FA9422-11-R-0002 0003

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

See Block #2

PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ.NO.

5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY AFNWC/PKE CODE FA9422 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

AFNWC/PKE

2000 WYOMING BLVD SE

BLDG 20604 RM B-9C

KIRTLAND AFB, NM 87117-5624

JOE C. CASTILLO 505-853-5137

joe.castillo@kirtland.af.mil

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

FA9422-11-R-0002

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, X is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER.

If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

(X )

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: ( ) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO. ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

The purpose of this amendment is to reflect changes made to the List of Attachments of the Formal RFP, the Statement of Objectives (SOO), as well as changes to FAR Addendums 52.212-01 and 52.212-02. The changes are to clarify the RFP and address industry concerns.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print). 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

DONNA C. HEINZ

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 16C. DATE SIGNED

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

BY________________________________________

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070 30-105 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV.10-83)

PREVIOUS EDITION UNUSABLE Prescribed by GSA ConWrite Version 6.13.0 FAR (48 CFR) 53.243 Created 11 Jan 2011 9:55 AM

SCHEDULE

FA9422-11-R-0002 0003

1. Changes to the List of Attachments are as follows:

i. Delete Attachment 2 (the DD Form 254) in the Contract Documents, Exhibits and Attachments section located on page 9 of the formal RFP. As a result, at time of contract award, Attachment 3, the Contractor Demonstration Plan and Schedule will be changed to read Attachment 2.

2. Changes to the SOO are as follows:

i. Paragraph 1.0. The last sentence will be changed as follows: “The AF is exploring the availability of technologies to support an enterprise tracking system to enhance the nuclear enterprise mission set for the USAF by combining a suite of tracking applications on a bio-metrically secure handheld computing device.”

ii. Paragraph 2.0. The definition of the term relevant environment is added. As a result paragraph 2.0 is changed to read as follows: “The contractor shall select an appropriate technology and conduct a technical demonstration in a relevant environment. Relevant environment is defined as:

simulation at a contractor facility showing the basic details of what the product can do to track assets and relate those details to the product objectives and outcomes it would satisfy. It is acceptable to accomplish the simulation within a single location. The demonstration will exhibit an IT solution of synchronized position-finding of materials as well as exhibit the ability to provide real-time local/corporate command and control in tracking components.”

3. Changes to FAR Addendum 52.212-01, Instructions to Offerors-Commercial Items (Jun 2008), are as follows:

i. Page 7 of 67, second paragraph under paragraph 1.0 is changed as follows: “Therefore, the USAF is exploring the availability of technologies to support an enterprise tracking system to enhance the nuclear enterprise mission set by combining a suite of tracking applications on a bio-metrically secure handheld computing device.”

ii. Page 7 of 67, paragraph 1.1, Budget/Funding Information, is changed as follows: “The Air Force Nuclear Weapons Center (AFNWC) in support of AFGSC intends to use Research, Development, Test and Engineering (RDT&E) funds for this effort. Pursuant to this RFP, AFNWC anticipates making several firm-fixed price contract awards, estimated at no more than 10, depending upon the number of fully capable proposals received and availability of funds. The estimated cumulative cost for all contracts awarded is expected to not exceed $3.5M. Individual contracts shall not exceed $350,000.”

iii. Page 9 and 10 of 67, Table 2.2 is revised to reflect that Volume II, titled Technical Capability, is simply a “header” and there is no submittal – this submittal consists of Vol IIa and Vol IIb only. The first “Note” following the table is also revised to define product literature. The revised table and note are below.

Table 2.2 - Proposal Organization

VOLUME

ITO

Paragraph Number

VOLUME TITLE

PAPER

COPIES

ELECTRONIC

COPIES

PAGE LIMIT

I 3.0 Executive Summary 1 Original &

2 Copies 1 2

II 4.0

Technical Capability 1 Original &

2 Copies

II(a) 4.2.3 Subfactor 1.1:

Management Approach

1 Original & 2 Copies

1 5

II (b)

4.2.4.1 – 4.2.4.3

Subfactor 1.2: Product Capability

1 Original & 2 Copies

CDRL A001 (15

pages) and

Product Literature*

II (b) 4.2.4.4 Subfactor 1.2: Product Capability

1 Original & 2 Copies

1 15**

III 5.0 Cost/Price 1 Original 1 Section B of the

Contract

IV 6.0 Contract Documentation 1 Original 1 Unlimited

*Note: Offerors shall address Volume II (b), ITO paragraphs 4.2.4.1-4.2.4.3 through submission of the Demonstration Plan and Schedule described in CDRL A001 submission. The Demonstration Plan and Schedule shall have a page limit of 15 pages. Offerors may also include product literature with an unlimited page count. Product/Literature is defined as marketing or technical literature that offerors currently have in use to either promote or sell their product. It is generalized marketing information that offerors would hand to any customer interested in learning more about their product(s).

iv. Page 14 of 67, Paragraph 4.2.3.2 is changed to read: “The offeror shall submit resumes (not included in the page limit) for all key personnel to describe the professional credentials, training and/or experience, qualifications, and applicability of experience as it relates to successful execution of the requirements and objectives/product outcomes listed in the SOO. All personnel must meet the security clearance requirements as outlined in the DD254. Failure to submit resumes may result in an unacceptable rating.”

v.Page 16 of 67, Paragraph 5.1.2, Cost/Price Information is changed to read:

“Information beyond that required by this instruction shall not be submitted, unless you consider it essential to document or support your cost/price position. All information relating to the proposed cost, including all required supporting documentation, must be included in the section of the proposal designated as the Cost/Price volume. Under no circumstances shall this information and documentation be included elsewhere in the proposal.”

4. Changes to FAR Addendum 52.212-02 Evaluation—Commercial Items (Jan 1999) are as follows:

i. Paragraph b, Number of Contracts to be Awarded, on page 21 of 67 is changed to read: “The acquisition will be "full and open" competition with preference given to qualified small businesses.

AFNWC anticipates making several firm-fixed price contract awards, estimated at no more than 10, depending upon the number of fully capable proposals received that meet the minimum RFP requirements and depending on the availability of funds. The estimated cumulative cost for all contracts awarded is expected to not exceed $3.5M. Individual contracts shall not exceed $350,000.”

ii. Since the DD Form 254 is deleted, paragraph a.(1)(c) under M002 Evaluation Factors, on page 21 of 67 will be deleted from the RFP. As a result paragraph a.(1)(d) and a.(1)(e) will be renumbered as a.(1)(c) and a.(1)(d), respectively. In addition, paragraph a.(1)(d) is changed to read: “(c) Demonstrate the capability of performing a technology demonstration of a biometric hand-held computing device in a relevant environment.”

iii. On page 23 of 67, the paragraph above Table 1-Technical Capability Ratings is changed to read: “We estimate awarding no more than 10multiple firm-fixed-price contracts, depending upon the number of fully capable proposals received that meet the minimum RFP requirements and depending on the availability of funds. The estimated cumulative cost for all contracts awarded is expected to not exceed $3.5M. Individual contracts shall not exceed $350,000.”

iv. Since the DD Form 254 is deleted, on page 24 of 67, delete paragraph 1.1.3 under the Subfactor 1.1 Management Approach.

5. All other terms and conditions hereby remain unchanged.