RFP_with_attachments.pdf

CODE

(Hour)

PAGE(S)

until 02:00 PM local time 13 Oct 2014

X

A X B X C X D

EX

X

G F 106 - 114

115 - 156 X H 157 - 170

RATING PAGE OF PAGES

7. ISSUED BY

(Date)

IMPORTANT - Award will be made on this Form, or on Standard Form 26, or by other authorized official written notice.

Previous Edition is Unusable 33-134 STANDARD FORM 33 (REV. 9-97)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.214(c)

DO-C9 1 170

(If other than Item 7) N66604

15A. NAME 16. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO

AND

ADDRESS

SIGN OFFER (Type or print)

OF

OFFEROR

AMENDMENT NO. DATE

15B. TELEPHONE NO (Include area code) 17. SIGNATURE15C. CHECK IF REMITTANCE ADDRESS

IS DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE - ENTER

SUCH ADDRESS IN SCHEDULE.

18. OFFER DATE

1. THIS CONTRACT IS A RATED ORDER

UNDER DPAS (15 CFR 700)

2. CONTRACT NO.

N66604 8. ADDRESS OFFER TO

9. Sealed offers in original and 12 copies for furnishing the supplies or services in the Schedule will be received at the place specified in Item 8, or if handcarried, in the depository located in

CAUTION - LATE Submissions, Modifications, and Withdrawals: See Section L, Provision No. 52.214-7 or 52.215-1. All offers are subject to all terms and

Bldg 1258 conditions contained in this solicitation.

10. FOR INFORMATION

CALL:

A. NAME (NO COLLECT CALLS)

11. TABLE OF CONTENTS

SOLICITATION/ CONTRACT FORM

SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES/ COSTS

1 - 2 3 - 23

X I CONTRACT CLAUSES

DESCRIPTION/ SPECS./ WORK STATEMENT X

PACKAGING AND MARKING

24 - 72 73 - 74

J LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE

75 - 76 77 - 81

X K

REPRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATIONS AND

OTHER STATEMENTS OF OFFERORS

CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA 82 - 86 X

SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

OFFER (Must be fully completed by offeror) 87 - 91 X M

L INSTRS., CONDS., AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

NOTE: Item 12 does not apply if the solicitation includes the provisions at 52.214-16, Minimum Bid Acceptance Period.

is inserted by the offeror) from the date for receipt of offers specified above, to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item, delivered at the designated point(s), within the time specified in the schedule.

13. DISCOUNT FOR PROMPT PAYMENT

(See Section I, Clause No. 52.232-8)

14. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments

AMENDMENT NO. DATE

to the SOLICITATION for offerors and related documents numbered and dated):

FACILITY

12. In compliance with the above, the undersigned agrees, if this offer is accepted within calendar days (60 calendar days unless a different period

SOLICITATION, OFFER AND AWARD

X

(X) SEC. DESCRIPTION (X) SEC. DESCRIPTION PAGE(S)

PART I - THE SCHEDULE

26. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print) 27. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 28. AWARD DATE

EMAIL:TEL: (Signature of Contracting Officer)

CODE CODE

B. TELEPHONE (Include area code) C. E-MAIL ADDRESS

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

19. ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS NUMBERED 20. AMOUNT 21. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION

22. AUTHORITY FOR USING OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION:

10 U.S.C. 2304(c)( ) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)( ) (4 copies unless otherwise specified)

23. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

24. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 7) CODE 25. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY CODE

PART IV - REPRESENTATIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS

PART III - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

92 - 104

PART II - CONTRACT CLAUSES

NAVAL UNDERSEA WARFARE CTR. DIV., NPT.

MELISSA ARDIS, CODE 0223

CONTRACTS DEPARTMENT

1176 HOWELL STREET, BLDG. 1258

NEWPORT RI 02841

NAVAL UNDERSEA WARFARE CENTER

ANDREW C. NAGELHOUT, CODE 0223

CONTRACTS DEPARTMENT

1176 HOWELL STREET, BLDG. 1258

NEWPORT RI 02841

401-832-3755

401-832-4820FAX:

TEL:

401-832-4820FAX:

TEL: 401-832-3844

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

SOLICITATION

6. REQUISITION/PURCHASE NO.5. DATE ISSUED

14 Aug 2014

4. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID (IFB)

NEGOTIATED (RFP)

[ X ]

3. SOLICITATION NO.

N66604-14-R-1120

Section A - Solicitation/Contract Form

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

GENERAL INFORMATION

Distribution: FILE, KR, NUWC 0121, DCMA, DFAS, COR

NUWCDIVNPT Control Number: 141120

NUWCDIVNPT Requisition Number(s): N66604-1300398256

NUWCDIVNPT POC: Melissa Ardis (Email: melissa.ardis@navy.mil)

NOTE: For pricing purposes the anticipated award date of this contract is 6 March 2015.

DISTRIBUTION OF GFI

The Government Furnished Information (GFI) package is available upon request. Vendor must be registered with the Joint Certification Program (JCP) in order to receive the package. See www.dlis.dla.mil/jcp for further information regarding the JCP. Contact Melissa Ardis at melissa.ardis@navy.mil to request drawings and/or specifications. Submit via e-mail the solicitation #, company name, CAGE code, and JCP certification number. GFI will only be sent to the point of contact and address identified on the JCP certification. If this information is not valid, the certification must be updated before the GFI will be sent. Drawings and/or specifications will be mailed via USPS overnight.

Release of GFI package to Foreign contractors requires ITAR compliance (see SOW paragraph 3.0.8.1).

NOTE: This drawing package has a classified addendum. Requestors that do not have an existing secret facility clearance will not be eligible to receive the package. See attached DD 254.

Section B - Supplies or Services and Prices

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0001 1 Each Phase 1: Transition Study

FFP

PROPOSED AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $200,000

FOB: Origin

NET AMT

0002 1 Lot Data

FFP

Not Separately Priced

See Exhibit A

1001 1 Lot OPTION Option 1: Phase II - Assessment

CPIF

Product Integration & Non-Recurring Engineering

See NOTES A & D

TARGET COST

TARGET FEE

TOTAL TGT COST + FEE

MINIMUM FEE

MAXIMUM FEE

SHARE RATIO ABOVE TARGET

SHARE RATIO BELOW TARGET

1002 1 Each OPTION Preproduction Test Article

CPIF

See NOTES A & D

TARGET COST

TARGET FEE

TOTAL TGT COST + FEE

MINIMUM FEE

MAXIMUM FEE

SHARE RATIO ABOVE TARGET

SHARE RATIO BELOW TARGET

1003 1 Lot OPTION Performance Incentive Fee Pool

COST

See NOTE A

ESTIMATED COST

1004 1 Lot OPTION Data

FFP

Not Separately Priced

See Exhibit B

2001 6,000 Hours OPTION Option 2: Phase III

CPFF

Ship MM Integration, Fleet Experimentation and Test Engineering Services

See NOTES A & C

FIXED FEE

TOTAL EST COST + FEE

2002 1 Lot OPTION Support for Engineering Services

COST

Meals, Travel, incidental expenses

2003 1 Lot OPTION Data

CPFF

Not Separately Priced

See Exhibit C

3001 1 Each OPTION Option 3: Phase IV - Fielding

FFP

Logistics Support Package for RTI Product/Technology

3002 1 Lot OPTION Data

FFP

Not Separately Priced

See Exhibit D

4001 1,000 Hours OPTION Field Engineering, Repair, & Logistics

CPFF

Year 1

4002 1 Lot OPTION ODCs for CLIN 4001

COST

4003 2,000 Hours OPTION Field Engineering, Repair, & Logistics

CPFF

Year 2

4004 1 Lot OPTION ODCs for CLIN 4003

COST

4005 4,000 Hours OPTION Field Engineering, Repair, & Logistics

CPFF

Year 3

4006 1 Lot OPTION ODCs for CLIN 4005

COST

4007 1 Lot OPTION Data

CPFF

Not Separately Priced

See Exhibit E

5001 Each OPTION Full Production Units

FFP

See NOTES A & B

5002 Lot OPTION Spares/Installation/Checkout Hardware

FFP

5003 1 Lot OPTION Data

FFP

Not Separately Priced

See Exhibit F

6001 Each OPTION Full Production Units

FFP

6002 Lot OPTION Spares/Installation/Checkout Hardware

FFP

6003 1 Lot OPTION Data

FFP

Not Separately Priced See NOTES A & B

7001 Each OPTION Full Production Units

FFP

7002 Lot OPTION Spares/Installation/Checkout Hardware

FFP

7003 1 Lot OPTION Data

FFP

Not Separately Priced See NOTES A & B

8001 1 Lot OPTION Provisioned Items Orders (PIO)

FFP

AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $10,000,000, not including profit

9001 1 Lot OPTION Data Rights, Production Drawings

FFP

9002 1 Lot OPTION Data

FFP

Not Separately Priced

See Exhibit G

9003 1 Lot OPTION Data Rights, Detailed Interfaces

FFP

CLIN NOTES

NOTE A – Option item which is to be supplied only if, and to the extent, said option is exercised.

NOTE B – Stepladder pricing for CLINs 5001, 5002, 6001, 6002, and 7001, 7002 is established in Tables 1-6 below. The offerors shall adjust the break-point quantities for the step levels within its proposal in order to match the optimal economic quantity manufacturing processes and supplier pricing.

NOTE C – Labor hours, if any, shall be ordered by issuance of Technical Instructions (TIs) by the Contracting Officer’s Representative in accordance with NAVSEA 5252.242-9115 TECHNICAL INSTRUCTIONS (APR 1999) included in Section H –Special Contract Requirements.

Fixed Fee Table

CLIN Hours Est Cost/Hr (rate)

Fixed Fee/Hr (FF)

Fixed Fee (Hrs*FF)

Est Cost (Hrs*rate)

CPFF

NOTE D – The Contractor shall propose a Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) structure for these item(s).

The Contractor shall propose within the following Government/Contractor shareline boundaries:

ITEM UNDERRUN OVERRUN

1001 & 1002 50/50 50/50 Minimum Fee - 0% of Target Cost. Maximum Fee – Up to 8% of Target Cost.

TABLE 1: Stepladder Pricing for RTI Production Units, CLIN 5001

UNIT NAME

Part /

Drawing Number

PRICE PER QUANTITY PROCURED

CLIN

Range 1

(start at 1) Range 2

Range 3 (maximum 6)

Breakpoints to be Proposed by Contractors

Escort Mission Module Production Units

Pricing here for each unit

Pricing here for each unit

Pricing here for each unit

TABLE 2: Stepladder Pricing for RTI Production Units, CLIN 6001

Number

PRICE PER QUANTITY PROCURED

CLIN

Range 1

(start at 1) Range 2

Range 3 (maximum 8)

Breakpoints to be Proposed by Contractors

Escort Mission Module Production Units

Pricing here for each unit

Pricing here for each unit

TABLE 3: Stepladder Pricing for RTI Production Units, CLIN 7001

Part /

PRICE PER QUANTITY PROCURED

CLIN

Number Range 1

(start at 1) Range 2

Range 3 (maximum 8)

Breakpoints to be Proposed by Contractors

Escort Mission Module Production Units

Pricing here for each unit

Pricing here for each unit

TABLE 4: Stepladder Pricing for RTI Spare Parts for CLIN 5002

Number

CLIN Range 1 Range 2 Range 3

Breakpoints to be Proposed by

Contractors

List Spare Parts Individually 5002 Pricing here for each unit

Pricing here for each unit

Pricing here for each unit

Continue Lines as needed. 5002

TABLE 5: Stepladder Pricing for RTI Spare Parts for CLIN 6002

Number

List Spare Parts Individually 6002 Pricing here for each unit

Pricing here for each unit

Pricing here for each unit

Continue Lines as needed. 6002

TABLE 6: Stepladder Pricing for RTI Spare Parts for CLIN 7002

Number

List Spare Parts Individually 7002 Pricing here for each unit

Pricing here for each unit

Pricing here for each unit

Continue Lines as needed. 7002

HQ B-2-0004

HQ B-2-0004 EXPEDITING CONTRACT CLOSEOUT (NAVSEA) (DEC 1995)

(a) As part of the negotiated fixed price or total estimated amount of this contract, both the Government and the Contractor have agreed to waive any entitlement that otherwise might accrue to either party in any residual dollar amount of $500 or less at the time of final contract closeout. The term "residual dollar amount" shall include all money that would otherwise be owed to either party at the end of the contract, except that, amounts connected in any way with taxation, allegations of fraud and/or antitrust violations shall be excluded.

For purposes of determining residual dollar amounts, offsets of money owed by one party against money that would otherwise be paid by that party may be considered to the extent permitted by law.

(b) This agreement to waive entitlement to residual dollar amounts has been considered by both parties. It is agreed that the administrative costs for either party associated with collecting such small dollar amounts could exceed the amount to be recovered.

(End of Text)

HQ B-2-0007 LIMITATION OF COST OR LIMITATION OF FUNDS LANGUAGE

The clause entitled "LIMITATION OF COST" (FAR 52.232-20) or "LIMITATION OF FUNDS" (FAR 52.232-22), as appropriate, shall apply separately and independently to each separately identified estimated cost.

HQ B-2-0014 PAYMENTS OF FEE(S) (COMPLETION) (NAVSEA) (MAY 1993)

NOTE: This clause applies only to CLINs 1001 and 1002.

(a) For purposes of this contract, "fee" means "target fee" in cost-plus-incentive-fee type contracts, "base fee" in cost-plus-award-fee type contracts, "fixed fee" in cost-plus-fixedfee type contracts for completion and phase type contracts.

(b) The Government shall make payments to the Contractor, subject to and in accordance with the clause in this contract entitled "FIXED FEE" (FAR 52.216-8) or "INCENTIVE

FEE", (FAR 52.216-10), as applicable. Such payments shall be equal to TO BE PROVIDED BY THE OFFEROR percent (TO BE PROVIDED BY THE OFFEROR%) of the allowable cost of each invoice submitted by and payable to the Contractor pursuant to the clause of this contract entitled "ALLOWABLE COST AND PAYMENT" (FAR 52.216-7), subject to the withholding terms and conditions of the "FIXED FEE" or "INCENTIVE FEE" clause, as applicable (percentage of fee is based on fee dollars divided by estimated cost dollars, including facilities capital cost of money). Total fee(s) paid to the Contractor shall not exceed the fee amount(s) set forth in this contract.

(c) In the event of discontinuance of the work under this contract, or any specified phase of the contract, in accordance with the clause of this contract entitled "LIMITATION OF FUNDS" (FAR 52.232-22) or "LIMITATION OF COST" (FAR 52.232-20), as applicable, the fee shall be equitably adjusted by mutual agreement to reflect the diminution of work. If the adjusted fee is less than the sum of all fee payments made to the Contractor under this contract, the Contractor shall repay the excess amount to the Government. If the adjusted fee exceeds all payments made to the Contractor under this contract, the Contractor shall be paid the additional amount, subject to the availability of funds. In no event shall the Government be required to pay the Contractor any amount in excess of the funds obligated under this contract at the time of the discontinuance of work.

(d) Fee(s) withheld pursuant to the terms and conditions of this contract shall not be paid until the contract has been modified to reduce the fee(s) in accordance with paragraph (c) above, or until the Procuring Contracting Officer has advised the paying office in writing that no fee adjustment is required.

PAYMENT OF FEES(S) (LEVEL OF EFFORT – ALTERNATE I) (NAVSEA) (MAY 2010)

NOTE: This clause applies only to CLINs 2001, 4001, 4003 and 4005.

(a) For purposes of this contract, "fee" means "target fee" in cost-plus-incentive-fee type contracts, "base fee" in cost-plus-award-fee type contracts, or "fixed fee" in cost-plus-fixed-fee type contracts for level of effort type contracts.

(b) The Government shall make payments to the Contractor, subject to and in accordance with the clause in this contract entitled "FIXED FEE" (FAR 52.216-8) or "INCENTIVE FEE", (FAR 52.216-10), as applicable. Such payments shall be submitted by and payable to the Contractor pursuant to the clause of this contract entitled "ALLOWABLE COST AND PAYMENT" (FAR 52.216-7), subject to the withholding terms and conditions of the "FIXED FEE" or "INCENTIVE FEE" clause, as applicable, and shall be paid at the hourly rate(s) specified above per man-hour performed and invoiced. Total fee(s) paid to the Contractor shall not exceed the fee amount(s) set forth in this contract. In no event shall the Government be required to pay the Contractor any amount in excess of the funds obligated under this contract.

HQ B-2-0017 REFUNDS (SPARES AND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT) (NAVSEA)

(SEP 1990)

(a) In the event that the price of a spare part or item of support equipment delivered under this contract significantly exceeds its intrinsic value, the Contractor agrees to refund the difference. Refunds will only be made for the difference between the intrinsic value of the item at the time an agreement on price was reached and the contract price. Refunds will not be made to recoup the amount of cost decreases that occur over time due to productivity gains (beyond economic purchase quantity considerations) or changes in market conditions.

(b) For purposes of this requirement, the intrinsic value of an item is defined as follows:

(1) If the item is one which is sold or is substantially similar or functionally equivalent to one that is sold in substantial quantities to the general public, intrinsic value is the established catalog or market price, plus the value of any unique requirements, including delivery terms, inspection, packaging, or labeling.

(2) If there is no comparable item sold in substantial quantities to the general public, intrinsic value is defined as the price an individual would expect to pay for the item based upon an economic purchase quantity as defined in FAR 52.207-4, plus the value of any unique requirements, including delivery terms, inspection, packaging or labeling.

(c) At any time up to two years after delivery of a spare part or item of support equipment, the Contracting Officer may notify the Contractor that based on all information available at the time of the notice, the price of the part or item apparently exceeds its intrinsic value.

(d) If notified in accordance with paragraph (c) above, the Contractor agrees to enter into good faith negotiations with the Government to determine if, and in what amount, the Government is entitled to a refund.

(e) If agreement pursuant to paragraph (d) above cannot be reached, and the Navy's return of the new or unused item to the Contractor is practical, the Navy, subject to the Contractor's agreement, may elect to return the item to the Contractor. Upon return of the item to its original point of Government acceptance, the Contractor shall refund in full the price paid.

If no agreement pursuant to paragraph (d) above is reached, and return of the item by the Navy is impractical, the Contracting Officer may, with the approval of the Head of the Contracting Activity, issue a Contracting Officer's final decision on the matter, subject to Contractor appeal as provided in the "DISPUTES" clause (FAR 52.233-1).

(f) The Contractor will make refunds, as required under this requirement, in accordance with instructions from the Contracting Officer.

(g) The Contractor shall not be liable for a refund if the Contractor advised the Contracting Officer in a timely manner that the price it would propose for a spare part or item of support equipment exceeded its intrinsic value, and with such advice, specified the estimated proposed price, the estimated intrinsic value and known alternative sources or item, if any, that can meet the requirement.

(h) This requirement does not apply to any spare parts or items of support equipment whose price is determined through adequate price competition. This requirement also does not apply to any spare part or item of support equipment with a unit price in excess of $100,000;

or in excess of $25,000 if the Contractor submitted, and certified the currency, accuracy and completeness of, cost or pricing data applicable to the item.

HQ B-2-0020 TRAVEL COSTS - ALTERNATE I (NAVSEA) (DEC 2005)

(a) Except as otherwise provided herein, the Contractor shall be reimbursed for its reasonable actual travel costs in accordance with FAR 31.205-46. The costs to be reimbursed shall be those costs accepted by the cognizant DCAA.

(b) Reimbursable travel costs include only that travel performed from the Contractor's facility to the worksite, in and around the worksite, and from the worksite to the Contractor's facility.

(c) Relocation costs and travel costs incident to relocation are allowable to the extent provided in FAR 31.205-35; however, Contracting Officer approval shall be required prior to incurring relocation expenses and travel costs incident to relocation.

(d) The Contractor shall not be reimbursed for the following daily local travel costs:

(i) travel at U.S. Military Installations where Government transportation is available,

(ii) travel performed for personal convenience/errands, including commuting to and from work, and

(iii) travel costs incurred in the replacement of personnel when such replacement is accomplished for the Contractor's or employee's convenience.

H81X TRAVEL RESPONSIBILITIES (OCT 2011)

There may be situations where contractor employees and government employees travel together in government vehicles, or in vehicles rented by the government under the terms of the U.S. Car Rental Agreement (currently available at ( http://www.defensetravel.dod.mil/Docs/CarRentalAgreement.pdf ) the government has with various rental car companies. In such situations, contractor employees may only be passengers (not drivers) in such vehicles. If a contractor employee is a passenger in a government vehicle or a vehicle rented by the government, it would be on a "no additional cost to the government" basis. If a contractor employee is a passenger in a government vehicle, the contractor shall indemnify and hold the government harmless from all liability resulting from personal injury or death or damage to property which may occur as a result of such joint travel. When a contractor is a passenger in a vehicle rented by the government, liability would be limited to the terms set out in the U.S. Car Rental Agreement in effect at the time of any incident.

HQ B-2-0023 CONTRACT SUMMARY FOR PAYMENT OFFICE (COST/

FIXED PRICE) (FEB 1997)

This contract includes the following mixture of cost reimbursement and fixed price line items:

Item Type*

0001 FP

1001 CR

1002 CR

1003 FP

2001 CR

2002 CR

3001 FP

5001 FP

5002 FP

6001 FP

6002 FP

7001 FP

7002 FP

8001 FP

9001 FP

9003 FP

*CR – Cost Reimbursement FP – Fixed Price

Section C - Descriptions and Specifications

C11 STATEMENT OF WORK (JAN 2012)

1.0 Introduction (Applicable to All CLINs)

This Statement of Work (SOW) defines the requirements for the effort necessary to identify, assess, integrate, test, and field a technology or capability under the Rapid Technology Insertion (RTI) process for use on the Littoral Combat Ship. The RTI program overview and context is described further in Addendum 1 to the SOW.

In this procurement, the word “technology” is used to represent the capability being sought, proposed, and procured in response to an RTI Technical Challenge, and may mean a product, system, software application or program, or other capability as defined by the Contractor’s solution and proposed by the Contractor during the solicitation phase of the procurement. In some cases the phrase “product, system, or software” is added for reference, but lack of this term does not change the meaning of the word “technology” as defining the product to be delivered. Solutions being sought may also encompass non-material solutions, such as improved training or new tactics, and proposals that provide cost-effective responses to the technical challenges of this RFP without development of new systems or technology are also considered within the scope of this RFP.

2.0 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS (Applicable to All CLINs)

The following documents are applicable to the work described herein and are for use by the Contractor as general guidance, depending on the type of technology product, in the fulfillment of those tasks unless referenced by a specific section of the Statement of Work.

2.1 United States Codes (USC) and Executive Orders

USC42, Chapter 55 – National Environmental Policy; Section 4321- 4370d

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)

FIPS PUB 140-2 Federal Information Processing Standards Publication (FIPS

PUB)

03 Dec 2002

2.2 Military Standards

MIL-STD-167-1A Mechanical Vibrations of Shipboard Equipment (Type I- Environmental and Type II-Internally Excited)

02 Nov 2005

MIL-STD-461F Department of Defense Interface Standard- Requirements for the Control of Electromagnetic Interference Characteristics of Subsystems and Equipment

10 Dec 2007

MIL-STD-810G Environmental Engineering Considerations and Laboratory Tests 31 Oct 2008 MIL-STD-882E System Safety Program Requirements 11 May 2012 MIL-S-901D Shock Tests, H.I. (High Impact) Shipboard Machinery, Equipment, and Systems, Requirements for 17 Mar 1989

MIL-STD-1310H Shipboard Bonding, Grounding, and Other Techniques for Electromagnetic Compatibility and Safety

17 Sep 2009

MIL-STD-1399C Interface Standard for Shipboard Systems 02 Feb 1988 MIL-STD-46855A Human Engineering Requirements for Military Systems, Equipment, and Facilities 24 May 2011

2.3 Department of Defense (DoD)/Department of the Navy (DoN) Regulations, Directives and

Instructions

DoDD 4140.1 Supply Chain Materiel Management Policy 14 Dec 2011 DoDI 5000.02 Operation of the Defense Acquisition System 08 Dec 2008 DoDD 5000.01

The Defense Acquisition System 20 Nov 2007

DoD 5000.04- M-1

Cost and Software Data Reporting Manual, Cost Analysis Improvement Group (CAIG)

18 Apr 2007

DoDI 5000.61 Modeling and Simulation (M&S) Verification, Validation, and Accreditation (VV&A)

09 Dec 2009

DoDD 5220.22-M

National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM) 28 Feb 2006

DoDD 5230.24

Distribution Statements on Technical Documents 18 Mar 1987

DoDD 5230.25 Change 1

Withholding of Unclassified Technical Data from Public Disclosure 18 Aug 1995

DoDD 8320.02

Data Sharing in a Net-Centric Department of Defense 23 Apr 2007

DoDD 8500.01E

Information Assurance 23 Apr 2007

DoDI 8500.2 Information Assurance Implementation 06 Feb 2003 DoDD 8510.01

DoD Information Assurance Certification and Accreditation Process

(DIACAP)

28 Nov 2007

DoDI 8520.02 Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) and Public Key (PK) Enabling 24 May 2004 DoDD 8570.01

Information Assurance Training, Certification, and Workforce Management

23 Apr 2007

DoN CIO

MEMO 02-10

Department of the Navy Chief Information Officer Memorandum, Information Assurance Policy

26 Apr 2010

ASN (RDA)

MEMO

DoN Policy on Digital Product/Technical Data w/Attachment "Guidance on Acquisition and Conversion of Product / Technical Data to Digital Form" Revision 1

23 Oct 2004

2.4 Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (CJCS), Joint Requirements Oversight Committee (JROC)

Instructions and Memoranda

CJCSI

3170.01G

Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System 07 Mar 2011

6212.01E

Interoperability and Supportability of Information Technology and National Security Systems

15 Dec 2008

CJCSI

6510.01F (Series)

Information Assurance (IA) and Computer Network Defense (CND) 09 Feb 2011

6510.02B

Communications Security Modernization Plan 27 Nov 2002

CJCS CM

1014-00

Joint Mission Areas to Organize the Joint Operational Architecture 06 Sep 2000

JROCM 236-

Joint Requirements Oversight Committee Memorandum, Policy for Updating Capabilities Documents to Incorporate the Net-Ready Key Performance Parameter (NR-KPP)

19 Dec 2003

CJCSM

3500.04F

Universal Joint Task List (and Supplement CJCSM 3500.04D-01, 17

AUG 2006)

01 Jun 2011

2.5 Secretary of the Navy (SECNAV) and Office of the Chief of Naval Operations (OPNAV) Instructions

SECNAVINST

5200.38A

Department of the Navy (DoN) Modeling and Simulation Program

28 Feb 2002

OPNAVINST

1500.76B

NAVAL TRAINING SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS,

ACQUISITION, and MANAGEMENT

28 Apr 2010

OPNAVINST

5100.19E

Vols. I, II, and III: NAVY SAFETY and OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH (SOH) PROGRAM MANUAL for Forces Afloat

30 May 2007

OPNAVINST

5100.23G CH-1

NAVY SAFETY AND OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH (SOH)

PROGRAM MANUAL

21 Jul 2011

SECNAVINST

5510.34A

DISCLOSURE OF CLASSIFIED MILITARY INFORMATION

and CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION to

FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS, INTERNATIONAL

ORGANIZATIONS, and FOREIGN REPRESENTATIVES

08 Oct 2004

SECNAV M-5239.1 Information Assurance Manual Nov 2005 SECNAV M-5510.36 Department of the Navy Information Security Program June 2006

SECNAVINST

5510.36A

DEPARTMENT of the NAVY (DoN) INFORMATION

SECURITY PROGRAM (ISP) INSTRUCTION

06 Oct 2006

OPNAVINST

5513.3C

CNO Documentation Classification guidelines 21 Jul 2008

2.6 Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) and PEO Littoral Combat Ship and PEO Integrated

Warfare Systems (PEO IWS) Regulations, Directives and Instructions

PEOIWSINST 3058.1 Risk Management 02 Aug 2004 PEOIWSINST 3086.01 Automated Test and Analysis (ATA) Policy 30 Apr 2010 N/A Surface Navy Combat Systems Software Product Line

Architecture, Architecture Description Document (ADD), Version 1.0

31 Jul 2009

NAVSEAINST S9040:

(AA-GTP-010/SSCR,

Revision 4);

Shipboard Systems Certification Requirements for Surface Ship Industrial Periods [Non-Nuclear]

Jun 1998

NAVSEAINST S9095

AD-TRQ-010/TSTP

Total Ship Test Program Manual Mar 1995

NAVSEAINST

4160.3B

Technical Manual Management Program (TMMP) 21 Jun 2011

NAVSEAINST 4855.33 Application of ISO9000 series Quality Standards in NAVSEA Programs

19 Feb 1997

NAVSEAINST

8020.6E

Department of the Navy Weapon System Explosives Safety Review Board (WSESRB)

11 Mar 2008

PEOIWSINST 4730.1A Combat System Certification Policy 05 Jan 2012

NAVSEAINST

9410.2A

Naval Warfare System Certification Policy / Naval Warfare Systems Certification Process

24 Aug 2012

NAVSEAINST 9400.2 Implementation of Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Afloat Information Assurance Governance and Guidance

18 Aug 2010

9470-002-A-X-C PEO IWS Enterprise Configuration Control Process User Guide (this is Encl 2 PEO IWS INST 4130.1B)

14 Sep 2011

NAVSEA TE000-AB-

GTP-010

Rev 1 With Change A

Parts Derating Requirements and Application Manual for Navy Electronic Equipment

Mar 1991

PMS420-PLN-11-0003

Littoral Combat Ships Mission Modules Program – ACAT 1C Systems Engineering Plan

10 December

PMS420-DOC-10-0016 PEO LCS MM Software Measurement Handbook 11 Feb 2011 SUW-06-PLN-008 LCS MM Program Surface Warfare System Safety Program

Plan (SSPP) 12 July, 2011

(U) OPNAVINST

5100.19

Navy Occupational Safety and Healthy (NAVOSH) Program Manual for Forces Afloat

TBD Interface Control Document (ICD) For the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) Flight Zero Reconfigurable Mission Packages, Baseline 1.2

December 04, Jan 22, 2010

MPCE-CD-0040 V1.0 Common Hardware Requirements Specification for the LCS Mission Package Computing Environment (MPCE), 12 September

N/A NAVSEA Systems Engineering Technical Review Manual

(TRM).

Sep. 2009

2.7 Military Handbooks and DoD Guidance

MIL-HDBK-61B Configuration Management Guidance 10 Sep 2002 MIL-HDBK-502 and 502 Notice 1

Acquisition Logistics Handbook 30 May 1997 20 Jan 2005

MIL-STD-881C Work Breakdown Structures For Defense Materiel Items 03 Oct 2011 MIL-HDBK-1785 System Security Engineering Program Management

Requirements 01 Aug 1995

DoDAF v2.0, 2 Vols.

I, II, and III

DoD Architecture Framework: Volumes I, II, and III 30 Sep 2010

9010 Ser IWS/2a·233

Naval Open Architecture Contract Guide Book for Program Managers Version 2.0

30 Jun 2010

N/A Joint Software Systems Safety Handbook 27 Aug 2010 N/A Risk Management Guide for DoD Acquisition, 6th Edition, Version 1.0 Aug 2006

SPAWAR

Memorandum Ser 5.0/1274

Qualification Standards and Registration Procedures for Navy Validators

18 Mar 2010

2.8 Non-Government Documents

ASQC-Q9001-2008 Quality Systems - Model for Quality Assurance In-Depth, Development, Production, Installation, and Servicing

15 Nov 2008

CMMI-DEV v1.3 Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute (SEI) Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) for

10 Nov 2010

Development ANSI EIA-649-B National Consensus Standard for Configuration Management 01 Apr 2011

ANSI EIA-632

(R2003)

Processes for Engineering a System 9 Aug 2002

IEEE 828-2005 Software Configuration Management Plans 12 Aug 2005 IEEE 1012a-1998 Standard for Software Verification and Validation 21 Dec 1998

IEEE/ISO/IEC 16326-

Systems and Software Engineering--Life Cycle Processes-- Project Management

15 Dec 2009

IEEE 1220-2005 Application and Management of The Systems Engineering Process, Standard for

09 Sep 2005

IEEE/ISO/IEC 12207-

Systems and Software Engineering – Software Life Cycle Processes

31 Jan 2008

ISO 9000:2005 Quality Management Systems - Fundamentals and Vocabulary 20 Sep 2005 ISO 9001:2008 Quality Management Systems – Requirements 13 Nov 2008 ISO 9004:2009 Managing for the sustained success of an organization - A quality management approach Nov 2009

ISO 10007:2003 Quality Management - Guidelines for Configuration Management

July 2003

ISO 10013:2001 Guidelines for Quality Management System Documentation 12 Jul 2001 ISO 10015:1999 Quality Management - Guidelines for Training 01 Dec 1999 NIST Publication 500-220

National Institute of Standards and Technology; Special Guide on Open System Environment (OSE) Procurements

Oct 1994

NIST SP 800-53, Rev

Security Controls and Assessment Procedures for Federal Information Systems and Organizations

April 2013

NIST SP 800-53A,

Rev 1

Security Controls and Assessment Procedures for Federal Information Systems and Organizations (Objectives)

June 2010

NIST SP 800-37,

Rev 1

Guide for Applying the Risk Management Framework to Federal Information Systems

Feb 2010

NIST IR 7622 Notional Supply Chain Risk Management Practices for Federal Information Systems

Oct 2012

N/A National Defense Industrial Association Guidebook, Engineering for System Assurance ( http://www.acq.osd.mil/sse/docs/SA-Guidebook-v1- Oct2008.pdf )

Oct. 2008

3.0 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS (Applicable to All CLINs, unless otherwise specified)

The Contractor shall fabricate, build and test the product, system, software application or program, or other capability required by this contract in accordance with the approved specifications and Technical Data Package (TDP) for the equipment, this Statement of Work (SOW), the Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL), DD 1423 form, and other documents provided as Government Furnished Information (GFI). The contracted work scope shall solve the problems, provide a capability, or meet the technology needs of one of the “Challenge Areas” as identified in Attachment 1 to this SOW, “RTI Technology Topics”, as specified in the award document, and using the approach and solution provided by the Contractor in response to this RFP.

3.0.1 Progress, Status and Management Reports. The Contractor shall deliver a Contractor’s Progress, Status and Management Report (CDRL Item) that covers production plans and status as well as all active Design engineering and sustainment tasks in a single volume as a part of the Integrated Program Management Report (IPMR). Data item requirements shall include the following, with numerical tags as noted to indicate the applicability by project phase:

Description of progress made against milestones during the reporting period (All).

Results, positive or negative, related to previously identified problem areas, with conclusions and recommendations (All).

Any significant changes to the contractor’s organization (All).

Any significant changes to the milestone schedule (All).

Problem areas negatively affecting technical, schedule, or cost performance or progress. (All) Status of significant program events (e.g. Post-Award conference, technical interchange meetings, program reviews, milestones); (2,3) Status of significant/major production and/or issue resolution (4);

Status of production hardware items delivered, with an itemized listing of DD-250s signed, and note of any discrepancies on items submitted and not successfully delivered (4);

Itemized listing of any GFE or GFI received during the reporting period (All);

Status information on accountability of all GFM, GFE, and GFI – identify any changes to the status of the items or any accountability issues (All);

Program management metrics (2,3);

Assessment on project risk: For the Pre-production unit requirements and design engineering tasks, identify risks across the tasking. At a minimum, reporting shall identify: what the Contractor management team considers the top five (5) risks at each reporting interval; Contract cost data (or if applicable, Earned Value Management System (EVMS) data) including control accounts that are at risk; Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) events that are at risk of being late or are supporting risk reduction activity; appropriate levels of management reserve being allocated in technical plans so that the contract work meets targeted completion dates and allocated budgets (2);

Environmental Safety and Occupational Health (ESOH) hazard status (2,3);

Schedules for delivery orders and equipment production/deliveries (4);

Configuration Status Accounting (CSA) database activities (4);

Action item status (All);

Invoices submitted to Wide Area Work Flow (WAWF) (All);

Financial status of work being performed under engineering services tasks (3,4).

Associated CDRL Data Items:

“Integrated Program Management Report (IPMR)”

The program management office (PMO) shall continuously track and regularly identify residual data developed under the performance of this contract but not formally delivered to the Navy under other CDRL data items. The Data Accession List (DAL) will be provided as a related report to ensure all data tracking and data relationships are maintained and visible to both the PMO and the Contractor.

CDRL Data Items:

“Data Accession List”

3.0.2 Meetings. The Contractor shall coordinate, schedule, prepare, conduct, facilitate and participate in reviews, meetings and conferences to manage successfully the contract. The Government reserves the right to attend meetings between the prime contractor and sub-contractors. The Contractor shall provide the Government notice of any meeting in writing not less than fourteen (14) days in advance, or as soon as is reasonably possible. The Contractor shall provide Conference Agenda (CDRL Item), presentation materials (CDRL Item), and conference minutes (CDRL Item) for each meeting whenever designated by the Government or whenever the Contractor has reason to believe that a change in contract scope is discussed. The Contractor shall support meetings identified within the following paragraphs, as well as two technical review or exchange meetings per month at the Contractor’s facility and one meeting per quarter at one of the LCS shipyard offices, Marinette Marine, Marinette, WI or Austal, Mobile, AL. Teleconferencing shall be used whenever possible, otherwise meetings shall be held at the Contractor’s facility.

Data Item Title “Conference Agenda” “Presentation Materials” “Report, Record of Meeting, Minutes”

3.0.3 Quarterly Program Management Reviews (QPMR). Quarterly PMRs shall be conducted in person at the Contractor’s plant or via teleconferencing with the Contractor providing a summary of its current program status to include their Monthly Progress, Status and Management Report (CDRL Item). The current program status report shall contain the following main sections: Summary, Accomplishments, Current Status, Problem Areas, Risks and Mitigation, Cost and Schedule Data, and Future Plans. The reporting period shall be for the duration of the contract.

CDRL Data Items:

“Presentation Materials” (See paragraph 3.0.2)

3.0.4 Integrated Product Teams (IPTs) and Working Groups. The Contractor shall participate in and support quarterly IPTs and working groups (potentially including the Program Management IPT, Supportability IPT, Safety IPT and Production & Test IPT), to ensure integrated and coordinated work across all technical elements of the LCS and LCS Mission Module programs. The participation level in IPTs shall be in Phases II and III (Options 1 and 2), and shall be proposed by the Contractor in their proposal and approved by the Navy prior to contract award.

3.0.5 RTI Phase Kickoff Meeting. The Contractor shall provide a detailed briefing on its management and contract execution strategy at the Post-Award Kickoff Meeting to be held within 30 days after contract award at the Contractor’s facility and after the start of each RTI Phase. The Contractor shall plan for a one-half day Post-Award Kickoff Meeting. The Contractor shall briefly review the approach and methods for Program Management that they had proposed in order to support the successful on-time delivery of the contract requirements. The Contractor shall present and request concurrence on the Exit Criteria for that Phase of the project, as well as the project schedule as defined by the IMS, and all of the “key milestone” events. The Contractor shall include all events on the critical path of that Phase as key milestone events.

“Management Plan (Program Management Plan)”

3.0.6 Schedule Management and Work Breakdown Structure (Phases II and III only). For contract lines larger than $10M and for Phase II and III work scope the Contractor shall develop an Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) by logically networking detailed program activities including but not limited to: fabrication and assembly schedule, testing schedule, planned events and milestones, accomplishments, and activities from contract award to the completion of Production phase. The IMS shall also include the efforts of all activities, including Contractor, suppliers, and sub-contractor and present a current, integrated view of the contract that is consistent with resource plans and other approved documentation. Furthermore, the IMS shall reflect those risks identified and documented in the contractor’s risk management section of the monthly reports. The Contractor shall notify the Government in writing within 24 hours of any expected or projected work stoppages or delays that will impact schedules. The IMS schedule shall be consistent with the Contractor’s Work Breakdown Structure (CWBS) developed in the original cost proposal, and must be detailed sufficiently that critical and high-risk efforts are identified and planned realistically to assure that they can be executed. The Contractor shall present the current IMS data as a part of the Integrated Program Management Report and Quarterly Progress Review.

3.0.7 Data Requirements. The data to be furnished hereunder shall be prepared in accordance with the Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL), DD Form 1423, Exhibit A to G, attached hereto. For all data delivered under this contract, Electronic delivery is acceptable. Letter of transmittals shall be delivered via e-mail with notification of file attributes and directory information for retrieval. Distribution Statements for contract data are provided in paragraph 1 of Attachment 4 to the CDRL DD-1423.

3.0.7.1 Data Management. The Contractor shall post contract data and applicable deliverables to a Government specified website, unless otherwise specified on the applicable CDRL DD Form 1423-1. The Contractor shall provide electronic-mail (e-mail) notification to the Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) and other Government personnel identified on the CDRL Addressee List within 1 day of CDRL delivery (posting new/revised information and CDRL deliverable(s) on the website or delivering as specified on the associated DD Form 1423-1).

The Contractor shall deliver data via Electronic deliveries using the PEO LCS online data system or, if approved, a contractor managed Integrated Development Environment. When the DID indicates that DD-1423 must specify that electronic or paper copy is to be delivered, an electronic delivery is to be provided.

The Contractor shall notify each addressee, for both draft and final data, that the data item has been delivered. The Contractor shall mark all CDRL items with the contract number (and if applicable, the Technical Instruction number that provided funding). The contractor shall e-mail the Letter of Transmittal with notification of file attributes and directory information for retrieval. Unless otherwise noted, Government review comments on draft documents will be provided within 30 days, and subsequent delivery is due within 30 days of comment receipt. Data items are not approved unless explicitly approved by the Government, either electronically or in writing. Data items not specifically approved within the designated timeframe shall be considered disapproved.

The contractor shall mark ALL Data with standard Distribution D marking in accordance with DoDD 5220.22-M, "National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual", (NISPOM). Other U.S. requests shall be referred to PEO

LCS.

Address information and technical contact names for data deliverables may be modified by the PEO LCS Program Office in writing with 30 days’ notice.

3.0.8.1 International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR). The Contractor shall be solely responsible for getting any Department of State approvals, licenses, Technical Assistance Agreements (TAA), etc. required by the International Traffic in Arms Regulations.

3.0.8.2 System Security Program Upon receipt of applicable guidance from the contracting agency and using

MIL-HDBK-1785 (DOD SYSTEM SECURITY ENGINEERING PROGRAM MANAGEMENT

REQUIREMENTS) and DoDD 5220.22-M, "National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual", (NISPOM) the Contractor shall establish a system security-engineering program that identifies, evaluates, and proposes solutions for eliminating or mitigating system vulnerabilities to known or postulated threats.

For Phase II and forward, the Contractor shall develop, execute, and maintain a comprehensive Security Management Plan (SMP), as a part of the Program Management Plan (PMP) per the CDRL Item, using DoD 5220.22M as guidance and subject to Government approval, consistent with the security classification guide, DD 254, and all appropriate security instructions.

The Contractor shall adhere to Government and program regulations, policies and procedures controlling the access of program facilities, information and systems by visitors. All Contractor personnel requiring access to the Government workspaces (GFF) will complete a National Agency Check (NAC). If an emergency situation exists, and the Contractor requires access to the Government workspace in advance of completing the NAC, the Contractor employee may begin work with a waiver from the Contracting Officer Representative (COR). Completion of submission requirement for the NAC is required prior to waiver approval.

The Contractor shall develop and implement an internal Operational Security (OPSEC) plan to reduce security risks on the program. Contractor personnel should be aware at all times of any unusual persons or packages in their work area and immediately report those to the building security staff. If Contractor personnel become aware of any person seeking unauthorized access to information or program materials, they should immediately report this to the

COR.

3.0.8.3 Website Security. The Contractor shall ensure that its publicly accessible web-sites are free of For Official Use Only (FOUO), and/or indicators that could tip-off adversaries about impeding program activity. The Government will provide additional OPSEC guidance as necessary.

3.0.8.4 Contractor’s Internal Network and Data Security. The Contractor shall ensure that its internal networks and data have sufficient protection to prevent intrusion from sources outside its facilities. Because project data and information associated with Mission Module (MM) and Mission Package (MP) architecture, design and interfaces directly affects the Government, and because this data will be stored on Contractor networks as part of program execution, it is imperative that the Contractor take all necessary actions to safeguard the data, information systems and networks that contain, transport, process or store program data.

IA Certification & Accreditation (C&A) requirements apply to all DoD and Contractor's Information Systems (IS)/networks that receive, process, display, store, or transmit DoD information. Contractor IS/networks that are involved in the development or operation of systems shall be configured and operated in accordance with controlling laws, regulations, and DoD policy.

3.0.8.5 General Security Requirements

The Contractor shall establish appropriate administrative, technical, and physical safeguards to protect any and all Government systems and data, to ensure the confidentiality, integrity, availability, authentication, and non-repudiation of Government data. As a minimum, this shall include provisions for personnel security, electronic security and physical security.

3.0.8.6 Contractor Information Assurance (IA) Training and Certification

The Contractor shall ensure that personnel who are categorized as working within the DoD IA workforce meet the appropriate requirements of DoD 8570.01-M.

3.0.8.7 Password Management

“Administrative” accounts, for use by the system administrator for System software upgrades and maintenance, shall be password protected. Administrative passwords shall be a minimum length of 15 characters and consists of a mix of upper case letters, lower case letters, numbers, and special characters, including at least one of each.1

The Contractor shall ensure that all factory-set or default firmware passwords are changed before delivery of the System. Each password shall be a minimum length of 15 characters and consists of a mix of upper case letters, lower case letters, numbers, and special characters, including at least one of each. Each password shall be protected such that they are not embedded in access scripts or stored on function keys.

3.0.9 Government Furnished Information

The Contractor shall submit a GFI Deficiency Report in accordance with the following guidelines:

1 Administrative passwords shall meet FISMA (NIST SP 800-53/IA-5) or follow the DISA STIGs: GEN000580 - Password Length, GEN000600 - Password Character Mix (Mixed case), GEN000620 - Password Character Mix (Digits), GEN000640 - Password Character Mix (Special), GEN000800 - Password Reuse.

a. If GFI is not received within fourteen (14) days after the date it is scheduled to be delivered.

b. Within twenty (20) calendar days after contractor receipt of the GFI and inspection for patent defects such as quantity, identification, description, and readability, or if it differs in some other significant respect from that expected to be delivered.

c. Within fourteen (14) calendar days after contractor determination that GFI has latent defects such as technical, engineering, or design deficiencies that existed at the time of GFI delivery, but which were not discovered until actual attempted use of the GFI.

“GFI Deficiency Report”

3.1 TRANSITION STUDY (RTI Phase I, Base Contract Award, Firm Fixed Price, CLINs 0001 - 0002)

The Contractor shall develop a Transition Study that plans for the integration, test, and operational evaluation of the technology. The Contractor shall develop exit criteria for each Phase of the contract work scope in the Transition Study. The Contractor shall work with the Navy identified applicable Technical Warrant Holders (GFI) in the Transition Study.