Question_and_Answer.docx
DOCX document 14 KB Posted
- Attached to
- TPX 42
- Solicitation number
- N68335-17-R-0220
About this file
Question and Answer.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Question_&_Answer_7.11.17.docx | DOCX document | |
| pdp17446.docx | DOCX document | |
| Q&A_N68335-17-R-0220.docx | DOCX document | |
| pdp29745.docx | DOCX document | |
| Recorder_CDRLs_6.9.17_signed.pdf | ||
| Recorder-Reproducer_Replacement_SSS_Final_6.9.17.pdf | ||
| pdp28567.docx | DOCX document | |
| TPX_42_Recorder_Spreadsheet_6.9.17.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
1. Statement - under section 3.0 Volume 2: Corporate Experience, there is a shall NOT statement about corporate experience examples of subcontractors or teammates.
Question - Does this count for pass through contracts where LJT was the developer of the product and solution.
Response- The intent of that statement is you shall not propose corporate experience of proposed subs/teammates to LJT under this effort specifically.
Any corporate experience LJT has as a sub/teammate could be proposed in accordance with Section L 3.1.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .