QASP_FINAL.docx
DOCX document 48 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Defense Spectrum Organization (DSO) Annapolis Facility Support Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- HC1047-21-R-4003
- Issued by
- Defense Information Systems Agency
About this file
This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan outlines performance standards and evaluation methods for a facilities support services contract at the Defense Spectrum Organization Annex facility. The contractor shall provide physical security, mailroom services, custodial services, grounds maintenance, pest control, and facility management. Performance will be assessed monthly on metrics such as the number of incidents, complaints, and errors. Contract administration documents like progress reports must be accurate and timely. Response times for urgent and emergency requests are defined. The contractor must meet minimum acceptable quality levels to receive satisfactory ratings in areas like security, mail delivery, pest control, and maintenance tasks. Contract options include incentive fees for exceeding performance targets. Surveillance methods involve random sampling for most tasks but full inspections for others. The Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan establishes procedures for monitoring and documenting contractor performance on the facilities support contract.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Updated Reading Library.docx | DOCX document | |
| Amendment 0001_Solicitation.pdf | ||
| QandA_FINAL.docx | DOCX document | |
| Mission Essential.pdf | ||
| Copy of Price Worksheet-832117726-4.12.21.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| GFPin PIEE under identifier 1005757.pdf | ||
| HC1047-21-R-4003_May6.pdf | ||
| QandA.docx | DOCX document | |
| Past Performance Reference.docx | DOCX document | |
| Consent letter.docx | DOCX document | |
| Reading Library word document.docx | DOCX document | |
| DD254 Final.pdf | ||
| Cover letter and Past performance Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| wage.pdf |
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN (QASP)
1. Contract or Task Order Title: Defense Spectrum Organization (DSO) Annapolis Facility Operation Support
2. Purpose:
This QASP provides a systematic method to evaluate performance for the stated contract. This QASP explains the following:
· What will be monitored?
· How monitoring will take place.
· Who will conduct the monitoring?
· How monitoring efforts and results will be documented.
This QASP does not detail how the contractor accomplishes the work. Rather, the QASP is created with the premise that the contractor is responsible for management and quality control actions to meet the terms of the contract. It is the Government’s responsibility to be objective, fair, and consistent in evaluating performance. In addition, the QASP should recognize that unforeseen and uncontrollable situations may occur.
This QASP is a “living document” and the Government may review and revise it on a regular basis. Updates shall ensure that the QASP remains a valid, useful, and enforceable document. Copies of the original QASP and revisions shall be provided to the contractor and Government officials implementing surveillance activities.
3. Roles and Responsibilities:
The following personnel shall oversee and coordinate surveillance activities.
Program/Project Manager (PM) – The PM provides program oversight and supports the COR’s performance assessment activities.
Contracting Officer (KO) – The KO shall ensure performance of all necessary actions for effective contracting, ensure compliance with the contract terms, and shall safeguard the interests of the United States in the contractual relationship. The KO shall also ensure that the contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment under this contract. Determine the final assessment of the contractor’s performance.
Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) – The COR is responsible for providing continuous technical oversight of the contractor’s performance. The COR uses the QASP to conduct the oversight/surveillance process. The COR shall keep a Quality Assurance file that accurately documents the contractor’s actual performance. The purpose is to ensure that the contractor meets the performance standards contained in the contract. The COR is responsible for reporting early identification of performance problems to the KO. The COR is required to provide an annual performance assessment to the KO which will be used in documenting past performance. The QASP is the primary tool for documenting contractor performance. The COR is not empowered to make any contractual commitments or to authorize any contractual change on the Government’s behalf.
4. Primary Method of Surveillance:
Random sampling is scheduled for tasks 1-7 and 9-13. There will be 100% inspection for tasks 8 and 14.
· 100 Percent Inspection. This is usually only the most appropriate method for infrequent tasks or tasks with stringent performance requirements, e.g., where safety or health is a concern. With this method, performance is inspected/evaluated at each occurrence. One hundred percent inspection is too expensive to be used in most cases.
· Random Sampling. This is usually the most appropriate method for recurring tasks. With random sampling, services are sampled to determine if the level of performance is acceptable. Random sampling works best when the number of instances of the services being performed is very large and a statistically valid sample can be obtained. Computer programs may be available to assist in establishing sampling procedures.
Surveillance Matrix
The Surveillance Matrix (Appendix 1) is the list of performance objectives and standards that must be performed by the contractor. This matrix details the method of surveillance the COR will use to validate and inspect these performance elements. Inspection of each element will be documented in the COR file.
Performance objectives define the desired outcomes. Performance Standards define the level of service required under the contract to successfully meet the performance objective. The inspection methodology defines how, when, and what will be assessed in measuring performance. The Government performance surveillance, using this QASP, to determine the quality of the contractor’s performance as it relates to the performance element standards. The AQL performance Standard Table should be used to form the foundation of the COR’s inspection checklist.
5. Performance Standards:
The Performance Standards are captured in the table in Appendix 1.
6. Documenting Performance:
Acceptable Performance.
The Government shall document positive performance. A Performance Assessment Report (PAR) template is attached (Appendix 2). Any report may become part of the supporting documentation for fixed price payments, award/incentive fee payments, Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) entries, or other actions.
Unacceptable performance.
Unacceptable contractor performance can be identified by customer complaints (Appendix 3) or upon schedule surveillance evaluations. When unacceptable performance occurs, the COR shall inform the contractor. This will normally be in writing unless circumstances necessitate verbal communication. The COR shall document the discussion and place it in the COR file and provide a copy to the KO.
When the COR determines formal written communication is required, the COR shall prepare a Corrective Action Report (CAR). The CAR is forwarded to the KO for dissemination to the contractor. A CAR template is attached to this QASP (Appendix 4).
The contractor shall acknowledge receipt of the CAR in writing. The CAR will specify if the contractor is required to prepare a corrective action plan to document how the contractor shall correct the unacceptable performance and avoid a recurrence. The CAR will also state how long after receipt the contractor has to present this corrective action plan to the KO and COR. The Government may withhold payment for services until corrective action is taken. The Government shall review the contractor's corrective action plan to determine acceptability.
Any CAR may become a part of the supporting documentation for contract payment deductions, fixed fee deductions, award fee nonpayment, CPARS or other actions deemed necessary by the KO.
7. Mandatory or regulatory compliance items: The contractor will provide initial proof of compliance with regulatory and compliance items contained in the contract. The COR and the KO will evaluate the initial submission and will conduct ad hoc reviews of the contractor's compliance throughout the remainder of the contract. The contractor will monitor compliance as required by FAR 52.222-50, Combating Trafficking in Persons, and report any issues to the KO.
8. Acceptable Quality Level (AQL):
The Acceptable Quality Levels are captured in the table in Appendix 1.
9. Evaluation Method:
The evaluation methodology for task areas on this contract is contained within the table in Appendix 1.
10. Performance Rating
In evaluating the quality of contractor’s performance, the following performance ratings may be used (same as CPAR ratings).
| Rating |
| Definition |
| Note |
| Exceptional |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| To justify an Exceptional rating, identify multiple significant events and state how they were of benefit to the Government. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. |
| Very Good |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| To justify a Very Good rating, identify a significant event and state how it was a benefit to the Government. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified. |
| Satisfactory |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| To justify a Satisfactory rating, there should have been only minor problems, or major problems the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract/order. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. A fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be evaluated with a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract/order. |
| Marginal |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| To justify Marginal performance, identify a significant event in each category that the contractor had trouble overcoming and state how it impacted the Government. A Marginal rating should be supported by referencing the management tool that notified the contractor of the contractual deficiency (e.g., management, quality, safety, or environmental deficiency report or letter). |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| To justify an Unsatisfactory rating, identify multiple significant events in each category that the contractor had trouble overcoming and state how it impacted the Government. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating. An Unsatisfactory rating should be supported by referencing the management tools used to notify the contractor of the contractual deficiencies (e.g., management, quality, safety, or environmental deficiency reports, or letters). |
Appendix 1 - Surveillance Matrix
| Performance Standard |
| Acceptable Quality Levels (AQL) |
| Method of Surveillance |
| Results/Ratings |
| Security Services (PWS Task 6.1) |
| Target Acceptable: Work performed to meet 100% of requirements accurate/error free, and delivered on time with no major security incidents. |
Minimum Acceptable: Work performed to meet 95% of requirements accurate/error free, and delivered on time with only one minor security incident.
Any required revisions are:
•Resolved within 24 hours •Accepted by KO/COR Random Sampling
Measurement Interval The Measurement Interval is monthly.
Measurement Period The Measurement Period begins at 00:01 on the first day of the month and ends at 24:0 0 on the last day of the month.
Timing of Measurement Measurements are taken within ten (10) days of the end of the Measurement Period.
Reporting Frequency:
Reporting to commence upon Contract Award and continue throughout the Period of Performance.
A rollup of assessment of the Surveillance Inspection Results will aid in the development of an overall rating for this objective.
Potential Overall Ratings:
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory
| Custodial and Related Services (PWS Task 6.2) |
| Target Acceptable: No more than 2 complaints per month and delivered on time. |
Minimum Acceptable: No more than 4 complaints per month and delivered on time.
Any required revisions are:
•Resolved within 1 week •Accepted by KO/COR Random Sampling
Measurement Interval The Measurement Interval is monthly.
Measurement Period The Measurement Period begins at 00:01 on the first day of the month and ends at 24:00 on the last day of the month.
Timing of Measurement Measurements are taken within ten (10) days of the end of the Measurement Period.
Reporting Frequency:
Reporting to commence upon Contract Award and continue throughout the Period of Performance A rollup of assessment of the Surveillance Inspection Results will aid in the development of an overall rating for this objective.
Potential Overall Ratings:
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory
| Grounds Maintenance (PWS Task 6.3) |
| Target Acceptable: No more than 1 complaints per month and delivered on time. |
Minimum Acceptable: No more than 2 complaints per month and delivered on time.
Any required revisions are:
•Resolved within 1 week •Accepted by KO/COR Random Sampling
Measurement Interval The Measurement Interval is monthly.
Measurement Period The Measurement Period begins at 00:01 on the first day of the month and ends at 24:00 on the last day of the month.
Timing of Measurement Measurements are taken within ten (10) days of the end of the Measurement Period.
Reporting Frequency:
Reporting to commence upon Contract Award and continue throughout the Period of Performance A rollup of assessment of the Surveillance Inspection Results will aid in the development of an overall rating for this objective.
Potential Overall Ratings:
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory
| Pest Control (PWS Task 6.4) |
| Target Acceptable: Work is performed within 100% accurate/error free and delivered on time per the Integrated Pest Management (IPM) plan. |
Minimum Acceptable: Work is performed with two deviations from IPM.
Any required revisions are:
•Resolved within 1 week •Accepted by KO/COR Random Sampling
Measurement Interval The Measurement Interval is monthly.
Measurement Period The Measurement Period begins at 00:01 on the first day of the month and ends at 24:00 on the last day of the month.
Timing of Measurement Measurements are taken within ten (10) days of the end of the Measurement Period.
Reporting Frequency:
Reporting to commence upon Contract Award and continue throughout the Period of Performance A rollup of assessment of the Surveillance Inspection Results will aid in the development of an overall rating for this objective.
Potential Overall Ratings:
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory
| Mailroom Services (PWS Task 6.5) |
| Target Acceptable: Work performed 95% accurate/error free and delivered on time. |
Minimum Acceptable: Work performed 90% accurate/error free and delivered on time.
Any required revisions are:
•Resolved within 48 hours •Accepted by KO/COR Random Sampling
Measurement Interval The Measurement Interval is monthly.
Measurement Period The Measurement Period begins at 00:01 on the first day of the month and ends at 24:00 on the last day of the month.
Timing of Measurement Measurements are taken within ten (10) days of the end of the Measurement Period.
Reporting Frequency:
Reporting to commence upon Contract Award and continue throughout the Period of Performance A rollup of assessment of the Surveillance Inspection Results will aid in the development of an overall rating for this objective.
Potential Overall Ratings:
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory
| Operation Support (PWS Task 6.6) |
| Target Acceptable: Work performed 95% accurate/error free and delivered on time. |
Minimum Acceptable: Work performed 90% accurate/error free and delivered on time.
Any required revisions are:
•Resolved within 1 week •Accepted by KO/COR Random Sampling
Measurement Interval The Measurement Interval is monthly.
Measurement Period The Measurement Period begins at 00:01 on the first day of the month and ends at 24:00 on the last day of the month.
Timing of Measurement Measurements are taken within ten (10) days of the end of the Measurement Period.
Reporting Frequency:
Reporting to commence upon Contract Award and continue throughout the Period of Performance A rollup of assessment of the Surveillance Inspection Results will aid in the development of an overall rating for this objective.
Potential Overall Ratings:
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory
| Snow/Ice Removal (PWS Task 6.7) |
| Target Acceptable: All areas are cleared and salted per the PWS and delivered on time to allow access and prevent slip hazards. |
Minimum Acceptable: All areas are cleared and salted per the PWS and delayed only one (1) hour past the requirements to allow access and prevent slip hazards.
Any required revisions are:
•Resolved within 1 hour •Accepted by KO/COR Random Sampling
Measurement Interval The Measurement Interval is monthly.
Measurement Period The Measurement Period begins at 00:01 on the first day of the month and ends at 24:00on the last day of the month.
Timing of Measurement Measurements are taken within ten (10) days of the end of the Measurement Period.
Reporting Frequency:
Reporting to commence upon Contract Award and continue throughout the Period of Performance A rollup of assessment of the Surveillance Inspection Results will aid in the development of an overall rating for this objective.
Potential Overall Ratings:
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory
| HPCON DELTA Cleaning (PWS Task 6.8) |
| Target Acceptable: All areas are cleaned to meet 100% of the contract requirements within 24 hours of request. |
Minimum Acceptable: All areas are cleaned to meet 100% of the contract requirements within 48 hours of request.
Any required revisions are:
•Resolved within 24 hours •Accepted by KO/COR 100% inspection
Measurement Interval The Measurement Interval is monthly.
Measurement Period The Measurement Period begins at 00:01 on the first day of the month and ends at 24:00 on the last day of the month.
Timing of Measurement Measurements are taken within ten (10) days of the end of the Measurement Period.
Reporting Frequency:
Reporting to commence upon Contract Award and continue throughout the Period of Performance A rollup of assessment of the Surveillance Inspection Results will aid in the development of an overall rating for this objective.
Potential Overall Ratings:
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory
| Other Direct Costs (PWS Task 6.9) |
| Target Acceptable: Contain required information, 100% accurate/error free, and delivered on time. |
Minimum Acceptable: Contain required information with only two errors and delivered on time.
Any required revisions are:
•Resolved within 1 week •Accepted by KO/COR Random Sampling
Measurement Interval The Measurement Interval is monthly.
Measurement Period The Measurement Period begins at 00:01 on the first day of the month and ends at 24:00on the last day of the month.
Timing of Measurement Measurements are taken within ten (10) days of the end of the Measurement Period.
Reporting Frequency:
Reporting to commence upon Contract Award and continue throughout the Period of Performance A rollup of assessment of the Surveillance Inspection Results will aid in the development of an overall rating for this objective.
Potential Overall Ratings:
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory
On-Site Facilities Manager Support (PWS Task 6.10)
High level of satisfaction with Contractor delivery of Program Management services and deliverables.
Target Acceptable: Contain required information, 100% accurate/error free, and delivered on time.
Minimum Acceptable: Contain required information with only two errors and delivered on time.
Any required revisions are:
•Resolved within 1 week •Accepted by KO/COR Random Sampling
Measurement Interval The Measurement Interval is monthly.
Measurement Period The Measurement Period begins at 00:01 on the first day of the month and ends at 24:00 on the last day of the month.
Timing of Measurement Measurements are taken within ten (10) days of the end of the Measurement Period.
Reporting Frequency:
Reporting to commence upon Contract Award and continue throughout the Period of Performance.
A rollup of assessment of the Surveillance Inspection Results will aid in the development of an overall rating for this objective.
Potential Overall Ratings:
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory
| Preventive Maintenance (PWS Task 6.11) |
| Target Acceptable: All work is performed to meet 100% of the contract requirements per preventive maintenance plan. |
Minimum Acceptable: All work is performed to meet 90% of the contract requirements per preventive maintenance plan.
Any required revisions are:
•Resolved within 1 week •Accepted by KO/COR Random Sampling
Measurement Interval The Measurement Interval is monthly.
Measurement Period The Measurement Period begins at 00:01 on the first day of the month and ends at 24:00 on the last day of the month.
Timing of Measurement Measurements are taken within ten (10) days of the end of the Measurement Period.
Reporting Frequency:
Reporting to commence upon Contract Award and continue throughout the Period of Performance.
A rollup of assessment of the Surveillance Inspection Results will aid in the development of an overall rating for this objective.
Potential Overall Ratings:
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory
| Non-recurring work (PWS Task 6.12) |
| Target Acceptable: Emergency Service Calls are initiated within two hours of notification, Urgent service call are completed within 5 business days of request, and Routine service calls are completed within 10 business days of request. |
Minimum Acceptable: Emergency Service Calls are initiated within eight hours of notification, Urgent service call are completed within 10 business days of request, and Routine service calls are completed within 20 business days of request.
Any required revisions are:
•Resolved within 1 week •Accepted by KO/COR Random Sampling
Measurement Interval The Measurement Interval is monthly.
Measurement Period The Measurement Period begins at 00:01 on the first day of the month and ends at 24:00 on the last day of the month.
Timing of Measurement Measurements are taken within ten (10) days of the end of the Measurement Period.
Reporting Frequency:
Reporting to commence upon Contract Award and continue throughout the Period of Performance.
A rollup of assessment of the Surveillance Inspection Results will aid in the development of an overall rating for this objective.
Potential Overall Ratings:
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory
| System Replacement (PWS Task 6.13) |
| Target Acceptable: All work is performed to meet 100% of the installation requirements and systems function properly. |
Minimum Acceptable: All work is performed to meet 100% of the installation requirements and systems function properly with minor corrective work needed.
Any required revisions are:
•Resolved within 1 week •Accepted by KO/COR Random Sampling
Measurement Interval The Measurement Interval is monthly.
Measurement Period The Measurement Period begins at 00:01 on the first day of the month and ends at 24:00 on the last day of the month.
Timing of Measurement Measurements are taken within ten (10) days of the end of the Measurement Period.
Reporting Frequency:
Reporting to commence upon Contract Award and continue throughout the Period of Performance.
A rollup of assessment of the Surveillance Inspection Results will aid in the development of an overall rating for this objective.
Potential Overall Ratings:
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory
Contract Administration (PWS Task 6.14)
High level of satisfaction with Contractor delivery of Program Management services and deliverables.
Target Acceptable: Contain required information, 100% accurate/error free, and delivered on time.
Minimum Acceptable: Contain required information, with only two errors, and delivered on time.
Any required revisions are:
•Resolved within 1 week •Accepted by KO/COR 100% inspection
Measurement Interval The Measurement Interval is monthly.
Measurement Period The Measurement Period begins at 00:01 on the first day of the month and ends at 24:00 on the last day of the month.
Timing of Measurement Measurements are taken within ten (10) days of the end of the Measurement Period.
Reporting Frequency:
Reporting to commence upon Contract Award and continue throughout the Period of Performance.
A rollup of assessment of the Surveillance Inspection Results will aid in the development of an overall rating for this objective.
Potential Overall Ratings:
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory
Appendix 2 – Performance Assessment Report
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT (PAR)
(If more space is needed, use reverse and identify by number)
| 1. CONTRACT/TASK ORDER NUMBER |
| 2. CONTRACTOR |
| 3. TYPE OF SERVICES |
4. QUALITY ASSURANCE PERSONNEL (COR) SIGNATURE AND DATE
| 5. COR PHONE |
| 6. SUSPENSE DATE |
I. PERFORMANCE
7. |_| DEFICIENCY (CHECK ALL BOXES THAT APPLY)
|_| NEW
|_| REPEAT
|_| NO DEFICIENCY NOTED
8. SERVICES SUMMARY or PWS PARAGRAPH ITEM REVIEWED
| 9. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DEFICIENCY (IF DEFICIENCY BOX WAS CHECKED) |
| 10. DETAILED PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT |
II. CONTRACTOR VALIDATION
11. CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE |_| CONCUR |_| NON-CONCUR
12. CORRECTIVE ACTION ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE
13. CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE CORRECTIVE ACTION AND PREVENTION OF RECURRENCE OR REASON FOR NON-CONCURRENCE OF COR CITED DEFICIENCY
III. ACTION CORRECTED
14. |_| CONCUR |_| NON-CONCUR COR SIGNATURE AND DATE
15. COR REMARKS (REQUIRED)
6. CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE REMARKS
Appendix 3 – Customer Complaint Record
CUSTOMER COMPLAINT RECORD
DATE/TIME OF COMPLAINT
SOURCE OF COMPLAINT
ORGANIZATION
BUILDING NUMBER
INDIVIDUAL
PHONE NUMBER
NATURE OF COMPLAINT
CONTRACT REFERENCE
VALIDATION
DATE/TIME CONTRACTOR INFORMED OF COMPLAINT
ACTION TAKEN BY CONTRACTOR
RECEIVED/VALIDATED BY
Appendix 4 – Corrective Action Report
CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT (CAR)
(If more space is needed, use reverse and identify by number)
1. CONTRACTOR
2. CONTRACT NUMBER
3. TYPE OF SERVICES
4. FUNCTIONAL AREA
5. SUSPENSE DATE
6. CONTROL NUMBER
7. DEFICIENCY |_| MAJOR |_| MINOR
FINDING:
FINDING IMPACT:
Please respond with a written corrective action plan that details the corrective action of the cited deficiency, the cause of the deficiency, and actions taken to prevent recurrence by Suspense Date in Block 5. If date was not entered in Block 5, the contractor is not required to provide a response.
8. QUALITY ASSURANCE PERSONNEL (COR)
TYPED NAME AND GRADE
SIGNATURE AND DATE
9. ISSUING AUTHORITY
TYPED NAME AND GRADE
SIGNATURE AND DATE
10. COR RESPONSE TO CONTRACTOR CORRECTIVE ACTION AND ACTION TAKEN TO PREVENT RECURRENCE
11. COR DETERMINATION
|_| ACCEPTED |_| REJECTED
12. CLOSE DATE
Enclosure 6, Page 1 of 2 Pages 17Jul2013/Version 2
Encl 4, QASP 11Feb2021/v4
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .