SP0600-14-R-0501_Amendment_0009.pdf

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment your desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION

NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO.

IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

See continuation pages.

DLA Energy-FESAB/ ATTN: Owen Hassig 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Suite 2495 Ft. Belvoir, Va, 22060-6222 Phone: 703-767-8486 Fax: 703-767-9338 Owen.Hassig@dla.mil

Same As Block 6

SP0600-14-0604

SP0600-14-R-0501

Ft. Bliss, TX

1 16

03/27/2014

11/27/2013

SP0600-14-R-0501

Amendment 0009

1. The solicitation is hereby amended to make the following corrections to the narratives in provision B0001 –B34.01 in both the OSP and Solicitation for CLINS 0009, 00016, and 0023.

The references in the narrative for these CLINS to the “initial 5-year period,” are changed to read as follows:

“First Option Period” – CLIN 0009

“Second Option Period” – CLIN 0016

“Third Option Period” – CLIN 0023

2. The solicitation is hereby amended to incorporate the questions and answers found on pages 3- 16 of this amendment.

2. All other terms and conditions of the solicitation remain unchanged.

1. Can the Government provide the mileage between the Biggs AAF GOCO

Facility and the Doña Ana Bulk/Retail GOCO Facility?

A: 32 miles one way.

2. Can the Government provide the mileage between the Biggs AAF GOCO

Facility and the Oro Grande Bulk/Retail GOCO Facility?

A: 64 miles one way

3. Can the Government provide the mileage between the Doña Ana Bulk/Retail GOCO

Facility and the Ora Grande Bulk/Retail GOCO Facility?

A: 24 miles one way.

4. Will the Post make available a disposal site for excess soil removed from the

COCO construction site?

A: The Government will make a location available in the vicinity of the COCO site for disposal of excess soil. Site will be made available contingent upon the contractor spreading the soil – the Post will not allow the creation of mounds of soil.

5. Will tracked vehicles be required to access any GOCO/COCO sites?

A: No tracked vehicles will be required to access the sites; also, refer to PWS Appendix D, IBCT, section: Limitations.

6. Will tracked vehicles be crossing the new COCO facility approaches entering the facility from the main road? It appears that the tracked vehicles drive along the side of the main road now.

A: See answer to Question 5.

7. For design purposes and considering the customer is primarily a heavy Brigade Combat

Team, please provide the maximum length, height, and weight of the user's largest vehicle(s) that we can expect to serve.

A: 1. Tanker TRL 5000 gal (M969 TRL): L-366" H-104" W-97" Weight Loaded 48,950lb

Truck Tractor Bob Tail, M1088, L-281" H-112" W-96" Weight 18,640lb.

2. HEMITT Tanker 2500 gal (M978): L-400" H-101" W-96" Weight Loaded- 55,000lb

Also, see PWS PWS Appendix D, IBCT, section: Limitations.

8. Is the sewer main at the COCO site a gravity system or a force main?

A: - It is a gravity system.

9. What is the depth of the sewer line connection point at the COCO facility and the size of the sewer main?

A: The connection point will be a 6” sewer main that will be installed by

Government for connection point. Sewer main has not yet been installed so the exact depth is unknown at this time.

10. What is the diameter of the water main at the COCO site?

A: The water main running adjacent to the site is 12”. As noted in the water utility plan there is a tee (12”x12”x8”) in the 12” main. Connection point is at the 8” stub-out from the tee.

11. Are there any buried utilities (fiber optic lines, communication lines, or other utilities) adjacent to or within the COCO site that could affect the design and/or construction?

A: Water, electric, and communication lines are adjacent to the site as noted on utility plans.

The Government will install a sanitary sewer adjacent to the corner of the COCO site shown on the utility plan.

12. Please confirm that it is the service provider's responsibility to tie in the COCO facility approaches to the existing road even though this will be outside the property boundary stakes.

A: Yes, it will be the responsibility of the COCO to tie in the facility access to the existing road.

13. Will the Government provide drawings identifying the COCO property boundaries, including property dimensions, and utility connection points?

A: This was provided to pre-proposal conference attendees via email. If a copy is required, please contact Owen Hassig at owen.hassig@dla.mil.

14. What communication requirements with the control tower at Biggs AAF must the service provider meet?

A: Service provider must obtain handheld and base station radios to communicate with airfield entities. The radios must be compatible with installation trunking system.

15. Please provide workload estimates for surge events (number/year, average duration of a surge event, etc.).

A: Biggs AAF had 27 visiting units, or aviation exercises requiring non-standard fuel support requirements in 2013. Other national event driven requirements will be as needed.

16. Please provide historical workload for Biggs AAF so the service provider can assess the tempo of operations.

A: FY 13 current service provider provided 3,490,205 gallons of fuel to 2,729 aircraft.

17. Please provide site schematic(s) showing where the Service Provider is to expect the utility points of connection for the IBCT COCO.

A: See answer to question 13

18. Please provide a copy of the Installation Design Guide, and any particular requirements that may govern materials for this area due to the new construction.

A: Available upon request. Please contact Owen Hassig owen.hassig@dla.mil.

19. Reference PWS paragraph C.4.0 – APPLICABLE DIRECTIVES. During the site visit, it was mentioned that there are specific Army vehicle grounding requirements for the design of the

COCO. Please provide the reference we are to use if different from “best commercial practices” per paragraph C.4.0.

A: The grounding requirements must comply with FM 10-67-1.

20. Please provide a copy of the Environmental Assessment for this site.

A: This was previously posted to www.fbo.gov via amendment 0005.

21. Please provide any geotechnical information available (i.e., borings data, specific soils type and cross-sections, any known water levels, etc) from the site or from the closest recent nearby construction.

A: This information was provided to pre-proposal attendees via SAFE File Sharing site. If a copy is needed, please contact Owen Hassig at owen.hassig@dla.mil

22. Please confirm that we need to be able to issue up to 600 gallons of DS2 once or twice a month as bulk for the locomotives, and that the unit will bring their own vehicle/tank (i.e., there is no delivery requirement).

A: The delivery requirement is annotated in the revised PWS dated February 01, 2014 posted to ww.fbo.gov via amendment 0004.

23. Reference PWS paragraph C.6.2 requiring utility meters (electric and water). Please confirm that the meters are for monitoring and reporting usage only, and the MOA between DLA

& Bliss provides that all utilities at no charge to the Service Provider for the term of the contract.

A: Utilities are at no cost to the service provider.

24. If Service Provider is to provide these meters, please provide the manufacturer and model numbers/sizes of the electric and water meters that Bliss wants installed for compatibility purposes.

A: Service Provider to coordinate meter requirements with privatized utility providers – Fort

Bliss Water Services (FBWS; Current POC – Kara Gunter, kara.gunter@ftbliss.asusinc.com) &

Rio Grande Electric (RGEC; Current POC – Roger Andrade, randrade@rgec.com).

25. Please confirm that the incoming power is 3-phase.

A: Yes, the incoming power is 3-phase.

26. Please state the number of telephone lines the government is providing to this site for items such as FMU, 9-1-1, fire system, etc.

A: Three lines as follows: 1 for FMU, 1 for 9-1-1, and 1 for Class A to call help desk at Bliss and DLA.

27. Please advise if there is the capability for additional copper lines to be leased through the

Post by a telecom service (such as AT&T) for the Service Provider’s commercial number and/or

DSL Internet service.

A: Yes, the OPS capabilities for the fuel points is a 25 pair copper so the telephone requirement cannot exceed 25 telephone lines.

28. Will there be adequate designated telephone lines to allow for FM Manager Operate to be set up at the COCO Facility?

A: Yes, see reply to question 27.

29. Please identify the type of fire system that must be installed to mesh with the Post (such as a Mass Notification system) and the manufacturer and model we need to supply, whether it is wired (copper telecom) or wireless, any other details, etc.

A: Fire alarms shall be installed IAW UFC 3-600-01, Chapter 5, NFPA 70-National Electrical

Code, NFPA 72- National Fire Alarm Code and AR 420–1 Chapter 25–29. (12 February 2008) which states:“ Cost effectiveness”. Appropriate fire protection in facility and system designs guarantees the most economical and least interruption of essential missions. Installations will not omit fire protection from construction designs and plans for the sake of economy or expediencies, since add-ons are expensive and often less effective.

The fire alarm system shall be an Integrated Radio Transceiver and Fire Alarm Control Panel for narrowband D-21 capabilities (165.0625) with BTX Interface BTX with Fire, Mass Notification and Relay Cards. Mass Notification Panel with Remote Station and 8 pre-recorded message as per UFC 4-021-01, Design and O & M: Mass Notification System. Must report 100% zone by zone to D21 system.

FBFES requests a fully addressable Fire Alarm Control. Panel (FACP) that is compatible with the post system.

FBFES request the Fire Alarm Panels be located in a mechanical room that is accessible from the outside for easy firefighter access. A heat detector shall be installed above the fire alarm panel instead of the standard smoke detector. Manual pull stations shall be of metal construction, dual action and key operable. The Fire Alarm System wiring shall be Class “A”, Style 6 for

“DEVICES” and Class A, Style “Z” for “HORN/STROBES or DPW approved style.

All pull stations will be key operated not allen wrench.

30. During the site visit to the two new facilities at Doña Ana and Orogrande, it was noticed that the perimeter fire hydrants on the loop were outside of the security fencing. Is it the Service

Provider’s discretion whether hydrants are inside or outside of the fence, or does the Fire Chief as AHJ require one or the other?

A: Fire Hydrants shall be installed IAW UFC 3-600-01, Chapter 3.7.3, and NFPA 24-

Installation of Private Fire Service Mains and their Appurtenances and NFPA 291- Fire Flow

Testing and Marking of Hydrants.

FBFES requests that new fire hydrants shall be Mueller or Kennedy, dry barrel with 1-4 ½ inch connection and 2-2 ½ inch connections.

Hydrants located in high traffic areas such as Motor pools shall have “bollards” installed to provide protection from damage.

Hydrants in landscaped areas shall not have trees/plants within 6 feet to maintain clear visibility and access at all times. Fire hydrants will be installed within the required 150’ of the Fire

Department Connection.

31. During construction, workspace is needed for the Service Providers construction office, materials storage, equipment parking, maneuver space, etc. Is any adjoining temporary workspace available next to the leased property just for the construction period, which will then be turned back over upon completion of the facilities?

A: Yes, a temporary lay down area can be provided in the vicinity of the COCO site. Contractor will be required to obtain a local license from DPW-RP for the lay down area, since it will be outside of the COCO site footprint.

32. For design purposes and considering the customer is primarily a heavy Brigade Combat

Team, please provide the maximum length, height, and weight of the user’s largest vehicle(s) that we can expect to serve.

A: See reply to question 7.

33. As above, does the design need to include accommodations for tracked vehicles to use this facility (i.e., up to 70+ tons)?

A: See answer to Question 5.

34. Please confirm that 7-foot high fencing is required around the facility per UFC 3-460-01

Design: Petroleum Fuel Facilities paragraph 2-6.2.

A: Yes, the site perimeter needs to be fenced in accordance with UFC3-460-01 Paragraph 2-6.2.

35. Is the IBCT COCO 24-7 access for retail to be by open gate, or is a card-lock system to be used such as at Orogrande? If by card-lock, please specify if Service Provider is to provide and the model information.

A: For security reasons, the facility shall have entrance and exit gates that are lockable.

36. During the site visit, it was mentioned that weather covers (canopies) are required at the service islands and bulk loading racks; please confirm.

A: Weather covers (canopies) are required at the service islands and bulk loading racks.

37. Is there a disposal location (Post landfill or spoil site) available to the Service Provider for top-soiled organics, and also any excess clean spoil? If so, where is it located and what are the permit requirements (if any) to use the site?

A: See response to question #4.

38. Is there a borrow site on Post that the Service Provider may use to haul in clean fill if needed, and if so what are the details on its’ use?

A: There is a site located within three miles of the COCO site where fill could be obtained.

39. Does the Post do its’ own utility locate/markout, and if so is a commercial One-Call also required?

A: With regards to utility locates/markings it will be the contractor’s responsibility to walk thru the installation’s digging permit form and obtain all required approvals. It is the service provider’s responsibility to process Service Orders at DPW to have respective utility providers mark their utilities.

40. Is there a Post standard minimum setback distance (easement) from the edge of, or the centerline of, the street?

A: Setback distance for the site will be determined by the distance from the ground lease boundary to the road.

41. Since the power is located near the facility, is temporary power available off of it for use during construction and before the final connections to Service Power?

A: Contractor can use existing electrical utility for temporary power. Contractor will be required to establish a utility sales agreement with the DPW for use of temporary power. Contractor will be billed for use of temporary power.

42. Are any of the utilities privatized, requiring coordination with another Contractor?

A: Utilities are currently not privatized. However, Fort Bliss anticipates privatization of the electrical, water and sanitary sewer utilities during the April 2014 thru September 2014 timeframe. Connection to privatized utilities will require coordination with respective utility providers. Water/Sanitary Sewer – Fort Bliss Water Services; electrical – Rio Grande Electric.

43. Are there any fees associated with the connection of utilities to the COCO?

A: Yes, privatized utilities will have costs associated with connection to their utility grids.

Contractor needs to contact FBWS & RGEC directly to obtain cost information. Utility

Company POC information is provided in response to question #24.

44. Does the Post require, or allow, an Oil Water Separator connected to the sanitary sewer?

A: An Oil Water Separator is allowed by permit from the installation DPW Environmental division, but is not required. The Service Provider's design must allow for treatment of contaminated water.

45. Previous COCO PWS for retail facilities typically has a statement to the effect “facilities shall be equipped to provide air and water for vehicle servicing” but that was not found in this document; is that a requirement?

A: No.

46. What are the Service Provider’s responsibilities for placing and disposal of spill materials

(kits) at the COCO location; i.e., is the Service Provider required to provide 24/7 available materials to the customer, or is the Service Provider only responsible for spills and materials caused by the Service Provider?

A: The contractor is responsible for providing and maintaining replacement supplies Spill

Remediation Kits 24/7 at the COCO location; while the Government provides and provides replacement spill remediation kits at the GOCO locations.

47. Is service provider responsible for disposing of used spill kit materials?

A: Service provider will need to dispose of these materials either through their own hazardous waste service or through the Fort Bliss Field Services group which is a fee-based service.

48. Is service provider responsible for providing spill materials to the customer 24/7 or just provide for service provider spills and materials?

A: See answer to question 46.

49. If the Service Provider is to place spill materials outside and readily available at all manned/unmanned facilities, who is responsible for pilferage and/or disposal of used materials?

A: Contractor is responsible for accountability/securing their spill materials. See question 47 answer regarding disposal of used materials.

50. Will the government allow (or actually perform) recovery and turn-in of waste fuel and/or small amounts of contaminated water disposal such as from the COCO filter/separator drawoffs, drain box/OWS captures of spills, etc? Even though it is waste, it is generated from government-owned product.

A: Service provider will need to dispose of these materials either through their own haz-waste service or through the Fort Bliss Field Services group which is a fee-based service.

51. Are drawings, plot plans, and/or layouts required with the technical proposal?

A: See item 2 on Amendment 0003 to the solicitation.

52. Reference PWS paragraph C.4.0 – APPLICABLE DIRECTIVES for “validated best commercial practices” and Appendix C listing of listing of directives. If API 650 tanks are used, do these tanks need to only meet the requirements of API 650, or API 650 and the UFC?

A: The tanks must meet the requirements of API 650 and the UFC.

53. The State of New Mexico has specific Operations & Maintenance (O&M) requirements for AST sites, and neither Orogrande nor Doña Ana have opened for service yet. Are there currently O&M or other plans available for them, and if so have they been approved by the appropriate agencies?

A: These two sites are in operation and they do not require an NMED O&M Plan because the federal government has not yielded sovereign immunity to the state governments regarding regulation of ASTs.

54. New Mexico also has specific UST requirements and when McGregor has the new tanks installed, who is responsible for any plan changes and subsequent submittals for approval to the state and/or other agencies?

A: DPW-Environmental Division will retain responsibility for O&M Plan modifications and submittals. DPW-Environmental Division will need the operators of this facility to comply with

NMED-required monthly recordkeeping and inspections. The monthly inspection must be performed by someone with a current A/B Operator Training certificate from an NMED-approved training provider.

55. Request a confirmation of the days and hours of operation for the tasks.

A: Please see the revised performance work statement dated Feb 1, 2014 posted via amendment

0004 to the solicitation.

56. Please confirm the requirement and any particular elements necessary to service wide-body aircraft (i.e., minimum two refuelers NLT 15 before landing, etc), with some historical usage data.

A: See revised PWS dated Feb 1, 2014 which was incorporated to the solicitation via amendment

0004.

57. What required training and certifications are needed for operating Service Provider vehicles on BAAF, other than valid CDL’s and endorsements?

A: All personnel that drive within the confines of the airfields restricted area are required to obtain airfield drivers training through airfield operations drivers training manager.

58. Are airfield-only tires required for the refuelers at BAAF, or can standard, general purpose be used?

A: Standard general purpose tires are acceptable for use on the airfield.

59. Is there a Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) in place with the current into-plane

Service Provider?

A: Current provider does not have a Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) in place.

60. When the new Service Provider starts, does this close out the contract of the current provider?

A: Yes, the current contract with Atlantic Aviation will be terminated at this time.

61. Will the Service Provider be required to supply the Environmental and Spill Control

Plans, O&M, and Security & Safety for the GOCO sites, or are these plans already available to be handed over to the Service Provider for update/execution?

A: The new Service Provider is responsible to supply its own (updated) facility Environmental and Spill Control Plans, update currently provided O&M manuals as required, and develop facility Security & Safety plans for the GOCO sites.

62. Are there required levels of security clearance for operations of the Service Provider’s employees at any of the sites, including flight line entry at BAAF?

A: Employees require a security background check from the National Agency Check (NAC).

63. Please clarify that the service provider is required to provide all computer systems used for processing to the EBS; that is, are we correct that no government computers will be provided?

A: Computers will be Service Provider’s Computers; no Government computers will be provided.

64. Since the current provider is processing accounting from the BAAF location and several of the current sites (Orogrande and Doña Ana, specifically) are not yet in operation, will the

Service Provider under this award have access via dedicated telephone lines to all existing, as well as newly constructed, sites for downloading and process accounting from one central location?

A: Yes.

65. Is there a requirement for meeting/escorting the delivery trucks to/from any of the sites?

A: No, there is no requirement to escort delivery trucks to/from any location.

66. Reference PWS C.5.1.3.1.2 states “The government shall be responsible for issuing and revoking keys as requested in writing from the customer units.” Please verify if this means the government will provide and encode the VIL-keys, and also handle the revocation turn-ins while simply providing the new data files to the Service Provider.

67. Reference PWS C.6.10 – AVIATION OPERATIONS PLAN description includes a lengthy section on hot refueling. Since that mission is to be removed until a later date, will this paragraph be revised to delete those references?

A: Yes, this section has been removed in the PWS dated 2/1/2014, posted via amendment 0004.

68. Is there an existing geotechnical soils report for the area where the new IBCT facility is to be constructed?

A: Yes, this report was provided to pre-proposal attendees via SAFE File Sharing site. If a copy is needed, please contact Owen Hassig at owen.hassig@dla.mil

69. Will the bulk JP8 tanks at the IBCT facility need to have internal floating roofs?

A: Internal floating roofs are not required; the type of roof is at the service provider’s discretion and should be built in accordance with best commercial practices. However, the service provider should mention the type of roof selected in iths proposal.

70. Will the Contractor be responsible to perform maintenance, other than operator level maintenance, at the GOCO facilities of Doña Anna, Oro Grande, McGregor, and Biggs AAF?

A: The contractor is responsible for Operator Maintenance Level. Maintenance beyond the

Operator Maintenance Level will be performed by a DLA Energy recurring maintenance funded contract.

71. What are the standby requirements for refuelers on certain aircraft?

A: Refuels are required to be ready and waiting to fuel aircraft upon its arrival to airfield.

72. Will aircraft refuelers be “Flightline Use Only” vehicles or is there an over-the-road requirement also?

A: Yes, Airfield operations refuelers are for flight line us only.

73. Will the Government require a 35%, 60%, and 95% construction design review?

A: No, the government will not conduct a construction design review because this is a service contract. Please disregard any answers to the contrary found in any previous amendment.

74. Will the fire department require Knox Boxes at the IBCT bulk facility?

A: Yes, Knox Boxes will be required by the fire dept.

75. Will there be design reviews for the IBCT bulk and retail facilities?

A: See response to question 73.

76. Will the containment basin at the IBCT bulk be required to connect to an oil/water separator?

A: An Oil Water Separator is allowed but is not required. The Service Provider's design must allow for treatment of contaminated water.

77. Will the above-ground tanks at the IBCT retail be required to be double wall per the EA?

A: Retail tanks are required to be double walled. Single wall bulk storage tanks must have secondary containment provided that is 110% of the capacity of the single wall bulk storage tanks.

78. Has a UXO survey been completed for the Bulk and Retail IBCT site?

A: UXO survey for Bulk/Retail COCO site to be completed by the installation in the next 60 days.

79. Can the site storm water runoff be directly piped to the existing storm water retention basin to the west of the IBCT proposed site?

A: Based on previous master drainage study (information provided via SAFE File Sharing Site to pre-proposal conference attendees; available up on request. Please contact Owen Hassig at owen.hassig@dla.mil) completed in 2006 COCO site is included in the drainage area R-5 served by the linear retention basin west of the COCO site. Adequacy of the existing design to accommodate the increase in runoff from the proposed COCO facility should be recalculated for the COCO to include gain or loss from any other existing or planned development in drainage area R-5. If the contractor chooses to use the existing storm water retention basin to the west of the COCO site, all infrastructure costs associated with piping storm water from the COCO site to the existing storm water basin will be borne by the contractor. Fort Bliss will not bear any costs associated with infrastructure installation for directing storm water from the COCO site to the existing storm water retention basin.

From the operational compliance standpoint - The owner/operator of the COCO facility will have to obtain storm water permit coverage to operate. This will include preparing a facility storm water pollution prevention plan, storm water sampling and analysis, worker training, and reporting to the state.

80. Please supply utilities information as is built now.

A: Available on request; please contact owen.hassig@dla.mil.

81. Please identify the type of fire system that must be installed to mesh with the Post (such as a Mass Notification system) and the manufacturer and model we need to supply, whether it is wired (copper telecom) or wireless, any other details, etc.

A: Refer to answer provided in Attachment 1 Question 4.

82. Since the current provider is processing accounting from the BAAF location and several of the current sites (Oro Grande and Doña Ana, specifically) are not yet in operation, will the

Service Provider under this award have access via dedicated telephone lines to all existing, as well as newly constructed, sites for downloading and process accounting from one central location?

A: Dedicated telephone lines are will be provided at the newly constructed sites and all existing sites, for downloading and process accounting from one central location.

83. Is there a requirement for meeting/escorting the delivery trucks to/from any of the sites?

A: No, there is no requirement to escort delivery trucks to/from any location.

84. During the site visit, it was mentioned that the AbilityOne requirements are quite hard to meet with this type of contract. The Government said at the time, that the AbilityOne requirements would be revisited to decide if they can be imposed on this contract. Has a decision been made yet?

A: There are no changes to the evaluation factors listed in the solicitation.