MSL_PreProposalConference_September_2015_Public_FBO_Posting.pdf

NASA Revitalization Project Measurement Systems Laboratory (MSL) Langley Research Center Hampton, Virginia

Design-Bid-Build Pre-Proposal Conference

U.S. General Services Administration

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

September 16, 2015

Agenda 10:00 AM – 12:00 PM

Introductions of Government & Project Contractors Purpose of Pre-Proposal Conference NASA Revitalization Plan Design Overview for

Measurement Systems Laboratory (MSL) Pre-Proposal Overview Phase 1 Timeline Questions & Answers

2 GC: TBD

Speaker: Anthony (Tony) Dell’Arciprete, GSA

Introduction: Gov’t Representatives U.S. General Services Administration Anthony Dell’Arciprete Program Manager Ray Porter Contracting Officer Anthony Teti Contracting Officer Brett Molash Project Engineer

U.S. National Aeronautics & Space Administration William Abrams Project Manager Floyd Quintana Program Manager

GC: TBD

Introduction: Project Contractors

A/E Firm: AECOM Ed Weaver Program Manager

Construction Management Firm: Hill International Jim Beckett Project Executive Christopher Reilly Senior Project Manager

Purpose: Pre-Proposal Conference Speaker: Anthony Dell’Arciprete, GSA

Design-Bid-Build Services in Request for

Proposal (RFP) Measurement Systems Laboratory (MSL)

NASA Revitalization Plan Overview Speaker: Floyd Quintana, NASA

NASA Revitalization Plan

NASA Revitalization Plan Overview

Creating Langley’s Future…It’s Langley creates innovative solutions to the grand challenges of earth science, space exploration and flight in all atmospheres, for the benefit of all humankind.

8 GC: TBD

“Mother Center”

NACA

National Aeronautics Lab Unitary Plan Birth of Space Program

Heritage

New Town Revitalize Langley Lab Consolidation Diversified Portfolio Repair by Replacement Recapitalization

Present

Enables full spectrum of R&D Promotes collaboration and productivity Flexible and adaptive to changing mission needs Environmentally sustainable Embraces future work environments

Future

Aging Infrastructure Poses Risk to Mission Agency-wide, more than 80 percent of NASA’s infrastructure and facilities by value are beyond their design life – thus more likely to be unsuitable for current and future missions.

Aging, Apollo-era legacy infrastructure is inefficient and costly to maintain and operate.

Assets over 40 years old (typical design life is 30 years) pose a risk to

NASA’s unique research and development mission.

Risk severity rises as assets age beyond 40.

To control risk, control the share and average age of assets >40

Maintenance backlog continues to grow.

Whitlow—”NASA Facility Strategy Presentation” at the 2011 Facilities Engineering Conference

LaRC’s oldest building is 80 years old and the Center average is around 44 years old—We are proactively revitalizing the Center’s core infrastructure to meet future missions.

Figures of Merit Relevance to the NASA Mission

Supports Multiple NASA Mission Directorates (current and future) Ability to Sustain/Develop Core Competency

Utilization Usage rates Enables our competitiveness/Reimbursable opportunities

Cost of Ownership Maintenance and Utility Costs Deferred Maintenance / Facility Condition Assessment (FCA)

Linkage to Master Plan Central to Core Campus Sustainability / Energy Efficiency

Overarching Revitalization Decisions

Sustain / enhance essential in-house experimental capability

Enable multi-disciplinary integrated systems capability

Incorporate Computational Simulation as a cross-cutting capability in everything we do

Continually assess the needs of NASA’s missions and divest of facilities (even large ones) when it no longer makes sense for the mission and the national good

Summary of Investments & Savings Provides new state-of-the-art, sustainable, energy efficient

R&D facilities Sustains, enhances and creates our essential experimental capability to meet future agency missions by providing more efficient and effective facilities and labs

By 2030 the Center Revitalization Plan:

Saves nearly $100M Maintenance and Utilities Eliminates $141M Deferred Maintenance Reduces our footprint by 1.21M sq. ft.

Achieves approximately 600K sq. ft. of new building space Reduces the current replacement value (CRV) by approximately $1B

Plan requires investments which will be funded through Agency Construction of Facilities (CoF) and Recapitalization funds, Program dollars and LaRC’s CMO

Headquarters Building (AOB1) Langley Headquarters Office of the Director

Houses multiple organizations Office of Human Capital Chief Financial Officer Office of Procurement Office of Chief Counsel

Integrated Engineering Services Building (IESB)

Engineering Design Studio Brings different technical groups together during the design process

Flight Mission Support Facility Provide a facility to monitor and inform team while mission in flight

Training and Learning Classrooms Conference Facilities Cafeteria

Computational Research Facility (CRF)

Current Status:

Initiated Pre-Design Study –

March 2013 Completion B1194 deemed not appropriate New site and design completed

Future Work:

FY15 – Begin Construction

FY Start Description Justification (Demo’s No Earlier Than)

Cost Savings

($M)

Computational/Office: Data Center and High Density Office Space

Relevant to all MDs; Core campus;

consolidation of IT capability; energy efficient; Demo B1209 and repurpose B1268

M+U: $0.6

DM: $1.3

CRV: $10.9

Goal: Re-ViTALize LaRC Transform the Center to enable LaRC to make vital contributions to NASA missions – both current and future – by establishing a stimulating work environment, modernizing infrastructure and investing in new capabilities to meet the accelerating pace of science and technology trends.

Revitalization success through strategic workforce partnerships with GSA and USACE enables LaRC to focus our critical hires toward the Agency Mission.

AOB1

IESB

CRF

MSL

ViTAL – Vibrant Transformation to Advance Langley

ALDF Demo

B1192 Demo

Current Investment Timeline

2004 2010 2011 2015

AOB1

2013 2016

IESB CRF MSL

ViTAL – Vibrant Transformation to Advance Langley

New Town focus on modernizing aging facilities

Master Plan approach for future campus development

ViTAL integrated facility strategy to meet NASA mission

Revitalization Office established to execute ViTAL plan

Master Plan Update incorporates ViTAL plan

Continued Progress and Planning

2018+

Concept Design Overview Speaker: Ed Weaver, AECOM

Guiding Themes / Key Drivers

Sustainability Interior Environment Campus Setting / Context Presence

Campus Context - Buildings

Roles and Responsibilities Speaker: Chris Reilly, Hill International

Construction Management Overview

Open, Timely Communications Commitment to Issue Resolution Proactive Quality Program Viable Schedule Used as a Tool Risk Management Partnering

SAFETY!

ePM Systems Proliance

RFIs Submittals Correspondence

Proposal Overview Speakers: Anthony Dell’Arciprete, GSA Ray Porter, GSA Anthony Teti, GSA

2 Phase Source Selection Process

Proposal Overview: Phase 1

Phase 1:

Past Performance on Similar Project Project Team Qualifications Safety Subcontracting Methodology

GC:TBD

Proposal Overview: Phase 1

Past Performance Past Performance on Similar Projects

Construction Firms

Proposal Overview: Phase 1 --continued

Project Team Qualifications:

Offeror’s Principal-In-Charge/Project Executive Construction Project Manager Construction Superintendent Construction MEP Coordinator Quality Control Manager Safety Coordinator BIM Coordinator & Document Manager LEED Accredited Professional (AP)

Proposal Overview: Phase 1 --continued

Safety Subcontracting Methodology

Notification of Technical Rating to All Firms Develop the Advisory Shortlist Offerors on the Advisory Short List will be invited to participate in Phase 2

Proposal Overview: Phase 2 Phase 2:

Project Management and Delivery Plan Interactive Discussions Project Labor Agreement Price

Timeline Speaker: Ray Porter, GSA 10/1/2015: Proposals are Due 2:00PM to

Ray Porter GSA 10 Hard Copies Required, No Fax/PDFs

11/23/2015: GSA Will Notify Offerors 12/1/15: Phase 2 Criteria Will be Sent 3/2016: Anticipated Award 4/2016: Notice to Proceed (NTP) 24 Months for Construction NTP to S.C.

Questions & Answers

Thank You For Joining Us Today

U.S. General Services Administration

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

31 GC: TBD