NtnlCompTable.xls
XLS spreadsheet 91 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- S08F6AR007
About this file
National Compensation Table
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amend5-AR.doc | DOC document | |
| 1_Amend3-AR.doc | DOC document | |
| OAOMS10.pdf | ||
| Amend3-AR.doc | DOC document | |
| Pre-PropPresentation.ppt | PPT presentation | |
| OAOMS10GAPCtrRep.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| OA_CTSPropertyList.pdf | ||
| POMS10.pdf | ||
| 1_Amend2-AR.doc | DOC document | |
| Amend2-AR.doc | DOC document | |
| Amend1-AR.doc | DOC document | |
| RFP-AR_OACTS.doc | DOC document |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
instructions
| rfp_sal_v5 |
| DOL OFFICE OF JOB CORPS NATIONAL STAFF COMPENSATION REPORT |
| General Information. Job Corps Regional Offices will supply this report to organizations that request RFP's for the issuance of new Center Operations Contracts. The purpose of the report is to provide consistent information to all offerors concerning the Department of Labor's expectations concerning the compensation rates it deems to be reasonably competitive for most of the staff positions that are found at a Job Corps center. If an offeror has what it believes is more accurate information about locally competitive compensation rates or has what it believes is a more effective and productive approach to staff compensation, there is no requirement that it use the information provided in this report. However, the offeror should in these cases be prepared to explain the basis for the staff compensation levels that are reflected in its proposal. |
| Position Titles. The position titles that are covered by this report are found in the "position_titles" sheet. Each position title has been assigned to one of 10 different pay groups. Pay group 1 contains the lowest compensated positions and pay group 10 consists of the highest compensated position (Center Director). |
| Pay Group Compensation Rates. The compensation rates for each pay group are provided on the "center_table" sheet. Information is provided separately for the first contract year and the second contract year. For both of the two base years, the "center_table" sheet provides a "Midpoint for Use in Budgeting" for each pay group. This information includes both an annual salary amount and an annual benefits amount plus a total. For budgeting purposes, reference should be made to the total of salary plus benefits. Offerors have wide discretion in terms of how total compensation breaks down into salary versus benefits. In this regard, the Department's expectations concerning staff compensation levels focus on the total package of salary plus benefits and is not necessarily concerned with the split between salary and benefits. |
| Low/High Salary Ranges. For each one of the 10 pay groups, both a low end and a high end are displayed as background information only. The Department's compensation expert recommendeds that the low end salary levels would be appropriate for inexperienced new hires or appointees and that the high end salary levels would be appropriate for fully experienced and highly qualified top performers. The display of the low/high ranges is to reinforce the point that formulation of center budgets using compensation mid-points in no way implies all staff members in a particular position should receive the same salary. |
| Adaptation of the Report to a Specific RFP. Regional Offices must adapt the report to a specific RFP by entering relevant information in three cells on the "center_table" sheet. These are the green-shaded cells labelled: a) Name of Center Under Procurement; b) Geographic Adjustment Factor; and c) Planned Start Date of New Contract. The geographic adjustment factors for all centers are provided in the "geo_adjustmt_factors" sheet; so it is a simple matter to look up the factor that applies to the center that is under procurement. Also note that the entry for new contract start date is used to calculate the inflationary increase that must be applied to the original salary table that was provided effective 01/01/2006 |
center_table
| rfp_sal_v5 | ||||||||
| DOL OFFICE OF JOB CORPS NATIONAL STAFF COMPENSATION REPORT | 07/01/07 | |||||||
| Offerors shall justify proposed salary levels using prevailing wage rate data from the local labor market, this National Staff Compensation Report data sheet, or a combination of both. This table reflects independent, expert advice that has been given to the Department of Labor. | ||||||||
| a. | Name of Center Under Procurement.......................................................................... | Little Rock | c. | Planned Start Date of New Contract............................................ | 10/01/08 | |||
| b. | Geographic Adjustment Factor, This Center..................................................................... | 91.1% | d. | Employer Paid Fringe Target Level.................................... | 20.4% | |||
| Pay Group | Budget Element | Base Year 1 | Base Year 2: Inflation @ | 2.40% | Recommended Salary Range | |||
| Low End | Midpoint for Use in Budgeting | High End | Low End | Midpoint for Use in Budgeting | High End | |||
| 1 | Annual Base Salary | $17,411 | $20,022 | $22,634 | $17,829 | $20,503 | $23,177 | 30% |
| Base Fringe Benefit Allowance | $4,085 | $4,183 | ||||||
| Total of Base Salary + Fringes | $24,107 | $24,685 | ||||||
| 2 | Annual Base Salary | $19,719 | $23,663 | $27,607 | $20,192 | $24,231 | $28,269 | 40% |
| Base Fringe Benefit Allowance | $4,827 | $4,943 | ||||||
| Total of Base Salary + Fringes | $28,490 | $29,174 | ||||||
| 3 | Annual Base Salary | $23,511 | $28,213 | $32,916 | $24,075 | $28,890 | $33,705 | 40% |
| Base Fringe Benefit Allowance | $5,756 | $5,894 | ||||||
| Total of Base Salary + Fringes | $33,969 | $34,784 | ||||||
| 4 | Annual Base Salary | $27,303 | $32,764 | $38,224 | $27,958 | $33,550 | $39,142 | 40% |
| Base Fringe Benefit Allowance | $6,684 | $6,844 | ||||||
| Total of Base Salary + Fringes | $39,448 | $40,394 | ||||||
| 5 | Annual Base Salary | $31,095 | $37,314 | $43,533 | $31,842 | $38,210 | $44,578 | 40% |
| Base Fringe Benefit Allowance | $7,612 | $7,795 | ||||||
| Total of Base Salary + Fringes | $44,926 | $46,005 | ||||||
| 6 | Annual Base Salary | $34,887 | $41,865 | $48,842 | $35,725 | $42,870 | $50,015 | 40% |
| Base Fringe Benefit Allowance | $8,540 | $8,745 | ||||||
| Total of Base Salary + Fringes | $50,405 | $51,615 | ||||||
| 7 | Annual Base Salary | $40,955 | $49,146 | $57,337 | $41,938 | $50,325 | $58,713 | 40% |
| Base Fringe Benefit Allowance | $10,026 | $10,266 | ||||||
| Total of Base Salary + Fringes | $59,171 | $60,592 | ||||||
| 8 | Annual Base Salary | $46,597 | $58,247 | $69,896 | $47,716 | $59,645 | $71,574 | 50% |
| Base Fringe Benefit Allowance | $11,882 | $12,168 | ||||||
| Total of Base Salary + Fringes | $70,129 | $71,812 | ||||||
| 9 | Annual Base Salary | $54,606 | $68,258 | $81,910 | $55,917 | $69,896 | $83,875 | 50% |
| Base Fringe Benefit Allowance | $13,925 | $14,259 | ||||||
| Total of Base Salary + Fringes | $82,183 | $84,155 | ||||||
| 10 | Annual Base Salary | $83,730 | $104,662 | $125,595 | $85,739 | $107,174 | $128,609 | 50% |
| Base Fringe Benefit Allowance | $21,351 | $21,864 | ||||||
| Total of Base Salary + Fringes | $126,013 | $129,038 |
position_titles
| POSITION TITLES BY PAY GROUP | |||||
| Position Titles Commonly Found at Job Corps Centers | |||||
| 1 | Child Care Aide | 4 | Accountant | 6 | Academic Instructor |
| Cooks Helper | Career Development Specialist | Career Development Mgr | |||
| Dining Hall/Food Service Aide | Career Exploration Instructor | Career Transition Mgr | |||
| Laundry Operator | Career Preparation Leader/Inst | Child Care Manager | |||
| Career Transition Specialist | Finance Manager | ||||
| 2 | Child Care Specialist | Cook, Lead/Senior | Human Resources (HR) Manager | ||
| Clerk/Receptionist | Dental Hygienist | IT System Administrator | |||
| Driver | EEO Coordinator | Recreation Manager | |||
| Groundskeeper | Exec Secretary/Office Mgr | Security Manager | |||
| Janitor/Custodian | Licensed Practical Nurse | ||||
| Maintenance Worker | Property/Supply Manager | 7 | Registered Nurse | ||
| Property/Supply Clerk | Counseling Director | ||||
| Purchasing Clerk | 5 | ACT Coordinator | |||
| Recreation/Avocation Assistant | Bus/Community Liaison | 8 | Academic Manager | ||
| Security Guard/Officer | Center Standards Officer | Admin Manager/Director | |||
| Student Records Clerk | Child Care Teacher | Director of Residential Living | |||
| Counselor | Health Services Administrator | ||||
| 3 | Arts/Crafts Instructor | Dining Hall Manager | Vocational Manager | ||
| Assistant CSO | Drivers Education Instructor | ||||
| Bookkeeper/Accounting Clerk | Maintenance Manager | 9 | Deputy Center Director | ||
| Cook | Purchasing Agent/Buyer | Education and Training Manager | |||
| Dental Assistant | Residential Advisor Supv | ||||
| HR Specialist/Benefits Asst | Safety Instructor/Coordinator | 10 | Center Director | ||
| Lab/X-Ray Technician | Student Records Manager | ||||
| Librarian | TEAP Counselor | ||||
| Recreation Specialist | Testing Coordinator | ||||
| Residential Advisor | Vocational Instructor | ||||
| Secretary/Admin Assistant | Vocational Testing Coordinator | ||||
| SGA Advisor | VST Project Coordinator | ||||
| Transportation Coordinator | Work-Based Learning Coordinator | ||||
| June 2007 |
geo_adjustmt_factors
| US DEPARTMENT OF LABOR | |||
| OFFICE OF JOB CORPS | |||
| Geographic Differentials in Cost of Labor | |||
| Data Reported for All Available Locations | |||
| National Average, United States = 100% | |||
| Job Corps Center | Aggregate Differential | Comparison Cities | |
| 1 | Alaska | 125.8% | Palmer, Alaska |
| 2 | Albuquerque | 95.3% | Albuquerque, New Mexico |
| 3 | Anaconda | 88.9% | Anaconda, Montana |
| 4 | Angell | 97.3% | Waldport, Oregon |
| 5 | Arecibo | 73.7% | Arecibo, Puerto Rico |
| 6 | Atlanta | 100.3% | Atlanta, Georgia |
| 7 | Atterbury | 89.7% | Franklin, Indiana |
| 8 | Bamberg | 89.6% | Orangeburg, South Carolina |
| 9 | Barranquitas | 71.4% | Coamo, Puerto Rico |
| 10 | Batesville | 85.3% | Batesville, Mississippi |
| 11 | Blackwell | 90.0% | Rhinelander, Wisconsin |
| 12 | Blue Ridge | 87.2% | Marion, Virginia |
| 13 | Boxelder | 87.6% | Rapid City, South Dakota |
| 14 | Brooklyn | 114.0% | Brooklyn, New York |
| 15 | Brunswick | 88.7% | Brunswick, Georgia |
| 16 | Carl D. Perkins | 90.6% | Langley, Kentucky |
| 17 | Carville | 85.0% | Geismar, Louisiana |
| 18 | Cascades | 102.8% | Burlington, Washington |
| 19 | Cass | 87.6% | Bentonville, Arkansas |
| 20 | Cassadaga | 94.2% | Fredonia, New York |
| 21 | Centennial | 94.6% | Nampa, Idaho |
| 22 | Charleston | 93.5% | Charleston, West Virginia |
| 23 | Chicago | 109.1% | Chicago, Illinois |
| 24 | Cincinnati | 99.8% | Cincinnati, Ohio |
| 25 | Clearfield | 95.7% | Clearfield, Utah |
| 26 | Cleveland | 102.0% | Cleveland, Ohio |
| 27 | Collbran | 94.3% | Pueblo, Colorado |
| 28 | Columbia Basin | 98.1% | Moses Lake, Washington |
| 29 | Connecticut | 111.4% | Statewide, Connecticut |
| 30 | Curlew | 95.3% | Republic, Washington |
| 31 | David L. Carrasco | 89.6% | El Paso, Texas |
| 32 | Dayton | 100.6% | Dayton, Ohio |
| 33 | Delaware Valley | 103.0% | Port Jervis, New York |
| 34 | Denison | 91.8% | Sergeant Bluff, Iowa |
| 35 | Detroit | 112.2% | Detroit, Michigan |
| 36 | Earle C. Clements | 93.0% | Henderson, Kentucky |
| 37 | Edison | 114.9% | Edison, New Jersey |
| 38 | Excelsior Springs | 97.6% | Excelsior Springs, Missouri |
| 39 | Exeter | 102.1% | Kingston, Rhode Island |
| 40 | Flatwoods | 85.5% | Coeburn, Virginia |
| 41 | Flint | 106.9% | Flint, Michigan |
| 42 | Flint Hills | 90.2% | Manhattan, Kansas |
| 43 | Fort Simcoe | 103.3% | Union Gap, Washington |
| 44 | Fred G Acosta | 93.6% | Tucson, Arizona |
| 45 | Frenchburg | 92.8% | Winchester, Kentucky |
| 46 | Gadsden | 89.2% | Gadsden, Alabama |
| 47 | Gainesville | 90.4% | Gainesville, Florida |
| 48 | Gary | 95.0% | San Marcos, Texas |
| 49 | Gerald Ford | 103.8% | Grand Rapids, Michigan |
| 50 | Glenmont | 99.2% | Glenmont, New York |
| 51 | Golconda | 91.0% | Harrisburg, Illinois |
| 52 | Grafton | 102.7% | Grafton, Massachusetts |
| 53 | Great Onyx | 89.5% | Bowling Green, Kentucky |
| 54 | Gulfport | 90.5% | Gulfport, Mississippi |
| 55 | Guthrie | 90.3% | Guthrie, Oklahoma |
| 56 | Harpers Ferry | 102.2% | Charles Town, West Virginia |
| 57 | Hartford | 104.3% | Hartford, Connecticut |
| 58 | Hawaii | 104.1% | Waimanalo, Hawaii |
| 59 | Homestead | 96.3% | Homestead, Florida |
| 60 | Hubert H. Humphrey | 107.4% | St Paul, Minnesota |
| 61 | Indypendence | 100.0% | Indianapolis, Indiana |
| 62 | Inland Empire | 107.5% | San Bernardino, California |
| 63 | Iroquois | 97.7% | Albion, New York |
| 64 | Jacksonville | 96.0% | Jacksonville, Florida |
| 65 | Jacobs Creek | 89.0% | Bristol, Tennessee |
| 66 | Joliet | 106.6% | Joliet, Illinois |
| 67 | Keystone | 96.9% | Hazleton, Pennsylvania |
| 68 | Kicking Horse | 87.9% | Polson, Montana |
| 69 | Kittrell | 92.0% | Henderson, North Carolina |
| 70 | Laredo | 86.8% | Laredo, Texas |
| 71 | Little Rock | 91.1% | Little Rock, Arkansas |
| 72 | Long Beach | 112.3% | Long Beach, California |
| 73 | Loring | 83.9% | Presque Isle, Maine |
| 74 | Los Angeles | 113.4% | Los Angeles, California |
| 75 | Lyndon B. Johnson | 88.2% | Franklin, North Carolina |
| 76 | Memphis | 97.6% | Memphis, Tennessee |
| 77 | Miami | 99.4% | Miami, Florida |
| 78 | Mingo | 89.1% | Dexter, Missouri |
| 79 | Mississippi | 88.5% | Statewide, Mississippi |
| 80 | Montgomery | 91.5% | Montgomery, Alabama |
| 81 | Muhlenberg | 89.2% | Madisonville, Kentucky |
| 82 | New Orleans | 96.1% | New Orleans, Louisiana |
| 83 | North Texas | 97.5% | Mckinney, Texas |
| 84 | Northlands | 98.6% | Burlington-Downtown, Vermont |
| 85 | Oconaluftee | 88.3% | Bryson City, North Carolina |
| 86 | Old Dominion | 87.5% | Lynchburg, Virginia |
| 87 | Oneonta | 95.6% | Oneonta, New York |
| 88 | Ouachita | 86.5% | Camden, Arkansas |
| 89 | Penobscot | 92.5% | Bangor, Maine |
| 90 | Philadelphia | 107.7% | Philadelphia, Pennsylvania |
| 91 | Phoenix | 99.5% | Phoenix, Arizona |
| 92 | Pine Knot | 87.2% | Corbin, Kentucky |
| 93 | Pine Ridge | 86.0% | Scottsbluff, Nebraska |
| 94 | Pittsburgh | 99.6% | Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania |
| 95 | PIVOT | 105.5% | Portland, Oregon |
| 96 | Potomac | 107.2% | District Of Columbia, District of Columbia |
| 97 | Quetin N. Burdick | 90.3% | Minot, North Dakota |
| 98 | Ramey | 74.6% | Aguadilla, Puerto Rico |
| 99 | Red Rock | 96.7% | Towanda, Pennsylvania |
| 100 | Roswell | 89.5% | Roswell, New Mexico |
| 101 | Sacramento | 108.7% | Sacramento, California |
| 102 | San Diego | 107.0% | San Diego, California |
| 103 | San Jose | 121.3% | San Jose, California |
| 104 | Schenck | 88.3% | Brevard, North Carolina |
| 105 | Shreveport | 91.9% | Shreveport, Louisiana |
| 106 | Shriver | 104.1% | Leominster, Massachusetts |
| 107 | Sierra Nevada | 104.7% | Reno, Nevada |
| 108 | South Bronx | 113.6% | Bronx, New York |
| 109 | Springdale | 101.8% | Troutdale, Oregon |
| 110 | St Louis | 102.2% | St Louis, Missouri |
| 111 | Talking Leaves | 88.0% | Muskogee, Oklahoma |
| 112 | Timber Lake | 103.1% | Estacada, Oregon |
| 113 | Tongue Point | 98.1% | Astoria, Oregon |
| 114 | Trapper Creek | 90.3% | Hamilton, Montana |
| 115 | Treasure Island | 120.9% | San Francisco, California |
| 116 | Treasure Lake | 89.0% | Lawton, Oklahoma |
| 117 | Tulsa | 95.1% | Tulsa, Oklahoma |
| 118 | Turner | 93.1% | Albany, Georgia |
| 119 | Weber Basin | 96.5% | Ogden, Utah |
| 120 | Westover | 104.1% | Chicopee, Massachusetts |
| 121 | Whitney M. Young Jr. | 95.1% | Crestwood, Kentucky |
| 122 | Wilmington | 99.3% | Wilmington, Delaware |
| 123 | Wolf Creek | 96.7% | Sutherlin, Oregon |
| 124 | Woodland | 104.4% | Laurel, Maryland |
| 125 | Woodstock | 102.6% | Randallstown, Maryland |
| * Note New Orleans, Louisana and Gulfport, Mississippi information is pre-Hurricane Katrina |
source_tbl
| Rocco Recommended Levels at 100% Range, Effective for Year Beginning 1/1/2006 | Inflated at 3% per Year to July 1, 2007 | ||||||||
| Pay Group | Midpoint | ||||||||
| 1 | $22,000 | $22,997 | |||||||
| 2 | $26,000 | $27,179 | |||||||
| 3 | $31,000 | $32,405 | |||||||
| 4 | $36,000 | $37,632 | |||||||
| 5 | $41,000 | $42,859 | |||||||
| 6 | $46,000 | $48,085 | |||||||
| 7 | $54,000 | $56,448 | |||||||
| 8 | $64,000 | $66,901 | |||||||
| 9 | $75,000 | $78,400 | |||||||
| 10 | $115,000 | $120,214 | |||||||
| Inflation from 7/1/2007 | 1.0060 | Cum Thru Prior PY | 1.0000 | Add'l Inflation This PY Thru Start Date | 1.0060 | Contract Year 2 Start | 10/01/09 | Annual Rate Next Year | 1.0240 |
| Fund Availability Factor | 95% | ||||||||
| Geographic Adjustor | 0.9110 | inflation from 7/1/2007 to start date of contract | |||||||
| Combined Adjustment | 0.8706 | key variables | avg days per year | 365.25 | new cont start date | 10/1/2008 | |||
| Fully Adusted to Center Location and Contract Start Date | year start date | annual rate | cum thru prev yr | days this yr | as% year | add infl this yr | |||
| 1 | $20,022 | 7/1/07 | 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 458 | 125.4% | 1.0000 | ||
| 2 | $23,663 | 7/1/08 | 1.0240 | 1.0000 | 92 | 25.2% | 1.0060 | ||
| 3 | $28,213 | 7/1/09 | 1.0240 | 1.0240 | -273 | -74.7% | 0.9824 | ||
| 4 | $32,764 | 7/1/10 | 1.0240 | 1.0486 | -638 | -174.7% | 0.9594 | ||
| 5 | $37,314 | 7/1/11 | 1.0240 | 1.0737 | -1003 | -274.6% | 0.9369 | ||
| 6 | $41,865 | 7/1/12 | 1.0240 | 1.0995 | -1369 | -374.8% | 0.9149 | ||
| 7 | $49,146 | 7/1/13 | 1.0240 | 1.1259 | -1734 | -474.7% | 0.8935 | ||
| 8 | $58,247 | 7/1/14 | 1.0240 | 1.1529 | -2099 | -574.7% | 0.8726 | ||
| 9 | $68,258 | 7/1/15 | 1.0240 | 1.1806 | -2464 | -674.6% | 0.8521 | ||
| 10 | $104,662 | 7/1/16 | 1.0240 | 1.2089 | -2830 | -774.8% | 0.8321 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .