The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.
RFP# N61331-17-R-0002
Attachment J-6 Past Performance Questionnaire Based on your knowledge of the contract, please provide your assessment of how well the contractor performed on each of the following topics. Please check the appropriate rating and comment on all responses other than those rated N/A.
Performance Assessment Values:
| 5 = Outstanding |
| 4 = Excellent |
| 3 = Good |
| 2 = Satisfactory |
| 1 = Unsatisfactory |
| 0 = Not Applicable |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements, to the Government’s benefit. Contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements, to the Government’s benefit. Contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. Contractual performance of the element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| Performance barely meets some contractual requirements. Contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| Performance does not meet some or most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. Contractual performance of the element being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.. |
| Unable to provide a score. Performance in this area not applicable to effort assessed. |
Assessment Elements:
| Question |
| Performance Rating |
| Comments |
| Cost Control. Rate the contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling cost (including reporting and analyzing variances) and ability to deliver at the agreed-to cost/price. Provide reasons for changes to the contract value (e.g., scope changes, overrun/underrun, Government-imposed schedule changes). |
| 5 |
| Schedule. Rate the contractor’s ability to deliver according to the agreed-to schedule. What were the causes of any schedule variances? |
| 5 |
| Mission Requirements. Rate the contractor’s ability to provide a product or service that met your mission requirements. |
| 5 |
| Quality. Rate the contractor’s ability to provide a product or service that met your required level of quality. Assess the contractor’s conformance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g., commonly accepted technical, professional, environmental, or safety and health standards.) |
| 5 |
| Subcontract Management. Rate the contractor’s ability to meet the goals of the subcontracting plan, to include the ability to timely award and manage subcontracts. |
| 5 |
| Business Relations. Rate the contractor’s ability to integrate and coordinate all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness, quality of problem resolution, corrective action plans, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, customer satisfaction, and its ability to submit accurate invoices in a timely manner. |
| 5 |
| Management of Key Personnel. Assess the contractor’s performance in selecting, retaining, supporting, and replacing—when necessary—key personnel. |
| 5 |
| Recommendation. To what extent would you recommend this contractor for additional contracts? Rate on the following scale: 5 = Yes, definitely; 4 = Yes, likely; 3 = Maybe, 2 = No, not likely; 1 = No, not ever; 0 = N/A. |
| 5 |
Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
