Attachment (5) Questions and Answers - Amend 0004.pdf
PDF 541 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N6824623Q0026
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment (5) Questions and Answers – Amendment 0004
N6824623Q0026 Defense Fuel Support Point (DFSP) Guam Waste Disposal
Question (1): Ref: Attachment (2) PWS - Seed Project CTO S-1 Disposal – Section 3.4
Is the government able to provide any historical data for waste characterization of the RME waste?
Answer: See Attachment (6), lab certification of RME from the previous U-12 disposal contact. It would be the same categorization as that RME.
Question (2): Ref: Attachment (a) Quotation Sheet
If no analytical data of the RME waste is available, shall the Contractor assume that the
Solids in CLIN 0001 is hazardous waste with D001, D004 to D011 (but total mercury less than 260 mg/kg), and D018 waste codes for bidding purposes?
Answer: N/A
Question (3): Ref: Attachment (a) Quotation Sheet
Does the 40CFR 261.2(c)(2)(ii) exclusion apply to CLIN 0002 Liquids (fuel) if the liquid is burned for energy recovery?
Answer: The contractor is responsible for compliance with Guam EPA and other regulators regarding any need to test the RME liquid and sludge and to determine if there would be any issues burning this before choosing to burn it.
Question (4): Ref: Attachment (a) Quotation Sheet
If the 40CFR 261.2(c)(2)(ii) exclusion does not apply to CLIN 0002 Liquids, shall the
Contractor assume that the liquid is hazardous waste with D001, D004 to D011 (but total mercury less than 260 mg/kg), and D018 waste codes for bidding purposes?
Answer: Assume that 40CFR 261.2(c)(2)(ii) applies
Question (5): Ref: Attachment (1) PWS - DFSP Guam Waste Disposal – Section 3.2
Will laboratory sampling be ordered under a separate CLIN if required or will the Contractor need to build it into their per gallon rate.
Answer: No
Question (6): Ref: Attachment (c) Addendum to 52.212-1: Section (3) Factor 2 – Experience
The instructions are not clear whether we are to include Experience for Teaming Partners in our Factor 2 Submittal. Would the Government please advise whether the Contractor is able to include Teaming Partner experience as part of the 5 Submittals of Experience as allowed for under this section?
Attachment (5) Questions and Answers – Amendment 0004
N6824623Q0026 Defense Fuel Support Point (DFSP) Guam Waste Disposal
Answer: See updated Attachment (c). “Experience submittals may include work performed by one or more of teaming partners and/or subcontractors included in the Technical
Capability submittal. A company MUST be included in the Technical Capability submittal in order to be considered for Experience.”
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .