounced inspection that identifies areas inspected and/or any deficiencies noted. (See ATTACHMENT #3: COR Inspection Report.)

Evaluation Procedures: Results of each inspection will be documented on a COR Inspection Report. A “pass”, “fail” or “N/A” rating will be assigned to each requirement/task inspected based on the Performance Criteria listed below. A description of the inspection and observed defects will be recorded. A “fail” rating may require contractor re-performance of requirement/task. The COR will establish a time frame (on a case by case basis) during which the Contractor must complete all corrective action(s). DLA-SM may (at the Contracting Officer’s unilateral discretion) levy monetary deductions against the Contractor for any “fail” ratings documented in the COR Inspection Reports as listed in ATTACHMENT #1: PRST of the PWS. The COR will ascertain whether documented deficiencies were corrected and processes implemented to ensure re-occurrence of the deficiency is prevented.

Performance Criteria:

1) Each “Performance Standard” is a requirement/task that may contain several actions.

Each requirement/task will be evaluated based on individual tasks/service.

2) At a minimum, the COR will inspect all “Performance Standards” listed in

ATTACHMENT #1-PRST.

3) A “pass” rating will be assigned to each task/service inspected that met or exceeded the established Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) for each “Performance Standard” requirement evaluated.

4) A “fail” rating will be assigned to each task/service inspected that fell below the established AQL for each “Performance Standard” requirement evaluated. When a “fail” rating is assigned, all observed deficiencies must be documented on a COR Inspection Report. See ATTACHMENT #3: COR Inspection Report.

5) A “N/A” rating will be assigned when no work was required to be performed on a specific task/service.

Corrective Actions:

1) The COR will notify the Contractor within 24-hours each time a “fail” rating is assigned and discuss the basis for the rating.

2) The COR will solicit the Contractor’s proposed corrective action(s) to preclude re-occurrence of the deficiency(s). The COR will establish a time frame (on a case by case basis) during which the Contractor must complete all corrective action(s).

3) Based upon the Contractor’s performance, the COR may recommend corrective action(s).

Subsequent inspections may be performed more frequently if deficiencies continue.

4) The COR will document the results of each inspection using ATTACHMENT #3: COR Inspection Report. The COR Inspection Reports will be maintained on site in the “COR File” and forwarded to the Contracting Officer upon request.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .